LIVE ASCO 2026 Live — KOL insights, hot abstracts & $TICKER finance buzz View Live Updates →
KOL Pulse - Trial Profile

CROWN Trial

1L ALK+ metastatic NSCLC - Pfizer

1L ALK+ metastatic NSCLC Lorlatinib (Lorbrena) ASCO 2024 FDA Approved
Explore Trial Data

Top KOLs Discussing CROWN

David Wallace-Wells
David Wallace-Wells
@dwallacewells
336.6K impressions
Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, FASCO
Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, FASCO
@CharuAggarwalMD
34.9K impressions
Normand Blais, MD
Normand Blais, MD
@NormandBlais
22.9K impressions
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
21.1K impressions
Marcelo Corassa, MD.
Marcelo Corassa, MD.
@MarceloCorassa
20.0K impressions
Vinay Prasad MD MPH
Vinay Prasad MD MPH
@VPrasadMDMPH
16.9K impressions

CROWN Key Slides & Visuals

Official trial slides and relevant visuals shared by KOLs at ASCO 2024. Click any image to expand.

Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino @PTarantinoMD
CROWN Data
21.1K impressions · 152 likes · May 31, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] 100 Lorlatinib (n = 149) Crizotinib (n = 147) 90 Events, n 55 115 PFS, months, median NR (64.3 to NR) 9.1 (7.4 to 10.9) (95% CI) 80 HR (95% CI) 0.19 (0.13 to 0.27) 70 70% 60 65% 63% PFS (%) 60% 50 40 30 15% 20 10% 10% 8% 10 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 Time (months) Number at risk Lorlatinib 149 126 118 111 103 96 93 89 87 81 81 79 77 74 67 45 26 14 4 1 0 Crizotinib 147 107 70 42 30 19 16 16 11 10 9 9 9 8 6 4 2 0 0 0 0
Marcelo Corassa, MD.
Marcelo Corassa, MD. @MarceloCorassa
CROWN Data
19.8K impressions · 87 likes · May 31, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] 100 Lorlatinib (n = 149) Crizotinib (n = 147) 90 Events, n 55 115 PFS, months, median NR (64.3 to NR) 9.1 (7.4 to 10.9) (95% CI) 80 HR (95% CI) 0.19 (0.13 to 0.27) 70 70% 60 65% 63% PFS (%) 60% 50 40 30 15% 20 10% 10% 8% 10 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 Time (months) Number at risk Lorlatinib 149 126 118 111 103 96 93 89 87 81 81 79 77 74 67 45 26 14 4 1 0 Crizotinib 147 107 70 42 30 19 16 16 11 10 9 9 9 8 6 4 2 0 0 0 0
Nathan A. Pennell MD, PhD, FASCO
CROWN Data
15.5K impressions · 56 likes · May 31, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] 100 Lorlatinib (n = 149) Crizotinib (n = 147) 90 Events, n 55 115 PFS, months, median NR (64.3 to NR) 9.1 (7.4 to 10.9) (95% CI) 80 HR (95% CI) 0.19 (0.13 to 0.27) 70 70% 60 65% 63% PFS (%) 60% 50 40 30 15% 20 10% 10% 8% 10 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 Time (months) Number at risk Lorlatinib 149 126 118 111 103 96 93 89 87 81 81 79 77 74 67 45 26 14 4 1 0 Crizotinib 147 107 70 42 30 19 16 16 11 10 9 9 9 8 6 4 2 0 0 0 0
Balazs Halmos
Balazs Halmos @BalazsHalmosMD
CROWN Data
13.1K impressions · 190 likes · May 31, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] How it started How it is going 1.0 100 Lortatinib 90 Events, 14 115 Cisplatin/paclitaxel PFS. months median 10.91 (96% CO Cisplatin/gemcitabine 80 HR 95% CO 0.8 Cisplatin/docetaxel 70 10% Overall survival probability Carboplatin/paclitaxel 60 60% 0.6 PFS(%) (%) 63% 60% 50 PFS 40 0.4 30 20 19% 10% 185 an 0.2 to @@@@@@ 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 0 Time (months) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 126 118 111 00 % 93 Crizotinia 70 c 30 : : : : # Time (months) M7 107 19 16 : : : : : 26 14 : 0
Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, FASCO
CROWN Data
11.9K impressions · 95 likes · May 31, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] At 60.2 Months of Median Follow-Up, Median PFS by Investigator Was Still Not Reached With Lorlatinib 100 Lorlatinib Crizotinib 90 (n=149) (n=147) 80 Events, n 55 115 TO PFS, median NR 9.1 60 (95% CI), (64.3-NR) (7.4-10.9) PFS, % 50 months 40 HR (95% CI) 0.19 (0.13-0.27) 30 20 10 0 0 4 6 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 50 00 64 68 72 78 50 No. at risk Time, months - Lorialinib 149 120 116 111 103 96 93 89 87 61 61 79 77 74 67 45 26 14 4 1 0 - Crizotinib 147 107 70 42 30 19 16 10 11 10 9 0 9 a 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 HR, - - MR, - insulanc) 05, - - FEE - 2024 ASCO #ASCO24 - - Benjamin J. Belomon ASCO - I ANIMALLAS MEETING - - - - - - o. - CONDITIONS
Yakup Ergün
Yakup Ergün @dr_yakupergun
CROWN Data
11.1K impressions · 60 likes · May 31, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Lorlatinib Showed Superior PFS Benefit Irrespective of Presence or Absence of Baseline Brain Metastases With Baseline Brain Metastases Without Baseline Brain Metastases Lorlatinib Crizotinib Lorlatinib Crizotinib (n=35) (n=38) (n=114) (n=109) Events n 16 34 Events, n 39 81 100 PFS, median NR 6.0 100 PFS, median NR 10.8 (95% CI). months (32.9-NR) (3.7-7.6) (95% CI). months (64.3-NR) (9.0-12.8) 90 90 HR (95% CI) 0.08 (0.04-0.19) HR (95% CI) 0.24 (0.16-0.36) 80 80 70 70 63% 60 53% 60 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10% 10 10 0 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 No. at risk Time, months Time, months No. at risk Lorlatinib 35 31 29 28 28 26 26 25 23 20 20 20 19 18 15 10 7 5 2 0 - Lorlatinib 114 95 89 83 75 70 67 64 64 61 61 59 58 56 52 35 19 9 2 1 0 Crizotinib 38 22 11 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 - Crizotinib 109 85 59 38 27 18 16 16 11 10 9 9 9 8 6 4 2 0 0 HR. hazard ratio; NR. not reached; PFS, progression-free survival 2024 ASCO #ASCO24 PRESENTED BY: Benjamin J. Solomon (Ben.Solomon@petermac.org) ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO Permission KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER
Benjamin Besse
Benjamin Besse @BenjaminBesseMD
CROWN Data
9.5K impressions · 121 likes · Jun 01, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Current Post Hoc Analyses at 5 Years Endpoint evaluation by BICR stopped after the 3-year analysis Lorlatinib 100 mg once daily Current analyses Key eligibility criteria n=149 Data cutoff: October 31, 2023 Stage IIIB/IV ALK+ NSCLC No prior systemic treatment for Stratified by: metastatic disease Presence of brain metastases Investigator Assessed ECOG PS 0-2 Randomized (yes VS no) PFS' Asymptomatic treated or untreated 1:1 Ethnicity ORR and IC ORR CNS metastases were permitted N=296 (Asian vs non-Asian) DOR and IC DOR 21 extracranial measurable target lesion (RECIST 1.1) with no prior Crizotinib 250 mg twice daily IC TTP radiation required n=147 Safety No crossover between treatment arms was permitted Biomarker analyses The median duration of follow-up for PFS was 60.2 months (95% CI, 57.4-61.6) in the lorlatinib arm and 55.1 months (95% CI, 36.8-62.5) in the crizotinib arm CNS, central nervous system; DOR, duration of response ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group IC, intracranial, ORR, objective response rate NSCLC, non small cell kng cancer, PFS. progression that survival, PS performance - RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, TTP, time to tumor progression. Defined as the time from randomization to RECIST-defined progression or death due to any cause 2024 ASCO #ASCO24 PRE SENTED BY: Benjamin J. Solomon (Ben.Solomon@petermac.org ASCO - seceive GREA I ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of N author ed ASCO Permission required for - contact KNOWLEDGE CONDUCES CANCER --- [Slide 2] At 60.2 Months of Median Follow-Up, Median PFS by Investigator Was Still Not Reached With Lorlatinib 100 Lorlatinib Crizotinib 90 (n=149) (n=147) 80 Events, n 55 115 70 PFS, median NR 9.1 60 (95% CI), (64.3-NR) (7.4-10.9) FS, % 50 months 40 HR (95% CI) 0.19 (0.13-0.27) 30 20 10 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 No. at risk Time, months - Lorlatinib 149 126 118 111 103 96 93 89 87 81 81 79 77 74 67 45 26 14 4 1 0 - Crizotinib 147 107 70 42 30 19 16 16 11 10 9 9 9 8 6 4 2 0 0 0 0 HR, hazard ratio, NR, not reached, os, overall survival, PFS, progression-free survival 2024 ASCO #ASCO24 PRESENTED IT Benjamin J. Solomon (Ben.Solomon@petermac.org) ASCO name/Cox ONE ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASICO Permission required for - conses permissions) KNOWLEDGE CONDUERS CANCELL
Aakash Desai, MD, MPH
CROWN Data
7.5K impressions · 29 likes · May 31, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] With Baseline Brain Without Baseline Brain Metastases Metastases Lorlatinib Crizotinib Lorlatinib Crizotinib (n = 35) (n = 38) (n = 114) (n = 109) PFS Median NR NR 10.8 6.0 (3.7- (95% CI), (32.9- (64.3- (9.0- 7.6) months NR) NR) 12.8) 0.08 0.24 HR (95% (0.04- (0.16- CI) 0.19) 0.36) 5-year PFS 53 (35- Not 63 (52- 10 (5- (95% CI), % 68) estimable 71) 19) Time to IC progression Median NR NR 23.9 7.2 (3.7- (95% CI), (NR- (NR- (16.4- 11.0) months NR) NR) 30.8) 0.03 0.05 HR (95% (0.01- (0.02- CI) 0.13) 0.13)

CROWN Top Tweets

Top 10 by impressions - click to view on X

David Wallace-Wells
David Wallace-Wells@dwallacewells

“More than half of patients (60%) with advanced lung cancer who took lorlatinib were still alive five years later with no progression of disease, data presented at the world’s largest cancer...

👁 336.6K ♡ 1757 ↻ 376 May 31, 2024
Normand Blais, MD
Normand Blais, MD@NormandBlais

@StephenVLiu @bensolomon1 No matter what @VPrasadMDMPH may say, these results are outstanding and never seen before in lung cancer, ever!

👁 22.9K ♡ 2 ↻ 0 May 31, 2024
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino@PTarantinoMD

Truck test ✅ #CROWN #lcsm

👁 21.1K ♡ 152 ↻ 21 May 31, 2024
Marcelo Corassa, MD.
Marcelo Corassa, MD.@MarceloCorassa

So, 5y PFS is out. CROWN shows that only 3% of patients had disease progression from year 4 to year 5. Toxic, Lorlatinib is indeed, but this in totally unprecedented in thoracic oncology. ALK fusion...

👁 19.8K ♡ 87 ↻ 27 May 31, 2024
Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, FASCO
Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, FASCO@CharuAggarwalMD

Let’s take a minute. Have we seen anything like this in NSCLC before? mPFS NR at 5 years? 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 These curves are very impressive, and should urge us to think about management of AEs and optimize...

👁 17.5K ♡ 84 ↻ 24 May 31, 2024
Nathan A. Pennell MD, PhD, FASCO
Nathan A. Pennell MD, PhD, FASCO@n8pennell

Not to steal the thunder from the oral session today, but this is the CROWN PFS curve, more or less flat between 2-5 years and still 60% progression free at 5 years! #ASCO24...

👁 15.5K ♡ 56 ↻ 15 May 31, 2024
Balazs Halmos
Balazs Halmos@BalazsHalmosMD

#ASCOLung How it started How it is going

👁 13.1K ♡ 190 ↻ 42 May 31, 2024
Vinay Prasad MD MPH
Vinay Prasad MD MPH@VPrasadMDMPH

Its great to see #asco24 changing language. In the future, I would love to see @asco make sure All randomized studies use appropriate control arms (sorry CROWN) All RCTs...

👁 12.9K ♡ 25 ↻ 2 May 31, 2024
Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, FASCO
Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, FASCO@CharuAggarwalMD

The curve again! 👑 #ASCO24 @ASCO

👁 11.9K ♡ 95 ↻ 21 May 31, 2024
Yakup Ergün
Yakup Ergün@dr_yakupergun

#ASCO24 CROWN study: lorlatinib vs crizotinib Lorlatinib..... no need to comment, look at the curves👇 Presented by Dr. @bensolomon1 👏👏 @OncoAlert

👁 11.1K ♡ 60 ↻ 26 May 31, 2024

About the CROWN Trial

CROWN is a landmark Phase III, randomized, open-label trial that established lorlatinib (Lorbrena) as the standard of care for first-line treatment of ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC. The trial randomized 296 treatment-naive patients 1:1 to lorlatinib 100 mg once daily or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily, demonstrating unprecedented progression-free survival exceeding 5 years. CROWN represents the longest PFS ever reported with any single-agent molecular targeted treatment across all metastatic solid tumors.

FDA Approval

FDA APPROVED Lorbrena (lorlatinib) — Adults with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors are ALK-positive as detected by an FDA-approved test

On March 3, 2021, the FDA approved lorlatinib (Lorbrena) for first-line treatment of ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC based on CROWN trial results demonstrating a 72% reduction in progression risk. This converted the previous 2018 accelerated approval (2L/3L) to full approval and expanded the indication to include previously untreated patients. The original accelerated approval was granted November 2, 2018 for ALK-positive NSCLC after progression on crizotinib and at least one other ALK inhibitor.

Companion diagnostic: Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx Assay co-approved for patient selection.

Source: FDA Press Release

Trial Methodology & Results

Study Design

Phase III, global, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel 2-arm trial in treatment-naive patients with ALK-positive advanced or metastatic NSCLC. ALK rearrangements were identified by the Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx immunohistochemical assay.

Population

Adults with previously untreated ALK-positive advanced or metastatic NSCLC, ECOG performance status 0-2. Patients were randomized 1:1 (149 lorlatinib, 147 crizotinib). Both patients with and without baseline brain metastases were enrolled (35 lorlatinib, 38 crizotinib had brain metastases at baseline).

Interventions

Lorlatinib 100 mg orally once daily versus crizotinib 250 mg orally twice daily in 28-day cycles. Median treatment duration with lorlatinib was 57.0 months.

Primary Endpoints

Primary endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS) based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). Secondary endpoints: investigator-assessed PFS, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), intracranial objective response (IOR), and safety.

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

After a median follow-up of 60.2 months, PFS HR was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.13-0.27), representing an 81% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death. Median PFS was not reached with lorlatinib (95% CI: 64.3-NR) versus 9.1 months (95% CI: 7.4-10.9) with crizotinib. The 5-year PFS rate was 60% with lorlatinib versus 8% with crizotinib. ORR was 81% (95% CI: 73-87) with lorlatinib versus 63% (95% CI: 54-70) with crizotinib.

PFS HR 0.19 — 60% alive without progression at 5 years

Source: JCO 5-Year Analysis (Solomon et al. 2024)

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival data were not yet mature at the 5-year analysis. In the pivotal phase I/II study, with a median OS follow-up of 72.7 months, median OS was not reached with lorlatinib, and 5-year OS was 76% (95% CI: 57-88) in treatment-naive ALK-positive NSCLC patients (n=30).


Source: JCO - OS Not Yet Mature

Safety & Tolerability

Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 77% of lorlatinib patients versus 57% with crizotinib, primarily driven by laboratory abnormalities. Hypercholesterolemia occurred in 72% (20% Grade 3), hypertriglyceridemia in 66% (17% Grade 3, 8% Grade 4), requiring lipid-lowering medication initiation in 83% of patients. CNS effects occurred in 52% (cognitive 28%, mood 21%, psychotic 7%), mostly Grade 1-2. Weight gain occurred in 44% (23% Grade 3). Treatment-related permanent discontinuation was only 5%.

Manageable safety — only 5% treatment-related discontinuation

Source: AE Kinetics & Management (Bauer et al. 2025)

Clinical Implications

CROWN established lorlatinib as the preferred first-line treatment for ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC, with 5-year PFS of 60% representing a transformative outcome that approaches chronic disease management. The intracranial efficacy is particularly noteworthy, with 92% freedom from brain progression at 5 years, addressing a critical unmet need in ALK-positive NSCLC. Key clinical debates include the unique toxicity profile (hyperlipidemia, CNS effects, weight gain) versus second-generation ALK TKIs, optimal TKI sequencing strategies, and long-term cardiovascular implications of sustained hyperlipidemia management.

CROWN in the News

Key KOL Sentiments - CROWN

DoctorSentimentComment
Normand Blais, MD
@NormandBlais
● POSITIVE @StephenVLiu @bensolomon1 No matter what @VPrasadMDMPH may say, these results are outstanding and never seen before in lung cancer, ever!
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
● POSITIVE Truck test ✅ #CROWN #lcsm https://t.co/IHvSnJS6Z5 https://t.co/hS6f7pYRpJ
● POSITIVE Let’s take a minute. Have we seen anything like this in NSCLC before? mPFS NR at 5 years? 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 These curves are very impressive, and should urge us to think about management of AEs and optimize 1L Tx for ALK+ NSCLC @ASCO #ASCO24 @ALKPositiveinc
● POSITIVE IMO, results are truly remarkable, even in world where we expect strong efficacy from targeted Rx in enriched pop'n. Ironically, going for easy win v criz was aiming too low & hurt lorlatinib. If shown to soundly beat alectinib H2H, IMO it'd be
d.planchard
@dplanchard
● POSITIVE Superb presentation @bensolomon1 and results that will convince us to begin 1st-line treatment with lorlatinib in our ALK patients...@ASCO #ASCO24 https://t.co/5rpD9lUYYH
Chul Kim
@chulkimMD
● POSITIVE Great discussion by @JessicaJLinMD on CROWN, PALOMA-3, MARIPOSA! A must-watch. #ASCO24 https://t.co/lLmq0JcYNV
Christine Lovly, MD, PhD
@christine_lovly
● POSITIVE Dr. @benlevylungdoc has a fun + educational game “Name the KM curve”. ⬇️ These KM curves for CROWN 👑 = unprecedented! Truly impressive. Research = Progress #ASCO24 @OncoAlert @ALKPositiveinc https://t.co/nubupWqT28
Dr Amol Akhade
@SuyogCancer
● POSITIVE So which ALK inhibitor is best in class ? Who gets the CROWN at the 5 years follow up ? Lorlatinib vs Crizotinib. Lorlatinib PFS HR 0.24 for pts without Brain mets . Median PFS not reached . HR of 0.08 for those with brain mets . Clearly Lorlatini
Balazs Halmos
@BalazsHalmosMD
● POSITIVE The 👑 CROWN study - amazing results Congrats @bensolomon1! (And sorry… but someone had to do it..😉) https://t.co/FwpoA2qY9E
● POSITIVE Incredible! Now, #LCSM if there was no change in efficacy with dose reductions what should be our starting treatment dose? Are we unnecessarily awaiting for patients to experience AEs to give them a lower dose with similar efficacy ? #ASCO24 https:
Stephen V Liu, MD
@StephenVLiu
● POSITIVE Dr. @bensolomon1 shows the massive progress we have seen in #ALK therapy for NSCLC at #CIOT25. Profound PFS benefit with lorlatinib in CROWN. Will NVL-655 / neladalkib eclipse those marks? https://t.co/1Wls7RcpSH
Eric K. Singhi, MD
@lungoncdoc
● POSITIVE I really appreciate Dr. Lin's discussion re: updates from CROWN study , & I agree: -Effective now, for most new patients with ALK+ mNSCLC, 1L lorlatinib will be my preference -Helping my pts & team better understand & manage potential
Mario Balsa
@MarioBalsaMD
● POSITIVE 🫁 ALK+ NSCLC update by @bensolomon1 at #ELCC26: from TKIs to immune strategies ▪️ ALK TKIs → unprecedented outcomes (CROWN 👑) ▪️ Novel TKIs (e.g. NVL-655) → tackling compound resistance + CNS disease ▪️ ALK vaccines? Early signals of synergy with I
Yakup Ergün
@dr_yakupergun
● POSITIVE #ASCO24 5-Year Outcomes From the Phase III CROWN Study 💥Great results for Lorlatinib. The mPFS has not yet been reached in the median 5-year FU. 5y PFS➡️60%‼️ @bensolomon1 @OncoAlert https://t.co/Eu5YHFBAn9 https://t.co/9bwXhhCpur
Misako Nagasaka
@MNagasaka
● POSITIVE So excited to see the curves, or rather, a straight line 👑 https://t.co/eAgTicTyXH
Antonio Passaro
@APassaroMD
● POSITIVE Long-term PFS analysis is an endpoint that fills me with enthusiasm for the progress of medicine. It's a revolution in favor of our patients, where the magnitude of clinical benefit continues to advance. #ASCO24 #LCSM https://t.co/M3ooKjqtfa
Alfredo Addeo MD
@Alfdoc2
● POSITIVE @Timothee_MD @peters_solange Look forward to seeing the presentation… not sure the 5y changes much rather than reinforcing the message that lorla is a very effective treatment. Would I use it in 1st line all the time? I don’t think I would but happy
Benjamin Levy
@benlevylungdoc
● POSITIVE @christine_lovly @OncoAlert @ALKPositiveinc these curves are being teed up for the next edition - too impressive not to include
Nirmal Raut
@oncologician
● POSITIVE The truck is finally able to pass through the crown curves making lorlatinib clearly the winner 🏆 #ASCO24 https://t.co/PUSrNGIX70
Kam Zaki
@drkamzaki
● POSITIVE for the first time, we now can tell a subset of advanced lung cancer patients that we can control their disease for more than 5 years just by taking one drug a day 5-year update of the CROWN study data presented at #asco24 today https://t.co/yQLgwN
● POSITIVE @APassaroMD That is a line! Wow 🤩.
Tom Newsom-Davis
@tnewsomdavis
● POSITIVE 5yr CROWN update of Lorlatinib ✅ Clearly the most effective 1L ALK TKI ✅ PFS = extraordinary ✅ Dose reduction does not impact efficacy ✅ v3 ALK subtypes do not do worse ✅ No new ALK resistance mutations ❗️TP53 co-mut still do less well ❗️Toxicity m
Tejas Patil
@TejasPatilMD
● POSITIVE Here is the AE profile. While temporary discontinuation (39%) or dose reductions (21%) were common with lorlatinib, only 5% of patients had PERMANENT dose discontinuation in 5 yrs. https://t.co/AKeurEMLW0
Vincent Lam
@vincentlamMD
● POSITIVE CROWN has been another welcome advance for our ALK+ NSCLC patients, but how to incorporate 1L lorlatinib in practice? @ALKLungCancer https://t.co/zpCgR3KGbj
David Wallace-Wells
@dwallacewells
● NEUTRAL “More than half of patients (60%) with advanced lung cancer who took lorlatinib were still alive five years later with no progression of disease, data presented at the world’s largest cancer conference showed. The rate was 8% with a standard drug.” h
● NEUTRAL Not to steal the thunder from the oral session today, but this is the CROWN PFS curve, more or less flat between 2-5 years and still 60% progression free at 5 years! #ASCO24 #LCSM Is it worth the side effects of lorlatinib to turn ALK+ NSCLC into CM
Benjamin Besse
@BenjaminBesseMD
● NEUTRAL Lorlatinib PFS is impressive with an HR 0.19 over crizotinib. But why after 5 yrs FU can’t we see the OS curves and the cross over rate? Even if the number of events is not reached, that would help us to select our first line treatment. @ALKPositivei
● NEUTRAL ➡️ CROWN Study: Lorlatinib vs Crizotinib in ALK+ NSCLC - 5-Year Follow-Up 📊 Results: - PFS: Lorlatinib 🏆 60% (5-yr) vs Crizotinib 8% - IC Progression: Lorlatinib NR vs Crizotinib 16.4 mo 🧠 - Grade 3/4 AEs: 77% Lorlatinib vs 57% Crizotinib ⚠️ - Treat
Sanjay Popat
@DrSanjayPopat
● NEUTRAL .@bensolomon1 presents 5yr post hoc CROWN. mPFS with lorli still not reached! HR=0.19, 60% 5yr PFS rate for Lori. Durable PFS median NR if CNS+/- at baseline. Durable neuro protective effect. No efficacy change by dose reduction. No ALK-M+ resistance
The Innovation Oncology
@InnovOncology
● NEUTRAL Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib in Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From the Phase III CROWN Study @ASCO @JCO_ASCO @JCOOP_ASCO #MedEd #MedX #Oncology #ASCO2024 #ASCO24 https://t.co/vvSDvi3rd6 https://t.co
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
@HHorinouchi
● NEUTRAL ☑️#ASCO25 Abstract🆙 ☑️#LCSM Poster 🔥Impact of lorlatinib dose modifications on adverse event outcomes in the phase 3 #CROWN study 🎙️ Dr. Geoffrey Liu 📌Poster Bd70, Abstr8590 @OncoAlert @ASCO https://t.co/Lt4H1YyMzR https://t.co/nngSUOCmxA
Shankar Siva
@_ShankarSiva
● NEUTRAL 📢@bensolomon1 from @PeterMacCC presents 5-year data from CROWN #ASCO24 , ph III RCT of 1st line lorlatinib v crizotinib in ALK+ #lungcancer. ➡️N=296, 5-year PFS 60% vs 8%, median PFS not reached, only 4/114 w/o brain mets developed brain relapse on
Giannis Mountzios
@g_mountzios
● NEUTRAL #ASCO24 For the 1st time in the history of Thoracic Oncology a molecular agent confers a median PFS exceeding 5 years in metastatic disease!! #Lorlatinib in #ALK positive #NSCLC with the CROWN study sets a new benchmark in Precision Oncology!! Deser
Aya Mohamed, MD MSc
@Dr_Oncologista
● NEUTRAL CROWN trial Impressive data on mSLP not achieved after 60.2 months with Lorlatinib in ALK+ NSCLC.👏 @OncoAlert #ASCO24 https://t.co/8wYtZ0ZbZh
Jennifer A. Marks, MD
@jennifermarksmd
● NEUTRAL Dr. @JuliaRotow revisits the CROWN (1L lorlatinib vs crizotinib) data: PFS not reached at 5yrs Loratinib CNS ORR: 82% Crizotinib CNS ORR: 23% @DFarberThoracic @DAVAOnc #DAVAlung #HawaiiLung25 #lcsm #lcam https://t.co/SJvBg9lYg8
M-Lujn Oncologa
@MLPOncoData
● NEUTRAL @PTarantinoMD A truck full of alectinib!
DAVA Oncology
@DAVAOnc
● NEUTRAL At #DAVALung, Dr. Julia Rotow (@JuliaRotow) from @DanaFarber reviewed 5-year data from CROWN showing durable PFS and CNS activity with 1L lorlatinib in ALK+ NSCLC. While efficacy remains unmatched, AEs and resistance patterns prompt questions on sequ
Alessandro Russo
@Al3ssandroRusso
● NEUTRAL @christine_lovly @ALKPositiveinc @OncoAlert It would be interesting to see the data on ctDNA+ at baseline and after 3 months as did in FLAURA and FLAURA2…likely ctDNA shedders and those with no clearance might be the best candidate for escalating the
Oncology Brothers
@OncBrothers
● NEUTRAL 1. #CROWN: Ph III, n= 296, Lorlatinib vs. Crizotinib ALK+ mNSCLC - mPFS not reached for lorlatinib & 9.1 mos w/ crizotinib (HR:0.19) - 5yr PFS 60% w/ lorlatinib and 8% w/crizotinib. Improved intracranial progression (HR: 0.06) - AEs: ⬆️ w/ lorla
Dr Riyaz Shah
@DrRiyazShah
● NEUTRAL @JessicaJLinMD discussing CROWN; the new 1st line TKI of choice; agreed. #ASCO24 https://t.co/VM6Ew4hKw9
Kaushal Parikh
@kaushalpar
● NEUTRAL @Alfdoc2 @APassaroMD @Timothee_MD @peters_solange Full paper out in jco this morning. https://t.co/yoMPboydsI V compelling dara
Amy Brown
@ByAmyBrown
● NEUTRAL #ESMO20 – Pfizer's next-gen ALK+ lung cancer drug impresses, but watch the tox. Our quick take on the Crown trial, via @evaluatevantage $PFE $RHHBY https://t.co/s6xsDx6H4b https://t.co/vNGjN6zpfI
Jarushka Naidoo
@DrJNaidoo
● NEUTRAL #ASCO21 ctDNA dynamics from lorlatinib v. crizotinib in Ph III CROWN: - b/l ctDNA assoc with higher tumor burden - molec response (MR: ratio on-Tx:baseline mean VAF) - MR +/- ctDNA clearance assoc with longer PFS from lorlat - ?potential early marke
● NEUTRAL Optimized clin trial design in CROWN and VISION studies, allows invstigtrs to study ctDNA as predictor of outcomes for ALK+ pts on lorlatinib and METex14 pts on tepotinib (respctvly). Dr. Ross Soo @NUSingapore @paikpaul @sloan_kettering #LCSM #ASCO2
FiercePharma
@FiercePharma
● NEUTRAL Q4: Looking at the CROWN study data Pfizer is set to present at ESMO, how important is potentially having a next-generation option in first-line ALK+ lung cancer, given the number of therapies already approved in this setting? #FierceTalksESMO @YYEla
OncLive.com
@OncLive
● NEUTRAL #ICYMI: The @US_FDA gave the green light to expand the indication of lorlatinib to include use in the frontline treatment of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC based on data from the phase 3 CROWN trial. @FDAOncology #lcsm https://t.co/TZwOxs3lNq
● NEUTRAL FDA expands approval of Lorlatinib for 1st line +ALK NSCLC, based on CROWN study that showed PFS improvement over crizotinib. Questions remain: Use it in 1st line or keep for later lines, after 1st line Alectinib or Brigatinib. How to sequence? #LC
Oncology Central
@OncologyCentral
● NEUTRAL The CROWN study showed lorlatinib as a treatment for patients with untreated, ALK-positive #NSCLC . Find out more in this plain language summary from @FutureOncol_FSG 📖 https://t.co/gxVhw9wF9O #LCAM #lcsm #lungcancerawarenessmonth https://t.co/z5LBZE
Ben Solomon
@bensolomon1
● NEUTRAL US FDA approves first-line Lorlatinib following results of the CROWN phase 3 trial. https://t.co/b0j1mTXZeA
Vibha Ravi
@scripvibha
● NEUTRAL ESMO: Pfizer's Lorbrena makes case to Claim ALK+ Lung Cancer CROWN. Puts the drug in a position to challenge Roche Holding AG’s Alecensa, Novartis AG’s Zykadia and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.’s Alunbrig, by @kevinatgrogan #ESMO20 #ESMO2020 #oncolo
Marcelo Corassa, MD.
@MarceloCorassa
● NEGATIVE So, 5y PFS is out. CROWN shows that only 3% of patients had disease progression from year 4 to year 5. Toxic, Lorlatinib is indeed, but this in totally unprecedented in thoracic oncology. ALK fusion patients leading the way into making NSCLC a chroni
Vinay Prasad MD MPH
@VPrasadMDMPH
● NEGATIVE Its great to see #asco24 changing language. In the future, I would love to see @asco make sure All randomized studies use appropriate control arms (sorry CROWN) All RCTs provide appropriate post protocol care (sorry ADAURA) These choices shorten liv
Aaron Goodman - Papa Heme
@AaronGoodman33
● NEGATIVE @VPrasadMDMPH @Timothee_MD This is disgusting. I get yelled at for bad tone or making a joke yet people do this
Timothe Olivier, MD
@Timothee_MD
● NEGATIVE ALEX trial (alectinib) @peters_solange was approved in 2017 yet CROWN choose ... crizotinib as a control, already known to be inferior! ➡️CROWN had a suboptimal control arm ! Is lorlatinib the best first-line treatment ? I don't know. @Alfdoc2 http
João Oliveira
@oliveirajoaomd
● NEGATIVE @PTarantinoMD A real question: Why was the crizotinib therapy not stopped in 36 months in the control group?
Massimo Di Maio
@MassimoDiMaio75
● NEGATIVE @VPrasadMDMPH @Timothee_MD This is what we called type 1 suboptimal control arms (from the beginning of the trial). About 6% of the trials in oncology in our analysis had this problem. Further 5% of trials have a control arm which becomes suboptimal
David McCune
@davidemccune
● NEGATIVE @VPrasadMDMPH @Timothee_MD Also, it didn’t “run” without almost 300 individual decisions by physicians to allow the randomization of their patients on a trial they would not allow a loved one to join.