KOL Pulse — Trial Profile

TOP Study Trial

EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC with concurrent TP53 mutations — AstraZeneca

EGFR+TP53 mutated NSCLC Osimertinib + Chemotherapy ELCC 2026 Investigational
Visit Interactive Trial Page →

Top KOLs Discussing TOP Study

Biagio Ricciuti, MD, PhD
Biagio Ricciuti, MD, PhD
@BRicciutiMD
40,245 impressions
Dr Rishabh Jain
Dr Rishabh Jain
@DrRishabhOnco
17,476 impressions
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
10,916 impressions
Bishal Gyawali, MD, PhD, FASCO
Bishal Gyawali, MD, PhD, FASCO
@oncology_bg
6,618 impressions
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
@HHorinouchi
5,318 impressions
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade
@SuyogCancer
2,694 impressions

TOP Study Key Slides & Visuals

Official trial slides and relevant visuals shared by KOLs at ELCC 2026. Click any image to expand or view on X.

Dr Rishabh Jain
Dr Rishabh Jain @DrRishabhOnco
TOP Trial Key Results Summary
11,923 impressions · 79 likes · 2026-03-25
View on X ↗
No OCR text available for this slide group.
Bishal Gyawali, MD, PhD, FASCO
PFS/OS Curve Comparison vs FLAURA2
6,618 impressions · 17 likes · 2026-03-26
View on X ↗
No OCR text available for this slide group.
Dr Rishabh Jain
Dr Rishabh Jain @DrRishabhOnco
TOP Study Conclusions & PFS Data
5,553 impressions · 40 likes · 2026-03-25
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Conclusions TOP study prospectively demonstrated that osimertinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved PFS in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC harboring concurrent TP53 mutations. - Median PFS: 34.0 VS. 15.6 months; HR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.60; P<0.001 (improvement of ~18.4 months). - PFS benefit was consistent across all prespecified subgroups. OS data was immature at this interim analysis. There was an encouraging trend of OS benefit (HR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.88) with osimertinib-chemotherapy versus osimertinib monotherapy. The safety profile in this study was consistent with that reported in the FLAURA2 study, with no new safety signals. These findings provide key evidence to support a molecular risk-guided, individualized treatment strategy for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. --- [Slide 2] Progression-Free Survival Osimertinib- Osimertinib chemotherapy 100 (N=148) (N=146) Number of Events 67 107 80 Median PFS, mo (95% CI) 34.0 (24.9, 36.4) 15.6 (13.0, 18.3) Stratified HR (95% CI) 0.44 (0.32, 0.60); P<0.001 Percentage of Patients 60 Overall maturity: 59.2% Median follow-up for PFS*, months (95%CI): 40 Osimertinib-chemotherapy, 25.1 (21.0-29.2) Osimertinib monotherapy. 26.1 (19.6-32.4) Osimertinib-chemotherapy 20 Osimertinib Monotherapy Censored 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 Months from Randomization No. at Risk 146 126 105 82 47 33 21 8 3 0 148 119 56 51 22 12 7 6 4 0 Osimertinib + chemotherapy demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in PFS vs osimertinib monotherapy. Yunpeng Yang
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
Hidehito HORINOUCHI @HHorinouchi
TOP Study Proffered Paper Session
4,018 impressions · 15 likes · 2026-03-25
View on X ↗
No OCR text available for this slide group.
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade @SuyogCancer
TOP Study Trial Slides
2,694 impressions · 29 likes · 2026-03-25
View on X ↗
No OCR text available for this slide group.

TOP Study Top Tweets

Top 10 by impressions — click to view on X

Biagio Ricciuti, MD, PhD
Biagio Ricciuti, MD, PhD@BRicciutiMD

Important study tackling a highly relevant question in #EGFRm #NSCLC. One observation: the PFS and OS curves look visually identical, even though the reported medians differ—perhaps suggesting an inadvertent duplication of the PFS KM figure.

👁 40,245 ♡ 78 ↻ 11 2026-03-26
Dr Rishabh Jain
Dr Rishabh Jain@DrRishabhOnco

TP53 + EGFRm NSCLC - upfront intensification wins #ELCC26 TOP Trial (Phase III) Osi +/- chemo in EGFRm + TP53 co-mutation. PFS: 34.0 vs 15.6 mo (HR 0.44, p<0.001) ORR: 82.9% vs 72.0% DoR: 32.7 vs 15.3 mo

👁 11,923 ♡ 79 ↻ 25 2026-03-25
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino@PTarantinoMD

What's going on with these KM plots from lung cancer trials?!

👁 10,916 ♡ 22 ↻ 2 2026-03-26
Bishal Gyawali, MD, PhD, FASCO
Bishal Gyawali, MD, PhD, FASCO@oncology_bg

The PFS and OS curves for a similar trial FLAURA-2 were okay. How did this new trial have such an unbelievably smooth curve for the same intervention?

👁 6,618 ♡ 17 ↻ 6 2026-03-26
Dr Rishabh Jain
Dr Rishabh Jain@DrRishabhOnco

Not all EGFR NSCLC is the same... TP53 co-mutation changes the game #ELCC26 Phase 3 TOP trial EGFR + TP53 mutated advanced NSCLC. PFS: 34.0 vs 15.6 mo HR 0.44. OS (immature):

👁 5,553 ♡ 40 ↻ 19 2026-03-25
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
Hidehito HORINOUCHI@HHorinouchi

#ELCC26 @myESMO Proffered Paper session 1 TOP study: Osimertinib +/- Chemo in EGFRm + TP53 mutation PFS HR 0.44 (95%CI 0.32-0.61), ORR 82.9% vs. 72.0% Dr. Yunpeng Yang NCT04695925

👁 4,018 ♡ 15 ↻ 7 2026-03-25
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade@SuyogCancer

Osimertinib plus Chemo is way forward in metastatic NSCLC With P53 mutation. Expected results. @RManochakian @Alfdoc2 @DrewMoghanaki @myESMO @FordePatrick #elcc2026

👁 2,694 ♡ 29 ↻ 4 2026-03-25
Roberto Ferrara
Roberto Ferrara@RobertoFerrara_

TOP trial shows benefit of osi+chemio in EGFR mut/P53 mut NSCLC with early separation of OS curve (not occurring in Flaura2). P53 mut could be DISRUPTIVE and non-DISRUPTIVE which are functionally different categories. #ELCC2026

👁 2,216 ♡ 39 ↻ 14 2026-03-25
Giannis Mountzios
Giannis Mountzios@g_mountzios

#ELCC26 proffered paper session 1 with results of the TOP trial: chemo+osi compared to osi alone in #EGFRmut #NSCLC with #TP53 mutations: Impressive doubling of PFS, points to consider:

👁 2,216 ♡ 30 ↻ 4 2026-03-25
Julien Mazieres
Julien Mazieres@JulienMazieres

TOP: first prospective phase III trial showing osi plus CTx significantly prolongs PFS vs. osi monotherapy in advanced EGFRm NSCLC with TP53 co-mutations. PFS 34 m. vs 15.6 m. #ELCC2026 @OncoAlert

👁 1,974 ♡ 23 ↻ 10 2026-03-25

About the TOP Study Trial

The TOP Study is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT04695925) evaluating osimertinib plus chemotherapy versus osimertinib monotherapy in previously untreated patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC harboring concurrent TP53 mutations. Presented at ELCC 2026, the study enrolled 294 patients and demonstrated that adding chemotherapy to osimertinib significantly improved progression-free survival. This is the first prospective phase III trial to address the question of treatment intensification in this molecularly defined high-risk subgroup.

Trial Methodology & Results

Study Design

Randomized 1:1, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial. Osimertinib 80 mg daily plus pemetrexed/carboplatin for 4 cycles followed by osimertinib plus pemetrexed maintenance versus osimertinib 80 mg daily monotherapy.

Population

Previously untreated stage IV or recurrent EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R) non-squamous NSCLC with concurrent TP53 mutations. ECOG PS 0-1; stable CNS metastases allowed. N=294 (146 combo, 148 mono).

Interventions

Experimental: osimertinib 80 mg QD + pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 + carboplatin AUC 5 Q3W for 4 cycles, then osimertinib + pemetrexed maintenance. Control: osimertinib 80 mg QD monotherapy. Stratified by EGFR mutation type, brain metastases, and ECOG PS.

Primary Endpoints

Primary endpoint: investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints: OS, ORR, DCR, DoR, safety, and patient-reported outcomes.

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Osimertinib plus chemotherapy demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS compared to osimertinib monotherapy, with a median PFS of 34.0 months (95% CI: 24.9-36.4) versus 15.6 months (95% CI: 13.0-18.3). The stratified hazard ratio was 0.44 (95% CI: 0.32-0.60; P<0.001), representing an improvement of approximately 18.4 months. PFS benefit was consistent across all prespecified subgroups.

PFS 34.0 vs 15.6 mo, HR 0.44

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04695925 →

Overall Survival (OS)

OS data was immature at this interim analysis (30.6% maturity). There was an encouraging trend favoring the combination arm with median OS of 48.4 months versus 36.5 months (HR 0.57; 95% CI: 0.38-0.88). Formal statistical testing of OS was not performed at this interim timepoint.


Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04695925 →

Safety & Tolerability

The safety profile of osimertinib plus chemotherapy was consistent with that reported in the FLAURA2 study, with no new safety signals identified. The combination was associated with higher toxicity compared to monotherapy, as expected with the addition of chemotherapy. Detailed adverse event data were presented alongside the efficacy results.

Consistent with FLAURA2, no new signals

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04695925 →

Clinical Implications

These findings provide key evidence supporting a molecular risk-guided, individualized treatment strategy for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. Notably, the FLAURA2 trial (osimertinib + chemotherapy in the broader 1L EGFRm population) has received FDA approval, but that indication does not specifically address TP53 co-mutated patients. The TOP study is the first prospective trial to demonstrate that TP53 co-mutation identifies a poor-prognostic subgroup that derives particular benefit from the osimertinib-chemotherapy combination (HR 0.44 vs FLAURA2's HR 0.62 in the unselected population). While the FLAURA2 approval provides a regulatory pathway for this combination, the TOP data suggest TP53 testing may help guide treatment intensification decisions within that approved framework. However, the duplicate KM figure controversy at ELCC 2026 underscores the need for corrected data and peer-reviewed publication before drawing definitive conclusions.

Key KOL Sentiments — TOP Study

DoctorSentimentComment
Dr Rishabh Jain ● POSITIVE 🚨 TP53 + EGFRm NSCLC - upfront intensification wins #ELCC26 🧪 TOP Trial (Phase III) Osi ± chemo in EGFRm + TP53 co-mutation ⚔️ Arms 🟢 Osi + chemo 🔵 Osi 📊 Key results 🔥 PFS: 34.0 vs 15.6 mo (HR 0.44, p<0.001) 📈 ORR: 82.9% vs 72.0% ⏳ DoR: 32.7 vs 15.3 mo 🧠 Benefit in https://t.co/95eDNYuQMV https://t.co/RcEdOIgc4y
Dr Rishabh Jain ● POSITIVE Not all EGFR NSCLC is the same… TP53 co-mutation changes the game #ELCC26 Phase 3 TOP trial 🧬 EGFR + TP53 mutated advanced NSCLC ⚔️ Strategy tested 🟢 Osimertinib + chemo 🟠 Osimertinib alone 📊 Signal is hard to ignore • PFS: 34.0 vs 15.6 mo → HR 0.44 • OS (immature): https://t.co/wh4n9XVWWW https://t.co/ucsxEObjlW
Giannis Mountzios ● POSITIVE #ELCC26 proffered paper session 1 with results of the TOP trial: chemo+osi compared to osi alone in #EGFRmut #NSCLC with #TP53 mutations : Impressive doubling of PFS, points to consider: ➡️ TP53 + poor prognostic group that needs intensification ➡️ Predictive value of TP53 for https://t.co/O0kANdYKAO
Hidehito HORINOUCHI ● NEUTRAL 🆙 #ELCC26 @myESMO 🇩🇰 🔥Proffered Paper session 1 ☑️TOP study: Osimertinib +/- Chemo in EGFRm + TP53 mutation 🎯PFS HR 0.44 (95%CI 0.32-0.61), ORR 82.9% vs. 72.0% 🎙️Dr. Yunpeng Yang 🎙️Chair: @peters_solange 📍NCT04695925 @OncoAlert @Larvol #LCSM https://t.co/XmlWknm3LT https://t.co/3IkvoKI3OJ
Dr Amol Akhade ● NEUTRAL Osimertinib plus Chemo is way forward in metastatic NSCLC With P53 mutation. Expected results. @RManochakian @Alfdoc2 @DrewMoghanaki @myESMO @FordePatrick #elcc2026 https://t.co/eXGqIIJGt3
Roberto Ferrara ● NEUTRAL TOP trial shows benefit of osi+chemio in EGFR mut/P53 mut NSCLC with early separation of OS curve (not occurring in Flaura2). P53 mut could be DISRUPTIVE and non-DISRUPTIVE which are functionally different categories. Trials should catch the functional P53 heterogeneity #ELCC2026 https://t.co/UUlGFHRVWw
Julien Mazieres ● NEUTRAL TOP : first prospective phase III trial showing osi plus CTx significantly prolongs PFS vs. osi monotherapy in advanced EGFRm NSCLC with TP53 co-mutations. mutations. PFS 34 m. vs 15.6 m. It reinforces the benefit of the combo in this high risk population. #ELCC2026 @OncoAlert https://t.co/hrH8FLyYRO
LARVOL ● NEUTRAL Recap of Day 1 of European Lung Cancer Congress (ELCC 2026): Top Trials Explore more insights and conference data from #ELCC26 👉 https://t.co/AOHoQjZywG #LARVOL #ELCC2026 #LungCancer #LCSM #NSCLC #SCLC #CancerResearch #CancerData #Oncology #OncologyInsights #ClinicalTrials | https://t.co/krRiUj2s0A
Hidehito HORINOUCHI ● NEUTRAL 🔁REVIEW #ELCC26 @myESMO 🇩🇰 🔥Proffered Paper session 1 ☑️TOP study: Osimertinib +/- Chemo in EGFRm + TP53 mutation 🎯PFS HR 0.44 (95%CI 0.32-0.61), ORR 82.9% vs. 71.6% 🎙️Dr. Yunpeng Yang 📍NCT04695925 @OncoAlert @Larvol #LCSM https://t.co/iFPiWOmG4Y https://t.co/QU7h2e4qIU
Mario Balsa ● NEUTRAL ✨ Proffered session 1 at #ELCC26: Osimertinib + ChT in EGFR+ NSCLC (TP53 co-mut)! Phase 3 randomized 🎯 mPFS: 34.0 vs 15.6 mo (HR 0.44) 💥 ORR: 82.9% vs 71.6% || DOR: 32.7 vs 15.3 mo ▪️ OS trend (+) → HR 0.57 (immature) ▪️ Manageable safety, no new signals @OncoAlert @myESMO https://t.co/uasJr76jKV
OncLive.com ● NEUTRAL Osimertinib plus chemotherapy prolonged PFS vs osimertinib alone in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring concurrent EGFR and TP53 mutations. @myESMO #ELCC26 #ELCC2026 #lcsm #oncology https://t.co/ixGDWVaKZm
Lodovica Zullo ● NEUTRAL @BRicciutiMD PFS and OS to osi alone are not that different from what has been reported in overall population (TP53 wt or commutated)
Bhaarath PG ● NEUTRAL Top Trials to Follow on Day 2 @myESMO #ELCC26 KANDLELIT-001 | ADEPPT | NORTHSTAR | ASTEROID | BeamionLung-1 | BECOME #ELCC #ELCC2026 #Cancer #Oncology #LungCancer #NSCLC #SCLC #lcsm #pembrolizumab #adagrasib #durvalumab #zongertinib #becotarug #osimertinib #EGFR #KRAS #ERBB2 https://t.co/YorVHdKNyu
Bhaarath PG ● NEUTRAL @myESMO #ELCC26: Top Trials from Day 1 3082-CL-0101 | TOP | BL-B01D1-204-01 | NCT05879978 #ELCC #ELCC2026 #Cancer #Oncology #LungCancer #NSCLC #SCLC #lcsm #setidegrasib #osimertinib #izabren #serplulimab #obrixtamig #ezabenlimab #EGFR #KRAS #TP53 #DLL3 #ClinicalTrials https://t.co/O7swJLjyOr
Lung Cancers Today ● NEUTRAL 🫁 Osimertinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved PFS over osimertinib monotherapy in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC and TP53 co-mutations, according to data from the phase 3 TOP study presented at #ELCC26. ➡️ Learn more: https://t.co/ot0QfQshQM #lcsm #NSCLC https://t.co/pgWbLqzrQj
CURE Today ● NEUTRAL Big News from #ELCC26! 🧬 New data shows adding chemotherapy to Tagrisso nearly doubles progression-free survival for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients (34 months vs 15.6 months). #LungCancer #Oncology #ELCC2026 #ELCC26 #NSCLC #CancerResearch #Tagrisso https://t.co/JyYKHSeVTL
OncoDaily Lung ● NEUTRAL 🔬 Osimertinib + Chemotherapy Shows Strong Benefit in EGFR/TP53 Mutant NSCLC At #ELCC2026, the TOP study highlights a key shift in how we approach EGFR/TP53 mutant NSCLC, a subgroup known for poor outcomes with TKI monotherapy. 📊 What stands out: • Median PFS: 34.0 vs 15.6 https://t.co/QhvQF1cU9H
OncoDaily Lung ● NEUTRAL 🔬 Becotarug + Osimertinib Shows Survival Benefit in EGFR Exon 20 Insertion NSCLC At #ELCC2026, the BECOME study highlights a promising strategy for EGFR exon 20 insertion NSCLC, a subgroup with limited effective treatment options after chemotherapy. 📊 What stands out: • https://t.co/2HMKuFz68i
Biagio Ricciuti, MD, PhD ● NEGATIVE Important study tackling a highly relevant question in #EGFRm #NSCLC. One observation: the PFS and OS curves look visually identical, even though the reported medians differ—perhaps suggesting an inadvertent duplication of the PFS KM figure. But, if these represent PFS (based on https://t.co/Kv8TRSYmV3
Paolo Tarantino ● NEGATIVE What's going on with these KM plots from lung cancer trials?! 🤯 https://t.co/cnjB4yMg16
Bishal Gyawali, MD, PhD, FASCO ● NEGATIVE The PFS and OS curves for a similar trial FLAURA-2 were okay. How did this new trial have such an unbelievably smooth curve for the same intervention? https://t.co/bBuMgKIZ6A https://t.co/tntm1wlP2v
Philipp Doc ● NEGATIVE @BRicciutiMD Excellent catch. Curves this similar across endpoints with 59% vs 31% maturity suggest figure duplication. Requires clarification before assessing TP53 co-mutation benefits.
Alessio Cortellini ● NEGATIVE @BRicciutiMD Ouch😕 it looks like a duplication indeed! also, there isn't the "typical" initial overlap between them. The message is there and it aligns with what we saw from subgroup analysis of FLAURA2, but I had a similar thoughs about the shape of the KM PFS.. they look more like
Elad Sharon ● NEGATIVE Yup, the numbers below the PFS and OS curves are exactly the same… hopefully, just a mistakenly duplicated figure. https://t.co/bzEcFINJFs
Adam C Palmer ● NEGATIVE @BRicciutiMD Yes, the at-risk tables are identical - definitely an error
Nick Mullen ● NEGATIVE @BRicciutiMD Here's a crazy idea to avoid this issue: What if, instead of a handful of incorrect powerpoint slides shared on social media, the authors PREPRINTED the results so that pts/mds can use the available evidence to inform clinical decisions that REAL PEOPLES' LIVES depend on?!
Marcelo Corassa, MD. ● NEGATIVE @BRicciutiMD It is also interesting, if curves are actually true, how Osi Mono worked in this population. I was waiting for a poorer result in the control arm.
Marcelo Corassa, MD. ● NEGATIVE @ACortelliniMD @BRicciutiMD It's quite interesting indeed. I am risking to say that maybe we will be looking at different curves for PFS and OS shortly and these figures do not represent the actual findings. Weird, yes. But it still sends a (deviated) message.
MV Chandrakanth ● NEGATIVE TOP Study (ELCC 2026): In EGFR+TP53 NSCLC, adding chemo to osimertinib doubles PFS (34 vs 15.6 mo; HR 0.44). Big gain but higher toxicity—select patients wisely. #MVOnco #ELCC2026 https://t.co/hgqJwpEo3P