3 min read

SABCS24 Social Influence In Action

SABCS24 Social Influence In Action

Breaking New Ground: Key Takeaways from SABCS 2024

The halls of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) have been buzzing with excitement this year as researchers unveiled groundbreaking findings that promise to reshape the landscape of breast cancer treatment. At the heart of the discussions was an emerging narrative about how to optimize treatment strategies by integrating results from multiple practice-changing trials.

Drag nodes and zoom in and out of our interactive social network diagram below to follow the KOL social influence patterns from SABCS24.

 

Convergence of Game-Changing Therapies: PATINA and DESTINY-Breast09

The intersection of two major trials dominated conversations at this year's symposium, sparking intense discussion about the future of HER2+ breast cancer treatment. The PATINA trial, presented by Dr. Otto Metzger of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, delivered stunning results that had attendees buzzing: adding palbociclib as maintenance therapy showed remarkable improvements, pushing progression-free survival from 29.1 to an impressive 44.3 months. The excitement was palpable, with Dr. Sara Tolaney exclaiming it was an "Amazing benefit!!!!" The dramatic jump in 5-year overall survival rates from 29.8% to 74% only added to the enthusiasm.

But the real intrigue came from discussions about how to integrate these findings with the DESTINY-Breast09 trial results. Dr. Erika Hamilton raised important points about addressing toxicities while maintaining treatment efficacy, while Dr. Paolo Tarantino highlighted the practice-changing nature of the 15-month PFS benefit seen with palbociclib in combination therapy.  Dr. Santhosh Ambika was quick to point out how DB-09 results were going to complicate the picture.

Wow, #PATINA shows 15 month improved PFS in 1st line HER-2 when palbociclib is added to ET +HER-2 antibodies in maintenance 1st line setting after chemo induction.

👏#bcsm#SABCS24@SABCSSanAntonio @oncoalert

Phase 3 PATINA Study https://t.co/P5apneM1eO
— Erika Hamilton, MD (@ErikaHamilton9) December 12, 2024

 

‼️When you thought you had the #SABCS24 program figured out, here’s the PRACTICE-CHANGING #PATINA trial being added!

For the impatient ones, press release here: https://t.co/C3HIxbSnRb

If you’re able, though, make sure to attend the data presentation today by @Otto_DFCI! #bcsm pic.twitter.com/ozEzYaw3gQ
— Paolo Tarantino (@PTarantinoMD) December 12, 2024

 

DB-09 results gonna complicate the picture ..
— Santhosh Ambika (@RenoHemonc) December 12, 2024

 

PATINA trial in HER2+ ER+ MBC, Trast+Pert+ET +/- Palbociclib (#SABCS24):

- PFS benefit: 44 vs 29 months👏
- No clear OS benefit
- Worse toxicity profile.

DB09 data in 6 months and T-DXd likely moving to 1L. the future role of PATINA uncertain. Complex decisions ahead!🤔 pic.twitter.com/ulftZqCpQJ
— José Sandoval (@JLSandoval) December 13, 2024

 

New Horizons in Hormone Receptor-Positive Disease

Adding to the excitement, the EMBER-3 trial emerged as another star of the symposium, with Dr. Komal Jhaveri presenting groundbreaking data on imlunestrant, an exciting new oral SERD (Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader). When combined with abemaciclib, this novel therapy nearly doubled progression-free survival from 5.5 to 9.4 months in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients.   Dr. Jhaveri presented the exciting practice changing data of imlunestrant for 2L ER+ , HER2- advanced breast cancer.

 

@jhaveri_komal presents #EMBER3

Imlunestrant (oral SERD) beats fulv (88% of SOC ET) in 2nd line ER+ #bcsm only in those with ESR1 mut

However, combo of Imlunestrant + abema wins in all-comers 5.5 vs. 9.5 mo

* note prior CDK not required #SABCS24@SABCSSanAntonio@OncoAlert pic.twitter.com/w1fX4sKInA
— Erika Hamilton, MD (@ErikaHamilton9) December 11, 2024

 

EMBER3 shows benefit of imlunestrant in patients with HR+ MBC and mESR1
and for the combination of imlunestrant and Abemaciclib for all patients, regardless of ESR1 status #SABCS24@SABCSSanAntonio @jhaveri_komal @OncoAlert pic.twitter.com/NFsiYO4xfC
— Stephanie Graff, MD, FACP, FASCO (@DrSGraff) December 11, 2024

 

Long-Term Victory for BRCA-Positive Patients

The updated results from the OlympiA trial, presented by renowned researcher Dr. Judy Garber, brought renewed optimism for patients with BRCA1/2-positive breast cancer. The numbers told a compelling story: after 6.1 years of follow-up, adjuvant olaparib continued to demonstrate impressive benefits with hazard ratios of 0.65 for triple-negative breast cancer and 0.68 for hormone receptor-positive disease. Dr. Garber also shared an unexpected finding that caught everyone's attention: fewer new primary cancers were observed in patients receiving olaparib.

OlympiA update, median f/u 6.1 yrs presented by @judygarber5

iDFS: TNBC: HR 0.65, HR 0.68
OS ITT: 0.72

Fewer new primary cancers seen in olaparib arm; no evidence of increased risk of MDS or AML@SABCSSanAntonio @OncoAlert #SABCS24 pic.twitter.com/1pI0AzgqY7
— Sara Tolaney (@stolaney1) December 11, 2024

 

Reimagining Treatment Approaches: The De-escalation Revolution

This year's symposium also showcased a powerful trend toward smarter, more targeted treatment approaches. In the groundbreaking COMET trial, Dr. Shelley Hwang presented findings that challenged conventional wisdom about low-risk DCIS management. The data showed no significant difference in 2-year invasive cancer rates between active monitoring (4.2%) and surgery (5.9%), leading Dr. Hwang to conclude that "active monitoring is not inferior to standard care." This could represent a paradigm shift in how we approach early-stage breast cancer.

COMET meets primary endpoint of non-inferiority for active monitoring vs guideline concordant care (surgery) for low-risk DCIS. #SABCS24 @OncoAlert @ALLIANCE_org pic.twitter.com/BubJaMKgJv
— Stephanie Graff, MD, FACP, FASCO (@DrSGraff) December 12, 2024

 

Looking Ahead: A New Era of Integrated Treatment Strategies

The wealth of data presented at SABCS 2024 points to an evolving breast cancer treatment landscape that's becoming more nuanced, more personalized, and more effective. The exciting convergence of findings from trials like PATINA and DESTINY-Breast09 suggests we're entering a new phase where the strategic combination of different therapeutic approaches might offer unprecedented benefits for patients.

As we digest these exciting developments, one thing is clear: the future of breast cancer treatment is looking brighter than ever. The challenge now lies in thoughtfully integrating these various treatment approaches to optimize outcomes for each individual patient.

LUNAR Trial: Did Emory Get Caught in the Hype?

LUNAR Trial: Did Emory Get Caught in the Hype?

by Brian Shields The LUNAR trial is a phase 3 clinical trial that evaluated the safety and effectiveness of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy...

Read More