IMROZ Clinical Trial Sentiment

Total Impressions 200,306

KOL Sentiment

 -100100Positive

 

IMROZ Trial: Redefining Multiple Myeloma Treatment with Quadruple Therapy

Introduction

The IMROZ trial has brought significant advancements in the treatment landscape for multiple myeloma, particularly for patients who are transplant-ineligible. This trial explored the efficacy and safety of adding isatuximab to the standard VRd regimen (bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone), forming the quadruple regimen Isa-VRd. With its promising results, the IMROZ trial presents a potential shift in the standard of care for these patients.

Trial Design

The IMROZ trial enrolled 447 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who were ineligible for transplantation, mostly aged between 65 and 80 years. The participants were randomized to receive either the Isa-VRd regimen or the standard VRd regimen. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rates, and safety profiles.

Key Findings

The trial found that the Isa-VRd regimen significantly improved progression-free survival compared to VRd alone. Specifically, the 5-year PFS rates were 63% for Isa-VRd compared to 45% for the control group. Additionally, there was a higher rate of MRD negativity with Isa-VRd, with 58% achieving MRD negativity compared to 43% in the VRd group.

Safety Profile

While the Isa-VRd regimen demonstrated improved efficacy, it also came with a high rate of adverse effects. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were noted in the Isa-VRd group (84%) compared to the VRd group (91.6%). Notably, treatment-related deaths were higher in the Isa-VRd group, with 11% compared to 5.5% in the VRd group.

FDA Approval

The positive outcomes from the IMROZ trial have led to the FDA approving the use of isatuximab in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who are not candidates for transplantation. This approval opens up new avenues for treatment and offers hope for better management of the disease.

Conclusion

The IMROZ trial has demonstrated that adding isatuximab to the VRd regimen significantly improves efficacy, as evidenced by higher PFS and MRD negativity rates. Despite the increased adverse events, the benefits appear to outweigh the risks for many patients, positioning Isa-VRd as a potential new standard of care for transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma patients

 

Top Tweets

Sentiment Analysis

Doctor Name Sentiment Comment
Ben Derman
POSITIVE
PFS clearly in favor of Isa-VRd. Median f/u 60 months VRd arm did better than historical comps. Isa-VRd with 5-year PFS of 63%. This compares favorably with MAIA with Dara-Rd (~50%) and less than PERSEUS with Dara-VRd/ASCT (4-yr PFS 83%). Benefit consistent across subgroups. https://t.co/4Ghbzp41yk
rajkumar
Dr. SUNDARARAJAN RAJKUMAR
POSITIVE
The 5 year PFS of 62% is impressive and this trial along with one other similar phase III at #ASCO24 is providing new data on quads in elderly. With dose adjustment and monitoring this approach is feasible in patients who are transplant ineligible but not frail.
Sara Fagerlie, PhD, CHCP (she/her)
POSITIVE
Great discussion by @DrOlaLandgren at #ASCO24 of IMROZ, BENEFIT, & PERSEUS. Quads=higher rates of MRD and longer PFS vs triplets, regardless of age and ASCT eligibility. New SOC in #NDMM. Time to retire transplant eligible and ineligible terminology? @hemeoncnews @OncoAlert #mmsm https://t.co/YopUBUleQa
Muzaffar Qazilbash
POSITIVE
#ASCO24 IMROZ trial. Isa-VRd vs. VRd in transplant-ineligible NDMM. N=446, ~97% patients 65-80 years with ECOG PS 0-1; 5-year PFS 63% vs. 45% favoring Isa-VRd. No unexpected toxicities #mmsm @NEJM @thanosdimop @Myeloma_Doc @mbeksac56 https://t.co/5FGxhbYJWl
Dr. Samer Al hadidi
Dr. SAMER AL HADIDI
NEUTRAL
#mmsm #ASCO24 1️⃣ IMROZ: Isa-VRd vs VRd i n transplant-ineligible NDMM pts ➡️ https://t.co/BLS3sPJZ1F ✅ follow-up: 5 years ✅Median PFS Isa-VRd(NR, estimated 7.5 years!!) vs VRd(4.5 years) 🛑 Grade 5 TEAE: 2 times higher with Isa-VRd (11% vs 5.5%) https://t.co/08UepenQIc
rajkumar
Dr. SUNDARARAJAN RAJKUMAR
NEUTRAL
1) The Triplet vs Quad trials with will define role of quads in elderly patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. They also provide frontline phase III data with Isatuximab— and a choice between Dara and Isa. For some patients Isa will be more cost effective. @Myeloma_Doc #ASCO24
Dr. Samer Al hadidi
Dr. SAMER AL HADIDI
NEUTRAL
#mmsm #ASCO24 Thoughts on IMROZ Very important data ✅median PFS: 7.5 yrs(estimated) ✅Grade IV AEs: higher though compare to: MAIA: Dara-Rd: median F/U <5yrs (shorter median follow up),death related to AEs (10%) in Dara-Rd👇 https://t.co/P9cra0bSzv
Mike Thompson, MD, PhD, FASCO
NEUTRAL
IMROZ VRd +/- Isa #mmsm #ASCO24 Summary - Facon https://t.co/zJBz2gdUSP
rajkumar
Dr. SUNDARARAJAN RAJKUMAR
NEUTRAL
Third of the @NEJM #ASCO24 myeloma papers I’m highlighting. The IMROZ trial exploring quadrupletx, Isa-VRd, in transplant ineligible patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. @thanosdimop @Myeloma_Doc #ThierryFacon @Mohty_EBMT @TomBmt133 https://t.co/yTpeFvXyHs
Ben Derman
NEUTRAL
IMROZ data is out in @NEJM simultaneous with oral pres. As for treatment schedule, these were 6 week cycles with reduced dose dex and twice weekly bortezomib. Mostly std risk patients were enrolled but 36% had 1q gain. Median age 72 (26% >=75) https://t.co/OyMl51vQgH #ASCO24 https://t.co/aVh6K7xDvB
Ghazi Alotaibi
NEGATIVE
@ManniMD1 Also that dex schedule and velcade twice a week protocol is anything but tolerable.