LIVE ESMO GI 2026 Live — top KOL voices, trial buzz & conference slides from Munich View Live Coverage →
ESMO GI 2026 · Live Conference Intelligence · DRAFT

ESMO GI 2026 Conference Intelligence

Real-time KOL buzz, top voices, and trial signals from the ESMO Gastrointestinal Cancers Congress · Munich, Germany · July 1–4, 2026. The RAS G12D pancreatic story (zoldonrasib / daraxonrasib) is leading the conversation, alongside HCC (EMERALD-1/-3) and BRAF/KRAS colorectal data.

287
KOL Tweets
40
Physician Voices
337.6K
Total Impressions
20
Trials Tracked

Top Slides from #ESMOGI26

The most-viewed conference slides shared by GI KOLs — data tables, forest plots, and study designs, live from Munich. Click any card to open the original post.

ESMO GI 2026 slide — ESMO GI 2026 is almost here.

After going through the scientific progr🔍 Click to expand
@DrRishabhOnco
Dr Rishabh Jain
@DrRishabhOnco
ESMO GI 2026 is almost here. After going through the scientific program, these are the 10 trials I’m watching most closely 👇 1️⃣ KRYSTAL-10 Can KRAS G12C-targeted therapy finally outperform chemotherapy in second-line mCRC? 2️⃣ STAR-221 Will TIGIT become the next immunotherapy
👁 24.1K impressionsView on X ↗
ESMO GI 2026 slide — #ESMOGI26

GLEAM phase II:

Zolbetuximab + GN did not improve OS or PF🔍 Click to expand
@dr_yakupergun
Yakup Ergün
@dr_yakupergun
#ESMOGI26 GLEAM phase II: Zolbetuximab + GN did not improve OS or PFS in CLDN18.2+ metastatic pancreatic cancer. OS: 13.7 vs 13.6 months HR 1.00; p=0.499 A possible benefit signal emerged in the small IL-18-high subgroup, but this remains exploratory.
👁 8.1K impressionsView on X ↗
ESMO GI 2026 slide — From @RevMedicines data on Zoldonrasib plus Daraxonrasib in 2nd & 🔍 Click to expand
@Aiims1742
Anirban Maitra
@Aiims1742
From @RevMedicines data on Zoldonrasib plus Daraxonrasib in 2nd & 3rd line metastatic #PancreaticCancer - presented at #ESMOGI26 Small numbers but even a few years back, who would have imagined survival curves like this in 2nd & 3rd line metastatic PANCREATIC cancer? Amazing!
👁 7.1K impressionsView on X ↗
ESMO GI 2026 slide — The OncoAlert PULSE Faculty at #ESMOGI26 🌐
The GI oncology community i🔍 Click to expand
@OncoAlert
OncoAlert
@OncoAlert
The OncoAlert PULSE Faculty at #ESMOGI26 🌐 The GI oncology community is coming together at #ESMOGI26 in Munich 🇩🇪 — and the @OncoAlert PULSE Faculty will be ready to discuss highlights, key data, and expert perspectives from Munich. This 1–4 July 2026 Follow the OncoAlert 🚨
👁 5.4K impressionsView on X ↗
ESMO GI 2026 slide — ⚡ #ESMOGI26 EMERALD-1 OS update

📈 PFS benefit confirmed with durvalum▣ 2 slides🔍 Click to expand
@DraMartinezLago
Nieves Martinez Lago MD PhD
@DraMartinezLago
⚡ #ESMOGI26 EMERALD-1 OS update 📈 PFS benefit confirmed with durvalumab + TACE ❌ No OS benefit in the current analysis 🧩 Early deaths, disease heterogeneity and limited post-TACE systemic therapy may have influenced outcomes. @OncoAlert
👁 5.0K impressionsView on X ↗
ESMO GI 2026 slide — Daraxonrasib and Zoldonrasib are both KRAS inhibitors, but giving them🔍 Click to expand
@DrSamuelBHume
Samuel Hume
@DrSamuelBHume
Daraxonrasib and Zoldonrasib are both KRAS inhibitors, but giving them together (in mice) is better than either alone. They bind different parts of KRAS, deepening its inhibition - and they seem to anticipate each other's resistance mechanisms. 🧵 https://t.co/lW47qnfwhL
👁 4.2K impressionsView on X ↗
ESMO GI 2026 slide — What to Look forward at ESMO GI 2026 ? 🙂👇 @myESMO #esmogi26🔍 Click to expand
@SuyogCancer
Dr Amol Akhade
@SuyogCancer
What to Look forward at ESMO GI 2026 ? 🙂👇 @myESMO #esmogi26
👁 4.0K impressionsView on X ↗
ESMO GI 2026 slide — In a real-world cohort of 316 non-metastatic dMMR/MSI-H CRC patients, ▣ 3 slides🔍 Click to expand
@p_ciracimd
Paolo Ciracì
@p_ciracimd
In a real-world cohort of 316 non-metastatic dMMR/MSI-H CRC patients, neoadjuvant ICIs achieved high CR rates (67%), supporting their implementation in clinical practice. @AnnaliceGandini @OncoAlert #ESMOGI26
👁 3.9K impressionsView on X ↗
ESMO GI 2026 slide — Zolbetuximab plus gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in CLDN18.2+ metastat▣ 4 slides🔍 Click to expand
@ArndtVogel
Arndt Vogel
@ArndtVogel
Zolbetuximab plus gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in CLDN18.2+ metastatic PDAC: phase II GLEAM study @ESMO-GI 👉Primary endpoint not met, no OS & PFS benefit 👉Toxicity manageable 🧐Not the right drug, but maybe the right target
👁 3.3K impressionsView on X ↗

Top KOL Voices

Ranked by total impressions across ESMO GI 2026 tweets. Physician voices only (registry-verified).

#1@DrRishabhOnco
Dr Rishabh Jain@DrRishabhOnco
72.0K9 tweets
#2@DraMartinezLago
25.0K15 tweets
#3@Erman_Akkus
Erman Akkus@Erman_Akkus
18.9K14 tweets
#4@ChandrakanthMv
MV Chandrakanth@ChandrakanthMv
15.1K14 tweets
#5@Aiims1742
Anirban Maitra@Aiims1742
12.7K2 tweets
#6@DrAngelaLamarca
Angela Lamarca@DrAngelaLamarca
11.4K14 tweets
#7@ArndtVogel
Arndt Vogel@ArndtVogel
10.5K6 tweets
#8@graokane
9.6K7 tweets
#9@dr_yakupergun
Yakup Ergün@dr_yakupergun
9.3K2 tweets
#10@SuyogCancer
Dr Amol Akhade@SuyogCancer
7.6K3 tweets
#11@p_ciracimd
Paolo Ciracì@p_ciracimd
5.0K2 tweets
#12@MarioBalsaMD
Mario Balsa@MarioBalsaMD
4.2K5 tweets
#13@UOzkerim
2.3K3 tweets
#14@Markuseckstein3
Markus Eckstein@Markuseckstein3
2.1K1 tweets
#15@DaisukeKotani
2.1K3 tweets

Trial Buzz by GI Subtype

Expand any trial to see the verbatim KOL tweets driving it. Ordered by conversation volume.

🟠Pancreatic (incl. PDAC)31 tweets · 5 trials
RMC-GI-102zoldonrasib + chemo · 1L RAS G12D mPDAC
7.5K imp  ·  10 tweets
@ArndtVogel
Arndt Vogel@ArndtVogel
Safety and efficacy of zoldonrasib plus chemotherapy in 1L RAS G12D metastatic PDAC @ ESMO-GI 👏amazing response rates 👉favorable toxicity, combos feasible 🧐A new era in PDAC therapy @myESMO @ASCO
👁 2.5K❤ 26🔁 17
@Erman_Akkus
Erman Akkus@Erman_Akkus
🚀Zoldonrasib plus chemo in 1L of PDAC with KRASG12D proffered paper #ESMOGI26 ✅Tolerable ✅ORR 60-80% #cancer #oncology #MedX #pancreatic @OncoAlert
👁 1.1K❤ 22🔁 7
@DrAngelaLamarca
Angela Lamarca@DrAngelaLamarca
Non-randomised #Zoldonrasib + FOLFIRINOX/GemNab in 1L mKRAS G12D aPDAC data at @myESMO #ESMOGI26 by #BrianWolpin Poor(er) px charact in mFOLFIRINOX Less rash; good tolerance – good dose intensity 🥳ORR 82% mFOLFIINOX; 61% GN 😊Ph III RASolute 305 coming #ESMOAmbassadors
👁 1.0K❤ 22🔁 12
@DraMartinezLago
Nieves Martinez Lago MD PhD@DraMartinezLago
🧬 KRAS G12D is no longer an “undruggable” target. #ESMOGI26 🚀 Zoldonrasib + ChT showed promising early activity in 1L PDAC: 📈 ORR 82% + mFOLFIRINOX (DCR 96%) 📈 ORR 61% + Gem/Nab-P (DCR 90%) ✅ No new safety signals. ⏳ Phase III RASolute 305 is now underway. @OncoAlert
👁 888❤ 23🔁 13
@ChandrakanthMv
MV Chandrakanth@ChandrakanthMv
Zoldonrasib + chemotherapy in first-line KRAS G12D metastatic pancreatic cancer: encouraging early signals from ESMO GI 2026. 🔹 ORR: 82% (mFOLFIRINOX) | 61% (Gem/nab-paclitaxel) 🔹 DCR: 96% | 90% 🔹 ≥50% KRAS G12D ctDNA reduction: 100% (both arms) 🔹 No new or additive safety
👁 803❤ 1🔁 1
@graokane
Grainne O'Kane@graokane
🔥Zoldonrasib+mFFX or GnP #PDAC ➡️early efficacy data first-line ORR 61-82% DCR 90-96% ✅safety - few added side effects ✅ctDNA molecular responses ➡️RASolute305 trial in first line Where will it all fit in! Best combos? Best sequences ? Need chemo? @myESMO @OncoAlert
👁 727❤ 14🔁 13
@OncologyMarwarD
OsmanKostekMD@OncologyMarwarD
🧬 Zoldonrasib + chemotherapy shows impressive early activity in 1L KRAS G12D-mutant PDAC. 🔹 mFOLFIRINOX: ORR 82%, DCR 96% 🔹 Gem/Nab-P: ORR 61%, DCR 90% 🔹 100% of evaluable patients achieved >50% ctDNA reduction. #ESMOGI2026 @OncoAlert
👁 409❤ 4🔁 4
@AaronTeoh21
Aaron@AaronTeoh21
Pancreatic Cancer (PDAC): 🍋KRAS G12D inhibitors (e.g., zoldonrasib + chemo: encouraging Phase 1/2 ORR 61–82% 🍋 Daraxonrasib (RMC-6236): Oral RAS(ON) multi-selective (pan-RAS-like) inhibitor RASolute 302 (in 2L) and 303 (in Adjuvant with GemAbraxane, Phase3)
👁 99❤ 0🔁 0
RMC-9805-001zoldonrasib + daraxonrasib · 2L+ KRAS G12D mPDAC
15.4K imp  ·  9 tweets
@Aiims1742
Anirban Maitra@Aiims1742
From @RevMedicines data on Zoldonrasib plus Daraxonrasib in 2nd & 3rd line metastatic #PancreaticCancer - presented at #ESMOGI26 Small numbers but even a few years back, who would have imagined survival curves like this in 2nd & 3rd line metastatic PANCREATIC cancer? Amazing!
👁 7.1K❤ 59🔁 26
@MarioBalsaMD
Mario Balsa@MarioBalsaMD
🚨 RMC-9805-001 at #ESMOGI26! Can dual KRAS G12D inhibition (zoldonrasib + daraxonrasib) move the needle in KRAS G12Dm PDAC? (Phase I, 60 pretreated patients 2L/3L+) 🎯 ORR 50% in 2L and 47% in ≥3L || DCR 97% and 90% 💥 mPFS 9.6 mo in 2L, with a favorable safety profile and no
👁 2.2K❤ 12🔁 7
@DraMartinezLago
Nieves Martinez Lago MD PhD@DraMartinezLago
🧬 #ESMOGI26 Dual KRAS G12D blockade keeps gaining momentum. 🚀 Zoldonrasib + daraxonrasib showed encouraging activity in KRAS G12D PDAC: 📈 ORR 50% (2L) | 47% (3L+) ⏳ mPFS 9.6 vs 7.6 months ✅ Manageable safety profile. Phase III RASolute 309 is next. @OncoAlert
👁 1.6K❤ 17🔁 9
@DrAngelaLamarca
Angela Lamarca@DrAngelaLamarca
Impressive data with #Zoldonrasib + #Daraxonrasib in mKRAS G12D 2L/3L aPDAC at @myESMO #ESMOGI26 Rash 90%, 12% G3; No DLT 🤩ORR 50% 2L / 47% 3L mPFS 9.6m 2L / 7,6m 3L mOS NE 2L /  10.5m 3L 🎊Phase III RASolute 309 coming! 🤞🏻May we have a#ChemoFree option? #ESMOAmbassadors
👁 1.3K❤ 25🔁 13
@ArndtVogel
Arndt Vogel@ArndtVogel
Safety and efficacy of zoldonrasibplus daraxonrasib in patients with 2L+ KRAS G12D metastatic mPDAC @ ESMO-Gi 😍>90% DCR in 2nd/3rd line therapy 👉tox driven by daraxonrasib, only 5% treatment discontionuation 👉amazing.. @myESMO @ASCO
👁 980❤ 17🔁 11
@graokane
Grainne O'Kane@graokane
🔥Improving RASinhibition with combos: KRAS G12D #PDAC ➡️Ph1 RMC-9805-001 Daraxonrasib+ zoldonrasib (pan-RASi + G12Di) ✅60 pts 2nd/ 3rd+ line ✅ORR 47-50%; DCR 90-97% ✅PFS 2nd line 9.6mths ; mOS NE ❗️Zoldonrasib very well tolerated @myESMO @OncoAlert
👁 807❤ 17🔁 15
@Erman_Akkus
Erman Akkus@Erman_Akkus
🚀Daraxonrasib plus Zoldonrasib in 2L and beyond of PDAC with KRASG12D proffered paper #ESMOGI26 2L ✅ORR 50% ✅mPFS: 9.6 mo #cancer #oncology #MedX #pancreatic @OncoAlert
👁 758❤ 19🔁 7
@UOzkerim
Uğur Özkerim@UOzkerim
Promising early signal for KRAS G12D-mutant metastatic pancreatic cancer at #ESMOGI26. The KRAS G12D inhibitor zoldonrasib (RMC-9805) combined with chemotherapy demonstrated encouraging preliminary activity: • mFOLFIRINOX: ORR 82%, DCR 96% • Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel: ORR
👁 648❤ 11🔁 6
GLEAMzolbetuximab + GN · CLDN18.2+ mPAC
13.5K imp  ·  6 tweets
@dr_yakupergun
Yakup Ergün@dr_yakupergun
#ESMOGI26 GLEAM phase II: Zolbetuximab + GN did not improve OS or PFS in CLDN18.2+ metastatic pancreatic cancer. OS: 13.7 vs 13.6 months HR 1.00; p=0.499 A possible benefit signal emerged in the small IL-18-high subgroup, but this remains exploratory.
👁 8.1K❤ 20🔁 11
@ArndtVogel
Arndt Vogel@ArndtVogel
Zolbetuximab plus gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in CLDN18.2+ metastatic PDAC: phase II GLEAM study @ESMO-GI 👉Primary endpoint not met, no OS & PFS benefit 👉Toxicity manageable 🧐Not the right drug, but maybe the right target
👁 3.3K❤ 14🔁 11
@graokane
Grainne O'Kane@graokane
Ph2 randomised GLEAM trial #PDAC- targeting CLDN18.2 ➡️no imp in OS, -ve study 13.7 v 13.6mths ➡️Zolbetuximab impacted peripheral cytokines with ⬆️in IL-18 associating with OS ➡️CLDN story not over! ���️Fab presentation with science nuggets @CentralParkWMD @myESMO @OncoAlert
👁 670❤ 14🔁 12
@DraMartinezLago
Nieves Martinez Lago MD PhD@DraMartinezLago
📊 GLEAM | CLDN18.2+ mPDAC #ESMOGI26 First phase IIR trial of zolbetuximab in mPDAC ❌ Primary OS endpoint not met 📈 mOS: 13.7 vs 13.6 mo 🔹 ORR/DoR numerically higher ⚠️ Early discontinuation may have limited benefit Exploratory IL-18 signal deserves further study @OncoAlert
👁 628❤ 9🔁 7
@OncologyMarwarD
OsmanKostekMD@OncologyMarwarD
The phase II GLEAM trial delivered a negative result in CLDN18.2-positive metastatic pancreatic cancer. Adding zolbetuximab to gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel did not improve overall survival: 🔹 mOS: 13.7 vs 13.6 months 🔹 HR 0.99 (P=0.50) #ESMOGI2026 @OncoAlert
👁 449❤ 5🔁 4
@DrAngelaLamarca
Angela Lamarca@DrAngelaLamarca
GLEAM trial at @myESMO #ESMOGI26 GemNab +/- Zolbetuximab in CLDN18.2 +ve aPDAC 😔No differences in mOS or mPFS 😏ORR higher 45% vs 37.4% If you ask me, CLDN18.2 IS a valid target in PDAC. Let’s not give up! 💪 #ESMOAmbassadors
👁 282❤ 4🔁 2
🟢Liver / HCC30 tweets · 3 trials
EMERALD-1durvalumab + beva + TACE · unresectable HCC (OS)
15.8K imp  ·  14 tweets
@DrRishabhOnco
Dr Rishabh Jain@DrRishabhOnco
Hepatocellular carcinoma is set for a huge meeting at #ESMOGI26. Here are the Top 5 HCC abstracts I’m watching most closely 👇 1️⃣ 183O | EMERALD-1 (OS Update) Can the overall survival benefit establish durvalumab + TACE as the new standard for embolization-eligible HCC? 2️⃣ https://t.co/g0au0Eo5dQ
👁 5.2K❤ 42🔁 19
@DraMartinezLago
Nieves Martinez Lago MD PhD@DraMartinezLago
⚡ #ESMOGI26 EMERALD-1 OS update 📈 PFS benefit confirmed with durvalumab + TACE ❌ No OS benefit in the current analysis 🧩 Early deaths, disease heterogeneity and limited post-TACE systemic therapy may have influenced outcomes. @OncoAlert
👁 5.0K❤ 14🔁 5
@ChandrakanthMv
MV Chandrakanth@ChandrakanthMv
EMERALD-1 Final OS Analysis Durvalumab ± Bevacizumab + TACE in Unresectable Embolization-Eligible HCC (eeHCC) Key findings • Previous EMERALD-1 showed a significant PFS benefit. • Final analysis showed no overall survival benefit with the addition of durvalumab ± bevacizumab
👁 1.3K❤ 19🔁 4
@ArndtVogel
Arndt Vogel@ArndtVogel
OS in EMERALD-1: A phase III study of durvalumab ± beva and TACE in unresectable embolisation-eligible HCC 👉OR & PFS improved 👉no OS benefit 🧐No safety concerns, but also not strongly supporting the combination @myESMO @EASLedu @ILCAnews
👁 1.2K❤ 24🔁 17
@dr_yakupergun
Yakup Ergün@dr_yakupergun
#ESMOGI26 EMERALD-1 final OS: D+B+TACE did not improve OS despite the PFS benefit. 29.9 vs 33.3 months HR 1.10; p=0.47 Toxicity and treatment discontinuation were higher.
👁 1.1K❤ 8🔁 6
@Erman_Akkus
Erman Akkus@Erman_Akkus
🚀EMERALD-1 OS analysis proffered paper #ESMOGI26 ❌No OS benefit ✅PFS benefit #cancer #oncology #MedX #GI @OncoAlert
👁 963❤ 15🔁 11
@UOzkerim
Uğur Özkerim@UOzkerim
EMERALD-1 final OS results presented at #ESMOGI26 While adding durvalumab + bevacizumab to TACE significantly improved PFS (HR 0.77), this benefit did not translate into an overall survival advantage (OS HR 1.10). Durvalumab alone also failed to improve OS (HR 0.93). @OncoAlert
👁 529❤ 10🔁 5
@MarioBalsaMD
Mario Balsa@MarioBalsaMD
💥 EMERALD-1 at #ESMOGI26! Can adding durvalumab ± bevacizumab to TACE improve outcomes in unresectable HCC? ▪️ TACE + D + B significantly improved PFS (HR 0.77) || D alone showed only a numerical PFS improvement 🔴 Neither strategy improved OS versus TACE alone Long treatment
👁 444❤ 13🔁 5
EMERALD-3trem + durva ± len + TACE · eeHCC
7.2K imp  ·  9 tweets
@SuyogCancer
Dr Amol Akhade@SuyogCancer
EMERALD-3 may redefine treatment for embolization-eligible HCC. Adding STRIDE + TACE significantly improved PFS, ORR and DoR versus TACE alone, with a manageable safety profile. Early OS trend is encouraging, although longer follow-up is awaited. Will this change the practice?
👁 2.5K❤ 7🔁 5
@ArndtVogel
Arndt Vogel@ArndtVogel
Tumour response analyses by RECIST v1.1 and mRECIST in the phase III EMERALD-3 study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab with or without lenvatinib TACE in HCC @ESMO-GI 👉Primary endpoint met 👉ORR & PFS improved 👉OS benefit for STRIDE 🧐Option to be considered @myESMO @ASCO
👁 1.7K❤ 30🔁 18
@Erman_Akkus
Erman Akkus@Erman_Akkus
🚀EMERALD-3 response analysis proffered paper #ESMOGI26 ✅ORR and PFS benefit #cancer #oncology #MedX #GI @OncoAlert
👁 1.3K❤ 26🔁 13
@jryckman3
Jeff Ryckman@jryckman3
Absolutely not. It is no surprise that EMERALD-3 and the studies shown in the attached slide will be “positive” when the comparator delivers such poor local control, with TACE failure rates of 40% to 60%. These studies represent a misallocation of resources. We can and should
👁 606❤ 10🔁 2
@DraMartinezLago
Nieves Martinez Lago MD PhD@DraMartinezLago
🗣️ EMERALD-1 & EMERALD-3 discussion #ESMOGI26 🎯 PFS alone may not be enough. ⚖️ OS remains the key endpoint. 🧩 Patient selection, early mortality, toxicity and post-TACE treatment sequencing matter. The role of IO + TACE continues to evolve. @OncoAlert
👁 520❤ 8🔁 8
@DrAngelaLamarca
Angela Lamarca@DrAngelaLamarca
Data on #ORR from #EMERALD3 at @myESMO #ESMOGI26 Following the @ASCO data (see post below), response data by RECIST and mRECST presented today #ESMOAmbassadors https://t.co/Up1nprKiWl
👁 470❤ 4🔁 3
@BallenDF
Diego Felipe Ballen@BallenDF
Is CTLA-4 the key to unlocking an OS benefit in the post-TACE setting? The OS curves from EMERALD-1 and EMERALD-3 raise an intriguing question. Great discussion on IO strategies in HCC at #ESMOGI26. Looking forward to the final OS results from EMERALD-3.
👁 83❤ 1🔁 0
PROACTIFY90-SIRT · HCC real-world data
7.7K imp  ·  7 tweets
@Erman_Akkus
Erman Akkus@Erman_Akkus
PROACTIF #ESMOGI26 @myESMO ❗️✅Dosing is crucial with TARE in HCC #cancer #oncology #MedX @OncoAlert
👁 1.6K❤ 20🔁 12
@DraMartinezLago
Nieves Martinez Lago MD PhD@DraMartinezLago
⚡ Rapid Oral Session at #ESMOGI26 🔸 PROACTIF / Y-90 🔸 AGEO-NEO-MSI 🔸 CAPRI-2 GOIM 🔸 Anti-EGFR retreatment 🧬 From real-world evidence to biomarker-driven strategies. Promising data across GI cancers—now awaiting prospective confirmation and longer follow-up. @OncoAlert
👁 1.5K❤ 28🔁 15
@graokane
Grainne O'Kane@graokane
PROACTIF #HCC #iCCA #ESMOGI26 ➡️largest Real World dataset Y-90 ➡️989 HCC; 207 iCCA ➡️HCC 68% >5cm; 35% PVT ➡️Absorbed dose matters ➡️impressive outcomes VP1-3 ❗️IO Combos to date with TACE but increasing role Y90 globally! @myESMO @OncoAlert
👁 1.2K❤ 20🔁 13
@DrAngelaLamarca
Angela Lamarca@DrAngelaLamarca
Results from the #observational PROACTIF study on #radioembolisation in #HCC at @myESMO #ESMOGI26 👉Dose matters 📈Vp 1/2/3/4 are NOT all the same 🤞🏻1-3 may behave as non-PVT - worth considering TARE if elegible… 🤨My mental note: Vp4 need options/trials #ESMOAmbassadors
👁 1.2K❤ 17🔁 12
@ArndtVogel
Arndt Vogel@ArndtVogel
Effectiveness & safety of SIRT using yttrium-90 glass microspheres for HCC @eClinicalMed https://t.co/1P31BU6kU0 🔎RWD multi-center prospective PROACTIF, 989 pts pts 👉mOS: 21⋅8 mo 👉ORR: 45%, 10⋅7% underwent surgery 🧐interesting & supportive, but not overly impressive OS
👁 779❤ 14🔁 7
@ChandrakanthMv
MV Chandrakanth@ChandrakanthMv
Y-90 SIRT in large HCC: treat the dose, not just the size. The PROACTIF registry suggests higher tumor absorbed dose was associated with substantially longer overall survival—even in selected patients with portal vein thrombosis. Real-world evidence that supports personalized
👁 753❤ 12🔁 5
@MarioBalsaMD
Mario Balsa@MarioBalsaMD
🚨 PROACTIF at #ESMOGI26! Y-90 radioembolization with TheraSphere in HCC, (largest prospective RW dataset reported to date; n=989): ▪️ 68% tumors >5cm || 35% portal vein thrombosis 🎯 Higher absorbed tumor dose was associated with longer OS 💥 ≥400 Gy seemed particularly
👁 596❤ 13🔁 7
🔵Colorectal (CRC)11 tweets · 5 trials
🟣Gastric / GEJ7 tweets · 2 trials

Media Coverage & Market Signals

Press & media coverage of ESMO GI 2026, kept separate from official company announcements and finance / investor chatter.