KOL Pulse — Trial Profile

DESTINY-Breast 05 Trial

Adjuvant T-DXd vs. T-DM1 in high-risk HER2+ early breast cancer with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy — AstraZeneca / Daiichi Sankyo

HER2+ Early Breast Cancer · Residual Disease Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (Enhertu) SABCS 2025 · NEJM 2026 · NCT04622319 ✓ FDA APPROVED MAY 15 2026
Explore the Data →

Top KOL Voices on DESTINY-Breast 05

Santhosh Ambika
Santhosh Ambika
@RenoHemonc
12.5K impressions
Stephanie Graff, MD, FACP, FASCO
Stephanie Graff, MD, FACP, FASCO
@DrSGraff
9.2K impressions
Abi Siva MD
Abi Siva MD
@AbiSivaMD
7.3K impressions
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
6.4K impressions
Hope Rugo
Hope Rugo
@hoperugo
5.7K impressions
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers
@OncBrothers
4.2K impressions

SABCS 2025 / ESMO 2025 / NEJM 2026 Slides & Data

Conference slides shared by KOLs and presenters, with full OCR text available. All slides verified DESTINY-Breast 05 content.

NEJM
NEJM @NEJM
SABCS 2025 / NEJM 2026 — DESTINY-Breast 05
17.7K impressions · 44 likes
View on X →
[Slide 1] Invasive Disease-free Survival 100 90 3-Yr Invasive 80 Patients Disease-free 100 with Survival 70 Percentage of Patients Event (95% CI) 60 95 T-DXd no. (%) percent 50 90 T-DXd 51 (6.2) 92.4 (89.7-94.4) 40 85 T-DM1 T-DM1 102 (12.5) 83.7 (80.2-86.7) 30 80 Hazard ratio for invasive disease or 20 death, 0.47 (95% CI, 0.34-0.66) 0 10 P<0.001 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 Months No. at Risk T-DXd 818 788 781 776 771 768 758 753 731 684 634 544 440 380 370 275 218 212 129 92 90 46 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 T-DM1 817 781 769 760 745 734 719 708 687 632 599 527 417 355 337 233 186 177 120 84 79 38 14 13 4 1 1 0 0
NEJM
NEJM @NEJM
SABCS 2025 / NEJM 2026 — DESTINY-Breast 05
11K impressions · 30 likes
View on X →
[Slide 1] A Invasive Disease-free Survival 100 90 3-Yr Invasive 80 Patients Disease-free 100 with Survival 70 Percentage of Patients Event (95% CI) 60 95 T-DXd no. (%) percent 50 90 T-DXd 51 (6.2) 92.4 (89.7-94.4) 40 85 T-DM1 T-DM1 102 (12.5) 83.7 (80.2-86.7) 30 80 Hazard ratio for invasive disease or 20 death, 0.47 (95% CI, 0.34-0.66) 0 10 P<0.001 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 Months No. at Risk T-DXd 818 788 781 776 771 768 758 753 731 684 634 544 440 380 370 275 218 212 129 92 90 46 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 T-DM1 817 781 769 760 745 734 719 708 687 632 599 527 417 355 337 233 186 177 120 84 79 38 14 13 4 1 1 0 0 B Disease-free Survival 100 90 3-Yr 80 Patients Disease-free 100 with Survival 70 Percentage of Patients Event (95% CI) 60 95 T-DXd no. (%) percent 50 90 T-DXd 52 (6.4) 92.3 (89.5-94.3) 40 85 T-DM1 T-DM1 103 (12.6) 83.5 (79.9-86.4) 30 80 Hazard ratio for invasive disease, 20 noninvasive disease, or death, 0 10 0.47 (95% CI, 0.34-0.66) 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 P<0.001 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 Months No. at Risk T-DXd 818 788 781 776 771 768 758 753 731 683 633 543 440 380 370 275 218 212 129 92 90 46 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 T-DM1 817 779 767 757 743 733 718 707 686 631 598 526 416 354 336 233 186 177 120 84 79 38 14 13 4 1 1 0 0 C Distant Recurrence-free Interval 100 90 Patients 80 Patients Event-free 100 70 with at 3 Yr Percentage of Patients 60 95 T-DXd Event (95% CI) 50 90 no. (%) percent T-DM1 T-DXd 40 42 (5.1) 93.9 (91.4-95.7) 85 T-DM1 81 (9.9) 86.1 (82.5-89.1) 30 80 20 Hazard ratio for distant recurrence, 0 0.49 (95% CI, 0.34-0.71) 10 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 Months No. at Risk T-DXd 818 786 778 774 770 767 757 753 731 684 635 545 442 382 372 276 219 213 129 92 90 46 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 T-DM1 817 780 769 761 746 739 724 713 694 639 606 533 424 362 345 240 192 182 121 84 79 38 14 13 4 1 1 0 0 --- [Slide 2] 3-Yr Invasive Disease-free Hazard Ratio for Invasive Disease Subgroup T-DXd T-DM1 Survival (95% CI) (95% CI) T-DXd T-DM1 no. of patients with event/total no. percent All patients 51/818 102/817 92.4 (89.7-94.4) 83.7 (80.2-86.7) 0.47 (0.34-0.66) Age <65 yr 46/735 87/736 92.1 (89.2-94.3) 84.1 (80.2-87.2) 0.50 (0.35-0.71) >65 yr 5/83 15/81 94.9 (87.0-98.1) 79.2 (67.9-87.0) 0.31 (0.11-0.86) Race Asian 19/399 34/386 95.1 (91.9-97.0) 89.5 (85.3-92.6) 0.53 (0.30-0.93) Non-Asian 32/419 68/431 89.5 (84.5-93.0) 77.9 (72.1-82.7) 0.44 (0.29-0.67) Geographic region Asia 19/392 33/380 95.0 (91.9-97.0) 89.7 (85.4-92.7) 0.55 (0.31-0.96) Europe 13/222 30/223 93.1 (86.9-96.4) 82.9 (75.8-88.1) 0.40 (0.21-0.77) North America and Australia 5/57 10/72 85.8 (63.9-94.9) 80.7 (65.3-89.7) 0.56 (0.19-1.63) Rest of the world 14/147 29/142 85.1 (73.6-91.8) 69.2 (56.3-79.0) 0.43 (0.23-0.81) Central HER2 status IHC 3+ 46/676 86/670 91.8 (88.7-94.1) 83.2 (79.2-86.5) 0.49 (0.34-0.70) ISH-positive 5/140 16/147 96.2 (91.0-98.4) 86.5 (78.1-91.8) 0.35 (0.13-0.97) Hormone-receptor status Positive 33/581 59/583 93.5 (90.6-95.6) 86.8 (82.9-89.9) 0.54 (0.35-0.82) Negative 18/237 43/234 89.4 (82.0-93.9) 75.6 (67.6-81.9) 0.37 (0.22-0.65) Operative status at disease presentation, before neoadjuvant therapy Operable disease 21/387 34/393 92.8 (88.0-95.7) 88.4 (83.8-91.8) 0.58 (0.34-1.01) Inoperable disease 30/431 68/424 92.0 (88.5-94.5) 79.4 (73.9-83.8) 0.41 (0.27-0.63) Pathological nodal status after neoadjuvant therapy Positive 40/660 87/658 92.5 (89.3-94.8) 82.5 (78.4-85.9) 0.43 (0.29-0.62) Negative 11/158 15/159 91.6 (85.3-95.3) 88.3 (80.6-93.0) 0.73 (0.33-1.59) HER2-targeted neoadjuvant therapy Single 13/176 27/171 87.5 (77.6-93.3) 77.9 (67.7-85.2) 0.43 (0.22-0.84) Dual 38/642 75/646 93.6 (90.9-95.5) 85.2 (81.4-88.2) 0.48 (0.33-0.71) Previous neoadjuvant therapy Anthracycline 32/423 61/399 90.6 (86.1-93.6) 80.3 (74.8-84.8) 0.45 (0.29-0.69) Platinum compound 20/386 37/392 93.9 (90.4-96.1) 87.3 (82.4-90.9) 0.54 (0.31-0.93) Radiotherapy treatment Sequential radiotherapy 15/326 34/279 93.8 (88.4-96.7) 83.2 (76.4-88.2) 0.35 (0.19-0.64) Concurrent radiotherapy 30/438 57/480 92.8 (89.7-95.0) 85.1 (80.6-88.6) 0.55 (0.35-0.85) No radiotherapy 6/54 11/58 81.0 (61.0-91.4) 73.4 (56.4-84.6) 0.57 (0.21-1.55) 0.06 0.12 0.25 0.50 1.00 2.00 T-DXd Better T-DM1 Better
Santhosh Ambika
Santhosh Ambika @RenoHemonc
SABCS 2025 / NEJM 2026 — DESTINY-Breast 05
12.5K impressions · 33 likes
View on X →
[Slide 1] 16:30 - 18:15 Presidential Symposium | CHAIRS: GIUSEPPE CURIGLIANO, BRIGETTE MA FUTURE STUDIES NEEDED HOW COULD WE INTEGRATE DB11 AND DB05? Can we use a response-guided approach? HP pCR X 14 cycles ctDNA cT≥3 or cN+ THP Breast MRI undetectable Surgery TDXd HER2+ BC x12 wks (at C2D1) response RD x14 cycles Any HR status Sara Tolaney Check ctDNA: If no response Baseline & Baseline breast MRI Cycle Day 1 HP Invited Discussant LBA1 for all patients ctDNA pCR T-DXd for 4 X 14 cycles Baseline tumor-informed detectable cycles Surgery ultrasensitive ctDNA for (at C2D1) RCB2/3 all patients RD ACx4-T-DM1x Plasma samples for serial ctDNA testing 14 cycles RCB1 " " T-DM1 X 14 cycles Baseline C2d1 (week 0) (week 3) Side adapted from Bia Sequi/Ada Waks BERLIN AUDITORIUM - HUB 27
Abi Siva MD
Abi Siva MD @AbiSivaMD
SABCS 2025 / NEJM 2026 — DESTINY-Breast 05
7.3K impressions · 26 likes
View on X →
[Slide 1] PREOPERATIVE/ADJUVANT THERAPY See BINV-M 1 of 10 for Considerations for Those Receiving Preoperative/Adjuvant Systemic Therapy. HR-Positive or -Negative and HER2-Positive9 Preferred: Preoperative or adjuvant setting: TCHP (Docetaxel/Carboplatin + Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab) Adjuvant setting: TCH (Docetaxel/Carboplatin + Trastuzumab) If no residual disease after preoperative therapy or no preoperative therapy: Complete up to 1 year of HER2-targeted therapy with Trastuzumabh (category 1) + Pertuzumab. If node positive at initial staging, Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab (category 1) If residual disease after preoperative therapy: Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (category 1) alone. If Ado-trastuzumab emtansine discontinued for toxicity, then Trastuzumab (category 1) + Pertuzumab to complete 1 year of therapy. If node positive at initial staging, Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab (category 1)J Fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (category 1) for those with high risk of recurrence defined as inoperable cancer (cT4, N0-3, M0 or cT1-3, N2-3, M0) at presentation prior to neoadjuvant therapy or operable cancer (cT1-3, N0-1, M0) with axillary node-positive disease (ypN1-3) following preoperative therapy.
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino @PTarantinoMD
SABCS 2025 / NEJM 2026 — DESTINY-Breast 05
5K impressions · 62 likes
View on X →
[Slide 1] Primary endpoint: IDFSᵃ T-DXd T-DM1 n= 818 n= 817 Patients with events, n (%) 51 (6.2) 102 (12.5) 3-year IDFS, % (95% CI) 92.4 (89.7-94.4) 83.7 (80.2-86.7) HR (95 % CI) 0.47 (0.34-0.66) 1.0 P value <0.0001b Invasive Disease-Free Survival 0.8 Д8.7% 0.6 T-DXd (n = 818) T-DM1 (n = 817) Censor 0.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 Time, months Number at Risk: T-DXd 818 788 781 776 771 768 758 753 731 684 634 544 440 380 370 275 218 212 129 92 90 46 14 14 0 0 0 0 T-DM1 817 781 769 760 745 734 719 708 687 632 599 527 417 355 337 233 186 177 120 84 79 38 14 13 4 1 1 0 53% reduction in the risk of invasive disease recurrence or death for T-DXd compared with T-DM1 HR, hazard ratio; IDFS, invasive disease-free survival; T-DM1, trastuzumab emtansine; T-DXd, trastuzumab deruxtecan Efficacy stopping boundary, P 0.0183. MDFS is defined as the time from randomization until the date of first occurrence of one of the following events: recurrence of ipsilateral invasive breast tumor, recurrence of ipsilateral locoregional invasive breast cancer, contralateral invasive breast cancer, a distant disease recurrence, or death from any cause. Two-sided Pvalue from stratified log-rank test. Hazard ratio and 95% CI from stratified Cox proportional hazards model with stratification factor of operative status at disease presentation Dr Charles E Geyer Jr Content of this presentation is copyright and responsibility of the author. Permission is required for re-use. BERLIN DESTINY-Breast05 ESMO congress

Top 10 Tweets by Impressions

NEJM
NEJM @NEJM
Presented at #SABCS25: In patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer and residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy, trastuzumab deruxtecan improved invasive disease–free survival but carried a risk of interstitial lung disease. Full DESTINY-Breast05 phase 3 trial results: https://t.co/gzaCa8RKk2
👁 17.7K ❤ 44 🔁 17 2025-12-10
Santhosh Ambika
Santhosh Ambika @RenoHemonc
@dr_yakupergun @SuyogCancer @AnisToumeh @drsarahsam @stolaney1 @OncBrothers @oncologician @PTarantinoMD @JAMouabbi @DrSGraff Go with Tolaney approach to spare unnecessary Rx. https://t.co/C4lvMqBK0t
👁 12.5K ❤ 33 🔁 19 2025-10-18
NEJM
NEJM @NEJM
Original Article: Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Residual HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer (DESTINY-Breast05 phase 3 trial) https://t.co/bSyzhAR3U8 #SABCS25 | @SABCSSanAntonio https://t.co/NxQimnFjIY
👁 11K ❤ 30 🔁 3 2025-12-11
Abi Siva MD
Abi Siva MD @AbiSivaMD
Noticed in the latest @NCCN update: post-neoadjuvant T-DXd made the list, but neoadjuvant T-DXd + THP didn’t. Curious whether this signals preference for DB-05 vs DB-11, or simply where the evidence is easiest to implement. @PTarantinoMD @JAMouabbi @drsarahsam @OncBrothers https://t.co/VpHLzhDynQ
👁 7.3K ❤ 26 🔁 8 2026-01-21
Stephanie Graff, MD, FACP, FASCO
Stephanie Graff, MD, FACP, FASCO @DrSGraff
How are we feeling on Sunday morning RE: Destiny Breast 11 (neoadj) and DB-05 (residual disease)? What are we doing in the overlapping population? (Don’t vote just to see; that’s what the bookmark tab is for!) #ESMO25
👁 6.4K ❤ 16 🔁 9 2025-10-19
Hope Rugo
Hope Rugo @hoperugo
#SABCS2025 @curijoey and Sybille Loibl present safety data from DB11 and DB05. Most encouraging is the lack of an increase in ILD/pneumonitis when TDXd is given through adjuvant RT. Very careful monitoring and management will be critical in this setting @OncoAlert https://t.co/0abaLOviJc
👁 5.7K ❤ 34 🔁 18 2025-12-10
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino @PTarantinoMD
The KM curve of 2025: among high risk patients with HER2+ eBC and RD, adjuvant T-DXd halved the risk of recurrence vs T-DM1. New SoC for pts with: -inoperable disease at diagnosis -node-positive RD 10.8% rate of ILD, 3 deaths. Remember to monitor the lungs! #ESMOAmbassadors https://t.co/XURyOLXW3q
👁 5K ❤ 62 🔁 22 2025-10-18
Sherene Loi, MD
Sherene Loi, MD @LoiSher
DB05 #esmo25 impressive efficacy for post op node + or inoperable at baseline -balanced with ~10%ILD but 👏less CNS 🧠recurrences 🙌 Bravo to those &gt;70% patients putting up with all that nausea!! @myESMO #esmoambassadors @OncoAlert https://t.co/ZGRNomzMJs
👁 3.9K ❤ 37 🔁 11 2025-10-18
Yüksel Ürün
Yksel rn @DrYukselUrun
Excellent discussion as always by @stolaney1 shedding new light on HER2+ treatment direction.@myESMO #ESMO25 https://t.co/qtBJlrDAne
👁 3.8K ❤ 18 🔁 3 2025-10-18
Yakup Ergün
Yakup Ergn @dr_yakupergun
#SABCS25 DESTINY-Breast05: Post-neoadjuvant high-risk HER2+ EBC 🔹️iDFS HR 0.47, 3-yr iDFS 92.4% vs 83.7% 🔹️Major reduction in distant relapse (HR 0.49) and early signal of lower CNS events 🔹️Benefit consistent across HR status, nodal burden, operability, and HER2 strata https://t.co/hu2vZNAmmH
👁 3.1K ❤ 34 🔁 12 2025-12-11

DESTINY-Breast 05 — Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, Enhertu) vs. T-DM1 (Kadcyla)

DESTINY-Breast 05 is a phase 3, global, randomized, open-label trial evaluating T-DXd (Enhertu) vs. T-DM1 (Kadcyla) in adult patients with high-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer who have residual invasive disease following neoadjuvant therapy. The trial demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in invasive disease-free survival over T-DM1 (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.34–0.66; P<0.0001). On May 15, 2026 — via FDA Project Orbis concurrent review — the FDA approved Enhertu in the adjuvant residual-disease setting (DB-05) and in the neoadjuvant setting for Stage II/III disease (DB-11), bringing T-DXd into the HER2+ curative-intent continuum. The FDA approval adds T-DXd as a new adjuvant option; T-DM1 retains its KATHERINE-based residual-disease indication on label. Investigators including Shanu Modi (MSK) describe T-DXd as a potential new standard of care in early-stage disease given its head-to-head superiority over T-DM1.

FDA Approved May 15, 2026 — New Standard of Care

FDA Adjuvant Approval for HER2+ Residual Disease

Enhertu (fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki) — approved May 15, 2026 — As adjuvant treatment of adult patients with HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or ISH+) breast cancer who have residual invasive disease following neoadjuvant trastuzumab (with or without pertuzumab) and taxane-based treatment.

Dosing: 5.4 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 14 cycles. Black-box warning: interstitial lung disease / pneumonitis and embryo-fetal toxicity.

📄 Source: AstraZeneca Press Release →

Clinical Implications

✅ FDA-approved: DESTINY-Breast 05 adds T-DXd (Enhertu) as a new adjuvant option for adult patients with HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or ISH+) early breast cancer with residual invasive disease following neoadjuvant trastuzumab (±pertuzumab) plus taxane therapy. T-DM1 (Kadcyla) retains its existing KATHERINE-based indication on label; T-DXd does not formally replace it, but did demonstrate head-to-head superiority on iDFS in DB-05 and is positioned by investigators as a potential new standard of care. ✅ Companion approval: Via DESTINY-Breast 11 (same May 15, 2026 FDA action under Project Orbis), T-DXd → THP is also approved in the neoadjuvant setting for Stage II/III HER2+ disease. Together the two indications extend T-DXd across the HER2+ curative-intent continuum.

Trial Methodology & Results

Study Design

Phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter, global trial; 1,635 patients randomized 1:1 to 14 cycles of either T-DXd or T-DM1.

Population

Adult patients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or ISH+) early breast cancer with residual invasive disease in the breast and/or axillary nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus HER2-directed therapy — a high-risk-of-recurrence population.

Interventions

Intravenous T-DXd at 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 14 cycles versus intravenous T-DM1 at 3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 14 cycles.

Endpoints

Primary: investigator-assessed invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Key secondary: disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), distant recurrence-free interval, brain metastasis-free interval.

Invasive Disease-Free Survival (iDFS) — Primary Endpoint

Median iDFS was NOT REACHED in both arms at interim analysis. T-DXd reduced the risk of invasive disease recurrence or death by 53% — HR 0.47 (95% CI 0.34–0.66; P<0.0001). The 3-year iDFS rate was 92.4% (T-DXd) vs. 83.7% (T-DM1). Distant disease recurrence risk fell 51% and brain metastasis risk fell 36% with T-DXd.

✓ iDFS HR 0.47 — 53% reduction in invasive recurrence/death

📄 Source: NEJM 2026 (Loibl et al.) — DCO Sept 2025 →

Overall Survival (OS) — Key Secondary

OS data was immature at the interim analysis (2.9% data maturity). OS hazard ratio was 0.61 (95% CI 0.34–1.10), 3-year OS 97.4% (T-DXd) vs. 95.7% (T-DM1). Final OS analysis pending.

OS HR 0.61 — immature (2.9% maturity)

📄 Source: NEJM 2026 (Loibl et al.) →

Safety & Tolerability

Grade ≥3 AEs: 50.6% (T-DXd) vs. 51.9% (T-DM1). Key T-DXd AEs: nausea 71.3%, decreased neutrophil count 31.6%. Adjudicated drug-related ILD/pneumonitis occurred in 9.6% with T-DXd (Grade 1 2.0%, Grade 2 6.5%, Grade 3 0.9%, Grade 5 0.2% — 2 fatal events) vs. 1.6% with T-DM1.

⚠ ILD 9.6% (T-DXd) — strict monitoring required

📄 Source: NEJM 2026 (Loibl et al.) →

KOL Sentiment Table — Verbatim Comments

All KOL commentary on DESTINY-Breast 05 (POSITIVE → NEUTRAL → NEGATIVE). Tweet text is verbatim.

KOLSentimentComment
Hope Rugo ● POSITIVE #SABCS2025 @curijoey and Sybille Loibl present safety data from DB11 and DB05. Most encouraging is the lack of an increase in ILD/pneumonitis when TDXd is given through adjuvant RT. Very careful monitoring and management will be critical in this setting @OncoAlert https://t.co/0abaLOviJc
Yakup Ergn ● POSITIVE #SABCS25 DESTINY-Breast05: Post-neoadjuvant high-risk HER2+ EBC 🔹️iDFS HR 0.47, 3-yr iDFS 92.4% vs 83.7% 🔹️Major reduction in distant relapse (HR 0.49) and early signal of lower CNS events 🔹️Benefit consistent across HR status, nodal burden, operability, and HER2 strata https://t.co/hu2vZNAmmH
Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD ● POSITIVE 📌Excellent discussion by @stolaney1 ✨ at Presidential Symposium I #ESMO25 “Reshaping Destiny: trasforming outcomes in high-risk HER2+ BC” DESTINY-Breast05 @OncoAlert #OncoAlertAF @DFCI_BreastOnc https://t.co/XPejMBA96o
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center ● POSITIVE Practice changing data presented #ESMO25 by Dr. Charles Geyer showing significant reduction in risk of recurrence/death from DESTINY-Breast-05. Congratulations Dr. Geyer for this important work &amp; presenting on the world stage! @PittHealthSci @UPMCnews @UPMCPhysicianEd https://t.co/2ZguUP1csH
Mustafa zdoan, MD ● POSITIVE Two positive trials — two crucial questions: Who needs T-DM1 after neoadjuvant T-DXd, and what is the best regimen before maintenance T-DXd?
Mustafa zdoan, MD ● POSITIVE A new era in early HER2+ breast cancer. At #ESMO25, T-DXd outperformed T-DM1 in the adjuvant DESTINY-Breast05 and Surpassed standard ddAC-THP in the neoadjuvant DESTINY-Breast11 Bringing ADCs into the curative setting. Lung monitoring remains essential. #BreastCancer #TDXd https://t.co/7l6ta5HNhX
NEJM ● NEUTRAL Presented at #SABCS25: In patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer and residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy, trastuzumab deruxtecan improved invasive disease–free survival but carried a risk of interstitial lung disease. Full DESTINY-Breast05 phase 3 trial results: https://t.co/gzaCa8RKk2
Santhosh Ambika ● NEUTRAL @dr_yakupergun @SuyogCancer @AnisToumeh @drsarahsam @stolaney1 @OncBrothers @oncologician @PTarantinoMD @JAMouabbi @DrSGraff Go with Tolaney approach to spare unnecessary Rx. https://t.co/C4lvMqBK0t
NEJM ● NEUTRAL Original Article: Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Residual HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer (DESTINY-Breast05 phase 3 trial) https://t.co/bSyzhAR3U8 #SABCS25 | @SABCSSanAntonio https://t.co/NxQimnFjIY
Abi Siva MD ● NEUTRAL Noticed in the latest @NCCN update: post-neoadjuvant T-DXd made the list, but neoadjuvant T-DXd + THP didn’t. Curious whether this signals preference for DB-05 vs DB-11, or simply where the evidence is easiest to implement. @PTarantinoMD @JAMouabbi @drsarahsam @OncBrothers https://t.co/VpHLzhDynQ
Stephanie Graff, MD, FACP, FASCO ● NEUTRAL How are we feeling on Sunday morning RE: Destiny Breast 11 (neoadj) and DB-05 (residual disease)? What are we doing in the overlapping population? (Don’t vote just to see; that’s what the bookmark tab is for!) #ESMO25
Paolo Tarantino ● NEUTRAL The KM curve of 2025: among high risk patients with HER2+ eBC and RD, adjuvant T-DXd halved the risk of recurrence vs T-DM1. New SoC for pts with: -inoperable disease at diagnosis -node-positive RD 10.8% rate of ILD, 3 deaths. Remember to monitor the lungs! #ESMOAmbassadors https://t.co/XURyOLXW3q
Sherene Loi, MD ● MIXED DB05 #esmo25 impressive efficacy for post op node + or inoperable at baseline -balanced with ~10%ILD but 👏less CNS 🧠recurrences 🙌 Bravo to those &gt;70% patients putting up with all that nausea!! @myESMO #esmoambassadors @OncoAlert https://t.co/ZGRNomzMJs
Yksel rn ● NEUTRAL Excellent discussion as always by @stolaney1 shedding new light on HER2+ treatment direction.@myESMO #ESMO25 https://t.co/qtBJlrDAne
Stephanie Graff, MD, FACP, FASCO ● NEUTRAL Final tally! 🗳️ #ESMO25 @OncoAlert https://t.co/uIOBSc84GL https://t.co/IMhQ9Sl7vF
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO ● NEUTRAL @stolaney1 cautions to follow the trial data for #DB05 Should not use T-DXd in ALL HER-2 + #bcsm with residual disease- only those that met trial entry..really unresectable large size or node positive #ESMO25 #ESMOAmbassadors https://t.co/1tZ4UNvGxA
Oncology Brothers ● NEUTRAL 2. #DESTINYBreast05: PhIII, TDXd vs. TDM1 in high risk (inoperable or LN+) residual disease after NeoAdj chemo for Her2+ Breast Cancer: - ⬆️DFS &amp; iDFS w/ TDXd (HR: 0.47 in both end points). - ILD: 9.6% vs. 1.6% - New SoC/option for that very high risk pt! 4/13 https://t.co/qB2WLwVrcX
Oncology Brothers ● NEUTRAL 6. #DESTINYBreast05: PhIII, TDXd vs. TDM1 in high risk (inoperable or LN+) residual disease after NeoAdj chemo for Her2+ Breast Cancer: - ⬆️ iDFS with TDXd vs. TDM1 in all subgroups - Timings of RT did NOT impact the severity incidence or severity of ILD 7/7 https://t.co/IxH9Sgcmoe https://t.co/YLNtaI6iHj
Paolo Tarantino ● NEUTRAL DESTINY-Breast06: Among pts with endocrine-refractory, HR+/HER2- MBC, 1L T-DXd significantly improved PFS vs cape/taxanes (13.2 vs 8.1 mo, HR 0.62, p&lt;0.001), with a trend in OS (HR 0.83). Most of the pts enrolled had visceral disease. How will this change your practice?
Csar A. Rodrguez ● NEUTRAL News from #ESMO2025 7️⃣ Ladies and Gentlemen… with you the first analysis of DestinyBreast05 Trial @myESMO https://t.co/QKloIesZuZ
Aya Mohamed | MSc, MD ● NEUTRAL The @NEJM DESTINY-Breast05 trial is practice-changing: T-DXd cut recurrence/death risk by ~53% vs T-DM1 in high-risk HER2+ early breast cancer with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy. @OncoAlert #SABCS25 #BreastCancer #bcsm https://t.co/WJXMf298Rs https://t.co/mj137GbyhD
Oncology Brothers ● NEUTRAL TDXd now @US_FDA ✅ in neoadjuvant and adjuvant high risk residual HER2+ breast cancer based off DESTINYBreast05 and DESTINYBreast11: - ⬆️ pCR &amp; iDFS w/ TDXd - Timings of RT did NOT impact the incidence or severity of ILD - New Soc for high risk disease! #bcsm #OncTwitter https://t.co/G57TyGw8Xh
Toni Choueiri, MD ● NEUTRAL JUST IN: @FDA approves Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab deruxtecan (TdXD) for Her-2 + breast cancer and post residual disease , based upon Destiny breast 011/05 trials. https://t.co/fGjcZZ9Ay9 https://t.co/TDd9xdMYjZ
Susan G. Komen ● NEUTRAL Dr. Charles Geyer presented DESTINY-Breast05: T-DXd vs T-DM1 in HER2+ early BC given after initial treatment for those who have cancer remaining after neoadjuvant treatment. T-DXd cut recurrence risk by ~50% T-DXd poised to replace T-DM1 as SOC (5/5) https://t.co/2f5MU79DnO
BreastCancersToday ● NEUTRAL Behind the scenes with @AmandaNizamMD &amp; @drsarahsam at #ESMO25 discussing the DESTINY-Breast05 study. Full interview coming this week on https://t.co/0OkHxTwXuM! #DESTINYBreast05 #BreastCancer #HER2 #ESMO2025 @DFCI_BreastOnc @myESMO https://t.co/PSWbRUenvf
Dr Sarah Sammons ● NEUTRAL @DrSGraff Residual high risk only
Elisa Agostinetto ● NEUTRAL @Lucarecco @Stefani19753108 @OncoAlert Hi Luca, nice poll! I would recommend post-neoajuvant T-DXd only in the DB-05 criteria (ie, residual disease in the lymphnodes at surgery or inoperable disease at diagnosis) and not for all cases of residual disease! T-DM1 is still SoC for these cases @OncoAlert
NSABP Foundation ● NEUTRAL Interim analysis results DESTINY-Breast05/NSABP B-60 presented during #ESMO25: T-DXd reduced risk of invasive disease recurrence or death by 53% vs T-DM1 in pts w/high-risk HER2-positive #breastcancer w/residual invasive disease following neoadjuvant tx ➡️https://t.co/EQZNiAs2yu https://t.co/Jh465YGVuI
Dr Amol Akhade ● NEUTRAL Trastuzumab deruxtecan gets @US_FDA approval for NACT and for post NACT residual disease , based upon Destiny breast 011 and 05 trials . Expected approval especially for DB 05 setting . @stolaney1 @ErikaHamilton9 @dr_yakupergun @PTarantinoMD @elmayermd @OncoAlert https://t.co/uLDPlpr1LI
● NEUTRAL @Wildingarden In the Phase 3 DESTINY-Breast05 trial (EudraCT 2020-003982-20, the one authorized in Ireland in 2021 for Daiichi Sankyo’s trastuzumab deruxtecan vs. T-DM1), there were two adjudicated Grade 5 (fatal) interstitial lung disease events in the T-DXd arm. These were the only
● NEUTRAL @Wildingarden The specific hospitals where the two adjudicated Grade 5 (fatal) ILD events occurred in the T-DXd arm of DESTINY-Breast05 are not publicly disclosed in the NEJM publication, https://t.co/0AwSOt0GMS (NCT04622319), or related trial materials. Patient-level details like exact
Madeleine Armstrong ● NEGATIVE Enhertu’s perioperative Destiny beckons, but watch out for ILD. The @ApexOnco take on Destiny-Breast05 &amp; Destiny-Breast11 data at #ESMO25 $AZN $DSKNY https://t.co/yIVbe2iT0v
Luca Arecco, MD ● NEGATIVE Over half voters (53%) would opt for TCHP → T-DXd as preferred sequencing in HER2+ eBC setting. The key challenge is now finding the optimal sequencing and patient selection while awaiting further updates from DB-11 and DB-05. @OncoAlert https://t.co/2U9v9dZ5pj
Michael Lam, PharmD, BCOP ● NEGATIVE @NEJM @SABCSSanAntonio Notable takeaway: DESTINY-Breast05 has minimal US enrollment, despite the US accounting for 40% of T-DXd’s global market share. There is a major disconnect between the study population and real-world usage. How much is a vial of T-DXd in the US vs in Asia? https://t.co/tzKZ4YiCU1