● LIVE #ESMO26 live from Madrid, Oct 23–27 — today’s highlights, trending trials and physician reactions Follow ESMO 2026 live →
KOL Pulse - Trial Profile

DESTINY-Breast09 Trial

DESTINY-Breast09 is a Phase 3 trial of first-line trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, Enhertu) plus pertuzumab versus the standard taxane + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (THP) regimen in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. The T-DXd combination improved median PFS to 40.7 vs 26.9 months (HR 0.56; p<0.0001), supporting FDA approval on December 15, 2025. Sponsor: Daiichi Sankyo / AstraZeneca.

1L HER2+ mBC Enhertu + Perjeta #ASCO25 #SABCS25
Discover KOL Sentiment on DESTINY-Breast09 →

ESMO 2026 physician reactions

Posts by physicians about DESTINY-Breast09 during ESMO 2026 (October 2026), newest first. Each post is shown in full and verbatim and linked to the original on X.

October 26, 2026: the brain-metastases analysis

Physician posts on the exploratory brain-metastases analysis Cristina Saura presented at ESMO 2026, newest first. Each post is shown in full and verbatim and linked to the original on X. The figures are in the brain-metastases result block.

Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD
Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD@to_be_elizabeth
𝕏

📌 A DESTINY-Breast09 analysis of T-DXd + pertuzumab vs taxane + trastuzumab + pertuzumab for pts with HER2+ a/mBC and baseline brain metastases 🧠 ✨Cristina Saura Manich #ESMO26 🇪🇸 @OncoAlert #OncoAlertAF https://t.co/omeRvpUWXf

137 views 3 likes5 RT 2026-10-26
Yakup Ergün
Yakup Ergün@dr_yakupergun
𝕏

#ESMO26 | DB-09 | BM efficacy We already knew T-DXd had strong intracranial activity. Here are the first-line data: in HER2+ breast cancer with BM, T-DXd+pertuzumab vs THP delivered a median PFS of 36.5 vs 11.1 mo and 12-m CNS-PFS of 88.9% vs 42.5%. Nearly double the intracranial response rate!

372 views 8 likes5 RT 2026-10-26
Matteo Lambertini, MD PhD
Matteo Lambertini, MD PhD@matteolambe
𝕏

Oral abstract #BreastCancer session at #ESMO26: presented by super @CristinaSaura3 additional impressive data from DESTINYbreast09 on efficacy of first-line anti-HER2 #TrastuzumabDeruxtecan plus #pertuzumab in patients with brain metastases @OncoAlert @myESMO https://t.co/xDTpiCuc3z

310 views 11 likes4 RT 2026-10-26
Kazuki Nozawa, MD
Kazuki Nozawa, MD@kazuki_nozawa
𝕏

DESTINY-Breast09 (Exploratory CNS Analysis) #ESMO26 T-DXd + P demonstrated superior efficacy versus THP in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases (n=61). Systemic PFS: HR 0.30 CNS-PFS: HR 0.26 CNS-ORR: 51.6% vs 26.7% Systemic ORR: 83.9% vs 70.0% Supports T-DXd + P as first-line therapy, including patients with brain metastases.

295 views 6 likes3 RT 2026-10-26
Sara Tolaney
Sara Tolaney@stolaney1
𝕏

DESTINY-Breast09 CNS Analysis Assessment of pts with BICR-assessed brain mets (treated and asymptomatic or clinically inactive) n=61 Deeper systemic and CNS response, and higher iORR @OncoAlert #ESMO26 https://t.co/lJhfvJgg2R

272 views 3 likes2 RT 2026-10-26
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino@PTarantinoMD
𝕏

Doubling in intracranial ORR (51 vs 26%) and dramatic improvement in intracranial PFS with T-DXd/P vs THP in 1L HER2+ mBC. The DB09 regimen is the clear SoC for patients with brain metastases at metastatic diagnosis. #ESMO26 #ESMOAmbassadors https://t.co/i7NAbeJFk1

509 views 13 likes4 RT 2026-10-26
Elisa Agostinetto
Elisa Agostinetto@ElisaAgostinett
𝕏

At #ESMO26 Rapid oral abstracts session on advanced #breastcancer @CristinaSaura3 presents an exploratory analysis of DB-09 on pts with brain mets 🧠 Systemic PFS and CNS-PFS was ⬆️ in pts treated with T-DXd + P vs THP SoC @OncoAlert https://t.co/DJvsxocLwM

204 views 6 likes4 RT 2026-10-26
Nurullah İlhan,MD
Nurullah İlhan,MD@drnurullahilhan
𝕏

Good morning from Madrid! Watching today’s DESTINY-Breast09 update: T-DXd + pertuzumab vs THP in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer with baseline brain metastases. What will this analysis add to the first-line discussion? @VHIO @myESMO @OncoDaily @OncoAlert #ESMO26 @stolaney1 @PTarantinoMD

43 views 0 likes0 RT 2026-10-26
Jeff Ryckman
Jeff Ryckman@jryckman3
𝕏

Longer CNS-PFS w/ T-DXd + pertuzumab in the DESTINY-Breast09 (DB-09) brain mets subgroup (LBA49). 📌 Exploratory subgroup of randomized phase 3 DESTINY-Breast09: 61 pts w/ HER2+ advanced/metastatic breast cancer, baseline brain mets by BICR and ≥1 follow-up brain scan. T-DXd + pertuzumab (n=31) vs taxane + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (THP, n=30). 📌 Median follow-up 23.6 mo. mCNS-PFS NE vs 9.7 mo; HR 0.26 (95% CI 0.11-0.57). 📌 CNS-cORR 51.6% (95% CI 33.1-69.8) vs 26.7% (95% CI 12.3-45.9), by BICR. 📌 mPFS 36.5 vs 11.1 mo. 📌 Parent-trial drug-related ILD/pneumonitis: 12.1% (incl 2 grade 5) vs 1.0%. Brain mets subgroup AE rates aren't reported. Side note: prior CNS local therapy and the active/treated brain mets split aren't reported in the abstract. https://t.co/1kEnVk7VEw #ESMO26 #BCSM

186 views 0 likes1 RT 2026-10-26

DESTINY-Breast09 Key Takeaways

Design — Phase 3, open-label; 1L T-DXd (Enhertu) + pertuzumab vs standard THP, HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (NCT04784715). (NEJM)

PFS (primary) — Median 40.7 vs 26.9 months; HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.44-0.71; p<0.0001) — 44% reduction, benefit regardless of HR status. (NEJM)

Overall survival — Immature (16% maturity); early numerical trend favors T-DXd + pertuzumab (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.59-1.19). (interim)

Brain metastases (ESMO 2026, exploratory) — In 61 patients with brain metastases at baseline confirmed by BICR (31 vs 30), CNS-cORR was 51.6% vs 26.7%, median systemic PFS 36.5 vs 11.1 months (HR 0.30) and 12-month CNS-PFS 88.9% vs 42.5% with T-DXd + pertuzumab vs THP. Small subgroup, endpoints not prespecified; separate from the primary PFS result. (Saura, ESMO 2026 slides; DCO 26-Feb-2025)

Safety — Adjudicated drug-related ILD/pneumonitis 12.1% (2 fatal, 0.5%); neutropenia 78% all-grade (29% Grade 3/4); nausea 75%. (NEJM)

Regulatory — FDA approved December 15, 2025 for 1L HER2+ metastatic breast cancer; PATHWAY (4B5) companion Dx co-approved. (FDA.gov)

Sponsor / Drug — Daiichi Sankyo / AstraZeneca; T-DXd (Enhertu) ADC + pertuzumab (Perjeta). (FDA label)

Compiled and reviewed by the KOL Pulse research team, led by Brian Shields, Founder, KOL Pulse. Last updated October 26, 2026.

Top KOLs Discussing DESTINY-Breast09

Cristina Saura
Cristina Saura
@CristinaSaura3
ESMO 2026 presenter
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
137.3K impressions
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade
@SuyogCancer
56.6K impressions
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers
@OncBrothers
52.3K impressions
Dr Sarah Sammons
Dr Sarah Sammons
@drsarahsam
35.3K impressions
Erika Hamilton, MD
Erika Hamilton, MD
@ErikaHamilton9
30.7K impressions
Tatiana Prowell, MD
Tatiana Prowell, MD
@tmprowell
23.8K impressions
Free Access · KOL Pulse Intelligence

Track oncology’s top KOLs in your specialty

Create a free account, pick the tumor types you cover, and go beyond the tweet — the intelligence pharma teams use to map influence and prepare for engagement:

  • ✓Enhanced KOL profiles
  • ✓Pharma influence & potential advisory-board patterns
  • ✓2025 Open Payments financial analysis
  • ✓Social-media sentiment & trend signals
Get free access — pick your specialty
Choose the tumor types you follow. No cost, unsubscribe anytime.

DESTINY-Breast09 Key Slides & Visuals

ESMO 2026 slides

Slides from ESMO 2026 (Madrid) as photographed and shared on X by physicians, newest first. Each post is shown verbatim; click any slide to enlarge, and open the OCR text under each post. All ESMO 2026 DESTINY-Breast09 slides in the KOL Pulse slide library →

Sara Tolaney (@stolaney1)
Sara Tolaney @stolaney1
DESTINY-Breast09 · ESMO 2026 brain-metastases analysis (exploratory)
Oct 26, 2026 · ESMO 2026
View on X ↗
DESTINY-Breast09 CNS Analysis Assessment of pts with BICR-assessed brain mets (treated and asymptomatic or clinically inactive) n=61 Deeper systemic and CNS response, and higher iORR @OncoAlert #ESMO26 https://t.co/lJhfvJgg2R
[Slide 1 - Conclusions] In this exploratory analysis of DESTINY-Breast09, T-DXd + P demonstrated robust systemic and intracranial disease control versus standard-of-care THP, supporting a meaningful clinical benefit in patients with BMs at BL - Longer systemic PFS (HR 0.30) with T-DXd + P versus THP - Deeper systemic and CNS responses with T-DXd + P versus THP (systemic cORR: 83.9% vs 70.0%, respectively), with CNS-cORR ~2-fold higher with T-DXd + P versus THP (CNS-cORR: 51.6% vs 26.7%) - More durable systemic responses with T-DXd + P versus THP (median DOR: 35.1 vs 10.5 mo) These findings further strengthen the body of evidence which supports the CNS activity of T-DXd in 1L HER2+ a/mBC, building on the efficacy observed in later lines of therapy from DESTINY-Breast12 and pooled analyses of DESTINY-Breast01/02/03 T-DXd + P demonstrated substantial and durable systemic and intracranial disease control versus THP, supporting its use as 1L therapy in HER2+ a/mBC Cristina Saura - ESMO Congress, Madrid 2026 [Slide 2 - Systemic cORR, CNS-cORR, and DORs] Responders with BICR-assessed BMs at BL Systemic cORR: T-DXd + P (n=31) 83.9% (95% CI 66.3-94.5) [CR 9.7, PR 74.2]; THP (n=30) 70.0% (50.6-85.3) [PR 70.0]; delta 13.9% CNS-cORR: T-DXd + P 51.6% (33.1-69.8) [CR 35.5, PR 16.1]; THP 26.7% (12.3-45.9) [CR 23.3, PR 3.3]; delta 24.9% Response duration, T-DXd + P (n=31) vs THP (n=30): Patients with objective response, n (%): 26 (83.9) vs 21 (70.0) Median DOR, mo (95% CI): 35.1 (17.1-NE) vs 10.5 (6.7-30.1) Patients with objective CNS response, n (%): 16 (51.6) vs 8 (26.7) Median CNS-DOR, mo (95% CI): NE (14.3-NE) vs 18.5 (8.3-NE) Slide conclusion: In patients with BICR-confirmed BMs at BL, T-DXd + P demonstrated deeper and more durable systemic responses versus THP; CNS-cORR was ~2-fold higher (51.6% vs 26.7%), and CNS-CR rates were 35.5% versus 23.3%, respectively. Footnote: Responses by BICR. Data cutoff February 26, 2025 (median [range] follow-up 23.6 mo [2.8-41.4]). Results should be interpreted with caution due to the low number of patients in the subgroup. Cristina Saura - ESMO Congress, Madrid 2026 [Slide 3 - Baseline demographics and disease characteristics] Patients with BICR-confirmed BMs at BL: T-DXd + P (n=31) | THP (n=30); ITT population: T-DXd + P (n=383) | THP (n=387) Age, median (range), years: 56 (27-79) | 54 (26-71) | 54 (27-85) | 54 (20-81) Geographical region - Asia: 17 (54.8) | 11 (36.7) | 188 (49.1) | 191 (49.4) Western Europe and North America: 5 (16.1) | 5 (16.7) | 87 (22.7) | 78 (20.2) Other geographic regions: 9 (29.0) | 14 (46.7) | 108 (28.2) | 118 (30.5) ECOG 0 / 1: 20 (64.5) / 11 (35.5) | 18 (60.0) / 12 (40.0) | 256 (66.8) / 127 (33.2) | 246 (63.6) / 141 (36.4) HER2 IHC 3+: 28 (90.3) | 24 (80.0) | 318 (83.0) | 315 (81.4) HER2 IHC <3 / ISH+: 3 (9.7) | 6 (20.0) | 62 (16.2) | 71 (18.3) HR status positive / negative: 16 (51.6) / 15 (48.4) | 14 (46.7) / 16 (53.3) | 207 (54.0) / 176 (46.0) | 209 (54.0) / 178 (46.0) De novo disease at diagnosis: 11 (35.5) | 7 (23.3) | 200 (52.2) | 200 (51.7) PIK3CAm detected: NA | NA | 116 (30.3) | 121 (31.3) Visceral metastases: 30 (96.8) | 28 (93.3) | 281 (73.4) | 268 (69.3) Prior radiotherapy to the brain: 7 (22.6) | 6 (20.0) | NA | NA Slide conclusion: Baseline demographics and disease characteristics of patients with BMs at BL were generally consistent with the ITT population, although rates of de novo disease were higher in the T-DXd + P arm versus the THP arm in the BM subgroup. Data cutoff: February 26, 2025 (median [range] follow-up 23.6 mo [2.8-41.4]) Cristina Saura - ESMO Congress, Madrid 2026 [Slide 4 - Exploratory efficacy analysis] ITT population (n=770; T-DXd + P and THP arms only - the T-DXd + placebo arm remains blinded until the final PFS analysis) Patient population: BICR-assessed BMs at BL, which must be clinically inactive OR treated and asymptomatic, requiring no further treatment with corticosteroids or anticonvulsants (>=2 weeks between the end of whole brain radiotherapy and trial enrolment); >=1 follow-up brain scan after BL Patients with BICR-assessed BMs at BL (n=61): T-DXd + P (n=31); THP (n=30) Exploratory outcomes by BICR (endpoints not prespecified in the clinical study protocol): systemic PFS, CNS-PFS; systemic cORR, CNS-cORR; DOR, CNS-DOR Data cutoff: February 26, 2025 Footnote: A total of 47 patients (T-DXd + P, n=25; THP, n=22) had INV-assessed BMs at BL before retrospective BICR assessment at EoT. Retrospective BICR assessment confirmed a total of 61 patients with BMs at BL: 32 patients had BMs at BL as assessed both by BICR and INV (16 in each arm), while 29 patients had BMs at BL as assessed by BICR but not by INV (T-DXd + P, n=15; THP, n=14). Cristina Saura - ESMO Congress, Madrid 2026
Paolo Tarantino (@PTarantinoMD)
Paolo Tarantino @PTarantinoMD
DESTINY-Breast09 · ESMO 2026 brain-metastases analysis (exploratory)
Oct 26, 2026 · ESMO 2026
View on X ↗
Doubling in intracranial ORR (51 vs 26%) and dramatic improvement in intracranial PFS with T-DXd/P vs THP in 1L HER2+ mBC. The DB09 regimen is the clear SoC for patients with brain metastases at metastatic diagnosis. #ESMO26 #ESMOAmbassadors https://t.co/i7NAbeJFk1
Kaplan–Meier slide (3 of 4) in numbers · BICR, n=61, exploratory · Saura, ESMO 2026 presentation slides; BICR; data cutoff 26-Feb-2025
EndpointT-DXd + P (n=31)THP (n=30)HR (95% CI)
Median systemic PFS36.5 mo (19.1–NE)11.1 mo (7.5–15.4)0.30 (0.14–0.60)
12-month systemic PFS86.5%39.4%—
Median CNS-PFSNE (19.1–NE)9.7 mo (4.2–19.2)0.26 (0.11–0.57)
12-month CNS-PFS88.9%42.5%—
[Slide 1 - DESTINY-Breast09 study design] Randomized, multicenter, Phase III trial (NCT04784715) Brain MRI/CT imaging schedule: All patients at BL; only patients with INV-assessed BMs at BL were mandated regular on-treatment brain MRI/CT imaging; all patients at EoT Patient population - key eligibility criteria: HER2+ a/mBC; asymptomatic/inactive BMs allowed; DFI >6 mo from last chemotherapy or HER2-targeted therapy in neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting Prior lines of therapy: one prior line of ET for mBC permitted; no other prior systemic treatment for a/mBC Stratification factors: de novo vs recurrent disease; HR+ or HR-; PIK3CAm (detected vs non-detected) R 1:1:1 - T-DXd + placebo (n=387, blinded until final PFS analysis); T-DXd + P (n=383); THP: taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) + trastuzumab + P (n=387) Primary endpoint: PFS (BICR per RECIST 1.1). Key secondary endpoint: OS. Other secondary endpoints: PFS (INV), ORR (BICR/INV), DOR (BICR/INV), PFS2 (INV), safety/tolerability Exploratory efficacy analysis: all brain MRI/CT scans were assessed retrospectively for BMs at BL by BICR after EoT; systemic and CNS responses were assessed by BICR Cristina Saura - ESMO Congress, Madrid 2026 [Slide 2 - Exploratory efficacy analysis] ITT population (n=770; T-DXd + P and THP arms only - the T-DXd + placebo arm remains blinded until the final PFS analysis) Patient population: BICR-assessed BMs at BL, which must be clinically inactive OR treated and asymptomatic, requiring no further treatment with corticosteroids or anticonvulsants (>=2 weeks between the end of whole brain radiotherapy and trial enrolment); >=1 follow-up brain scan after BL Patients with BICR-assessed BMs at BL (n=61): T-DXd + P (n=31); THP (n=30) Exploratory outcomes by BICR (endpoints not prespecified in the clinical study protocol): systemic PFS, CNS-PFS; systemic cORR, CNS-cORR; DOR, CNS-DOR Data cutoff: February 26, 2025 Footnote: A total of 47 patients (T-DXd + P, n=25; THP, n=22) had INV-assessed BMs at BL before retrospective BICR assessment at EoT. Retrospective BICR assessment confirmed a total of 61 patients with BMs at BL: 32 patients had BMs at BL as assessed both by BICR and INV (16 in each arm), while 29 patients had BMs at BL as assessed by BICR but not by INV (T-DXd + P, n=15; THP, n=14). Cristina Saura - ESMO Congress, Madrid 2026 [Slide 3 - Systemic PFS and CNS-PFS in patients with BMs at BL (BMs at BL assessed by BICR)] Kaplan-Meier curves; the figures are in the table above this panel (raw curve-axis OCR suppressed). Slide conclusion: Patients with BMs at BL in the T-DXd + P arm had substantially longer systemic PFS and CNS-PFS than those in the THP arm. Footnote: Responses by BICR. Data cutoff February 26, 2025 (median [range] follow-up 23.6 mo [2.8-41.4]). Results should be interpreted with caution due to the low number of patients in the subgroup. Due to the low number of events recorded, PFS could not be calculated for the 32 patients with BMs at BL assessed by both BICR and INV. Cristina Saura - ESMO Congress, Madrid 2026 [Slide 4 - Systemic cORR, CNS-cORR, and DORs] Responders with BICR-assessed BMs at BL Systemic cORR: T-DXd + P (n=31) 83.9% (95% CI 66.3-94.5) [CR 9.7, PR 74.2]; THP (n=30) 70.0% (50.6-85.3) [PR 70.0]; delta 13.9% CNS-cORR: T-DXd + P 51.6% (33.1-69.8) [CR 35.5, PR 16.1]; THP 26.7% (12.3-45.9) [CR 23.3, PR 3.3]; delta 24.9% Response duration, T-DXd + P (n=31) vs THP (n=30): Patients with objective response, n (%): 26 (83.9) vs 21 (70.0) Median DOR, mo (95% CI): 35.1 (17.1-NE) vs 10.5 (6.7-30.1) Patients with objective CNS response, n (%): 16 (51.6) vs 8 (26.7) Median CNS-DOR, mo (95% CI): NE (14.3-NE) vs 18.5 (8.3-NE) Slide conclusion: In patients with BICR-confirmed BMs at BL, T-DXd + P demonstrated deeper and more durable systemic responses versus THP; CNS-cORR was ~2-fold higher (51.6% vs 26.7%), and CNS-CR rates were 35.5% versus 23.3%, respectively. Footnote: Responses by BICR. Data cutoff February 26, 2025 (median [range] follow-up 23.6 mo [2.8-41.4]). Results should be interpreted with caution due to the low number of patients in the subgroup. Cristina Saura - ESMO Congress, Madrid 2026
Dr Amol Akhade (@SuyogCancer)
Dr Amol Akhade @SuyogCancer
DESTINY-Breast09 · ESMO 2026 slides
Oct 24, 2026 · ESMO 2026
View on X ↗
Nice discussion by Dr Rita Nanda . Clear message .🙂👍@esmo #ESMO2026 https://t.co/uyXCvGi49z
[Slide 1] 08:30 - 10:00 Proffered paper 2: Breast cancer, early and advanced stage CHAIRS: SARA HURVITZ, SEOCK-AH IM Evolving Management of HER2-Positive MBC Frontline Treatment • DESTINY-Breast09: T-DXd + P Maintenance • PATINA (HR+): palbociclib + H +/- P + ET • HER2CLIMB-05: tucatinib + HP [KM: Progression-free Survival — Trastuzumab deruxtecan + pertuzumab vs THP] No. of Patients / Median Progression-free Survival (95% CI), mo: Trastuzumab Deruxtecan + Pertuzumab 383, 40.7 (36.5–NC); THP 387, 26.9 (21.8–NC) Hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.56 (95% CI, 0.44–0.71) P<0.00001 (prespecified P-value boundary for superiority, 0.00043) [KM: TUC + TRAS + PERT vs PBO + TRAS + PERT — small table: Events 141 | 191; Median (months) (95% CI) 24.9 (21.3 to –) | 16.3 (12.6 to 18.7); HR (95% CI) two-sided P value 0.641 (0.514 to 0.799); <.0001 — partially legible] [KM: Progression-free Survival — Palbociclib + HER2 + ET vs HER2 + ET] No. of Events/Total No. of Patients / Median PFS (95% CI), mo: Palbociclib + HER2 + ET 127/261, 44.3 (32.4–56.8); HER2 + ET 135/257, 29.1 (23.3–38.6) Hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.59–0.96) Two-sided unstratified P=0.02 by log-rank test Rita Nanda, MD Tolaney et al, NEJM 2026; Metzger et al, NEJM 2026; Dieras et al, JCO 2026 Rita Nanda — Invited Discussant LBA26, LBA96 and LBA15 ALICANTE AUDITORIUM - HALL 6 [Slide 2] 08:30 - 10:00 Proffered paper 2: Breast cancer, early and advanced stage CHAIRS: SARA HURVITZ, SEOCK-AH IM TROPION-Breast02 Brain Metastases Data: The Caveats • Small, exploratory analysis, not stratified (n=61) • Imbalances between arms • Median age 62 vs 55 yrs, prior CNS tx 46 vs 58% • DFI < 12 mos 17 vs 31% (ICC more aggressive biology) • Only pts with asymptomatic brain mets were eligible • Cannot extrapolate to symptomatic disease or leptomeningeal metastases • Brain imaging was only mandatory for pts with mets at baseline • Can dato-DXd delay/prevent new brain metastases→early-stage setting • Nonetheless, impressive intracranial RR and PFS with dato-DXd Rita Nanda, MD Rita Nanda — Invited Discussant LBA26, LBA96 and LBA15 ALICANTE AUDITORIUM - HALL 6 [Slide 3] 08:30 - 10:00 Proffered paper 2: Breast cancer, early and advanced stage CHAIRS: SARA HURVITZ, SEOCK-AH IM POP-DURVA: Results and Relevance Clinically Negative Study • Did not meet primary endpoint (pCR 1.4%) • Only 2 doses over 4-week period • Enrichment for TIL was minimal (>5%); median level across 10% Biologically rich dataset→inform future studies • "Clean" dataset—most studies of de-escalation also include chemo/ADC • Immune activation clearly demonstrated—increase in sTILs, PD-L1, IFN-gamma, inflamed phenotype • Change in TIL, but not baseline TIL, correlated with tumor response Relevance • Predictive biomarker of IO benefit may be dynamic, and in vivo tumor response may better guide tx selection • Future of de-escalation strategies→response-adapted designs Rita Nanda, MD Rita Nanda — Invited Discussant LBA26, LBA96 and LBA15 ALICANTE AUDITORIUM - HALL 6

More slides on this page

Official trial slides and relevant visuals shared by KOLs. Click any image to expand.

Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino @PTarantinoMD
DESTINY-Breast09 Data
38.7K impressions · 253 likes · Apr 21, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] ADCs will move to earlier lines (including neo/adjuvant) Neoadjuvant Adjuvant 1L cytotoxic, pre-ChT DESTINY-Breast11 DESTINY-Breast05 POSITIVE DESTINY-Breast09 T-DXd vs T-DXd/THP vs AC-THP T-DXd vs T-DM1 T-DXd +/- pertuzumab vs THP TROPION-Breast04 SURVIVE-HERoes TROPION-Breast02 Dato-DXd/Durva vs KN522 regimen T-DXd vs TPC Dato-DXd vs.TPC TROPION-Breast03 TROPION-Breast05 Dato-DXd +-/Durvavs. TPC Dato-DXd/Durva vs. chemo/pembro In the probable future, we will ASCENT-05/OptimICE-RD ASCENT-03 SG/pembro vs pembro +/- cape SG vs. TPC likely have more Topo1 ADCs approved in earlier indications NCT06393374 POSITIVE ASCENT-04 (curative setting, 1L setting) Sac-TMT/ pembro vs TPC SG/pembro vs. TPC/pembro SASCIA ASCENT-07 SG vs TPC SG vs. TPC HER2+ DYNASTY-Breast02 TNBC DB-1303 vs. TPC @PTarantinoMD HR+/HER2- TroFuse-010 Sac-TMT + pembro vs TPC
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade @SuyogCancer
DESTINY-Breast09 Data
8.3K impressions · 35 likes · Jun 02, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Summary: T-DXd + P is a highly effective regimen in the 1L setting Optimal sequencing remains unclear Potential selection factors for 1L use of T-DXd + P: Clinical: brain metastases, significant visceral disease, recent progression after (neo)adjuvant therapy Biological: molecular markers of early progression (eg PIK3CAm), HER2 drivers (eg HER2DX low/med ERBB2 score), dynamic markers (eg lack of early drop in ctDNA) - need to be further validated Patient preference Could we achieve the same benefit with induction T-DXd + P till best response followed by maintenance HP? -- paucity of data Benefit of ET in maintenance phase in ER+ (PATINA) Ongoing trials evaluating improving outcome with maintenance therapy - HER2CLIMB-05 (Tucatinib): INAVO122 (Inavolisib for PIK3CAm) 2025 ASCO #ASCO25 PRESENTED Claudine Isaacs MD FRCPC ASCO 2025 ASCO ANNUAL MEETING
Dana-Farbers Breast Oncology Center
DESTINY-Breast09 Data
7.5K impressions · 56 likes · Jun 02, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Time without progression Duration of response Response to treatment The timepoint after randomization at which The length of time that at least half the The percentage of participants who had at least half of the participants had cancer people continued to respond to a 30% decrease in size of tumors (known as objective progression or died (known as median treatment (known as median duration response rate) was: progression-free survival) was: of response) was: 3 years ~9 in 10 (85%) of those in the T-DXd + pertuzumab arm manan T-DXd + 41 months 39 26 pertuzumab ~8 in 10 (79%) of those in the THP arm months months for people given for people given T-DXd + pertuzumab THP 58 (15.1%) people given T-DXd + pertuzumab and THP 27 months 33 (8.5%) people given THP had all signs of their cancer disappear (known as complete response) Safety What's next? Side effects possibly related to treatment that were experienced by at least 2 in 5 (40%) people in The study will continue to explore if T-DXd either treatment arm were: alone is superior to THP (once there is T-DXd + pertuzumab THP OF sufficient follow up to allow for this preplanned analysis) while also understanding if there is a further benefit of 71% Nausea 29% 46 (12%) people given T-DXd + pertuzumab with longer follow up T-DXd + pertuzumab 56% Diarrhea 54% and 4 (1%) people given How do the results of the THP developed interstitial 49% Neutropenia lung disease DESTINY-Breast09 study 45% (reduced white blood cells) (inflammation and/or help to improve the treatment scarring of the lungs); of cancer? 48% Fatigue 35% most cases were mild/moderate DESTINY-Breast09 potentially 46% Alopecia 50% establishes T-DXd with pertuzumab (hair loss) 2 (0.5%) people given as an effective new first-line treatment T-DXd + pertuzumab 42% Vomiting 13% died as a result option for people with HER2-positive metastatic/advanced breast cancer Where can I access more information? DESTINY-Breast09 ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04784715 This summary is based on an oral presentation by Professor Sara M Tolaney at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting (Presentation ID LBA1008). This summary, and the results of this study, have not yet been peer reviewed. The authors would like to thank the patients and their families who participated in the DESTINY-Breast09 study, and the investigators, co-investigators, and study staff. Date of summary: May 2025. The DESTINY-Breast09 study was sponsored by AstraZeneca. In March 2019, AstraZeneca entered into a global and commercialization collaboration agreement with Daiichi Sankyo deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201). This plain language summary was prepared --- [Slide 2] What is the purpose of the DESTINY-Breast09 study? DESTINY Breast09 Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a recommended treatment for DESTINY-Breast09 is a clinical study of adults people whose breast cancer has a high level of the human epidermal who were given T-DXd alone, T-DXd + pertuzumab, growth factor receptor 2 protein (known as 'HER2-positive') and if the or THP as the first treatment for their HER2-positive cancer cells cannot be completely removed with surgery and have spread metastatic/advanced breast cancer. from where they started (known as metastatic/advanced cancer). T-DXd can currently only be given to these people if their breast cancer The study was designed to find out how well T-DXd has worsened (known as disease progression) while receiving the first worked with or without pertuzumab in delaying disease recommended treatment, which is a combination of a chemotherapy drug progression as compared with THP. The study also and two HER2-targeting drugs, known as THP (taxane + trastuzumab assessed the side effects participants experienced when + pertuzumab). receiving these treatments. What did the study show? This planned analysis of DESTINY-Breast09 showed that participants in the T-DXd + pertuzumab arm lived longer without their disease growing, spreading, or getting worse compared with participants in the THP (taxane + trastuzumab + pertuzumab) arm. Side effects of the treatments were manageable and as expected based on results of previous studies. How was the DESTINY-Breast09 study carried out? Start of study People included in the study had: 383 people were randomly assigned to Metastatic/advanced breast cancer T-DXd + pertuzumab 2 drugs Start of HER2+ HER2-positive tumors treatment* 387 people were randomly assigned to eeen No prior chemotherapy or HER2-targeted THP (taxane + trastuzumab + pertuzumab) therapy for metastatic/advanced breast cancer taxane options = paclitaxel or docetaxel 3 drugs One prior endocrine-based therapy for *At the time of this first analysis, the T-DXd alone arm remained blinded; metastatic/advanced breast cancer (optional) this will be evaluated at a subsequent analysis
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade @SuyogCancer
DESTINY-Breast09 Data
2.7K impressions · 20 likes · Jun 02, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] DESTINY-Breast09 Conclusions T-DXd + P demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit by BICR vs THP, which was consistently observed across subgroups PFS by BICR - Hazard ratio of 0.56 vs THP (P<0.00001) - Median PFS was 40.7 months (T-DXd + P) vs 26.9 months (THP) 44% Median DOR of >3 years with T-DXd + P. with CRs in 15.1% (T-DXd + P) Reduction in risk of vs 8.5% (THP) disease progression Early os data suggest a positive trend favoring T-DXd + P. or death with with a supportive hazard ratio of 0.60 for PFS2 T-DXd + P vs THP T-DXd + P safety data were consistent with known profiles of individual treatments T-DXd + P demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit vs THP and may represent a new first-line standard of care for patients with HER2+ a/mBC been DICR blended DOR duction of response human updermal growth factor incapital 3 positive os perfurume ASCO Tolaney MPH 2025 #ASCO25 ASCO MEETING KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER 2025 ASCO ANNUAL MEETING
Jame Abraham, MD, FACP
Jame Abraham, MD, FACP @jamecancerdoc
DESTINY-Breast09 Data
1.7K impressions · 19 likes · Apr 21, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Enhertu plus pertuzumab demonstrated highly statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival US. THP as 1st-line therapy for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer --- [Slide 2] DESTINY-Breast09 Phase III trial of AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo's Enhertu is the first trial in more than a decade to demonstrate superior efficacy across a broad HER2-positive metastatic patient population versus current 1st-line standard of care Positive high-level results from a planned interim analysis of the DESTINY-Breast09 Phase III trial showed Enhertu (trastuzumab deruxtecan) in combination with pertuzumab demonstrated a highly statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) compared to a taxane, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (THP) as a 1st-line treatment for patients with HER2- positive metastatic breast cancer. The PFS improvement was seen across all pre- specified patient subgroups with Enhertu in combination with pertuzumab. The key secondary endpoint of overall survival (OS) was not mature at the time of this planned interim analysis; however, interim os data showed an early trend favouring the Enhertu combination compared with THP. The second arm assessing Enhertu monotherapy versus THP remains blinded to patients and investigators and will continue to the final PFS analysis. HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is an aggressive disease driven by overexpression or amplification of HER2 affecting 15-20% of patients with metastatic breast cancer. 1 While HER2-targeted therapies have improved outcomes, prognosis remains poor, with most patients experiencing disease progression within two years of 1st-line treatment with THP, which has are for more
Guilherme Nader Marta
Guilherme Nader Marta @GuiNaderMarta
DESTINY-Breast09 Data
1.4K impressions · 18 likes · Jun 02, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] DESTINY-Breast09 Conclusions T-DXd + P demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit by BICR vs THP, which was consistently observed across subgroups PFS by BICR - Hazard ratio of 0.56 vs THP (P<0.00001) - Median PFS was 40.7 months (T-DXd + P) VS 26,9 months (THP) 44% Median DOR of >3 years with T-DXd + P, with CRs in 15.1% (T-DXd + P) Reduction in risk of vs 8.5% (THP) disease progression Early os data suggest a positive trend favoring T-DXd + P, or death with with a supportive hazard ratio of 0.60 for PFS2 T-DXd + P vs THP T-DXd + P safety data were consistent with known profiles of individual treatments T-DXd + P demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit vs THP and may represent a new first-line standard of care for patients with HER2+ a/mBC a/mBC, advanced/molastatic breast cancer; BICR, blinded independent central review CR complete response DOR duration of response HER2 human epidermal growth factor reception 2-positive, OS, overall survival P. portuzumab PFS, progression free survival PFS2, second progression-free survival, T-DXd, trashizumab deruxtecan, THP, laxane . trastuzumeb . partzzumab 2025 ASCO PRESENTED OT Sara M Tolaney, MD, MPH ASCO MERICAN SOCIETY #ASCO26 CLINICAL ONCOLO ANNUAL MEETING Preservation . property of the author and ASCO KHCWLEDGE CONQUERS CANC
Dr Sarah Sammons
Dr Sarah Sammons @drsarahsam
DESTINY-Breast09 Data
1.1K impressions · 34 likes · Jun 02, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] DESTINY-Breast09 DESTINY-Breast09 study design A randomized, multicenter, open-label,* Phase 3 study (NCT04784715) Eligibility criteria Endpoints n=387 HER2+ a/mBC T-DXd + placebo Primary PFS (BICR) Asymptomatic/inactive brain mets allowed Key secondary DFI >6 mo from last chemotherapy or R n=383 os HER2-targeted therapy in neoadjuvant/ adjuvant setting 1:1:1 T-DXd + pertuzumab Secondary One prior line of ET for mBC permitted PFS (INV) No other prior systemic treatment THP ORR (BICR/INV) n=387 for mBC Taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) DOR (BICR/INV) trastuzumabl + pertuzumabl PFS2 (INV) Stratification factors Safety and tolerability De-novo vs recurrent mBC HR+ or HR- If T-DXd was discontinued due to AEs (except Grade >2 ILD), patients could switch to trastuzumab** PIK3CAm (detected vs non-detected) Concurrent use of ET (AI or tamoxifen) was allowed for those with HR+ disease after six cycles of T-DXd or discontinuation of taxane in THP arm "Open THP arm Double blinded for pertuzumeb experimental arms THER2 targeted therapy chemotherapy 4 mgkg Q3W 1840 mg loading dose then 420 mg Q3W pacitaxel 80 mg/m? ow or 175 mg/m2 Q3W or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Q3W of SDX cycles or until lg loading dose then dose AE DEL disease free interval DOR duration of response ET. endocrine therapy HER2 human epidemal growth factor mets metastases mo months ORR objective response rate OS overall survival PFS progression froo survival Q3W. every 3 weeks QW. once every week R randomization T-DXd. trastuzumab deruxlecan NCT04784715 Updated Mar 6 2025 Available from helps 2025) 2025 ASCO #ASCO25 Sara M Tolaney MD MPH ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY or CLINICAL ONCOLDON ANNUAL MEETING . KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- [Slide 2] DESTINY-Brea PFS (BICR): primary endpoint T-DXd + P THP 93.0% (n=383) (n=387) 1.0 - (95% CI 89.9 95.2) 85.9% 40.7* 26.9 Median, mo (95% CI) (95% CI 81.9. 89.1) (36.5, NC) (21.8, NC 0.8 70.1% Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.56 (0.44, 0.71) 87.8% (95% CI 64.8, 74.8) P-value <0.00001 (95% CI 84.0. 90.7) 0.6 72.4% (95% CI 67.4 76.8) + 52.1% 0.4 (95% CI 46.4, 57.5) 0.2 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Time from randomization (months) No. at risk T-DXd 383 358 355 321 293 275 242 208 175 153 82 49 21 10 3 0 THP 387 353 312 273 241 215 187 160 124 106 51 32 12 5 1 0 Statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS benefit with T-DXd + P (median A 13.8 mo) "Median PFS estimate for T-DXd P is likely to change at updated analysis 'stratified log rank test A P value of <0.00043 was required for interim analysis superiority BICR blinded independent central review CI confidence interval mo months (mJPFS (median) progression tree survival NG, not calculable T DXd trastuzumati deruxtecan THP taxane . trastuzumat . partuzumab 2025 ASCO Pid SENTED #ASCO25 Sara M Tolaney MD. MPH ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY CUNICAL ONCOLD ANNUAL MEETING Presentation . KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANC --- [Slide 3] DESTINY-Breast09 Patient disposition Blinded until final PFS analysis Screened (N=1703) T-DXd + placebo (n=387) , Randomized 1:1:1 (N=1157) T-DXd + P (n=383) THP (n=387) Treated (n=380; 99.2%) Treated (n=383; 99.0%) Discontinuation reasons, %* Discontinued T-DXd (59.7%)* Discontinued taxane (96.3%)* Discontinued trastuzumab (66.6%)* PD 21.3 18.8 52.5 AE 20.8 25.8 3.4 Patient decision 11.1 7.3 5.7 Protocol deviation 0.3 0.3 0.3 Lost to follow up - 0.5 0.5 Other 2.4 43,6 3.7 Death 3.9 - 0.5 In the T-DXd + P arm, 8.7% (n=33/380) of patients switched to trastuzumab (+ P) after discontinuation of T-DXd for reasons other than PD Concurrent ET use was 13.5% (T-DXd + P) vs 38.3% (THP) among patients with HR+ disease" At DCO, 39.6% (n=302) of patients remained on any treatment: 45.8% (n=174) T-DXd + P vs 33.4% (n=128) THP* Median duration of follow up: 29.2 months Pertuzumab could not be continued as a single agent without T DX4 or trastuzumab THP was administered as per institutional standards "Percentages are based on the patients who started treatment 154 2% of patients discontinued all treatments 964 0% (n=250) of patients were assigned to docetaxol and 34 4% (n=133) were assigned to pacificate) 15-50% of patients completed the minimum of Six cycles of texase per protocol patients with HR+ disease could receive ET after Six cycles of T-DXd of discontinuation of tuxune AE adverse event DCD data outoff ET endocrine therapy HR+ hormone receptor-positive P. pertuzumab PD progressive disease; PFS progression from survival T DXd trastuzumati denutecan THP taxane trastuzumab pertuzumati 2025 ASCO PRE SENTED #ASCO25 Sara M Tolaney MD. MPH ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY or CUNICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation . property of the author and A800 Permission required to reuse contact permissions@asco.or KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER
Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD
Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD @to_be_elizabeth
DESTINY-Breast09 Data
750 impressions · 12 likes · Jun 02, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] DESTINY-Breast09 Overall safety summary Safety analysis set* Median total treatment duration: T-DXd + P: 21.7 mo (range 0.3-44.5) T-DXd + P THP - T-DXd: 20.0 mos (n=381) (n=382) THP: 16.9 mo (range (0.7-41.7) Total exposure, patient years 659,7 564.0 Median treatment duration for taxanes: Any TEAE, n (%) 380 (99.7) 378 (99.0) Docetaxel: 5.5 mo (range (0.7-37.4) Possibly treatment-related TEAEs (investigator assessed), n (%) 373 (97.9) 369 (96.6) Paclitaxel: 4.4 mo (range 0.2-30.7) Grade >3 209 (54.9) 200 (52.4) Median number of cycles for taxanes: Serious TEAEs, n (%) 103 (27.0) 96 (25.1) Docetaxel: 8 (range 1-51) TEAEs associated with any treatment discontinuation, n (%) 79 (20.7) 108 (28.3) Paclitaxel: 6 (range 1-42) TEAEs associated with any dose interruptions, n (%) 262 (68.8) 187 (49.0) TEAEs associated with any dose reductions, n (%) 175 (45.9) 76 (19.9) TEAEs with outcome of death, n (%) 13 (3.4) 3 (0.8) Possibly treatment related (investigator assessed) 5 (1.3) 1 (0.3) "Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment (at least one study drug); 'dose modifications or discontinuations relate to any component of each arm. Itreatment-related TEAEs with outcome of death were pneumonitis (n=1), sepsis (n=1), septic shock (n=1), febrile neutropenia (n=1), and dyspnea (n=1) in the T-DXd P arm, and anemia (n=1) in the THP arm excludes data from the 8.7% (33/380) of treated patients who received trastuzumab after discontinuing T-DXd due to TEAEs mo months P. pertuzumab; T-DXd. trastuzumab deruxtecan; TEAE treatment-emergent adverse event THP, taxane + trastuzumab . pertuzumab 2025 ASCO PRE SENTED BY: Sara M Tolaney, MD. MPH ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF #ASCO25 CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO Permission required for reuse contact permissions@asco. KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER

DESTINY-Breast09 Top Tweets

Top 10 by impressions - click to view on X

Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino@PTarantinoMD

ADCs are rapidly moving to earlier line treatment for breast cancer. Will likely reach the (neo)adjuvant setting soon. Here’s a recap of key ADC phase 3 trials expected to shape practice in the...

👁 38.7K ♡ 253 ↻ 103 Apr 21, 2025
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

&lt; 2 wks to #ASCO25, here is a📝 of 🔑abstracts for general onc that could guide our SoC! - #ATOMIC - #MATTERHORN -...

👁 37.9K ♡ 256 ↻ 83 May 17, 2025
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade@SuyogCancer

Another money 💰 slide from #asco25 @ASCO . Treatment algorithm for HR +/ HER 2 -ve mBC @OncoAlert @medicalwatchBC

👁 33.6K ♡ 262 ↻ 83 Jun 06, 2025
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino@PTarantinoMD

The curves everybody’s been waiting for. First line T-DXd + pertuzumab significantly prolonged PFS over THP for HER2+ MBC (40.7 vs 26.9 months, HR 0.56, p&lt;0.001), doubled the rate of...

👁 30.8K ♡ 427 ↻ 118 Jun 02, 2025
Tatiana Prowell, MD
Tatiana Prowell, MD@tmprowell

#OncTwitter #regulatory #bcsm 📣 #FDA has approved trastuzumab deruxtecan + pertuzumab for 1st-line tx of adults w/ HER2+...

👁 22.9K ♡ 32 ↻ 15 Dec 15, 2025
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino@PTarantinoMD

When you have a packed @ASCO room at 7.30 am, you know that a change in practice is coming. #DESTINYBreast09 @stolaney1 #ASCO25 3 minutes to go

👁 21.8K ♡ 169 ↻ 16 Jun 02, 2025
OncoAlert
OncoAlert@OncoAlert

The #ASCO25 #OncoAlertTOP10 Abstracts in #BreastCancer These are some of our picks of TOP abstracts we look forward to be presented at the upcoming...

👁 19.8K ♡ 92 ↻ 48 May 23, 2025
Dr Sarah Sammons
Dr Sarah Sammons@drsarahsam

Destiny-Breast-09 will likely establish a new first-line therapy for HER2+ MBC. Here are my considerations going into #ASCO25 Patient population considerations: 1) De novo patients...

👁 15.3K ♡ 190 ↻ 58 May 29, 2025
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO@ErikaHamilton9

T-DXd + pertuzumab approved for 1st L HER-2+ #bcsm! Now for the debates around induction length, maintenance, re-induction etc. My opinion: I&#x27;ll induce to...

👁 15.1K ♡ 83 ↻ 29 Dec 15, 2025
Dr Sarah Sammons
Dr Sarah Sammons@drsarahsam

Recent rationale in metastatic breast cancer for bringing ADCs into the 1st line has quoted very high 1st line attrition rates of patients not making it to second line. This study is likely more...

👁 14.4K ♡ 68 ↻ 17 Jun 06, 2025

About the DESTINY-Breast09 Trial

DESTINY-Breast09 is a clinical trial evaluating Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) + pertuzumab in 1L HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo / AstraZeneca. KOL discussion spans multiple conferences with 106 tracked posts from 54 oncology opinion leaders generating 504.4K total impressions.

FDA Approval

FDA APPROVED Enhertu (fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki) + Perjeta (pertuzumab) — First-line treatment of adults with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or ISH+) breast cancer

On December 15, 2025, the FDA approved fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (Enhertu) in combination with pertuzumab for 1L HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Approval based on DESTINY-Breast09 (NCT04784715) demonstrating PFS HR 0.56, median PFS 40.7 vs 26.9 months (p<0.0001). FDA also co-approved the PATHWAY anti-HER-2/neu (4B5) Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody as companion diagnostic.

Source: FDA (December 15, 2025)

Trial Methodology & Results

Study Design

Phase 3, randomized (1:1:1), three-arm, multicenter trial comparing T-DXd (5.4 mg/kg) plus pertuzumab versus taxane plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (THP) in treatment-naive HER2-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer.

Population

Adults with HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or ISH+) unresectable or metastatic breast cancer with no prior chemotherapy or HER2-targeted therapy for advanced disease. A single prior line of endocrine therapy was permitted.

Interventions

Fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (Enhertu) 5.4 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks plus pertuzumab versus taxane (docetaxel or paclitaxel) plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab (THP).

Primary Endpoints

Primary: progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Key secondary: overall survival (OS), confirmed objective response rate (ORR).

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

T-DXd plus pertuzumab demonstrated a 44% reduction in risk of disease progression or death versus THP. Median PFS was 40.7 months (95% CI: 36.5-NE) versus 26.9 months (95% CI: 21.8-NE) (HR 0.56; 95% CI: 0.44-0.71; p<0.0001).

PFS HR 0.56 — median 40.7 vs 26.9 months

Source

Overall Survival (OS)

OS data remain immature (16% maturity). Early numerical trend favors T-DXd plus pertuzumab (HR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.59-1.19).


Source

Safety & Tolerability

Adjudicated drug-related ILD/pneumonitis occurred in 12.1% of patients, including two fatal (Grade 5) events (0.5%). Neutropenia was common (78% all grades, 29% Grade 3/4). Nausea occurred in 75%. ILD was the leading cause of permanent discontinuation (6.6%).

ILD 12.1% including 2 fatal events

Source

Clinical Implications

DESTINY-Breast09 establishes T-DXd plus pertuzumab as a new first-line standard of care for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. FDA approved December 15, 2025. ILD risk and immature OS data remain areas of active debate.

ESMO 2026: Brain Metastases at Baseline (Exploratory Analysis, DCO 26-Feb-2025)

Cristina Saura presented an exploratory analysis at ESMO 2026 (Madrid, October 26, 2026) of patients with brain metastases at baseline. Brain MRI/CT scans were reviewed retrospectively by blinded independent central review (BICR) after end of treatment. The analysis included 61 patients with BICR-confirmed brain metastases at baseline that were clinically inactive, or treated and asymptomatic, and who had at least one follow-up brain scan: 31 in the T-DXd + pertuzumab arm and 30 in the THP arm. The T-DXd + placebo arm was not included; per the slides, it remains blinded until the final PFS analysis. Data cutoff February 26, 2025; median follow-up 23.6 months. Regular on-treatment brain imaging was required only for patients whose brain metastases were identified by investigators at baseline; 29 of the 61 patients in this analysis (15 vs 14) were identified only on the retrospective central review.

Endpoint (BICR)T-DXd + pertuzumab (n=31)THP (n=30)HR (95% CI)
CNS confirmed ORR (CNS-cORR)51.6% (16/31; 95% CI 33.1–69.8)26.7% (8/30; 95% CI 12.3–45.9)—
CNS complete response35.5%23.3%—
Median CNS duration of responseNE (95% CI 14.3–NE)18.5 mo (95% CI 8.3–NE)—
Systemic confirmed ORR83.9% (26/31; 95% CI 66.3–94.5)70.0% (21/30; 95% CI 50.6–85.3)—
Median systemic duration of response35.1 mo (95% CI 17.1–NE)10.5 mo (95% CI 6.7–30.1)—
Median systemic PFS (events)36.5 mo (95% CI 19.1–NE; 13 events)11.1 mo (95% CI 7.5–15.4; 22 events)0.30 (0.14–0.60)
12-month systemic PFS86.5%39.4%—
Median CNS-PFS (events)NE (95% CI 19.1–NE; 9 events)9.7 mo (95% CI 4.2–19.2; 17 events)0.26 (0.11–0.57)
12-month CNS-PFS88.9%42.5%—

The slides state that these endpoints were not prespecified in the protocol and that results should be interpreted with caution because of the small number of patients. No p-values were shown. De novo disease was more frequent in the T-DXd + pertuzumab arm of this subgroup (35.5% vs 23.3%). These results are separate from the trial's primary PFS result in all randomized patients (40.7 vs 26.9 months, HR 0.56; NEJM) and from overall survival, which remains immature. The FDA approval (December 15, 2025) covers first-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer; there is no separate brain-metastases indication.

Exploratory · CNS-cORR 51.6% vs 26.7% (BICR, n=61)

Source: Saura, ESMO 2026 presentation slides; BICR; data cutoff 26-Feb-2025 (slides as posted on X) · ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04784715

DESTINY-Breast09 FAQ

What is the DESTINY-Breast09 trial?

DESTINY-Breast09 is a global, randomized, open-label Phase 3 trial (NCT04784715) in previously untreated (first-line) HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer comparing trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, Enhertu) plus pertuzumab versus the standard taxane + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (THP) regimen.

Is first-line T-DXd + pertuzumab FDA approved?

Yes. On December 15, 2025 the FDA approved Enhertu in combination with pertuzumab (Perjeta) for the first-line treatment of adults with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or ISH+) breast cancer, based on DESTINY-Breast09. The PATHWAY (4B5) companion diagnostic was co-approved.

What were the DESTINY-Breast09 PFS results?

T-DXd plus pertuzumab reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 44% versus standard THP: median PFS 40.7 months versus 26.9 months (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.44-0.71; p<0.0001), with benefit regardless of hormone-receptor status.

Is overall survival data mature in DESTINY-Breast09?

No. Overall survival data remain immature (about 16% maturity), with an early numerical trend favoring T-DXd plus pertuzumab (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.59-1.19). Longer follow-up is needed.

What is the main safety concern in DESTINY-Breast09?

Interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis is the key monitored risk: adjudicated drug-related ILD occurred in 12.1% of patients, including two fatal (Grade 5) events (0.5%). ILD was the leading cause of permanent discontinuation; neutropenia and nausea were also common.

What did the DESTINY-Breast09 brain metastases analysis at ESMO 2026 show?

In an exploratory analysis presented by Cristina Saura at ESMO 2026, 61 patients had brain metastases at baseline confirmed by blinded independent central review (31 T-DXd + pertuzumab, 30 THP; data cutoff February 26, 2025). The CNS confirmed objective response rate was 51.6% vs 26.7%, median systemic PFS was 36.5 vs 11.1 months (HR 0.30), and 12-month CNS-PFS was 88.9% vs 42.5% (CNS-PFS HR 0.26). The subgroup is small and the endpoints were not prespecified, so the results are hypothesis-generating. They do not change the approved indication, which is first-line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

DESTINY-Breast09 in the News

Key KOL Sentiments - DESTINY-Breast09

DoctorSentimentComment
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
BOSTON, MA
● POSITIVE ADCs are rapidly moving to earlier line treatment for breast cancer. Will likely reach the (neo)adjuvant setting soon. Heres a recap of key ADC phase 3 trials expected to shape practice in the next
● POSITIVE No comments needed congrats super @stolaney1 from @DanaFarber and all involved in the #DB09 trial !!!! #ASCO25 @OncoAlert @ASCO @DFCI_BreastOnc https://t.co/SlmLlK7f4b
Sara Tolaney
@stolaney1
BOSTON, MA
● POSITIVE A lot is happening in breast cancer! ASCENT-04 reports improvement in PFS for sacituzumab + pembro vs TPC+pembro in 1L mTNBC, &amp; DESTINY-Breast09 reports improved PFS for TDXd+P vs THP in 1L metas
Dr Amol Akhade
@SuyogCancer
Mubai, INDIA
● POSITIVE Well balanced summary and take home message by discussant @ASCO @dr_yakupergun @stolaney1 #ASCO25 #Destinybreast09 https://t.co/lNXJ6tlBrG
● POSITIVE Excellent #ASCO25 infographic highlighting the results of the DESTINY-Breast09 study: Participants in the #TDXd + #Pertuzumab arm lived longer without their disease growing, spreading, or getting wor
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO
@ErikaHamilton9
NASHVILLE, TN
● POSITIVE TDXd + pertuzumab improves PFS in 1st line DB-09! #HER2 #bcsm @OncoAlert @OncBrothers https://t.co/vw08GRAvV4
Tom Powles
@tompowles1
● POSITIVE Two ADC/PD1 combinations show +ve efficacy in 1st line breast cancer. ASCENT-04: sacituzumab/pembro vs TPC/pembro in mTNBC = PFS &amp; DESTINY-B09 TDXD/Pembro vs THP in HER2+ PFS. Topo-1:TROP2/PD1
Elisa Agostinetto
@ElisaAgostinett
● POSITIVE As expected, DB-09 showed significant improvement in PFS with T-DXd in 1st line in combination with pertuzumab, thus likely representing a practice-changing study for HER2+ #breastcancer Looking f
@CParkMD
CORYDON, IN
● POSITIVE Congratulations to Dr. Sara Tolaney @stolaney1 @DanaFarber and the #DestinyBreast09 investigators for a TRANSFORMATIVE study for 1st line metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. #ASCO25 Really enjoyed ta
Yakup Ergün
@dr_yakupergun
Istanbul, Turkey
● POSITIVE Post #ASCO25 thoughts on the DESTINY-Breast09 trial: T-DXd + pertuzumab extended mPFS to 40.7 months in 1st-line HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (THP: 26.9 months, HR: 0.56). The absolute difference o
Anis Toumeh, MD
@AnisToumeh
● POSITIVE Long awaited, and expected results by most. Practice will likely change soon. #bcsm https://t.co/4Z20qoiEkP
Taro Yamanaka
@TaroY_oncology
● POSITIVE Big news for HER2+ MBC! DESTINY-Breast09 T-DXd + pertuzumab significantly improved PFS vs. THP in 1L setting. OS data still maturing, but early trends look promising. Detailed results to fo
● POSITIVE Another treatment option for our patients with HER2 positive MBC in the 1L setting. TDXD + P was better than THP in DB-09. Awaiting details on magnitude of benefit and safety at upcoming meeting. htt
Megan Kruse
@MeganKruseMD
● POSITIVE What a thought provoking and stimulating ASCO for the breast cancer community! Still processing it all and looking forward hearing what others think of SERENA-6, DB-09, ASCENT-04 and beyond. #ASCO25 #
● POSITIVE Additional analyses of DESTINY-Breast09 in key subgroups of interest Trastuzumab deruxtecan + pertuzumab vs taxane + trastuzumab + pertuzumab for patients with HER2+ advanced/metastatic BC T-DXd +
● POSITIVE @ErikaHamilton9 Great thoughts
● POSITIVE Practice changing interim results DESTINY-Breast09 evaluating 1st Line T-DXd + P vs THP in HER2+ MBC PFS 40.7 m vs 26.9 m! PFS2 not reached vs 36.5 m OS immature #ASCO2025 https://t.co/BzLzELxR2
● POSITIVE @DrSGraff Agree completely. Not everyone needs upfront T-DXd and the side effects of prolonged T-DXd are significant. A maintenance approach is critical. THP with maintenance tucatinib or palbociclib
Elisabetta Munzone
@elisabettasabet
● POSITIVE DESTINY-Breast09 is practice-changing, with 1L T-DXd+P showing 40.7m PFS vs 26.9m. But real-world fit? 31% d/c T-DXd early, only 10% got it 2L. Few pts with prev pertuzumab. Time to rethink duration
Oncology Brothers
@OncBrothers
ORCHARD PARK, NY
● NEUTRAL &lt; 2 wks to #ASCO25, here is a of abstracts for general onc that could guide our SoC! - #ATOMIC - #MATTERHORN - #SERENA6 - #ASCENT04 - #DestinyBreast09 - #IMforte &amp; #Dellphi304 - Updates: #C
Tatiana Prowell, MD
@tmprowell
BALTIMORE, MD
● NEUTRAL #OncTwitter #regulatory #bcsm #FDA has approved trastuzumab deruxtecan + pertuzumab for 1st-line tx of adults w/ HER2+ unresectable or #MetastaticBreastCancer based on DB-09 trial: 44% in ri
Dr Sarah Sammons
@drsarahsam
BOSTON, MA
● NEUTRAL Destiny-Breast-09 will likely establish a new first-line therapy for HER2+ MBC. Here are my considerations going into #ASCO25 Patient population considerations: 1) De novo patients (capped at 50%):
● NEUTRAL Thematic take on @ASCO breast cancer abstracts: 1. Move 'em up. DB09, ASCENT-04, SERENA-6 are really just trials of using agents earlier in the course of advanced disease. Since all patients with t
Guilherme Nader Marta
@GuiNaderMarta
● NEGATIVE Great take on some key #ASCO25 breast cancer abstracts If all patients will eventually get the drug, the real questions are: does giving it earlier really improve outcomes and how well was cross-
Laila Agrawal, MD
@LailaAgrawalMD
● NEGATIVE 2. First line Tdxd + P - longer exposure to more toxic rx, eliminates non-chemo option (HP after taxane) &amp; most in control arm didnt get tdxd at progression. Doesnt prove 1st line Tdxd better t
120s · every quote verbatim