KOL Pulse — Trial Profile

NorthStar Trial

Metastatic EGFRm NSCLC — Osimertinib + Local Consolidative Therapy (LCT) — AstraZeneca

Metastatic EGFRm NSCLC Osimertinib + LCT ESMO 2025 / ELCC 2026 Investigational
Visit Interactive Trial Page →

Top KOLs Discussing NorthStar

Stephen V Liu, MD
Stephen V Liu, MD
@StephenVLiu
11.6K impressions
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers
@OncBrothers
9.5K impressions
Drew Moghanaki
Drew Moghanaki
@DrewMoghanaki
7.3K impressions
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
@HHorinouchi
7.3K impressions
Dr Rishabh Jain
Dr Rishabh Jain
@DrRishabhOnco
6.5K impressions
Eric K. Singhi, MD
Eric K. Singhi, MD
@lungoncdoc
3.0K impressions

NorthStar Key Slides & Visuals

Official trial slides and relevant visuals shared by KOLs at ESMO 2025 and ELCC 2026. Click any image to expand or view on X.

Stephen V Liu, MD
Stephen V Liu, MD @StephenVLiu
PFS Results & Subgroup Analysis
11.6K impressions · 88 likes · 2025-10-17
View on X ↗
No OCR text available for this slide group.
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers @OncBrothers
PFS Results & Subgroup Analysis
9.5K impressions · 23 likes · 2025-10-17
View on X ↗
No OCR text available for this slide group.
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
Hidehito HORINOUCHI @HHorinouchi
PFS Results & Subgroup Analysis
5.1K impressions · 9 likes · 2026-03-26
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Higher Radiation BED to Primary Tumor Associated with Improved Outcom >75 <75 Gy Gy 10 Organ at Risk Median Range N (%) P 0.006 (1-sided) 0.8 Lung Rediation Modality V20Gy 17% (3%-31.6%) UMATO MRT 30 30 (71) 15 (36) Mean 8.2 Gy (0.14 Gy - 18.4 Gy) S887 30 Conformal or 0 Conformal 7 (17) PFS (Probability) 0.6 Esophagus 0.4 Mean 9.2 Gy (0.47 Gy - 36.7 Gy) Site Lung 38 (90) 0.2 Bone 9(21) Heart Brain 3 (7) Mean 6.0 Gy (0.02 Gy - 24.9 Gy) Gy 0.0 4 (10) 36 48 60 72 Other 0 12 24 Time (Months) a75 Gy Dose At risk 14 11 9 8 5 2 0 25 (60) Censored 0 1 1 1 3 4 6 4 5 5 8 8 50Gyin4-56x 9(21) Events 0 2 60-70Gyin9-20fx 3 (7) <75 Gy 30-40 Gy in 10 fx 8 (29) At risk 16 11 4 3 2 0 0 Censored 0 0 3 (7) 3 3 3 3 3 Events 0 $ 9 10 11 13 13 19-20Gra1b 3 (7) 50Gyin 25 6x 1 (2) Relevant treatment related AEs in radiation cohort G1-3 Pneumonitis Event Grade 1 Grade 2 BED ≥75 Gy: median PFS = 49.1 mo (95% CI 21.6-NA) Grade 3 Lung V20 Gy BED <75 Gy: median PFS = 22.3 mo (95% CI 11.6-39.7) Pneumonitis 1 (2.3) 5(11.9) 1 (2.3) > 25% < 25% HR 0.31 (90% CI 0.14-0.70), p = 0.006 Esophagitis 3(7.1) 1 (2.3) Dyspnea 12 (28.5) 1 (2.3) 4/9 2/29 p<0.007 Saumil (Dudhi, MD PhD Content of this copyright responsibility of the author Permission is required for re-use Two presentation RT "levers": is and aim for thoracic BED ≥75 Gy when feasible. Keep lung V20 <25% to mitigate pneumonitis risk. ESMO ASLC ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL FOR THE STUDY or LUNG CANCER ESTRO Increase I 2 ETOP-IBCSG lings - 1 --- [Slide 2] Conclusions Addition of LCT to osimertinib significantly prolonged PFS compared with osimertinib alone Clearance of thoracic nodal disease and pleural effusion following induction osimertinib are potential predictors of benefit from LCT Consolidative radiotherapy results in excellent local control rates with failures occurring outside the RT field at new distant metastatic sites outcomes Thoracic BED and ≥ 75Gy and lung V20Gy < 25% are associated with improved minimal toxicity Saumil Gandhi, MD PhD Content of his presentation IS copyright and responsibility of the author Permission is required for re-use Organisers ESMO IASLC Partners INTERNATIONAL FOR THE STUDY OF LING CANCER ESTRO I 1 I i ETOP-IBCSG
Dr Rishabh Jain
Dr Rishabh Jain @DrRishabhOnco
NorthStar Trial Data
4.6K impressions · 29 likes · 2026-03-26
View on X ↗
No OCR text available for this slide group.
Eric K. Singhi, MD
Eric K. Singhi, MD @lungoncdoc
Nodal Clearance & LCT Benefit
3.0K impressions · 24 likes · 2026-03-27
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Patterns of Failure after Osimertinib + LCT Site of First Recurrence New VS Prior Involvement 100 100 80 80 Percent 60 Percent 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 New Site Site Present at Both Locoregional Distant Both Baseline Recurrence In Relation to RT Field Organ Site of First Recurrence (RT Alone Cohort) 25 100 20 80 Percent 60 Percent 15 40 10 20 5 0 0 In RT Field Out of RT Field Lung/Pleura Bone Spine Brain Thoracic Liver Adrenal Other node Saumil Gandhi, MD PhD Organizers Partners Content of this presentation n copyright and responsibility of the author Permission is required for re-une ESMO IASLC ESTRO L ETOP-IBCSG --- [Slide 2] Nodal Clearance after Induction Osimertinib PREDICTIVE of LCT Benefit Thoracic Nodes Present at Randomization PFS Thoracic Nodes Absent at Randomization PFS Osimertinib + LCT 1.0 12 Osimertinib LCT Osimertinib Osimertinib as 0.8 p 0.388 (1-sided) P - 0.008 (1-sided) F / 04 04 PFS (Probability) 0.6 0.4 a 0.2 00 0 2 24 36 & 0.0 60 72 Time (Months) 0 12 Chined CT 24 36 48 60 At nat 34 72 34 * Censored 0 7 5 Osimertinb LCT Time (Months) 2 3 0 Events 0 4 0 $ At risk 22 8 5 20 22 23 5 Censored 0 16 24 12 29 0 6 Ownerting 29 2 2 Events 0 2 0 2 5 At nok 34 4 7 27 8 Cansored 0 11 9 11 1 8 4 Osimertinib 13 Eventy 0 1 1 1 13 1 2 22 3 25 I At nisk 28 27 4 19 Censored 0 10 29 29 1 5 Events 0 3 1 4 0 8 8 0 15 19 8 Osi Osi + LCT: median PFS = 19.0 mo (95% CI 12.6-23.2) 19 8 20 20 alone: HR median PFS = 15.9 mo (95% CI 10.9-23.9) 0.93, 90% CI 0.60-1.43, p = 0.388 Osi Osi alone: + LCT: median PFS = 41.5 mo (95% CI Saumil Gandhi, MD PhD HR median PFS = 19.6 mo (95% CI 31.2-NA) 9.1-31.5) 0.43, 90% CI 0.23-0.78, p = 0.008 Content of this presentation is copyright and responsibility of the author Permission is required for re-use Organisers ESMO ASLC Partners INTERNATIONAL FOR STUDY OF LUNG CANCER ESTRO ETOP

NorthStar Top Tweets

Top 10 by impressions — click to view on X

Stephen V Liu, MD
Stephen V Liu, MD@StephenVLiu

Dr. @ZPiotrowskaMD discusses NORTHSTAR #ESMO25 - impressive PFS benefit in #EGFR NSCLC when local consolidation therapy added, but notable heterogeneity. Pt...

👁 11.6K ♡ 88 ↻ 21 2025-10-17
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

4. #NorthStar: PhII, Osimertinib +/- local consolidative therapy (LCT)for mNSCLC EGFR+: - ⬆️ PFS w/ LCT (25.3mos vs 17.5mos, HR: 0.66) - Benefit even with polymetastatic disease -...

👁 9.5K ♡ 23 ↻ 7 2025-10-17
Drew Moghanaki
Drew Moghanaki@DrewMoghanaki

The long-awaited results of NORTHSTAR are finally reported at #ESMO25. @fifimcdrmh

👁 7.3K ♡ 51 ↻ 17 2025-10-18
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
Hidehito HORINOUCHI@HHorinouchi

🆙 #ELCC26 @myESMO @IASLC 🇩🇰 🔥Mini Oral session 1 ☑️NorthStar 🎯PFS Osi +/- LCT 41.5m vs. 19.6m (HR 0.43, 90%CI 0.23–0.78) 🎙️Dr. Saumil Ghandi 🎙️Chair:...

👁 5.1K ♡ 9 ↻ 4 2026-03-26
Dr Rishabh Jain
Dr Rishabh Jain@DrRishabhOnco

🔥 Not all EGFRm metastatic NSCLC patients benefit from LCT #ELCC26 NorthStar (LBA3) secondary analysis finally tells us who truly benefits from adding local consolidative therapy...

👁 4.6K ♡ 29 ↻ 7 2026-03-26
Eric K. Singhi, MD
Eric K. Singhi, MD@lungoncdoc

#NORTHSTAR update #ELCC26 1️⃣Post-osi CT @ 6-12 wks •Nodes cleared: 41.5 v 19.6 mo •Persistent: no benefit •Effusion gone: 32.7 v 22.3 mo •Persistent: no...

👁 3.0K ♡ 24 ↻ 12 2026-03-27
high5md
high5md@high5md

“Very few negatives — only positives here.” Dr. @StephenVLiu wraps up #ESMO2025 in Berlin with his expert insights on HARMONi-6, OptiTROP-Lung04 &amp; a surprise from...

👁 2.3K ♡ 20 ↻ 7 2025-10-21
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
Hidehito HORINOUCHI@HHorinouchi

🆙 #ELCC26 @myESMO 🇩🇰 🔥Mini Oral session 1 ☑️NorthStar 🎯PFS Osi +/- LCT 41.5m vs. 19.6m (HR 0.43, 90%CI 0.23–0.78) 🎙️Dr. Saumil Ghandi 🎙️Chair: @DocSacher Dr....

👁 2.3K ♡ 5 ↻ 3 2026-03-26
Dr Rishabh Jain
Dr Rishabh Jain@DrRishabhOnco

Not all EGFRm NSCLC pts should get LCT #ELCC26 NorthStar (LBA3) deep dive clarifies who truly benefits from osimertinib + LCT 🧪 After 6–12 weeks induction osimertinib (no...

👁 1.9K ♡ 14 ↻ 5 2026-03-26
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade@SuyogCancer

Addition of local RT to Osimertinib improves PFS in metastatic NSCLC ( egfr mutated ) Northstar Trial update . @myESMO #elcc26 @DrewMoghanaki @Alfdoc2...

👁 1.5K ♡ 21 ↻ 8 2026-03-26

About the NorthStar Trial

NorthStar is a randomized phase II trial (NCT04479306) evaluating the addition of local consolidative therapy (LCT) to osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutant metastatic NSCLC. Patients who did not progress after 6-12 weeks of induction osimertinib were randomized to continue osimertinib alone or receive osimertinib plus LCT (radiation or surgery to residual disease sites). The study addresses whether consolidating residual disease with local therapy can extend disease control beyond systemic TKI therapy alone. Primary results were presented at ESMO 2025, with updated secondary analyses at ELCC 2026.

Trial Methodology & Results

Study Design

Randomized phase II trial. Patients with EGFR-mutant metastatic NSCLC received induction osimertinib for 6-12 weeks, then those without progression were randomized 1:1 to osimertinib alone vs. osimertinib plus local consolidative therapy.

Population

Patients with EGFR-mutant metastatic NSCLC, largely treatment-naive, including those with oligometastatic and polymetastatic disease. Patients were evaluated after induction osimertinib and only those without progression proceeded to randomization.

Interventions

Osimertinib alone vs. osimertinib plus local consolidative therapy (LCT), which included radiotherapy or surgery to residual disease sites. The induction-first design allowed response assessment before LCT delivery.

Primary Endpoints

Primary endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included patterns of failure, predictors of LCT benefit, and safety.

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Addition of LCT to osimertinib significantly prolonged PFS compared with osimertinib alone. At ESMO 2025, median PFS was 25.3 months with LCT vs. 17.5 months with osimertinib alone (HR 0.66). Updated ELCC 2026 analysis in patients with nodal clearance after induction osimertinib showed median PFS of 41.5 months vs. 19.6 months (HR 0.43, 90% CI 0.23-0.78, p=0.008). Patients with persistent thoracic nodes derived no significant benefit (HR 0.93, p=0.388).

PFS 41.5 vs 19.6 mo with nodal clearance (HR 0.43)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04479306

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival data were not reported as mature at the time of ESMO 2025 or ELCC 2026 presentations. OS remains a key unanswered question as noted by multiple KOLs.


Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04479306

Safety & Tolerability

No new adverse events or increased risk of pneumonitis were observed with the addition of LCT. Grade 1-3 pneumonitis was reported in approximately 16% of patients in the radiation cohort. Radiotherapy technique mattered: thoracic BED of 75 Gy or higher and lung V20Gy below 25% were associated with improved outcomes and minimal toxicity.

No new AEs; BED 75 Gy approach optimizes safety

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04479306

Clinical Implications

NorthStar provides the first randomized evidence supporting local consolidative therapy added to osimertinib in EGFR-mutant metastatic NSCLC. The ELCC 2026 update critically identifies that nodal clearance and pleural effusion resolution after induction osimertinib are predictive biomarkers of LCT benefit, enabling patient selection. This remains an investigational strategy -- osimertinib is approved as monotherapy but the addition of LCT is not an approved indication.

Key KOL Sentiments — NorthStar

DoctorSentimentComment
Stephen V Liu, MD ● POSITIVE Dr. @ZPiotrowskaMD discusses NORTHSTAR #ESMO25 - impressive PFS benefit in #EGFR NSCLC when local consolidation therapy added, but notable heterogeneity. Pt selection important, need uniform definitions, biomarkers (radiomics?). Encouraging results here. #ESMOAmbassadors
Oncology Brothers ● POSITIVE 4. #NorthStar: PhII, Osimertinib +/- local consolidative therapy (LCT)for mNSCLC EGFR+: - ⬆️ PFS w/ LCT (25.3mos vs 17.5mos, HR: 0.66) - Benefit even with polymetastatic disease - No new AEs or increased risk of pneumonitis - LCT should be considered for the right pt! 6/12
high5md ● POSITIVE “Very few negatives — only positives here.” Dr. @StephenVLiu wraps up #ESMO2025 in Berlin with his expert insights on HARMONi-6, OptiTROP-Lung04 &amp; a surprise from NorthStar. 🎥 Watch the reports now via high5oncologyTV #LungCancer #Oncology #high5oncologyTV @OncoAlert
Dr Riyaz Shah ● POSITIVE NORTHSTAR; induction osi prior to randomisation; largely Tx naive; lots of mets; induced oligo is a real phenomenon. PFS advantage. Fascinating study. Knowing if there’s an OS benefit for this approach is key #ESMO25
Devika Das, MD, MSHQS, FASCO ● POSITIVE Moving target with how this plays out with the use of Chemo/ Osi upfront but good to see more data in this space. A lot of clinicians have successfully been using this strategy with single agent Osimertinib and oligoprogressions . Congratulations to the study team! #lcsm #ESMO25
Alfredo Addeo MD ● POSITIVE @DrewMoghanaki @fifimcdrmh It is not a phase III though…. Strong rational to use osi and add SBRT on mts rather than chemo or ami and getting rather similar PFS! I know , I know .. No OS yet … still intriguing IMHO
Drew Moghanaki ● NEUTRAL The long-awaited results of NORTHSTAR are finally reported at #ESMO25. @fifimcdrmh
Hidehito HORINOUCHI ● NEUTRAL 🆙 #ELCC26 @myESMO @IASLC 🇩🇰 🔥Mini Oral session 1 ☑️NorthStar 🎯PFS Osi +/- LCT 41.5m vs. 19.6m (HR 0.43, 90%CI 0.23–0.78) 🎙️Dr. Saumil Ghandi 🎙️Chair: @DocSacher Dr. Andreas Rimner 📍NCT04479306 @OncoAlert @Larvol #LCSM
Dr Rishabh Jain ● NEUTRAL 🔥 Not all EGFRm metastatic NSCLC patients benefit from LCT #ELCC26 NorthStar (LBA3) secondary analysis finally tells us who truly benefits from adding local consolidative therapy (LCT) to osimertinib 🧪 Study design Pts without progression after 6–12 weeks osimertinib ➡️ Osi
Dr Amol Akhade ● NEUTRAL Addition of local RT to Osimertinib improves PFS in metastatic NSCLC ( egfr mutated ) Northstar Trial update . @myESMO #elcc26 @DrewMoghanaki @Alfdoc2 @RManochakian
Bhaarath PG ● NEUTRAL Top Trials to Follow on Day 2 @myESMO #ELCC26 KANDLELIT-001 | ADEPPT | NORTHSTAR | ASTEROID | BeamionLung-1 | BECOME #ELCC #ELCC2026 #Cancer #Oncology #LungCancer #NSCLC #SCLC #lcsm #pembrolizumab #adagrasib #durvalumab #zongertinib #becotarug #osimertinib #EGFR #KRAS #ERBB2
Nirmal Raut ● NEUTRAL #ESMO25 NorthStar shines bright for EGFR+ metastatic lung cancer! 🌟 Adding local consolidative therapy (like radiation/surgery) to Osimertinib significantly improves PFS (25.4 mos vs 17.0 mos) @BalazsHalmosMD @StephenVLiu @FordePatrick @drpragya_shukla #Pranshumohindra
OncLive.com ● NEUTRAL Adding local consolidative therapy to osimertinib improved outcomes in EGFR-mutated #NSCLC. 🫁 In a secondary analysis of the phase 2 NorthStar trial presented during #ELCC26 LCT + osimertinib significantly prolonged PFS vs osimertinib alone, with recurrences largely occurring
Henning Willers, MD, FASTRO ● NEUTRAL @blally_md @DrewMoghanaki @fifimcdrmh LCT was after 6-12 weeks which feels early because we still typically see ongoing regression from TKI during that time period. We favor LCT at around 6 months when max regression is achieved and before actual resistance develops.
Oncology Learning Network ● NEUTRAL Updates from #ELCC26: Results from the phase 2 #NorthStar trial demonstrate that adding local consolidative therapy to #osimertinib significantly improves outcomes in metastatic #EGFR-mutated #NSCLC. Learn more: #medtwitter #onctwitter
Jianjiao Ni ● NEUTRAL with the OS benefit of FLAURA2 and MARIPOSA. The clinical value of LCT in EGFR-mutant metastatic NSCLC needs to be re-evaluated
Alessio Cortellini ● NEUTRAL @Alfdoc2 @DrewMoghanaki @fifimcdrmh and it maintains safety and quality of life 😇, seems a thrid way to me! We know, we know... not a phase 3, let&#x27;s be cautious 😅
Henning Willers, MD, FASTRO ● NEUTRAL @Alfdoc2 @DrewMoghanaki @fifimcdrmh Exactly!
OncoDaily Lung ● NEUTRAL 🔬 Local Therapy Matters in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC At #ELCC2026, the #NorthStartrial analysis shows that adding local consolidative therapy (LCT) to osimertinib can significantly improve outcomes, but patient selection is key. 📊 What stands out: • Median PFS: 41.5 vs 19.6 months
Eric K. Singhi, MD ● NEGATIVE #NORTHSTAR update #ELCC26 1️⃣Post-osi CT @ 6-12 wks •Nodes cleared: 41.5 v 19.6 mo •Persistent: no benefit •Effusion gone: 32.7 v 22.3 mo •Persistent: no benefit 2️⃣RT w/ strong local control •8% in v 92% out-of-field 3️⃣RT technique •BED≥75:⬆️outcomes •V20&lt;25%:⬇️toxicity