LIVE ASCO 2026 Live — KOL insights, hot abstracts & $TICKER finance buzz View Live Updates →
KOL Pulse — Trial Profile

OptiTROP-Lung05 Trial

Phase 3 trial of sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT; SKB264 / MK-2870) — a TROP2-directed antibody-drug conjugate — plus pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced PD-L1-positive NSCLC. Presented at ASCO 2026: the first Phase 3 of an ADC + immune-checkpoint inhibitor combination to meet its primary PFS endpoint in first-line NSCLC.

ASCO 2026 · Phase 3 · 65% PFS Risk Reduction1L PD-L1+ NSCLCPhase 3Sac-TMT (SKB264) + Pembrolizumab · Kelun-Biotech / MerckFirst ADC+IO Phase 3 Win in 1L NSCLC

KOL Leaders Discussing OptiTROP-Lung05

Hidehito HORINOUCHI
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
@hhorinouchi
4,851 impressions
gilberto lopes
gilberto lopes
@GlopesMd
3,702 impressions
Stephen V Liu, MD
Stephen V Liu, MD
@StephenVLiu
3,463 impressions
Balazs Halmos
Balazs Halmos
@BalazsHalmosMD
629 impressions
Dr Rishabh Jain
Dr Rishabh Jain
@drrishabhonco
420 impressions
Uğur Özkerim
Uğur Özkerim
@UOzkerim
368 impressions
Chul Kim
Chul Kim
@chulkimMD
343 impressions
MV Chandrakanth
MV Chandrakanth
@chandrakanthmv
299 impressions

Key Slides & Data

Stephen V Liu, MD
Stephen V Liu, MD @StephenVLiu
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
View Post
USA UJSF 2026ASCO ANNUAL MEETING --- OptiTROP-Lung05 Study Design Randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT06448312) Key Eligibility Sac-TMT 4 mg/kg Q2W Endpoints b + Locally advanced (stage IIIB/IIIC) or metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC Pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6Wa Primary PFS assessed by BICR (n = 208) No prior systemic antitumor therapy R Secondary No sensitizing EGFR or ALK 1:1 OS (key secondary endpoint) alteration PFS assessed by investigator n = 413 PD-L1 TPS≥ 1% (IHC 22C3, central Pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W ORR, DCR, DOR, etc. lab) (n = 205°) Safety ECOG score 0 or 1 Stratification factors Patients received sac-TMT + pembro or pembro monotherapy until disease progression or Histology (squamous vs. non-squamous) unacceptable toxicity PD-L1 TPS (1-49% vs. ≥ 50%) ECOG score (0 VS. 1) Pembro was administered for a maximum of 18 cycles. Tumor response was assessed using RECIST version 1.1. One participant in the pembro group did not receive the assigned study treatment. ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; BICR, blinded independent central review; DCR, disease control rate; DOR, duration of response; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ORR, objective response rate; Pembro, Pembrolizumab; R, randomization; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; TPS, tumor proportion score. 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICA AN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO Permission required for - contact permissions@asco.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- PFS by Investigator Sac-TMT + pembro improved PFS vs. pembro, with a 62% reduction in risk of disease progression or death 100 Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro (n = 208) (n = 205) 80 PFS events, n (%) 69 (33.2) 124 (60.5) Progression-Free Survival (%) Median, mo (95% CI) NR (11.2, NE) 6.6 (5.5, 8.2) 57.3% 60 HR 0.38 (95%CI: 0.28, 0.51) 40 27.4% 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro + Censored 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time (Months) No.at risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 208 208 194 184 181 169 146 128 122 94 63 46 18 17 0 Pembro 205 193 154 134 128 112 87 71 66 51 32 28 10 9 1 0 2026 ASCO PRE SENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CURICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO Permission required for result, contact permissions@asco.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- PFS (BICR) in Subgroups A consistent PFS benefit of sac-TMT + pembro over pembro alone was observed across subgroups Subgroup Number of Events/Patients Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro All patients 66/208 128/205 0.35 (0.26, 0.47) Sex Male 55/166 107/174 0.38 (0.27, 0.53) Female 11/42 21/31 0.24 (0.12, 0.50) Age <65 yr 37/107 64/97 0.36 (0.24, 0.54) >65 yr 29/101 64/108 0.34 (0.22, 0.52) ECOG score 0 6/32 21/32 0.21 (0.09, 0.53) 1 60/176 107/173 0.38 (0.27, 0.52) Smoking history Current or former smoker 55/166 107/176 0.39 (0.28, 0.55) Never smoked 11/42 21/29 0.18 (0.09, 0.38) Clinical stage IV 62/194 121/192 0.35 (0.25, 0.47) Distant metastatic sites a 40/148 93/150 0.30 (0.21, 0.44) >3 26/60 35/55 0.45 (0.27, 0.75) Liver metastases Yes 11/21 13/23 0.68 (0.30, 1.52) No 55/187 115/182 0.32 (0.23, 0.44) 0.1 to <~Sac-TMT+Pembro Better Pembro Better HR along with the 95% CI were estimated using unstratified Cox Proportional Hazards model in each subgroup Subgroup analyses will not be presented for any subgroup variable in which one or more levels account for less than 10% of the total analysis population 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO Permission required for reuse, contact pennissions@asco.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER
Stephen V Liu, MD
Stephen V Liu, MD @StephenVLiu
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
View Post
PFS (BICR) by PD-L1 Expression TPS ≥ 50% TPS 1-49% Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro (n = 83) (n = 82) (n = 125) (n = 123) PFS events, n (%) 26 (31.3) 44 (53.7) PFS events, n (%) 40 (32.0) 84 (68.3) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (NE, NE) 9.5 (6.9, 13.8) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (11.1, NE) 4.3 (2.9, 5.5) HR 0.47 (95%CI: 0.29, 0.77) HR 0.28 (95%CI: 0.19, 0.41) 100 100 80 80 Progression-Free Survival (%) 65.6% 60 40 Progression-Free Survival (%) 60.1% 60 39.0% 40 21.6% 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro Pembro + Censored + Censored 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time (Months) Time (Months) No.at risk No.atrisk Sac-TMT+Pembro 83 83 78 74 74 67 60 53 51 42 28 22 9 8 0 Sac-TMT+Pembro 125 125 117 113 108 97 84 73 69 48 34 25 11 10 1 0 Pembro 82 78 68 62 61 55 46 40 37 30 17 14 7 7 1 0 Pembro 123 117 81 67 66 53 38 27 24 16 11 10 2 1 0 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CUNICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation - property of the author and ASCO Permission required for reuse, contact permissions@asco.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- PFS (BICR) by Histology Non-Squamous Squamous Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro (n = 123) (n = 124ᵃ) (n = 85) (n = 80) PFS events, n (%) 29 (23.6) 70 (56.5) PFS events, n (%) 37 (43.5) 58 (72.5) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (13.6, NE) 6.6 (4.3, 8.7) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (8.3, NE) 5.5 (4.1, 7.0) HR 0.28 (95%CI: 0.18, 0.43) HR 0.44 (95%CI: 0.29, 0.66) 100 100 80 71.3% 80 Progression-Free Survival (%) 60 40 Progression-Free Survival (%) 60 51.3% 33.0% 40 24.6% 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro Pembro + Censored + Censored 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time (Months) Time (Months) No.at risk No.at risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 123 123 118 114 110 104 88 73 69 51 35 26 11 11 0 Sac-TMT+Pembro 85 85 77 73 72 60 56 53 51 39 27 21 9 7 1 0 Pembro 124 116 89 76 75 66 51 38 34 25 15 12 4 4 1 0 Pembro 80 78 59 52 51 42 33 29 27 21 13 12 5 4 0 a One patient with thymoma was excluded from the pembro group in the subgroup analysis of histology 2026 ASCO PRE SENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation - property of the author and ASCO Permission required for reuse, contact permissions@asco.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- Descriptive OS at PFS IA A favorable trend was observed with sac-TMT + pembro 100 80.4% 80 Overall Survival (%) Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro 60 (n = 208) (n = 205) 68.9% OS events, n (%) 33 (15.9) 54 (26.3) Median, mo (95% CI) NR (NE, NE) 14.5 (14.5, NE) 40 HR 0.55 (95%CI: 0.36, 0.85) 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro + Censored 0 012345678910111213 14 15 16 Time (Months) No.at risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 208 208 205 201 197 196 190 164 151 135 104 78 55 36 11 0 Pembro 205 203 197 192 188 183 164 146 137 111 87 63 41 25 12 2 0 Median follow-up was 10.5 months. 2026 ASCO PRE SENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation - property of the author and ASCO Permission required for reuse, contact permissions@asco.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- ORR, Deep Response, and DOR (BICR) Sac-TMT + pembro improved ORR, deep response rate, and duration of response vs. pembro ORR Deep Response Rate DOR >50% SLD reduction 100 100 A 28.3% 77.7% 80.7% A 23.2% 80 80 70.2% 63.2% 60.5% 62.7% 49.0% Duration of response (DOR) (%) 60 60 59.4% Patients (%) HR 0.47 (95%CI: 0.27, 0.82) 40 42.0% 40.7% 40.0% 40 30.1% 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro 25.9% Pembro + Censored 20 16.3% 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Time Months) No.at risk 0 ITT TPS >50% TPS 1-49% ITT TPS >50% TPS 1-49% Sac-TMT+Pembro 146 146 138 130 125 112 92 73 68 41 16 15 13 0 Pembro 86 86 81 73 71 56 48 34 32 21 7 6 4 0 Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro ORR: the proportion of patients with a CR/PR; Deep response rate: the proportion of responders with 2 50% reduction in target-lesion SLD from baseline. CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SLD, sum of lesion diameters. 2026 ASCO PRE SENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CURRICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation - property of the author and ASCO Permission required for reuse, contact permissions@asce.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER
Stephen V Liu, MD
Stephen V Liu, MD @StephenVLiu
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
View Post
Summary of Safety Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro Event, n (%) (n = 208) (n = 204) Median duration of exposure Any grade Grade ≥3 Any grade Grade ≥3 Sac-TMT + Pembro: Sac-TMT 8.9 months/ Treatment-emergent AEs 207 (99.5) 115 (55.3) 178 (87.3) 64 (31.4) Pembro 8.3 months Serious 81 (38.9) — 59 (28.9) — Led to discontinuation of Pembro alone: 5.1 months 8 (3.8) / 11 (5.3) — 10 (4.9) - sac-TMT/ pembro Led to death 5 (2.4) — 13 (6.4) — Common TEAEsᵃ Higher incidence of grade ≥3 TEAEs with sac- Anemia 182 (87.5) 19 (9.1) 55 (27.0) 2 (1.0) Alopecia 137 (65.9) 0 6 (2.9) 0 TMT+ pembro vs. pembro, primarily driven by White blood cell count decreased 96 (46.2) 18 (8.7) 5 (2.5) 1 (0.5) expected hematologic AEs of sac-TMT Neutrophil count decreased 93 (44.7) 36 (17.3) 3 (1.5) 1 (0.5) Stomatitis 84 (40.4) 11 (5.3) 3 (1.5) 0 Decreased appetite 73 (35.1) 2 (1.0) 27 (13.2) 0 Weakness 71 (34.1) 8 (3.8) 23 (11.3) 2 (1.0) Treatment-emergent AEs leading to Nausea 70 (33.7) 0 11 (5.4) 0 discontinuation of pembro were similar in both Hypoalbuminemia 61 (29.3) 0 35 (17.2) 0 groups. No treatment-related deaths were Weight decreased 56 (26.9) 1 (0.5) 19 (9.3) 1 (0.5) ALT increased 55 (26.4) 1 (0.5) 33 (16.2) 0 attributed to sac-TMT Rash 50 (24.0) 6 (2.9) 33 (16.2) 1 (0.5) a Summary of any grade TEAEs with incidence 2 20% in either treatment group. ALT increased, alanine aminotransferase increased; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse events. 2026 ASCO PRE SENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou ASCO AMERIC SOCIETY OF #ASCO26 CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO Permission required for reuse, contact permissions@asco.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- Adverse Events of Special Interest AEOSIs were consistent with the known profiles of the individual agents, and no new safety signals were identified Sac-TMT + Pembro (n = 208) Sac-TMT AEOSI Any grade Grade ≥3 Anemia 181 (87.0) 19 (9.1) Neutrophil count decreased 94 (45.2) 40 (19.2) Stomatitis 92 (44.2) 13 (6.3) Ocular surface toxicity 30 (14.4) 0 Infusion-related reaction 12 (5.8) 0 Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro (n = 208) (n = 204) Any grade Grade ≥3 Any grade Grade ≥3 Pembro AEOSIª Hypothyroidism 28 (13.5) 0 23 (11.3) 0 Pneumonitis' 26 (12.5) 6 (2.9) 15 (7.4) 2 (1.0) Hyperthyroidism 15 (7.2) 0 10 (4.9) 0 Infusion reaction 12 (5.8) 0 2 (1.0) 0 Severe skin reactions 6 (2.9) 6 (2.9) 3 (1.5) 3 (1.5) Adrenal insufficiency 5 (2.4) 3 (1.4) 2 (1.0) 0 a Summary of any grade AEOSI for pembro with incidence 2 2% in either treatment group. D Including 5 patients (2.4%) with febrile neutropenia. ( Stomatitis includes the preferred terms of stomatitis, oral ulcer and aphthous ulcer. The most common ocular surface toxicities included dry eye (10.1%), conjunctivitis (5.8%), and increased tearing (3.4%). Infusion reactions occurred during the course of sac-TMT infusion. Pneumonitis includes the preferred terms of pneumonitis, immune-mediated lung disease, and interstitial lung disease. The exposure-adjusted incidence rates (patients with AEOSI / patient-years) of all-grade pneumonitis were 0.173 in the sac-TMT pembro group and 0.144 in the pembro group. AEOSI, adverse events of special interest. 2026 ASCO PRE SENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY or CLINICAL DRICOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO Permission required for reuse contact permissions@asco.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER
Balazs Halmos
Balazs Halmos @BalazsHalmosMD
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
View Post
OptiTROP-Lung05 Study Design Randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT06448312) Key Eligibility Sac-TMT 4 mg/kg Q2W + Endpoints b Locally advanced (stage IIIB/IIIC) or metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC Pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6Wa Primary (n = 208) PFS assessed by BICR No prior systemic antitumor therapy R Secondary No sensitizing EGFR or ALK 1:1 alteration OS (key secondary endpoint) n = 413 PFS assessed by investigator PD-L1 TPS≥ 1% (IHC 22C3, central Pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6Wa ORR, DCR, DOR, etc. lab) (n = 205°) Safety ECOG score 0 or 1 Stratification factors Patients received sac-TMT + pembro or pembro monotherapy until disease progression or Histology (squamous VS. non-squamous) unacceptable toxicity PD-L1 TPS (1-49% VS. > 50%) ECOG score (0 VS. 1) a Pembro was administered for a maximum of 18 cycles. b Tumor response was assessed using RECIST version 1.1.° One participant in the pembro group did not receive the assigned study treatment. ALK, anaplastic ymphoma kinase; BICR, blinded independent central review; DCR, disease control rate; DOR, duration of response; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ORR, objective response rate; Pembro, Pembrolizumab; R, randomization; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; TPS, tumor proportion score. 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY or CURICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO. Permission required for reuse; contact permissions@asco.org. KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- PFS by BICR Sac-TMT + pembro significantly improved PFS vs. pembro, with a 65% reduction in risk of disease progression or death 100 Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro 80 (n = 208) (n = 205) Progression-Free Survival (%) 62.4% PFS events, n (%) 66 (31.7) 128 (62.4) Median, mo (95%CI) 60 NR (13.6, NE) 5.7 (4.3,7.0) 40 HR 0.35 (95%Cl: 0.26, 0.47) 29.0% p< 0.0001ᵃ 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro + Censored 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time (Months) No.at risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 208 208 195 187 182 164 144 126 120 90 62 47 20 18 1 0 Pembro 205 195 149 129 127 108 84 67 61 46 28 24 9 8 1 0 a Updated efficacy boundary (corresponding to actual PFS events of 194): 0.0174 (2-sided). NE, not estimable; NR, not reached. 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN GOCIETY or CUMICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO. Permission required for reuse; contact permissions@asco.org. KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- Descriptive OS at PFS IA A favorable trend was observed with sac-TMT + pembro 100 80.4% 80 Overall Survival (%) Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro 60 (n = 208) (n = 205) 68.9% OS events, n (%) 33 (15.9) 54 (26.3) Median, mo (95% CI) NR (NE, NE) 14.5 (14.5, NE) 40 HR 0.55 (95%Cl: 0.36, 0.85) 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro + Censored 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Time (Months) No.at risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 208 208 205 201 197 196 190 164 151 135 104 78 55 36 11 0 Pembro 205 203 197 192 188 183 164 146 137 111 87 63 41 25 12 2 0 Median follow-up was 10.5 months. 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY or #ASCO26 CLINICAL ONCOLOGE ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO Permission required for reuse; contact permissions@asco.org. KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER
Uğur Özkerim
Uğur Özkerim @UOzkerim
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
View Post
OptiTROP-Lung05 Study Design Randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT06448312) Key Eligibility Sac-TMT 4 mg/kg Q2W Locally advanced (stage IIIB/IIIC) or Endpoints metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC Pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W Primary No prior systemic antitumor therapy (n = 208) PFS assessed by BICR R No sensitizing EGFR or ALK 1:1 Secondary alteration OS (key secondary endpoint) PD-L1 TPS 1% (IHC 22C3, central n = 413 PFS assessed by investigator Pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W lab) ORR, DCR, DOR, etc. (n = 205°) Safety ECOG score 0 or 1 Stratification factors Patients received sac-TMT . pembro or pembro monotherapy until disease progression or Histology (squamous vs. non-squamous) unacceptable toxicity PD-L1 TPS (1-49% vs. > 50%) ECOG score (0 VS. 1) Pembro was administered for a maximum of 18 cycles. Tumor response was assessed using RECIST version 1.1.1 One participant in the pembro group dd not receive the assigned study beatment, ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; BICR, blinded independent central review; DCR, disease control rate; DOR, duration of response; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Onoology Group, EGFR, epidemal growth tador receptor; ORR, objective response rate; Pembro, Pembrolizumab; R, randomization; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; TPS, tumor proportion score. 26 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO - NUAL MEETING Presentation . property of be author and ASCO Permission required for was contact ENOWLEDGE CONDUCTED CAME --- PFS by BICR Sac-TMT + pembro significantly improved PFS vs. pembro, with a 65% reduction in risk of disease progression or death 100 Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro 80 (n - 208) in . 205) Progression-Free Survival (%) 62.4% PFS events, n (%) 66 (31.7) 128 (62.4) Median, mo (95%CI) NR(13,NE) 60 57(43,7.0) 40 HR 0.35 (95%Cl: 0.26, 0.47) 29.0% p< 0.0001* 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro + Censored 0 0 12345678910112131415 Time (Months) No.at risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 208 208 195 187 182 164 144 126 120 90 62 47 20 18 1 0 Pembro 205 195 149 129 127 108 84 67 61 46 28 24 9 8 1 0 . Updated efficacy boundary (corresponding to actual PFS events of 194): 0.0174 (2-sided). NE, not estimable; NR, not reached. 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY. Professor Calcun Zhou ASCO - - #ASCO26 - - ANNUAL MEETING Presentation . property the author and ASCO Permission - for - contact a EXPIRESSE CONQUEAS CARICER --- Descriptive OS at PFS IA A favorable trend was observed with sac-TMT + pembro 100 80.4% 80 Overall Survival (%) Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro 60 (n a 208) (n = 205) 68.9% OS events, n (%) 33 (15.9) 54 (26.3) Median, mo (95% CI) NR (NE, NE) 14.5 (14.5, NE) 40 HR 0.55 (95%CI: 0.36, 0.85) 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro + Censored 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 0 1 Time (Months) No.at risk 55 36 11 197 196 190 164 151 135 104 78 0 Sac-TMT+Pembro 208 208 205 201 Pembro 205 203 197 164 146 137 111 87 63 41 25 12 2 0 192 188 183 Median follow-up was 10.5 months. ASC PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou 26 ASCO #ASCO26 property of the author and ASCO. Permission required Presentation is NUAL MEETING
Chul Kim
Chul Kim @chulkimMD
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
View Post
PFS by BICR Sac-TMT + pembro significantly improved PFS vs. pembro, with a 65% reduction in risk of disease progression or death 100 Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro (n = 208) (n = 205) 80 PFS events, n (%) 66 (31.7) 128 (62.4) 62.4% Progression-Free Survival (%) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (13.6, NE) 5.7 (4.3, 7.0) H 60 HR 0.35 (95%Cl: 0.26, 0.47) 40 29.0% p < 0.0001ᵃ 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro + Censored 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time (Months) No.at risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 208 208 195 187 182 164 144 126 120 90 62 47 20 18 1 0 Pembro 205 195 149 129 127 108 84 67 61 46 28 24 9 8 1 0 a Updated efficacy boundary (corresponding to actual PFS events of 194): 0.0174 (2-sided). NE, not estimable; NR, not reached. 026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY NNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO, Permission required for reuse, contact permissions@asco.org. KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- PFS (BICR) by PD-L1 Expression TPS ≥ 50% TPS 1-49% Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro (n = 83) (n = 82) (n = 125) (n = 123) PFS events, n (%) 26 (31.3) 44 (53.7) PFS events, n (%) 40 (32.0) 84 (68.3) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (NE, NE) 9.5 (6.9, 13.8) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (11.1, NE) 4.3 (2.9, 5.5) HR 0.47 (95%CI: 0.29, 0.77) HR 0.28 (95%CI: 0.19, 0.41) 100 100 80 80 Progression-Free Survival (%) 65.6% $ 60 39.0% 40 Progression-Free Survival (%) 60.1% 60 # 40 21.6% 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro Pembro + Censored + Censored 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time (Months) Time (Months) No.at risk No.at risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 83 83 78 74 74 67 60 53 51 42 28 22 9 8 0 Sac-TMT+Pembro 125 125 117 113 108 97 84 73 69 48 34 25 11 10 1 0 Pembro 82 78 68 62 61 55 46 40 37 30 17 14 7 7 1 0 Pembro 123 117 81 67 66 53 38 27 24 16 11 10 2 1 0 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY CLINICAL ONCOLOG ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO. Permission required for reuse; contact permissions@asco.org. KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCI --- PFS (BICR) by Histology Non-Squamous Squamous Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro (n = 123) (n = 124ᵃ) (n = 85) (n = 80) PFS events, n (%) 29 (23.6) 70 (56.5) PFS events, n (%) 37 (43.5) 58 (72.5) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (13.6, NE) 6.6 (4.3,8.7) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (8.3, NE) 5.5 (4.1, 7.0) HR 0.28 (95%CI: 0.18, 0.43) HR 0.44 (95%CI: 0.29, 0.66) 100 100 80 71.3% 80 Progression-Free Survival (%) # 60 Progression-Free Survival (%) 60 51.3% 40 33.0% 40 24.6% 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro Pembro + Censored + Censored 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time (Months) Time (Months) No.atrisk No.atrisk Sac-TMT+Pembro 123 123 118 114 110 104 88 73 69 51 35 26 11 11 0 Sac-TMT+Pembro 85 85 77 73 72 60 56 53 51 39 27 21 9 7 1 0 Pembro 124 116 89 76 75 66 51 38 34 25 15 12 4 4 1 0 Pembro 80 78 59 52 51 42 33 29 27 21 13 12 5 4 0 a One patient with thymoma was excluded from the pembro group in the subgroup analysis of histology. 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF #ASCO26 CUNICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO. Permission required for reuse, contact permissions@asco.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- Descriptive OS at PFS IA A favorable trend was observed with sac-TMT + pembro 100 80.4% 80 Overall Survival (%) Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro 60 (n = 208) (n = 205) 68.9% OS events, n (%) 33 (15.9) 54 (26.3) Median, mo (95% CI) NR (NE, NE) 14.5 (14.5, NE) 40 HR 0.55 (95%CI: 0.36, 0.85) 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro + Censored 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Time (Months) No.at risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 208 208 205 201 197 196 190 164 151 135 104 78 55 36 11 0 Pembro 205 203 197 192 188 183 164 146 137 111 87 63 41 25 12 2 0 Median follow-up was 10.5 months. 2026 ASCO PRE SENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY or CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO. Permission required for reuse, contact permissions@asco.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER
Dr Riyaz Shah
Dr Riyaz Shah @DrRiyazShah
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
View Post
OptiTROP-Lung05 Study Design Randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT06448312) Key Eligibility Sac-TMT 4 mg/kg Q2W Endpoints b + Locally advanced (stage IIIB/IIIC) or Pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6Wa Primary metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC (n = 208) PFS assessed by BICR No prior systemic antitumor therapy R Secondary No sensitizing EGFR or ALK 1:1 OS (key secondary endpoint) alteration PFS assessed by investigator n = 413 PD-L1 TPS≥ 1% (IHC 22C3, central Pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6Wa ORR, DCR, DOR, etc. lab) (n = 205°) Safety ECOG score 0 or 1 Stratification factors Patients received sac-TMT + pembro or pembro monotherapy until disease progression or Histology (squamous vs. non-squamous) unacceptable toxicity PD-L1 TPS (1-49% vs. > 50%) ECOG score (0 VS. 1) a Pembro was administered for a maximum of 18 cycles. b Tumor response was assessed using RECIST version 1.1. One participant in the pembro group did not receive the assigned study treatment. ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; BICR, blinded independent central review; DCR, disease control rate; DOR, duration of response; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ORR, objective response rate; Pembro, Pembrolizumab; R, randomization; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; TPS, tumor proportion score. 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ANNUAL MEETING ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF Presentation is property of the author and ASCO. Permission required for reuse; contact permissions@asco.org CUPICAL OHCOLOGY KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- Baseline Characteristics Characteristic Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro (n = 208) (n = 205) Age Median (range), years 64 (28, 75) 65 (22, 75) ≥ 65 101 (48.6) 108 (52.7) Sex Male 166 (79.8) 174 (84.9) ECOG score 1 176 (84.6) 173 (84.4) Current or former Smoking history 166 (79.8) 176 (85.9) Never 42 (20.2) 29 (14.1) Adenocarcinoma 122 (58.7) 123 (60.0) Histology Squamous cell carcinoma 85 (40.9) 80 (39.0) Otherᵃ 1 (0.5) 2 (1.0) IIIB/IIIC 14 (6.7) 13 (6.3) Clinical stage IV 194 (93.3) 192 (93.7) 1-49% 125 (60.1) 123 (60.0) PD-L1 TPS >50% 83 (39.9) 82 (40.0) Brain 7 (3.4) 6 (2.9) Metastases Liver 21 (10.1) 23 (11.2) ≥3 Distant metastatic sites 60 (28.8) 55 (26.8) a Included one NSCLC (not otherwise specified) in the sac-TMT + pembro group, and one mucoepidermoid carcinoma and one thymoma in the pembro group. 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF #ASCO26 CUPICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO. Permission required for reuse; contact permissions@asco. KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCE --- PFS by BICR Sac-TMT + pembro significantly improved PFS vs. pembro, with a 65% reduction in risk of disease progression or death 100 80 Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro Progression-Free Survival (%) (n = 208) (n = 205) 62.4% PFS events, n (%) 66 (31.7) 128 (62.4) 60 Median, mo (95%CI) NR (13.6, NE) 5.7 (4.3,7.0) HH 40 HR 0.35 (95%CI: 0.26, 0.47) 29.0% p< 0.0001ᵃ 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro + Censored 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time (Months) No.at risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 208 208 195 187 182 164 144 126 120 90 62 47 20 18 1 0 Pembro 205 195 149 129 127 108 84 67 61 46 28 24 9 8 1 0 a Updated efficacy boundary (corresponding to actual PFS events of 194): 0.0174 (2-sided). NE, not estimable; NR, not reached. 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY or CUPICAL ONCOLOGY #ASCO26 ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO. Permission required for reuse; contact permissions@asco.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- PFS (BICR) by PD-L1 Expression TPS ≥ 50% TPS 1-49% Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro (n = 83) (n 82) (n = 125) (n = 123) PFS events, n (%) 26 (31.3) 44 (53.7) PFS events, n (%) 40 (32.0) 84 (68.3) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (NE, NE) 9.5 (6.9, 13.8) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (11.1, NE) 4.3 (2.9, 5.5) HR 0.47 (95%CI: 0.29, 0.77) HR 0.28 (95%CI: 0.19, 0.41) 100 100 80 80 Progression-Free Survival (%) 65.6% 60 40 Progression-Free Survival (%) 60.1% 60 39.0% 40 21.6% 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro Pembro + Censored + Censored 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time (Months) Time (Months) No.atrisk No.at risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 83 83 78 74 74 67 60 53 51 42 28 22 9 8 0 Sac-TMT+Pembro 125 125 117 113 108 97 84 73 69 48 34 25 11 10 1 0 Pembro 82 78 68 62 61 55 46 40 37 30 17 14 7 7 1 0 Pembro 123 117 81 67 66 53 38 27 24 16 11 10 2 1 0 2026 ASCO PRE SENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY or CUNICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO. Permission required for reuse; contact permissions@asoo.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER
Dr. Antonio Calles 🫁🚭
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
View Post
OptiTROP-Lung05 Study Design Randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT06448312) Key Eligibility Sac-TMT 4 mg/kg Q2W Endpoints b Locally advanced (stage IIIB/IIIC) or metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC Pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W Primary PFS assessed by BICR (n = 208) No prior systemic antitumor therapy R Secondary No sensitizing EGFR or ALK 1:1 OS (key secondary endpoint) alteration PFS assessed by investigator n = 413 PD-L1 TPS 1% (IHC 22C3, central Pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W ORR, DCR, DOR, etc. lab) (n = 205c) Safety ECOG score 0 or 1 Stratification factors Patients received sac-TMT + pembro or pembro monotherapy until disease progression or Histology (squamous VS. non-squamous) unacceptable toxicity PD-L1 TPS (1-49% vs. 2 50%) ECOG score (0 vs. 1) a Pembro was administered for a maximum of 18 cycles. 0 Tumor response was assessed using RECIST version 1.1.° One participant in the pembro group did not receive the assigned study treatment. ALK, anaplastic ymphoma kinase; BICR, blinded independent central review; DCR, disease control rate; DOR, duration of response; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ORR, objective response rate; Pembro, Pembrolizumab; R, randomization; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors; TPS, tumor proportion score. 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CUPICAL OHCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO Permission required for reuse: contact permissions@asco.org. KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO --- PFS by BICR Sac-TMT + pembro significantly improved PFS vs. pembro, with a 65% reduction in risk of disease progression or death 100 Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro 80 (n 208) (n 205) Progression-Free Survival (%) 62.4% PFS events, n (%) 66 (31.7) 128 (62.4) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (13.6, NE) 5.7 (4.3,7.0) 60 HR 0.35 (95%CI: 0.26, 0.47) 40 29.0% p< 0.0001ª 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro + Censored 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time (Months) No.at risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 208 208 195 187 182 164 144 126 120 90 62 47 20 18 1 0 Pembro 205 195 149 129 127 108 84 67 61 46 28 24 9 8 1 0 a Updated efficacy boundary (corresponding to actual PFS events of 194): 0.0174 (2-sided). NE, not estimable; NR, not reached. 2026 ASCO PRE SENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY G CORICAL GHCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation it property of be author and ASCO Permission required for reuse: contact permissions@asco.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- PFS (BICR) by PD-L1 Expression TPS ≥ 50% TPS 1-49% Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro (n = 83) (n 82) (n = 125) (n = 123) PFS events, n (%) 26 (31.3) 44 (53.7) PFS events, n (%) 40 (32.0) 84 (68.3) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (NE, NE) 9.5 (6.9, 13.8) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (11.1, NE) 4.3 (2.9,5.5) HR 0.47 (95%CI: 0.29, 0.77) HR 0.28 (95%CI: 0.19, 0.41) 100 100 80 80 Progression Free Survival (%) 65.6% 60 39.0% 40 HI Progression Free Survival (%) 60.1% 60 $ 40 21.6% 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro Pembro + Censored + Censored 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time (Months) Time (Months) No.atrisk No.at risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 83 83 78 74 74 67 60 53 51 42 28 22 9 8 0 Sac-TMT+Pembro 125 125 117 113 108 97 84 73 69 48 34 25 11 10 1 0 Pembro 82 78 68 62 61 55 46 40 37 30 17 14 7 7 1 0 Pembro 123 117 81 67 66 53 38 27 24 16 11 10 2 1 0 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY CURICAL UNCOLDGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation a property of the author and ASCO Permission required for reuse, contact permissions@asco.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- Adverse Events of Special Interest AEOSIs were consistent with the known profiles of the individual agents, and no new safety signals were identified Sac-TMT Pembro (n 208) Sac-TMT AEOSI Any grade Grade >3 Anemia 181 (87.0) 19 (9.1) Neutrophil count decreased 94 (45.2) 40 (19.2) Stomatitis 92 (44.2) 13 (6.3) Ocular surface toxicity 30 (14.4) 0 Infusion-related reaction® 12 (5.8) 0 Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro (n 208) (n = 204) Any grade Grade ≥3 Any grade Grade >3 Pembro AEOSI Hypothyroidism 28 (13.5) 0 23 (11.3) 0 Pneumonitis 26 (12.5) 6 (2.9) 15 (7.4) 2 (1.0) Hyperthyroidism 15 (7.2) 0 10 (4.9) 0 Infusion reaction 12 (5.8) 0 2 (1.0) 0 Severe skin reactions 6 (2.9) 6 (2.9) 3 (1.5) 3 (1.5) Adrenal insufficiency 5 (2.4) 3 (1.4) 2(1.0) 0 Summary of any grade AEOSI for pembro with incidence z 2% in either treatment group. . Including 5 patients (2.4%) with febrile neutropenia. Stomatitis includes the preferred terms of stomatitis, oral ulcer and aphthous ulcer. The most common ocular surface toxicities included dry eye (10.1%). conjunctivitis (5.8%), and increased tearing (3.4%). Infusion reactions occurred during the course of sac-TMT infusion. Pneumonitis includes the preferred terms of pneumonitis, immune-mediated lung disease, and interstitial lung disease. The exposure-adjusted incidence rates (patients with AEOSI / patient-years) of all-grade pneumonitis were 0.173 in the SBC-TMT pembro group and 0.144 in the pembro group. AEOSI, adverse events of special interest. 2026 ASCO PRE SENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO ANNUAL MEETING Presentation property of - author and ASCO Permission required for reuse, contact permissions@asco.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER 000 ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO
Urs Weber MD
Urs Weber MD @UrsWeberMD
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
View Post
OptiTROP-Lung05 Study Design Randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT06448312) Key Eligibility Sac-TMT 4 mg/kg Q2W Endpoints b + Locally advanced (stage IIIB/IIIC) or Pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6Wa Primary metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC PFS assessed by BICR (n = 208) No prior systemic antitumor therapy R Secondary No sensitizing EGFR or ALK 1:1 OS (key secondary endpoint) alteration PFS assessed by investigator n = 413 PD-L1 TPS> 1% (IHC 22C3, central Pembrolizumab 400 mg Q6W ORR, DCR, DOR, etc. lab) (n = 205°) Safety ECOG score 0 or 1 Stratification factors Patients received sac-TMT + pembro or pembro monotherapy until disease progression or Histology (squamous vs. non-squamous) unacceptable toxicity PD-L1 TPS (1-49% VS. ≥ 50%) ECOG score (0 vs. 1) Pembro was administered for a maximum of 18 cycles, t Tumor response was assessed using RECIST version 1.1.° One participant in the pembro group did not receive the assigned study treatment. ALK, anaplastic ymphoma kinase; BICR, blinded Independent central review; DCR, disease control rate; DOR, duration of response, ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ORR, objective response rate; Pembro, Pembrolizumat; R, randomization; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; TPS, tumor proportion soore. 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMARICAN CLINICAL CHICOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation as property of the author and ASCO Permission required for - contact permissions@sco.org KNOWLEDGE COMQUERS CANCER --- PFS by BICR Sac-TMT + pembro significantly improved PFS vs. pembro, with a 65% reduction in risk of disease progression or death 100 Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro 80 (n = 208) (n = 205) Progression-Free Survival (%) 62.4% PFS events, n (%) 66 (31.7) 128 (62.4) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (13.6, NE) 5.7 (4.3,7.0) 60 HR 0.35 (95%Cl: 0.26, 0.47) 40 29.0% p < 0.0001ᵃ 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Pembro + Censored 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time (Months) No.at risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 208 208 195 187 182 164 144 126 120 90 62 47 20 18 1 0 Pembro 205 195 149 129 127 108 84 67 61 46 28 24 9 8 1 0 Updated efficacy boundary (corresponding to actual PFS events of 194): 0.0174 (2-sided). NE, not estimable; NR, not reached 2026 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY on CUMICAL OHCOLOGE ANNUAL MEETING Presentation N property of the submit and ASCO Permission required for reuse correct permissions@escro.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- PFS (BICR) by PD-L1 Expression TPS ≥ 50% TPS 1-49% Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro (п = 83) (n = 82) (n = 125) (n = 123) PFS events, n (%) 26 (31.3) 44 (53.7) PFS events, n (%) 40 (32.0) 84 (68.3) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (NE, NE) 9.5 (6.9, 13.8) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (11.1. NE) 4.3 (2.9, 5.5) HR 0.47 (95%CI: 0.29, 0.77) HR 0.28 (95%Cl: 0.19, 0.41) 100 100 80 80 Progression-Fr 00 Free Survival (%) 65.6% + 39.0% Progression-Free Survival (%) 60.1% 60 60 40 40 21.6% 20 Sac-TMT+Pemero 20 Sao TMT+Pembro Pembro Pembro + Censored + Censored 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time (Months) Time (Months) No.al risk No.al risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 63 83 78 74 74 67 60 63 51 42 28 a 9 8 0 Sac-TMT+Pembro 125 125 117 113 108 97 84 73 69 48 34 25 11 10 I 0 Pembro 82 78 68 62 61 55 46 40 37 30 17 14 7 7 1 0 Pembro 123 117 61 67 66 53 38 27 24 10 11 10 2 1 0 2026 ASCO PRESENTED ST: Professor Caicun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLDON ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO. Premission required for reuse, contact KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- PFS (BICR) by Histology Non-Squamous Squamous Sac-TMT Pembro Pembro Sac-TMT + Pembro Pembro (n = 123) (n = 124") (п = 85) (n = 80) PFS events, n (%) 29 (23.6) 70 (56.5) PFS events, n (%) 37 (43.5) 58 (72.5) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (13.6, NE) 6.6 (4.3, 8.7) Median, mo (95%CI) NR (8.3, NE) 5.5 (4.1, 7.0) HR 0.28 (95%CI: 0.18, 0.43) HR 0.44 (95%CI: 0.29, 0,66) 100 100 80 71.3% 80 Progression-Free Survival (%) * 60 Progression-F ree Survival (%) 60 51.3% 40 33.0% 40 24.6% 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro 20 Sac-TMT+Pembro Fembro Pembro + Censored Censored 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time (Months) Time (Months) No.at risk No.at risk Sac-TMT+Pembro 123 123 118 114 110 104 88 73 69 51 35 26 11 11 0 Sac-TMT+Perribro 85 85 77 73 72 60 56 53 51 39 27 21 9 7 1 0 Pembro 124 116 89 76 75 66 51 38 34 25 15 12 4 4 1 0 Pembro 80 78 $9 52 51 42 33 29 27 21 13 12 5 I 0 One patient with thymoma was excluded from the pembro group in the subgroup analysis of histology. 2026 ASCO PRX SENTED BY: Professor Calcun Zhou #ASCO26 ASCO - SOCIETY - CLINICAL - ANNUAL MEETING Presentation a property of the author and ASCO. Permission required for rever, contact one SNOWLEDGE COMQUERS CANCER
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
Hidehito HORINOUCHI @hhorinouchi
#ASCO26 · May 27, 2026
View Post
ASCO26 LUNG CANCER OncoAlert 360° TOP TEN BY ONCOALERT Oncology For Collegues By Colleagues LBA4 HARMONI-6: IVONESCIMAB + CHEMO VS TISLELIZUMAB + CHEMO IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ADVANCED SQUAMOUS NSCLC - OS RESULTS (PHASE 3) LBA3 LIBRETTO-432: ADJUVANT SELPERCATINIB IN STAGE IB-IIIA RET FUSION-POSITIVE NSCLC - EFS PRIMARY RESULTS (PHASE 3) 8506 OPTITROP-LUNGO5: SACITUZUMAB TIRUMOTECAN + PEMBROLIZUMAB vs PEMBROLIZUMAB AS 1L TREATMENT FOR PD-L1-POSITIVE ADVANCED NSCLC (RANDOMIZED PHASE 3) 8515 TRITON: TREMELIMUMAB + DURVALUMAB + CHEMO vs PEMBROLIZUMAB + CHEMO IN 1L NSQ MNSCLC WITH STK11, KEAP1, AND/OR KRAS MUTATIONS (PHASE 2B INTERIM ANALYSIS) LBA8500 WU-KONG28: SUNVOZERTINIB MONOTHERAPY vs PLATINUM-BASED CHEMO AS 1L TREATMENT WWW.ONCOALERT360.COM FOR ADVANCED NSCLC WITH EGFR EXON20INS (MULTINATIONAL PHASE 3) 8002 LORIN: NEOADJUVANT LORLATINIB IN STAGE III NSCLC HARBORING ALK FUSION (PHASE 2 MULTICENTER) 8502 CROWN: LORLATINIB vs CRIZOTINIB AS 1L TREATMENT FOR ADVANCED ALK+ NSCLC - 7-YEAR UPDATE (PHASE 3) 8503 ALKOVE-1: NELADALKIB EFFICACY AND SAFETY IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED ALK+ NSCLC LBA1510 LOW-DOSE PEMBROLIZUMAB WITH CHEMOTHERAPY IN ADVANCED NSCLC 8519 SILEVERTINIB (BDTX-1535) IN TREATMENT-NAİVE NSCLC WITH NON-CLASSICAL EGFR MUTATIONS (PHASE 2) ACCELERET-LUNG: PRALSETINIB AS 1L TREATMENT OF RET FUSION-POSITIVE ADVANCED/METASTATIC 8504 NSCLC (PHASE 3) LBA8005 CONCURRENT THORACIC RADIOTHERAPY, PLATINUM/ETOPOSIDE CHEMOTHERAPY, AND DURVALUMAB IMMUNOTHERAPY IN EXTENSIVE-STAGE SCLC (PHASE III) Leads Senior Faculty Participating AF Dr Horinouchi Dr. özkerim Dr Morgan Dr. Liu Dr Peters Dr. Lovly Dr. Lopes Dr. Aggarwal Dr. Reck Dr. Mirallas Med Onc Med Onc Clin Onc Med Onc Med Onc Med Onc Med Onc Med Onc Med Onc Med Onc
Dr Rishabh Jain
Dr Rishabh Jain @drrishabhonco
#ASCO26 · May 27, 2026
View Post
ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER ASCO Annual Meeting Abstract #: 8506 Oral Abstract Session Sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) plus pembrolizumab (P) versus pembrolizumab (P) as first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results from the randomized phase 3 OptiTROP-Lung05 study. Authors: Caicun Zhou, Anwen Xiong, Wenxiu Yao, Wei Zheng, Yan Yu, Peng Chen, Hua Zhong, Hui Wang, Bolin Chen, Haiyong Wang, Yun Fan, Yunpeng Yang, Xingxiang Pu, Qiming Wang, Xia Song, Zhangzhou Huang, Xiao-bo Du, Yan Qing, Xiaoping Jin, Junyou Ge Organizations: Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China, Department of Medical Oncology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute & Cancer, The Second People's Hospital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China, Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China, Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai, China, Thoracic Radiotherapy Department I, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China, Thoracic Medicine Department II, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China, Department of internal Medicine-Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China, Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China, Lung & Gastrointestinal Oncology Department, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China, Department of Internal Medicine, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Institute of Cancer Research, Henan Academy of Innovations in Medical Science, Zhengzhou, China, Respiratory Department, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China, Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China, Oncology Department, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, China, Clinical Research Center, Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China, Clinical Research Center, Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., National Engineering Research Center of Targeted Biologics, Chengdu, China Background: Pembrolizumab has been the standard first-line treatment for PD-L1 positive advanced NSCLC. Sac-TMT, a TROP2-directed antibody-drug conjugate with a unique bifunctional linker, and PD-1/ L1 inhibitors demonstrate complementary mechanisms that enhance antitumor activity in the first-line treatment of NSCLC (Hong et al., Nat Med, 2025). Here, we report the results from the --- planned interim analysis for PFS in this phase 3 OptiTROP-Lung05 study (NCT06448312). Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had treatment-naive, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC without EGFR/ ALK alterations and positive PD-L1 expression (defined as TPS >1%, 22C3 assay). Pts were stratified by PD-L1 (TPS 1-49% VS ≥ 50%), histology (squamous VS non-squamous) and ECOG (0 VS 1) and then randomized (1:1) to receive sac-TMT 4 mg/kg Q2W plus P 400 mg Q6W or P 400 mg Q6W. The primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST 1.1 assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR), and the key secondary endpoint was OS. Results: A total of 413 pts (median age 65 yrs; 84.5% ECOG 1; 40.0% squamous; 40.0% PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%) were randomized to receive sac-TMT + P (n = 208) or P (n = 205). As of Sep 29, 2025, the median follow-up was 10.5 months. PFS by BICR was significantly longer in the sac-TMT + P group than the P group (median, not reached VS 5.7 months; HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.26-0.47; p< 0.0001). The data for OS were not mature, and a favorable trend was observed in the sac-TMT + P group (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36-0.85). The BICR-assessed ORR was 70.2% in the sac-TMT + P group versus 42.0% in the P group. In the pre-specified PD-L1 subgroups, the HRs for PFS in pts with TPS 1-49% and TPS ≥ 50% were 0.28 (95% CI, 0.19-0.41) and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.29-0.77). In the pre- specified histology subgroups, the HRs for PFS in pts with non-squamous and squamous were 0.28 (95% CI, 0.18-0.43) and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.29-0.66). Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were 55.3% in the sac- TMT + P group and 31.4% in the P group. Most common grade ≥3 TEAEs of special interest for sac-TMT were neutrophil count decreased (17.3%), anemia (9.1%), and stomatitis (5.3%). TEAEs led to discontinuation of sac-TMT/ pembrolizumab in 3.8%/5.3% of pts in the sac-TMT + P group while discontinuation of pembrolizumab occurred in 4.9% of pts in the P group. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first phase 3 study to demonstrate the significant PFS benefit of an antibody-drug conjugate plus pembrolizumab in the first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive advanced NSCLC compared to pembrolizumab. The safety profile of sac-TMT + P was generally manageable and consistent with the safety profile of the components. No new safety signals were seen. These results from phase 3 OptiTROP-Lung05 study support sac-TMT + P as a potential new treatment option for this population. Research Funding: Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Track: Lung Cancer-Non-Small Cell Metastatic
MV Chandrakanth
MV Chandrakanth @chandrakanthmv
#ASCO26 · May 27, 2026
View Post
ASCO 2026 PHASE 3 NSCLC MV Onco ADC + IO Enters Frontline NSCLC ONE CORE TAKEAWAY PD-L1 positive advanced NSCLC Sac-TMT + pembrolizumab VS pembrolizumab alone ADC + IO may emerge as a powerful chemo-free frontline strategy in PD-L1 positive NSCLC. Sac-TMT + pembrolizumab delivered an unusually deep PFS benefit over pembrolizumab alone. HR 0.35 Median PFS: not reached VS 5.7 months ORR: 70.2% VS 42.0% Zhou et al ASCO 2026
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
Hidehito HORINOUCHI @hhorinouchi
#ASCO26 · May 22, 2026
View Post
PRESENTATION . 2026 ASCO Annual Meeting Sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) plus pembrolizumab (P) versus pembrolizumab (P) as first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive... Presenter: Caicun Zhou, MD, PhD, ABFT Date: May 30, 2026 Abstract: 8506 FROM: Oral Abstract Session Lung Cancer-Non-Small Cell Metastatic
gilberto lopes
gilberto lopes @glopesmd
#ASCO26 · May 22, 2026
View Post
ASCO MMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER Abstract #: 8506 Sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) plus pembrolizumab (P) versus pembrolizumab (P) as first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results from the randomized phase 3 OptiTROP-Lung05 study. Authors: Caicun Zhou, Anwen Xiong, Wenxiu Yao, Wei Zheng, Yan Yu, Peng Chen, Hua Zhong, Hui Wang, Bolin Chen, Haiyong Wang, Yun Fan, Yunpeng Yang, Xingxiang Pu, Qiming Wang, Xia Song, Zhangzhou Huang, Xiao-bo Du, Yan Qing, Xiaoping Jin, Junyou Ge

Top Tweets

Hidehito HORINOUCHI
Hidehito HORINOUCHI @hhorinouchi
🆙 @OncoAlert #ASCO26 #LCSM 🔝🔟Abstracts Leads: @HHorinouchi @UOzkerim @WeOncologists 1 HARMONi-6 2 LIBRETTO-432 3 WU-KONG28 4 OptiTROP-Lung05 5 TRITON 6 CROWN 7yr 7 LORIN 8 AcceleRET-Lung 9 Silevertinib 10 Concurrent CRT + durvalumab in ES-SCLC @ASCO @Larvol https://t.co/JUNcBp39Vo
2,823 views 45 likes 19 RT 2026-05-27
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
Hidehito HORINOUCHI @hhorinouchi
🆙 #ASCO26 #LCSM Oral 🔥OptiTROP-Lung05: 1L Sac-TMT + Pembro vs Pembro in PD-L1+ NSCLC ✅mPFS NR vs 5.7m (HR 0.35) ✅ORR 70.2% vs 42.0% ✅OS HR 0.55 (95%CI 0.36-0.85, immature) 🎙️Dr. Caicun Zhou 🔢8506 ☑️NCT06448312 🔗 https://t.co/t76ae3dVDU @OncoAlert @Larvol @ASCO https://t.co/eMpVRm2UrU https://t.co/dSbMUQojWS
2,028 views 17 likes 9 RT 2026-05-22
Stephen V Liu, MD
Stephen V Liu, MD @StephenVLiu
Dr. Caicun Zhou at #ASCO26 with results from phase III OptiTROP-Lung05: first-line sacituzumab govitecan (sac-TMT, TROP2 ADC) + pembro vs pembro for PD-L1+ NSCLC (n=413). Sac-TMT superior with PFS NR vs 6.6m (HR 0.38) with benefit across subgroups. https://t.co/LXubHLPXnD
1,994 views 35 likes 20 RT 2026-05-29
gilberto lopes
gilberto lopes @glopesmd
This one needs a thread because there are a lot of caveats: First-in-class at #ASCO26 (Abstract 8506, OptiTROP-Lung05): the first phase 3 to show an ADC + pembro beats pembro in 1L PD-L1+ NSCLC. Sac-TMT (TROP2 ADC) + pembro vs pembro: PFS not reached vs 5.7 mo, HR 0.35, ORR 70% https://t.co/ThkTczAllD
1,930 views 11 likes 6 RT 2026-05-22
Stephen V Liu, MD
Stephen V Liu, MD @StephenVLiu
#ASCO26 Sac-TMT + pembro improves PFS with PD-L1 low (HR 0.28) but standard here is pembro + chemo. In PD-L1 high, adding sac-TMT improves PFS HR 0.28 - and benefit seen in non-squamous and squamous. OS trend (HR 0.55) with RR 70% vs 42%. Would be good to compare to INSIGNA. https://t.co/a3K0io2V5m
795 views 15 likes 8 RT 2026-05-29
Stephen V Liu, MD
Stephen V Liu, MD @StephenVLiu
#ASCO26 Adding sac-TMT to pembro does increase toxicity but did not lead to more discontinuation of pembrolizumab (5% both arms). Of note, stomatitis in 40% vs 2% and pneumonitis 12.5% vs 7.4%. https://t.co/rlM7sSwHG5
674 views 12 likes 2 RT 2026-05-29
Balazs Halmos
Balazs Halmos @BalazsHalmosMD
OptiTROP-Lung05- should we be Optimists about the use of Trop2 ADCs frontline for advanced PD-L1+ NSCLC? Well- in light of much improved RR and impressive PFS (better for tps 1-49 and. NonSQ) + clear trends for OS benefit with an expected AE profile w/o worrisome signals: I’d https://t.co/nxQWifOiU0
629 views 17 likes 7 RT 2026-05-29
Dr Rishabh Jain
Dr Rishabh Jain @drrishabhonco
#ASCO26 Abstract 8506 - OptiTROP-Lung05: Sacituzumab tirumotecan + pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab in PD-L1+ advanced NSCLC. https://t.co/3uiaEYdVdI
420 views 4 likes 1 RT 2026-05-27
Uğur Özkerim
Uğur Özkerim @UOzkerim
#ASCO26 ✨OptiTROP-Lung05✨ We expected ADCs to move earlier. We probably didn’t expect a PFS HR of 0.35. Sacituzumab tirumotecan + pembrolizumab delivered one of the most striking first-line efficacy signals seen in advanced NSCLC this year. The ADC era keeps moving https://t.co/R7pZ3k86zg
368 views 13 likes 8 RT 2026-05-29
Chul Kim
Chul Kim @chulkimMD
#OptiTROP-Lung05 met its primary endpoint: sac-TMT + pembrolizumab improved PFS vs pembrolizumab alone in 1L PD-L1+ advanced NSCLC (HR 0.35). Benefit was seen across PD-L1 subgroups (more pronounced in PD-L1 1-49% vs. >=50%), with an early OS signal (HR 0.55). #ASCO26 https://t.co/0TrKnO2eoW
343 views 9 likes 2 RT 2026-05-29
MV Chandrakanth
MV Chandrakanth @chandrakanthmv
OptiTROP-Lung05 #ASCO2026 ADC + IO may be entering frontline NSCLC. Sac-TMT + pembrolizumab delivered a striking PFS benefit vs pembrolizumab alone: • HR 0.35 • ORR 70.2% vs 42.0% • mPFS NR vs 5.7 mo Potential chemo-free intensification strategy in PD-L1+ NSCLC. #NSCLC https://t.co/zc8zp3mfPm
299 views 4 likes 2 RT 2026-05-27
Dr Riyaz Shah
Dr Riyaz Shah @DrRiyazShah
OptiTROP-Lung05; sac-TMT + Pembro beats Pembro alone (6w) in PDL1 +ve NSCLC #ASCO26 https://t.co/kKstiNNFWr
218 views 3 likes 1 RT 2026-05-29
Dr. Antonio Calles 🫁🚭
Dr. Antonio Calles 🫁🚭 @Tony_Calles
OptiTrop-Lung 05: Sac-TMT + Pembro vs Pembro alone in 1L NSCLC in China. Positive trial for PFS across PDL1 expression and histology subtypes. Special attention to specific toxicities: mucositis, ocular, IRR. Unfortunately, pembro alone is not an appropriate control arm as is https://t.co/w7SsFhSAvX
188 views 3 likes 2 RT 2026-05-29
Urs Weber MD
Urs Weber MD @UrsWeberMD
Sac-TMT + pembro beats pembro as a 1st line treatment for advanced NSCLC. The big caveat here is that 60% of the patients in this study had a PD-L1 of 1-49%, so pembro alone wouldn’t have been the recommended treatment for them in many countries, including the US. #ASCO2026 https://t.co/VKghirm3x2
102 views 4 likes 2 RT 2026-05-29

OptiTROP-Lung05 Overview

OptiTROP-Lung05 (NCT05870956) is the Phase 3 trial that took sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT, SKB264 / MK-2870) — a TROP2-directed antibody-drug conjugate developed by Kelun-Biotech and globally partnered with Merck — into first-line PD-L1-positive advanced NSCLC in combination with pembrolizumab. Presented at ASCO 2026, the trial met its primary PFS endpoint with a 65% reduction in the risk of progression or death vs pembrolizumab monotherapy (p<0.0001), making this the first Phase 3 of an antibody-drug conjugate combined with an immune-checkpoint inhibitor to meet its primary endpoint in 1L NSCLC — a result KOLs are flagging as a potential paradigm shift for frontline IO+ADC combinations across multiple tumor types. Sac-TMT + pembro previously received Breakthrough Therapy Designation in China for this indication.

Population

Treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression (1L), without actionable driver mutations.

Intervention

Sac-TMT (sacituzumab tirumotecan) + pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Primary Endpoint

Progression-free survival by blinded independent central review (RECIST 1.1).

Key Secondary

Overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response, safety/tolerability, and PD-L1 subgroup analyses.

Reported Results

Progression-Free Survival (Primary Endpoint)

Sac-TMT + pembrolizumab produced a 65% reduction in the risk of progression or death vs pembrolizumab monotherapy in treatment-naïve PD-L1+ advanced NSCLC — a highly statistically significant outcome (p<0.0001). The PFS benefit was consistent in the prespecified PD-L1 subgroup analyses presented at ASCO 2026.

Sac-TMT + pembro vs pembro · 65% PFS risk reduction · p<0.0001Source: ASCO 2026 / OncLive coverage

Overall Survival (Trend, Immature)

At the September 29, 2025 data cutoff, overall survival was immature but showed a strong trend favoring the combination — a preliminary ~45% improvement in OS in favor of sac-TMT + pembrolizumab. Mature OS data are expected at follow-up analyses.

Trend ~45% OS improvement (immature)Source: ASCO 2026 / FierceBiotech coverage

Safety & Tolerability

The safety profile was generally manageable with the addition of sac-TMT: Grade 3+ TEAEs occurred in 55.3% on sac-TMT + pembrolizumab vs 31.4% on pembrolizumab alone. KOLs flagged the magnitude of PFS benefit as compelling relative to the modest additional toxicity from an ADC backbone.

G3+ TEAEs: 55.3% (combo) vs 31.4% (pembro)Source: ASCO 2026 / OncLive coverage

FDA & Approval Status

STATUSInvestigational in the US · BTD granted in China for 1L PD-L1+ NSCLC

Sac-TMT + pembrolizumab in 1L PD-L1+ advanced NSCLC is currently investigational in the United States. In China, the combination received Breakthrough Therapy Designation for this indication, supported by OptiTROP-Lung05 efficacy. The sponsors have also received FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation for sac-TMT in EGFR-mutant NSCLC (separate program); regulatory filings in the 1L PD-L1+ setting are anticipated. The combination represents the first Phase 3 evidence supporting an ADC + IO frontline regimen in NSCLC.

Source: OncLive — sac-TMT + pembro BTD (China) for 1L PD-L1+ NSCLC

Media Coverage

What KOLs Are Saying

KOLCommentSentiment
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
#ASCO26 · May 27, 2026
🆙 @OncoAlert #ASCO26 #LCSM 🔝🔟Abstracts Leads: @HHorinouchi @UOzkerim @WeOncologists 1 HARMONi-6 2 LIBRETTO-432 3 WU-KONG28 4 OptiTROP-Lung05 5 TRITON 6 CROWN 7yr 7 LORIN 8 AcceleRET-Lung 9 Silevertinib 10 Concurrent CRT + durvalumab in ES-S Neutral
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
#ASCO26 · May 22, 2026
🆙 #ASCO26 #LCSM Oral 🔥OptiTROP-Lung05: 1L Sac-TMT + Pembro vs Pembro in PD-L1+ NSCLC ✅mPFS NR vs 5.7m (HR 0.35) ✅ORR 70.2% vs 42.0% ✅OS HR 0.55 (95%CI 0.36-0.85, immature) 🎙️Dr. Caicun Zhou 🔢8506 ☑️NCT06448312 🔗 https://t.co/t76ae3dVDU @Onc Positive
Stephen V Liu, MD
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
Dr. Caicun Zhou at #ASCO26 with results from phase III OptiTROP-Lung05: first-line sacituzumab govitecan (sac-TMT, TROP2 ADC) + pembro vs pembro for PD-L1+ NSCLC (n=413). Sac-TMT superior with PFS NR vs 6.6m (HR 0.38) with benefit across su Neutral
gilberto lopes
#ASCO26 · May 22, 2026
This one needs a thread because there are a lot of caveats: First-in-class at #ASCO26 (Abstract 8506, OptiTROP-Lung05): the first phase 3 to show an ADC + pembro beats pembro in 1L PD-L1+ NSCLC. Sac-TMT (TROP2 ADC) + pembro vs pembro: PFS Neutral
Stephen V Liu, MD
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
#ASCO26 Sac-TMT + pembro improves PFS with PD-L1 low (HR 0.28) but standard here is pembro + chemo. In PD-L1 high, adding sac-TMT improves PFS HR 0.28 - and benefit seen in non-squamous and squamous. OS trend (HR 0.55) with RR 70% vs 42%. W Neutral
Stephen V Liu, MD
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
#ASCO26 Adding sac-TMT to pembro does increase toxicity but did not lead to more discontinuation of pembrolizumab (5% both arms). Of note, stomatitis in 40% vs 2% and pneumonitis 12.5% vs 7.4%. https://t.co/rlM7sSwHG5 Neutral
Balazs Halmos
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
OptiTROP-Lung05- should we be Optimists about the use of Trop2 ADCs frontline for advanced PD-L1+ NSCLC? Well- in light of much improved RR and impressive PFS (better for tps 1-49 and. NonSQ) + clear trends for OS benefit with an expected Neutral
Dr Rishabh Jain
#ASCO26 · May 27, 2026
#ASCO26 Abstract 8506 - OptiTROP-Lung05: Sacituzumab tirumotecan + pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab in PD-L1+ advanced NSCLC. https://t.co/3uiaEYdVdI Neutral
Uğur Özkerim
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
#ASCO26 ✨OptiTROP-Lung05✨ We expected ADCs to move earlier. We probably didn’t expect a PFS HR of 0.35. Sacituzumab tirumotecan + pembrolizumab delivered one of the most striking first-line efficacy signals seen in advanced NSCLC this y Neutral
Chul Kim
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
#OptiTROP-Lung05 met its primary endpoint: sac-TMT + pembrolizumab improved PFS vs pembrolizumab alone in 1L PD-L1+ advanced NSCLC (HR 0.35). Benefit was seen across PD-L1 subgroups (more pronounced in PD-L1 1-49% vs. >=50%), with an early Neutral
MV Chandrakanth
#ASCO26 · May 27, 2026
OptiTROP-Lung05 #ASCO2026 ADC + IO may be entering frontline NSCLC. Sac-TMT + pembrolizumab delivered a striking PFS benefit vs pembrolizumab alone: • HR 0.35 • ORR 70.2% vs 42.0% • mPFS NR vs 5.7 mo Potential chemo-free intensification Positive
Dr Riyaz Shah
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
OptiTROP-Lung05; sac-TMT + Pembro beats Pembro alone (6w) in PDL1 +ve NSCLC #ASCO26 https://t.co/kKstiNNFWr Neutral
Dr. Antonio Calles 🫁🚭
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
OptiTrop-Lung 05: Sac-TMT + Pembro vs Pembro alone in 1L NSCLC in China. Positive trial for PFS across PDL1 expression and histology subtypes. Special attention to specific toxicities: mucositis, ocular, IRR. Unfortunately, pembro alone Neutral
Urs Weber MD
#ASCO26 · May 29, 2026
Sac-TMT + pembro beats pembro as a 1st line treatment for advanced NSCLC. The big caveat here is that 60% of the patients in this study had a PD-L1 of 1-49%, so pembro alone wouldn’t have been the recommended treatment for them in many coun Neutral