Resectable gastric cancer (preoperative-only regimen selection) — Dutch investigator-initiated cooperative group (16 Netherlands centers)
Visit Interactive Trial Page →
Top tweets by impressions — click to view on X
🚨 Resectable Gastric Cancer | #GI26
CRITICS-II answers a key question
What is the best preoperative strategy when adjuvant therapy is omitted?
🧪 Trial design
Three fully neoadjuvant approaches…
CRITICS-II: multicenter Ph2 RCT in resectable gastric ca showing preop chemo (DOC) + CRT improved 1-yr EFS & pCR (20%) v CRT or chemo alone. But w D-FLOT now SOC, q’s are:
1. Could adding…
📊 CRITICS-II at #ASCOGI26
Total neoadjuvant therapy wins the pre-op race in resectable gastric cancer 🍽️🩺
3 strategies tested head-to-head
🧪 Chemo alone
🔥 Chemoradiation alone
🚀 Chemo ➜…
Here is a great trial already in progress building off MATTERHORN & CRITICS-II (presented today)!
Japanese EPOC2031 Ph2: TNT for resectable GEJ
-FLOT + pembro + short course RT (25 Gy/5fx)
-1…
CRITICS - II: TNT for Gastric Cancer?! When do we consider chemorads #ASCOGI26 #GI26 https://t.co/bXjddANLlC
#GI26 CRITICS-II (phase II) | Resectable GC
🔀 3 neoadj strategies tested (no adj therapy):
• CT alone (failed EFS threshold)
• CT → CRT (TNT)
• CRT alone
📈 1-yr EFS: 84% (CT+CRT) vs 78% (CRT) vs 68%…
Dr. Hallemeier excellent discussion on CRITICS-II vs TOPGEAR, noting differences in absence of IO & periop vs TNT approaches between studies including study heterogeneity. Important for further…
Dr. Verheij CRITICS-II rand PhII pick-the-winner neoadj tx strategies in resectable #GC/GEJC ➡️ total neoadjuvant chemo + chemoRT w/best outcomes & preferred candidate for further study, notably…
CRITICS-II: Phase II trial of neo-adjuvant CTx vs neo-adjuvant CTx and subsequent CTR vs neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in resectable GC
#ASCOGI26
👉 Arm1: lowest efficacy
👉…
#ASCOGI26 | CRITICS-II (Abstract 283)
Can we finally solve the post-op drop-out problem in gastric cancer?
Total neoadjuvant therapy (chemo → chemoradiotherapy → surgery) shows higher 1-year EFS…
Phase 2 'pick-the-winner' trial — CT + CRT arm selected for phase 3 evaluation in resectable gastric cancer. Shifts attention back to preoperative chemoradiotherapy after CRITICS-I (phase 3) showed no benefit for postoperative CRT. Does not change current practice but informs phase 3 design.
Three-arm pick-the-winner design comparing preoperative regimens. CT alone: 1-yr EFS 68% (below 75% threshold). CT + CRT: 1-yr EFS 84%. CRT alone: 1-yr EFS 78%. Winner = CT + CRT based on EFS, OS, surgical outcomes, and pCR. Median follow-up 40.4 months.
1-year OS rates: CT alone 74%, CT+CRT 89%, CRT alone 84%. Pick-the-winner design — not powered for formal OS comparison between arms.
Preoperative regimen safety profile detailed in primary publication. Pick-the-winner design focuses on 1-year EFS landmark rather than extensive toxicity comparison.
⚠️ Phase 2 pick-the-winner — informs phase 3 design, not current practice. Phase 2 'pick-the-winner' trial — CT + CRT arm selected for phase 3 evaluation in resectable gastric cancer. Shifts attention back to preoperative chemoradiotherapy after CRITICS-I (phase 3) showed no benefit for postoperative CRT. Does not change current practice but informs phase 3 design.