LIVE #WCLC26 — live KOL coverage of the World Conference on Lung Cancer View Full Coverage →
KOL Pulse Trial Intelligence

RMC-6236-001 NSCLC

Daraxonrasib (RASONQUE, Revolution Medicines), an oral RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibitor, produced dose-dependent responses of 31–37% in previously treated RAS-mutant NSCLC in this Phase 1–2 trial published in NEJM on September 2, 2026 — with median PFS of 8.3 months in the docetaxel-naïve 160–220 mg subgroup. Investigational in NSCLC; the Phase 3 RASolve 301 trial is ongoing.

2L+ RAS-Mutant NSCLC Daraxonrasib (RASONQUE) NEJM · Sept 2026 Investigational in NSCLC
See the KOL Reaction

RMC-6236-001 (NSCLC) Key Takeaways

Design — Phase 1–2 multicenter dose-escalation/expansion; daraxonrasib 10–400 mg orally once daily, 21-day cycles; primary endpoint safety. (NEJM, DCO 21-Jul-2025)

Population — Previously treated advanced RAS-mutant (non-G12C) NSCLC after platinum chemotherapy and anti-PD-(L)1; n=136 at ≤300 mg. (NEJM)

ORR — Dose-dependent: 31% (≤120 mg), 34% (160–220 mg), 37% (300 mg); docetaxel-naïve 160–220 mg subgroup (n=38): confirmed ORR 42%, DCR 89%. (NEJM / RevMed PR)

Survival — Docetaxel-naïve 160–220 mg subgroup: median PFS 8.3 mo (95% CI 4.0–12.5), median OS 16.0 mo (9.5–NE). (NEJM Fig 2 / RevMed PR)

Safety — Any-grade AEs 99% (any attribution); grade ≥3 AEs 54% (pneumonia 10%, diarrhea 9%, rash 8%, anemia 5%); four grade 5 events. At 160–220 mg: grade 3 TRAEs 25%, no grade 4/5 TRAEs. (NEJM)

Regulatory — ⚠️ Investigational in NSCLC. ✅ FDA-approved (Aug 2026, as RASONQUE) only in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Phase 3 RASolve 301 vs docetaxel ongoing (NCT06881784). (RevMed)

Sponsor / Drug — Revolution Medicines; daraxonrasib (RMC-6236), an oral RAS(ON) multi-selective, noncovalent tri-complex inhibitor. (RevMed)

Compiled and reviewed by the KOL Pulse research team, led by Brian Shields, Founder, KOL Pulse. Last updated September 2, 2026.

Free Access · KOL Pulse Intelligence

Track oncology’s top KOLs in your specialty

Create a free account, pick the tumor types you cover, and go beyond the tweet — the intelligence pharma teams use to map influence and prepare for engagement:

  • Enhanced KOL profiles
  • Pharma influence & potential advisory-board patterns
  • 2025 Open Payments financial analysis
  • Social-media sentiment & trend signals
Get free access — pick your specialty
Choose the tumor types you follow. No cost, unsubscribe anytime.

Top KOLs Discussing Daraxonrasib in NSCLC

Kathryn C. Arbour, MD
Kathryn C. Arbour, MD
@KCArbourMD
NEJM first author
Eric Topol
Eric Topol
@EricTopol
13.9K impressions
Dr. Antonio Calles 🫁🚭
Dr. Antonio Calles
@Tony_Calles
8.4K impressions
Jarushka Naidoo
Jarushka Naidoo
@DrJNaidoo
3.7K impressions
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade
@SuyogCancer
2.2K impressions
Patrick Forde
Patrick Forde
@FordePatrick
800 impressions
Yan Leyfman, MD
Yan Leyfman, MD
@YLeyfman
233 impressions
Rami Manochakian MD, FASCO
Rami Manochakian MD, FASCO
@RManochakian
219 impressions

RMC-6236-001 Key Slides & Visuals

Figures from the NEJM publication (Sept 2, 2026) as shared by physicians on X. The survival table beside the KM curve transcribes only legible published values.

NEJM
NEJM @NEJM
Progression-Free Survival (Figure 2)
NEJM · Sept 2, 2026 · KM curve
View Post
Population (docetaxel-naïve, 160–220 mg)NMedian PFS (95% CI)Median OS (95% CI)
RAS G12 mutations338.3 mo (4.5–13.3)
Any RAS mutation388.3 mo (4.0–12.5)16.0 mo (9.5–NE)

PFS medians per NEJM Figure 2 (data cutoff Jul 21, 2025); OS per Revolution Medicines release (Sept 2, 2026). Values read from the published figure — no interpolation.

Eric Topol
Eric Topol @EricTopol
Antitumor Activity (Figure 1)
NEJM · Sept 2, 2026 · Waterfall plot
View Post
[NEJM Figure 1 - Antitumor Activity of Daraxonrasib in Patients with RAS-Mutant NSCLC] Panel A: Response in All Patients with a Postbaseline Assessment. Dose groups: daraxonrasib <=120 mg, 160-220 mg, 300 mg. Best percent change waterfall; markers for progressive disease, stable disease, partial response, complete response, not evaluable. Panel B: Response in Previously Treated Patients (Not Docetaxel) Who Received Daraxonrasib, 160 to 220 mg. Majority of bars show tumor shrinkage; partial responses (green) and one complete response (purple) at right.
Miguel Gonzalez Velez, MD
Miguel Gonzalez Velez, MD @mgonzalezvelMD
NEJM Abstract
NEJM · Sept 2, 2026 · Full results summary
View Post
[NEJM Abstract - Daraxonrasib for Previously Treated RAS-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer] BACKGROUND: RAS mutations, as a group, are the most common oncogenic drivers of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and they occur in approximately 30% of patients. Whether daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) - an oral RAS(ON) multiselective, tri-complex inhibitor of guanosine triphosphate-bound mutant and wild-type RAS protein isoforms - is safe and effective in patients with RAS-mutant NSCLC is unknown. METHODS: In this phase 1-2, multicenter, dose-escalation and dose-expansion study of daraxonrasib, we enrolled patients with previously treated advanced RAS-mutant NSCLC and administered daraxonrasib in doses of 10 to 400 mg orally once daily in 21-day cycles. The primary end point was safety. Secondary end points included investigator-assessed objective response (complete or partial response) and the duration of response, with response assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. RESULTS: As of the data-cutoff date of July 21, 2025, a total of 136 patients with NSCLC who had been enrolled and treated with daraxonrasib at doses of 300 mg or less had been evaluated for safety and efficacy. Adverse events of any grade occurring with a dose of 300 mg or less, regardless of attribution, were reported in 99% of the patients, with rash, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and mucositis or stomatitis occurring in at least 30% of patients. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 54% of the patients, with pneumonia (in 10%), diarrhea (in 9%), rash (in 8%), and anemia (in 5%) occurring in at least 5% of patients; four grade 5 adverse events occurred. The percentage of patients who had an objective response was 31% with daraxonrasib at a dose of 120 mg or less, 34% at doses of 160 to 220 mg, and 37% at a dose of 300 mg.

Daraxonrasib NSCLC Top Tweets

Eric Topol
Eric Topol@EricTopol
𝕏
The newly approved, hit drug vs pancreatic cancer (daraxonrasib) also clicked in a Phase 1/2 clinical trial with some efficacy for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer and RAS mutations @NEJM https://t.co/h4rANahAqs https://t.co/lyb5XxXYQq
13.9K views85 likes2026-09-02
NEJM
NEJM@NEJM
𝕏
In a phase 1–2 study of daraxonrasib, 54% of patients with RAS-mutant non–small-cell lung cancer had grade 3 or higher adverse events, mainly pneumonia, diarrhea, and rash; more than 30% of patients had a response. Full study results: https://t.co/4XFCWCgIwP https://t.co/BfBEAg7xxu
11.3K views44 likes2026-09-02
Dr. Antonio Calles 🫁🚭
Dr. Antonio Calles 🫁🚭@Tony_Calles
𝕏
💊 Daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) oral, RAS(ON), multi-selective, tricomplex inhibitor of GTP-bound mutant and wild-type RAS in KRAS G12X mutant NSCLC ✅ORR = 38%, ✅DOR = 15.5 months ✅PFS = 9.8 m ✅OS = 17.7 m ⚠️Skin prophylaxis required. ✳️ 200 mg was selected for evaluation in https://t.co/3DmPgXKcWA
8.4K views48 likes2025-03-27
Jarushka Naidoo
Jarushka Naidoo@DrJNaidoo
𝕏
#ELCC25 Ph I Daraxonrasib (RAS-On panRAS inhibitor) in RAS+ NSCLC: - ORR 38% - mPFS 9.8m, mDOR 15.1m - modest tox (diarrhea & rash) - 200mg dose selected for ph III Promising. Delighted Ph III RASolve trial of this agent, coming to 🇮🇪 @myESMO @cancertrials_ie @Oncoalert #LCSM https://t.co/veNNokzsCn
3.7K views58 likes2025-03-27
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade@SuyogCancer
𝕏
Daraxonrasib . New first in class pan RAS inhibitor. Compared with Adagrasib and Sotorasib in NSCLC. @myESMO #ELCC2025 https://t.co/h6sILcFVrk
2.2K views31 likes2025-03-28
Patrick Forde
Patrick Forde@FordePatrick
𝕏
RAS(ON)i daraxonrasib in pretreated RAS mutant (non G12C) lung cancer, high grade tox in 54% incl 2.9% deaths. Tumor responses in 31-37% of pts, PFS 8.3m. So far not the breakthrough in lung cancer that it has been in pancreatic cancer #lcsm https://t.co/FDs6F1JRTd
800 views8 likes2026-09-02
Yan Leyfman, MD
Yan Leyfman, MD@YLeyfman
𝕏
For years, targeting RAS in lung cancer has been one of the biggest challenges in oncology. RAS mutations are among the most common oncogenic drivers in NSCLC—but the biology is complex, and effectively targeting RAS has remained notoriously difficult. Now, a new study of daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) offers another reason to rethink what may be possible. Daraxonrasib is an oral RAS(ON) multiselective inhibitor designed to target multiple mutant and wild-type RAS isoforms. In previously treated patients with RAS-mutant metastatic NSCLC: • Objective responses exceeded 30% across dose ranges • Response rates reached 37% at 300 mg daily • But the toxicity is substantial: 54% experienced grade ≥3 adverse events • Four grade 5 adverse events were reported The bigger story isn't simply the response rate. It is the possibility of moving beyond targeting a single RAS mutation and instead attacking RAS signaling in its active state across multiple isoforms. That could be particularly important in NSCLC, where RAS biology is heterogeneous and resistance remains a major challenge. At the same time, these results highlight the central problem: can we achieve meaningful RAS inhibition without paying too high a toxicity price? More than 30% response in a heavily pretreated population is encouraging—but durability, patient selection, combination strategies, and the therapeutic window will ultimately determine whether this becomes a new treatment paradigm. RAS has been called “undruggable” for decades. Perhaps the more interesting question now is: How far can we push RAS inhibition—and at what cost? https://t.co/PsmPqGY9XS
233 views2 likes2026-09-02
Rami Manochakian MD, FASCO
Rami Manochakian MD, FASCO@RManochakian
𝕏
🚨🔥@OncoAlert Hot off the press. Just published @NEJM ⭐️Results of phase 1/2 trial of: #Daraxonrasib (the famous & just approved drug in pancreas cancer) in: ✅Previously Treated #RAS-Mutant Non–Small-Cell #LungCancer (#NSCLC). ❇️#ORR: 31% at dose of 120 mg or less) 34% at doses of 160-220 mg) 37% at dose of 300 mg (the approved dose for pancreas cancer). ❇️#AEs ( ≥ grade 3): 54% 👇🏻 https://t.co/iYAcz1jupq
219 views12 likes2026-09-02
Miguel Gonzalez Velez, MD
Miguel Gonzalez Velez, MD@mgonzalezvelMD
𝕏
RMC-6236-001 by @KCArbourMD @DavidHongMD and other colleagues on @NEJM for RAS-mutant NSCLC. Take: Daraxonrasib showed a dose-dependent ORR of ~30%. 99% of patients with some toxicity and 4 grade 5 events reported. This is the first oral RAS(ON) agent to show some dose-response signal and likely to expand the options limited to KRAS G12C (Sotorasib and adagrasib). Management of toxicity will be key. #NSCLC #LCSM #KRAS
105 views1 likes2026-09-02
Uğur Özkerim
Uğur Özkerim@UOzkerim
𝕏
📢 Daraxonrasib in RAS-mutant NSCLC: promising activity, but toxicity deserves attention. In previously treated patients, response rates were 31–37%, with a median PFS of 8.3 months. However, grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 54% of patients. An encouraging step for RAS-targeted therapy, with the efficacy–toxicity balance to watch closely.@NEJM @OncoAlert @OpenMedKate @ManuelDomine @GlopesMd @weoncologists @MedwatchHQ @mirrorsmed
69 views2 likes2026-09-02

About the RMC-6236-001 Trial (NSCLC Cohort)

RMC-6236-001 (NCT05379985) is the first-in-human Phase 1–2 study of daraxonrasib, an oral RAS(ON) multi-selective, noncovalent tri-complex inhibitor that targets GTP-bound mutant and wild-type RAS isoforms. RAS mutations are the most common oncogenic drivers in NSCLC, occurring in roughly 30% of cases; outside RAS G12C there are no approved targeted therapies. The NSCLC results, published in the New England Journal of Medicine on September 2, 2026 (Arbour et al., NEJM 2026;395:882-893), cover 136 previously treated patients with advanced RAS-mutant (non-G12C) disease whose cancer progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-PD-(L)1 therapy.

✅ Daraxonrasib is FDA-approved (August 2026, brand name RASONQUE) for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma after at least one prior systemic therapy — the first broad RAS-targeted medicine approved in that disease. ⚠️ In NSCLC it remains investigational: these Phase 1–2 results informed the design of RASolve 301 (NCT06881784), the ongoing global randomized Phase 3 trial comparing daraxonrasib with docetaxel in previously treated RAS-mutant NSCLC.

Trial Methodology & Results

Study Design

Phase 1–2, multicenter, open-label dose-escalation and dose-expansion; daraxonrasib 10–400 mg orally once daily in 21-day cycles. Primary endpoint: safety.

Population

Previously treated advanced RAS-mutant (non-G12C) NSCLC after platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-PD-(L)1 therapy; 136 patients treated at ≤300 mg evaluated (DCO Jul 21, 2025).

Intervention

Daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) — oral RAS(ON) multi-selective, noncovalent tri-complex inhibitor of GTP-bound mutant and wild-type RAS.

Endpoints

Primary: safety. Secondary: investigator-assessed objective response and duration of response per RECIST 1.1.

Lead Authors

Kathryn C. Arbour, MD (MSKCC) and colleagues incl. David S. Hong, MD, for the RMC-6236-001 Investigators.

Next Step

RASolve 301 (NCT06881784): global randomized Phase 3, daraxonrasib vs docetaxel in previously treated RAS-mutant NSCLC — ongoing.

Objective Response

Responses were dose-dependent: 31% at doses of 120 mg or less, 34% at 160–220 mg, and 37% at 300 mg (NEJM, n=136, DCO 21-Jul-2025). In the docetaxel-naïve subgroup treated at 160–220 mg (n=38) — the population mirrored in the Phase 3 — confirmed ORR was 42% (95% CI 26–59) with a disease control rate of 89% (95% CI 75–97) (RevMed PR, Sept 2, 2026).

ORR 42% in the docetaxel-naïve 160–220 mg subgroup
Source: NEJM (DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa2504059)

Progression-Free & Overall Survival

In the docetaxel-naïve 160–220 mg subgroup, median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI 4.0–12.5 for any RAS mutation, n=38; 4.5–13.3 for RAS G12, n=33 — NEJM Figure 2) and median OS was 16.0 months (95% CI 9.5–NE) (RevMed PR, Sept 2, 2026). PFS and OS were not formal endpoints of this Phase 1–2 study.

Median OS 16.0 months in the docetaxel-naïve subgroup
Source: Revolution Medicines (Sept 2, 2026)

Safety

Adverse events of any grade, regardless of attribution, occurred in 99% of patients at ≤300 mg; rash, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and mucositis/stomatitis each occurred in at least 30%. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 54% (pneumonia 10%, diarrhea 9%, rash 8%, anemia 5%), and four grade 5 adverse events occurred (NEJM, n=136). Within the 160–220 mg dose range, grade 3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 25% of patients (most commonly rash 8% and diarrhea 3%) with no grade 4 or 5 TRAEs (RevMed PR). Physician reaction centered on this efficacy–toxicity balance.

Grade ≥3 AEs 54% overall; G3 TRAEs 25% at 160–220 mg
Source: NEJM (DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa2504059)

Daraxonrasib NSCLC in the News

Daraxonrasib NSCLC FAQ

What did the RMC-6236-001 trial show for daraxonrasib in NSCLC?

In the Phase 1-2 RMC-6236-001 study published in NEJM (Sept 2, 2026), daraxonrasib produced dose-dependent objective responses in previously treated RAS-mutant (non-G12C) NSCLC: 31% at doses of 120 mg or less, 34% at 160-220 mg, and 37% at 300 mg (data cutoff July 21, 2025; n=136). In a docetaxel-naive subgroup treated at 160-220 mg (n=38), confirmed ORR was 42% with a disease control rate of 89%.

Is daraxonrasib (RASONQUE) FDA-approved for lung cancer?

No. Daraxonrasib is investigational in NSCLC. Its FDA approval (August 2026, brand name RASONQUE) covers metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma after at least one prior systemic therapy. Approval in lung cancer would depend on the ongoing Phase 3 RASolve 301 trial.

What survival outcomes were reported?

In the docetaxel-naive 160-220 mg subgroup (n=38), median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% CI 4.0-12.5) and median overall survival was 16.0 months (95% CI 9.5-not estimable), per NEJM Figure 2 and the Revolution Medicines announcement.

What is the safety profile of daraxonrasib in NSCLC?

Per the NEJM report (n=136, doses of 300 mg or less), adverse events of any grade occurred in 99% of patients regardless of attribution; grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 54% (pneumonia 10%, diarrhea 9%, rash 8%, anemia 5%), and four grade 5 events occurred. In the 160-220 mg dose range, grade 3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 25% with no grade 4 or 5 TRAEs.

What is the next step for daraxonrasib in RAS-mutant NSCLC?

RASolve 301 (NCT06881784), a global randomized open-label Phase 3 trial comparing daraxonrasib with docetaxel in previously treated locally advanced or metastatic RAS-mutant NSCLC, is ongoing and was designed from these Phase 1-2 results.

Key KOL Sentiments - Daraxonrasib in NSCLC

KOLComment (verbatim)Sentiment
Eric Topol
@EricTopol
The newly approved, hit drug vs pancreatic cancer (daraxonrasib) also clicked in a Phase 1/2 clinical trial with some efficacy for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer and RAS mutations @NEJM https://t.co/h4rANahAqs https://t.co/lyb5XxXYQq Positive
Jarushka Naidoo
@DrJNaidoo
#ELCC25 Ph I Daraxonrasib (RAS-On panRAS inhibitor) in RAS+ NSCLC: - ORR 38% - mPFS 9.8m, mDOR 15.1m - modest tox (diarrhea & rash) - 200mg dose selected for ph III Promising. Delighted Ph III RASolve trial of this agent, coming to 🇮🇪 @myESMO @cancertrials_ie @Oncoalert #LCSM https://t.co/veNNokzsCn Positive
Dr Amol Akhade
@SuyogCancer
Daraxonrasib . New first in class pan RAS inhibitor. Compared with Adagrasib and Sotorasib in NSCLC. @myESMO #ELCC2025 https://t.co/h6sILcFVrk Positive
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
Daraxonrasib shining also in KRAS-mutant NSCLC! @NEJM #GOAT https://t.co/kr1NyE48rq https://t.co/HTS8kzo3Jy Positive
Balazs Halmos
@BalazsHalmosMD
The Revolution continues!! Thx to print version of NEJM and USPS we can get a Back to the Near Future glimpse of 9/3 edition.. Less than a week after its approval for pancreatic cancer dare-xonrasib already dared to go after Ras-mutant lung cancer! With 30-40% response rates, PFS of 8 months or so, significant tox profile (mostly derm/GI) but better at around selected 200 mg dose in further studies, it certainly should dare docetaxel in 2nd line with studies ongoing! Now for relevant patients who cannot get access to drug and have limited options, would one try off-label access to drug? Lets leave that for an off-line discussion.. while Revving the RevMed K-Ras engine up to keep moving the field forward! #lcsm Positive
Dr. Antonio Calles 🫁🚭
@Tony_Calles
💊 Daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) oral, RAS(ON), multi-selective, tricomplex inhibitor of GTP-bound mutant and wild-type RAS in KRAS G12X mutant NSCLC ✅ORR = 38%, ✅DOR = 15.5 months ✅PFS = 9.8 m ✅OS = 17.7 m ⚠️Skin prophylaxis required. ✳️ 200 mg was selected for evaluation in https://t.co/3DmPgXKcWA Neutral
Yan Leyfman, MD
@YLeyfman
For years, targeting RAS in lung cancer has been one of the biggest challenges in oncology. RAS mutations are among the most common oncogenic drivers in NSCLC—but the biology is complex, and effectively targeting RAS has remained notoriously difficult. Now, a new study of daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) offers another reason to rethink what may be possible. Daraxonrasib is an oral RAS(ON) multiselective inhibitor designed to target multiple mutant and wild-type RAS isoforms. In previously treated patients with RAS-mutant metastatic NSCLC: • Objective responses exceeded 30% across dose ranges • Response rates reached 37% at 300 mg daily • But the toxicity is substantial: 54% experienced grade ≥3 adverse events • Four grade 5 adverse events were reported The bigger story isn't simply the response rate. It is the possibility of moving beyond targeting a single RAS mutation and instead attacking RAS signaling in its active state across multiple isoforms. That could be particularly important in NSCLC, where RAS biology is heterogeneous and resistance remains a major challenge. At the same time, these results highlight the central problem: can we achieve meaningful RAS inhibition without paying too high a toxicity price? More than 30% response in a heavily pretreated population is encouraging—but durability, patient selection, combination strategies, and the therapeutic window will ultimately determine whether this becomes a new treatment paradigm. RAS has been called “undruggable” for decades. Perhaps the more interesting question now is: How far can we push RAS inhibition—and at what cost? https://t.co/PsmPqGY9XS Neutral
Rami Manochakian MD, FASCO
@RManochakian
🚨🔥@OncoAlert Hot off the press. Just published @NEJM ⭐️Results of phase 1/2 trial of: #Daraxonrasib (the famous & just approved drug in pancreas cancer) in: ✅Previously Treated #RAS-Mutant Non–Small-Cell #LungCancer (#NSCLC). ❇️#ORR: 31% at dose of 120 mg or less) 34% at doses of 160-220 mg) 37% at dose of 300 mg (the approved dose for pancreas cancer). ❇️#AEs ( ≥ grade 3): 54% 👇🏻 https://t.co/iYAcz1jupq Neutral
Miguel Gonzalez Velez, MD
@mgonzalezvelMD
RMC-6236-001 by @KCArbourMD @DavidHongMD and other colleagues on @NEJM for RAS-mutant NSCLC. Take: Daraxonrasib showed a dose-dependent ORR of ~30%. 99% of patients with some toxicity and 4 grade 5 events reported. This is the first oral RAS(ON) agent to show some dose-response signal and likely to expand the options limited to KRAS G12C (Sotorasib and adagrasib). Management of toxicity will be key. #NSCLC #LCSM #KRAS Neutral
Uğur Özkerim
@UOzkerim
📢 Daraxonrasib in RAS-mutant NSCLC: promising activity, but toxicity deserves attention. In previously treated patients, response rates were 31–37%, with a median PFS of 8.3 months. However, grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 54% of patients. An encouraging step for RAS-targeted therapy, with the efficacy–toxicity balance to watch closely.@NEJM @OncoAlert @OpenMedKate @ManuelDomine @GlopesMd @weoncologists @MedwatchHQ @mirrorsmed Neutral
Patrick Forde
@FordePatrick
RAS(ON)i daraxonrasib in pretreated RAS mutant (non G12C) lung cancer, high grade tox in 54% incl 2.9% deaths. Tumor responses in 31-37% of pts, PFS 8.3m. So far not the breakthrough in lung cancer that it has been in pancreatic cancer #lcsm https://t.co/FDs6F1JRTd Negative