SACI-IO HR+ (NCT04448886) is an investigator-initiated Phase 2 trial of sacituzumab govitecan (Trodelvy) plus-or-minus pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. It did not meet its primary progression-free-survival endpoint (ITT: 8.1 vs 6.2 months at ASCO 2024; HR 0.81, p=0.37; final HR 0.78, p=0.12), with only a numerical signal in the PD-L1-positive subgroup. The combination is investigational. Led by Aditya Bardia.
Explore Trial DataDesign — Investigator-initiated randomized Phase 2; sacituzumab govitecan (Trodelvy) +/- pembrolizumab (Keytruda), HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, PD-L1 unselected (NCT04448886). Led by Aditya Bardia. (ASCO 2024 LBA1004; ESMO Breast 2026 final)
PFS (primary) — NEGATIVE — Primary endpoint NOT met. ASCO 2024: median PFS 8.1 vs 6.2 months (HR 0.81; p=0.37). Final (ESMO Breast 2026, 34.6-mo follow-up): PFS HR 0.78, p=0.12 — not significant in the intent-to-treat population. (ASCO 2024 / ESMO Breast 2026)
Overall survival — No significant intent-to-treat benefit: OS HR 0.97 at final analysis. (ESMO Breast 2026 / ESMO Open, July 2026)
PD-L1 subgroup — A numerical signal favored the combination in the exploratory PD-L1-positive (CPS >=1) subgroup — hypothesis-generating, not confirmatory. (ESMO Breast 2026)
Safety — No new safety signals; consistent with known sacituzumab govitecan and pembrolizumab class effects (including the sacituzumab govitecan neutropenia Boxed Warning). One Grade 5 event (hepatotoxicity) reported in the monotherapy arm. (ESMO Breast 2026)
Regulatory / Sponsor — INVESTIGATIONAL + NEGATIVE — the SG + pembrolizumab combination in HR+/HER2- mBC is not FDA approved. Investigator-initiated (Aditya Bardia), with Gilead Sciences and Merck. (FDA label)
Compiled and reviewed by the KOL Pulse research team, led by Brian Shields, Founder, KOL Pulse. Last updated July 21, 2026.
Trial slides shared by KOLs at ASCO 2024 LBA1004. Click any image to expand. OCR text extracted via AWS Textract.
Highest-engagement tweets about this trial, ranked by KOL discussant count (replies + quote-tweets). Replies in green, quote-tweets in blue. Wall Street, stock-promo, and non-substantive replies excluded.
SACI-IO HR+: Adding pembrolizumab to SG did not improve PFS or OS overall in HR+ MBC, but a promising signal was seen in the PD-L1+ subgroup (CPS ≥1). More exploration needed. #ESMOBreast26 https://t.co/BLTrPHWVcn
Can we add pembrolizumab to SG for metastatic HR postive Her2 negative MBC? Not much benifit of PFS . 8.4 months vs 6.2 months . Not much useful strategy. @ASCO @OncoAlert #asco24 @Larvol https://t.co/quNLaziErI
SACI-IO HR+ in pts w/PDL1 unselected HR+ MBC, pembrolizumab + sacituzumab govitecan (SG) did not improve mPFS vs SG alone (8.1 vs 6.2 months, HR 0.81, p=0.37). a non-significant trend seen among patients w/ PD-L1+ (CPS ≥1) Larger trials ongoing #ASCO24 @OncoAlert https://t.co/
Ana garrida-castro presents Saci-IO in HR+ MBC. Intriguing trend towards improved PFS and OS in CPS+ disease with SG Pembo vs SG, underpowered for significance. HR neg study ongoing! #ASCO24 @OncoAlert https://t.co/pzs5Ccjsws
Ana Garrido-Castro from @DFCI_BreastOnc presents the results of SACI-IO HR+ investigator-initiated trial. Adding pembro to SG did not improve PFS in unselected pts with HR+ MBC (8.1 vs 6.2 mo, HR 0.81), although an intriguing trend in PFS and OS was seen in the PDL1+ subgroup. ht
#ASCO24 SACI-IO: SG w/wo Pembro in pts with metastatic HR+/HER2-BC 🔍≥1 prior ET and 0-1 ChT for MBC PFS➡️8.1 vs 6.2 mo (HR 0.76 but NS) OS➡️18.5 vs 17.9 mo (immature) Addition of Pembro to SG showed a non-significant trend toward improved PFS @OncoAlert https://t.co/Hf
SACI-IO HR+ is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized Phase II trial evaluating whether the addition of pembrolizumab to sacituzumab govitecan (SG, anti-Trop-2 ADC) improves outcomes versus SG alone in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer who had received ≥1 prior endocrine therapy and 0–1 prior lines of chemotherapy. Primary results were reported at ASCO 2024 (LBA1004, Garrido-Castro), where the trial did not meet its primary endpoint: adding pembrolizumab did not significantly improve PFS in the PD-L1-unselected ITT population (8.1 vs 6.2 months; HR 0.81; p=0.37). Final results with extended follow-up were presented at ESMO Breast Cancer 2026 (Abstract 424RO, Garrido-Castro, 8 May 2026; data cutoff 3 December 2025, median follow-up 34.6 months) and are now published in full in ESMO Open (Jul 2026), confirming no significant ITT benefit (PFS HR 0.78, p=0.12; OS HR 0.97), with the early suggestive OS trend (HR 0.65) maturing to essentially flat. A numerical, underpowered signal persisted in the exploratory PD-L1+ (CPS ≥1) subgroup. This combination is investigational: sacituzumab govitecan (Trodelvy, Gilead) monotherapy is FDA-approved in pretreated HR+/HER2- MBC (TROPiCS-02), but SG + pembrolizumab (Keytruda, Merck) is not approved in this or any setting.
Population: Adults with HR+ (ER ≥1% and/or PR ≥1%), HER2-negative, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Prior endocrine therapy ≥1 line required. 0–1 prior chemotherapy lines for metastatic disease. Excluded: prior TOPO1-inhibitor ADCs, irinotecan, or PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Baseline: median age 57, 77% prior CDK4/6 inhibitor, 56% no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease.
Interventions: Arm A: Sacituzumab govitecan 10 mg/kg IV on Days 1 and 8 + pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Arm B: Sacituzumab govitecan 10 mg/kg IV on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle (monotherapy). Treatment continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Endpoints: Primary: PFS in the overall population. Secondary: PFS in PD-L1+ (CPS ≥1 by 22C3); OS; ORR; safety. Exploratory: TROP2 / PD-L1 expression correlatives.
At the primary analysis (median follow-up 12.5 months), adding pembrolizumab to sacituzumab govitecan did not significantly improve PFS in the PD-L1-unselected ITT HR+/HER2- MBC population. Median PFS 8.1 vs 6.2 months; HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.51–1.28); p=0.37. Overall survival at this cut was not significant (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.33–1.28). [ASCO 2024 LBA1004, Garrido-Castro; corroborated by @DrSGraff & @Dr_Oncologista slide OCR]
ITT population (N=52 vs N=52) at final analysis: median PFS 8.4 months (95% CI 4.5–12.5) with SG + pembrolizumab vs 6.7 months (95% CI 3.8–8.7) with SG alone; HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.52–1.19); p=0.12 (log-rank); PFS events 46 vs 45. Median OS 22.2 months (95% CI 17.3–31.2) vs 22.1 months (95% CI 18.0–27.4); HR 0.97 (95% CI 0.61–1.54); p=0.46 (log-rank); OS events 37 vs 36. ORR 21.2% vs 17.3% (ASCO 2024 cut). [ESMO Breast 2026 424RO, DCO 12/3/25, FU 34.6 mo]
PD-L1+ subgroup (CPS ≥1, N=39: 19 vs 20): median PFS 9.7 months (95% CI 4.2–15.7) vs 5.6 months (95% CI 2.5–8.7); HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.28–1.14); p=0.11 (log-rank); PFS events 17 vs 18. Median OS 24.3 months (95% CI 17.0–NR) vs 17.7 months (95% CI 12.4–33.0); HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.32–1.48); p=0.34 (log-rank); OS events 12 vs 15. Numerically favourable but underpowered; not statistically significant. [ESMO Breast 2026 424RO, DCO 12/3/25, FU 34.6 mo]
Data evolution note: between the ASCO 2024 preliminary cut (DCO 1/12/2024, median FU 9.2 months) and the ESMO Breast 2026 final analysis (DCO 12/3/2025, median FU 34.6 months), the ITT OS HR moved from 0.65 (suggestive trend) to 0.97 (essentially flat). PD-L1+ subgroup signals remained directionally consistent.
"The safety profile of SG plus pembrolizumab was similar to that expected with either agent and no new safety signals were reported." One Grade 5 TEAE was reported in the SG monotherapy arm: hepatic failure (n=1), unlikely related to SG per investigator-assessed attribution. [ESMO Breast 2026 424RO, DCO 12/3/25, FU 34.6 mo]
Treatment-Emergent AEs ≥15% (Grade ≥2 / Grade 3-4), SG + Pembrolizumab (N=52) vs SG (N=52):
Interpretation (ASCO 2024 primary + ESMO Breast 2026 final analysis): The primary endpoint was negative — adding pembrolizumab did not significantly improve ITT PFS (ASCO 2024: 8.1 vs 6.2 mo, HR 0.81, p=0.37; ESMO Breast 2026 final: HR 0.78, p=0.12). With mature 34.6-month follow-up, the ITT OS hazard ratio moved from an early 0.65 to 0.97 (p=0.46) — the suggestive trend did not bear out. The PD-L1+ (CPS ≥1) subgroup signal persists numerically (PFS HR 0.56, OS HR 0.69) but remains underpowered and not statistically significant. KOL commentary below reflects the ASCO 2024 data cut and should be read in that context.
Stephanie Graff reported the SACI-IO HR+ topline cleanly: “in pts w/PDL1 unselected HR+ MBC, pembrolizumab + sacituzumab govitecan (SG) did not improve mPFS vs SG alone (8.1 vs 6.2 months, HR 0.81, p=0.37),” while flagging “a non-significant trend seen among patients w/ PD-L1+ (CPS ≥1).” Hope Rugo framed the same data more permissively, noting an “Intriguing trend towards improved PFS and OS in CPS+ disease with SG Pembo vs SG, underpowered for significance,” with the companion “HR neg study ongoing.” Paolo Tarantino similarly described “an intriguing trend in PFS and OS… seen in the PDL1+ subgroup.” Abi Siva polled the implications directly — “promising signal was seen in the PD-L1+ subgroup (CPS ≥1). More exploration needed.” Yakup Ergün noted the “Addition of Pembro to SG showed a non-significant trend toward improved PFS.” Suyog Amol Akhade dissented on practicality, calling the SG+pembro PFS gain “Not much benifit” and the regimen not a useful strategy.
SACI-IO HR+ (NCT04448886) is an investigator-initiated, randomized Phase 2 trial of the TROP-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate sacituzumab govitecan (Trodelvy), with or without the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab (Keytruda), in hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (PD-L1 unselected). It was led by Ana C. Garrido-Castro (Dana-Farber), part of the SACI-IO program by Aditya Bardia.
No. SACI-IO HR+ did not meet its primary progression-free-survival endpoint. At ASCO 2024 median PFS was 8.1 versus 6.2 months (HR 0.81; p=0.37), and the final analysis (ESMO Breast 2026; 34.6-month follow-up) confirmed no significant intent-to-treat benefit (PFS HR 0.78, p=0.12; overall survival HR 0.97). Only a numerical signal favored the combination in the PD-L1-positive subgroup.
No. The sacituzumab govitecan (Trodelvy) plus pembrolizumab (Keytruda) combination studied in SACI-IO HR+ is investigational and not FDA approved, and the trial was negative on its primary endpoint. Sacituzumab govitecan is separately approved as monotherapy in HR+/HER2- and triple-negative metastatic breast cancer, and pembrolizumab in certain breast cancer settings, but not this combination in HR+/HER2- disease.
Although the overall trial was negative, a numerical benefit favored adding pembrolizumab in the exploratory PD-L1-positive (CPS >=1) subgroup. This is hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory: the subgroup was exploratory and not powered for a definitive conclusion, so it does not establish efficacy and would require prospective testing.
No. This page covers the HR-positive/HER2-negative SACI-IO cohort. There is a separate SACI-IO trial in triple-negative breast cancer. The two studies address different breast cancer subtypes, and the results and interpretation for the HR-positive/HER2-negative population described here should not be conflated with the triple-negative study.
See how oncologists are reacting across the Trodelvy program: Physician Sentiment on TRODELVY® →