KOL Pulse — Trial Profile

SUPREMO / BIG 2-04 MRC Trial

Intermediate-risk early breast cancer post-mastectomy (pT1-2 N1; pT3N0; or pT2N0 grade III and/or LVI) — Medical Research Council (MRC) / NIHR partnership; EORTC Breast Cancer Group; Dutch Cancer Society; Cancer Australia; HSBC Trustees; Breast Cancer Institute of Edinburgh; Edinburgh Cancer Centre Endowments; University of Edinburgh

Intermediate-risk early breast cancer post-mastectomy (pT1-2 N1; pT3N0; or pT2N0 grade III and/or LVI)SABCS 2024 GS2-03
Visit Interactive Trial Page →

Top KOLs Discussing SUPREMO / BIG 2-04 MRC

Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD
Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD
@to_be_elizabeth
11.8K impressions
M. Bolton
M. Bolton
@5_utr
10.1K impressions
Wendy Woodward MDPhD
Wendy Woodward MDPhD
@IBCradiation
5.5K impressions
Icro Meattini
Icro Meattini
@Icro_Meattini
4.3K impressions
Chelain Goodman, MD PhD
Chelain Goodman, MD PhD
@ChelainG
3.2K impressions
Harold J. Burstein, MD, PhD, FASCO
Harold J. Burstein, MD, PhD, FASCO
@DrHBurstein
2.8K impressions

SUPREMO / BIG 2-04 MRC Key Slides & Visuals

Official trial slides and relevant visuals shared by KOLs at SABCS 2024 GS2-03. Click any image to expand.

Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD
Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD @to_be_elizabeth
SUPREMO / BIG 2-04 MRC Data
11.8K impressions · 96 likes · Dec 12, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] BREAST CANCER RESULTS: Overall Survival SYMPOSIUM UT Health AACR to Overall Survival by Randomized Treatment and NO or N+ Status NO Patients N+ Patients Trial arm No Chest Wall Irradiation Chest Wall Irradiation Trial arm No Chest Wall Irradiation Chest Wall Irradiation 1.00 1.00 Survival probability 0.75 0.50 0.25 Survival probability 0.75 0.50 Log-rank P = 0.40 0.25 Log-rank P = 0.90 HR 1.21 (95% Cl: 0.79. 1.85) HR 0.97 (95% CI: 0.74, 1.28) 0.00 0.00 0 5 10 0 5 10 Time (years) Time (years) Number at risk Number at risk Trial arm 211 177 58 Trial arm 587 518 147 191 160 48 614 528 143 0 5 10 0 5 10 Time (years) Time (years) --- [Slide 2] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER RESULTS: Regional Recurrence SYMPOSIUM UT Health AACR - I I Regional Recurrence by Randomized Treatment and NO or N+ Status NO Patients N+ Patients Trial arm No Chest Wall Irradiation Chest Wall Irradiation Trial arm No Chest Wall Irradiation Chest Wall Irradiation 1.00 1.00 Survival probability 0.75 0.50 Log-rank P - 1.0 Servival probability 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.25 Log-rank P - 0.03 HR 1.00 (95% Cl: 0.36, 2.77) HR 0.51 (95% Cl: 0.27. 0.96) 0.00 0.00 0 5 10 0 5 10 Time (years) Time (years) Number at risk Number at risk Trial arm 211 173 58 Trial arm 587 509 146 191 160 50 614 524 142 0 5 10 0 5 10 Time (years) Time (years) --- [Slide 3] BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM RESULTS: Metastasis-free & Disease-free Survival UT Health AACR - December 10-13, 2024 Kaplan-Meier Curves for ITT Population: Kaplan-Meier Curves for ITT Population: Metastasis-free Survival by Randomized Treatment Disease-free Survival by Randomized Treatment Trial arm No Chest Wall Irradiation Chest Wall Irradiation Trial arm No Chest Wall Irradiation Chest Wall Irradiation 1.00 1.00 Survival probability 0.75 0.50 Survival probability 0.75 0.50 0.25 Log-rank D = 0.60 No CWI events = 166 (20.8%) 0.25 Log-rank p = 70 No CWI events = 196 (24.5%) HR 1.06 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.31) CWI events - 176 (21.8%) HR 0.97 (95% CI: 0.79. 1.18) CWI events - 192 (23.8%) 0.00 0.00 0 5 10 0 5 10 Time (years) Time (years) Number at risk Number at risk Trial arm 799 668 199 Trial arm 799 648 192 808 668 185 808 659 180 0 5 10 0 5 10 Time (years) Time (years) This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/prenerner Contact them - nt for perminare to reprint and/or distribute --- [Slide 4] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER CONCLUSIONS SYMPOSIUM UT Health AACR - Internal - - December 10-13, 2024 In patients with 1-3 positive nodes or pN0 with other risk factors adjuvant chest wall irradiation with optimal systemic therapy: (a) Does not improve 10 year overall survival (b) Results in a clinically insignificant reduction in 10 year chest wall recurrence (< 2%) (c) Has no impact on disease free or metastasis free survival (d) Incremental improvements in multidisciplinary care probably explain the results (e) Adjuvant chest wall irradiation should be omitted in most patients meeting eligibility criteria for SUPREMO This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presentes Contact them if ed acade for permission to reprint and/or distribute.
Wendy Woodward MDPhD
Wendy Woodward MDPhD @IBCradiation
SUPREMO / BIG 2-04 MRC Data
5.5K impressions · 13 likes · Dec 12, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER CONCLUSIONS SYMPOSIUM UT Health AACR - I - - December 10-13, 2024 In patients with 1-3 positive nodes or pNO with other risk factors adjuvant chest wall irradiation with optimal systemic therapy: (a) Does not improve 10 year overall survival (b) Results in a clinically insignificant reduction in 10 year chest wall recurrence (< 2%) (c) Has no impact on disease free or metastasis free survival (d) Incremental improvements in multidisciplinary care probably explain the results (e) Adjuvant chest wall irradiation should be omitted in most patients meeting eligibility criteria for SUPREMO This presentation is the Intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at v1ikunki@exseed.ed.ac.uk for permission to reprint and/or distribute.
Icro Meattini
Icro Meattini @Icro_Meattini
SUPREMO / BIG 2-04 MRC Data
4.3K impressions · 27 likes · Dec 13, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] SAN ANTONIO CONCLUSIONS BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM UT Health AACR - December 10-13, 2024 In patients with 1-3 positive nodes or pNO with other risk factors adjuvant chest wall irradiation with optimal systemic therapy: (a) Does not improve 10 year overall survival (b) Results in a clinically insignificant reduction in 10 year chest wall recurrence (< 2%) (c) Has no impact on disease free or metastasis free survival (d) Incremental improvements in multidisciplinary care probably explain the results (e) Adjuvant chest wall irradiation should be omitted in most patients meeting eligibility criteria for SUPREMO This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at v1ikunkl@exseed.ed.ac.uk for permission to reprint and/or distribute. --- [Slide 2] SAN ANTONIO RESULTS: Overall Survival BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM UT Health AACR before Rej Case Center Kaplan-Meier Curves for ITT Population: Overall Survival by Randomized Treatment Trial arm No Chest Wall Irradiation Chest Wall Irradiation 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 Log-rank p = 0.79 No CWI deaths = 145 (18.1%) HR 1.04 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.30) CWI deaths = 150 (18.6%) 0.00 0 5 10 Time (years) Number at risk 799 695 205 808 689 191 0 5 10 Time (years) --- [Slide 3] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER RESULTS: Chest Wall Recurrence SYMPOSIUM? UT Health AACR Kaplan-Meier Curves for ITT Population: Local Recurrence by Randomized Treatment Trial arm - No Chest Wall Irradiation Chest Wall Irradiation 1.00 Trial arm - No Chest Wall Irradiation - Chest Wall Irradiation 0.75 NNT = 62.5 1,000 95% CI: (33.3, 500.0) 0.975 0.50 0.950 0.25 0.925 Log-rank p = 0.04 CWI events = 9 (1.1%) HR 0.45 (95% CI: 0.20, 0.99) No CWI events = 20 (2.5%) 0.900 0 5 10 0.00 Time (years) 0 5 10 Time (years) Number at risk 799 691 205 808 690 194 0 5 10 Time (years) --- [Slide 4] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM DECEMBER 10-13, 2024 AAGR HENRY a. GONZALE CONVENTION CENTER SAN ANTONIO, TX UT Health Does postmastectomy radiotherapy in 'intermediate-risk' breast cancer impact overall survival? 10 year results of the BIG 2-04 MRC randomized trial on behalf of the SUPREMO trial investigators lan Kunkler, FRCR Institute of Genetics and Cancer University of Edinburgh Medical Research MRC Council 11/11 --- [Slide 5] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER RESULTS: Overall Survival SYMPOSIUM* UT Health AAGR - - - I I I Kaplan-Meier Curves for ITT Population: Overall Survival by Randomized Treatment Trial arm No Chest Wall Irradiation + Chest Wall Irradiation 1.00 Survival probability 0.75 0.50 0.25 Log-rank p = 0.79 No CWI deaths = 145 (18.1%) HR 1.04 (95% Cl: 0.82, 1.30) CWI deaths = 150 (18.6%) 0.00 0 5 10 Time (years) Number at risk Trial arm 799 695 205 808 689 191 0 5 10 Time (years) --- [Slide 6] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER RESULTS: Chest Wall Recurrence SYMPOSIUM* UT Health AACR I - - - I I Kaplan-Meier Curves for ITT Population: Local Recurrence by Randomized Treatment Trial arm No Chest Wall Irradiation Chest Wall Irradiation 1.00 Trial arm No Chest Wall Irradiation Chest Wall Irradiation NNT = 62.5 1.000 Survival probability 0.75 95% Cl: (33.3, 500.0) Survival probability 0.975 0.50 0.950 0.925 0.25 Log-rank p = 0.04 CWI events = 9 (1.1%) HR 0.45 (95% Cl: 0.20, 0.99) No CWI events = 20 (2.5%) 0.900 0 5 10 0.00 Time (years) 0 5 10 Time (years) Number at risk Trial arm 799 691 205 808 690 194 0 5 10 Time (years) --- [Slide 7] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER CONCLUSIONS SYMPOSIUM* UT Health AACR - Market I I I - - December 10-13, 2024 In patients with 1-3 positive nodes or pN0 with other risk factors adjuvant chest wall irradiation with optimal systemic therapy: (a) Does not improve 10 year overall survival (b) Results in a clinically insignificant reduction in 10 year chest wall recurrence (< 2%) (c) Has no impact on disease free or metastasis free survival (d) Incremental improvements in multidisciplinary care probably explain the results (e) Adjuvant chest wall irradiation should be omitted in most patients meeting eligibility criteria for SUPREMO This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at v1ikunkl@exsed.ed.ac.uk for permission to reprint and/or distribute.
Richard Simcock
Richard Simcock @BreastDocUK
SUPREMO / BIG 2-04 MRC Data
1.4K impressions · 15 likes · Dec 12, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER CONCLUSIONS SYMPOSIUM UT Health AAGR - - - - December 10-13, 2024 In patients with 1-3 positive nodes or pNO with other risk factors adjuvant chest wall irradiation with optimal systemic therapy: (a) Does not improve 10 year overall survival (b) Results in a clinically insignificant reduction in 10 year chest wall recurrence (< 2%) (c) Has no impact on disease free or metastasis free survival (d) Incremental improvements in multidisciplinary care probably explain the results (e) Adjuvant chest wall irradiation should be omitted in most patients meeting eligibility criteria for SUPREMO This proventation b Do interfection property of the Contact Non d United adadas - perovasion to reprint tritter distribute --- [Slide 2] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER RESULTS: Overall Survival SYMPOSIUM" UT Health AAGR - - - - Tax Cana Charge Kaplan-Meler Curves for ITT Population: Overall Survival by Randomized Treatment Trial arm + No Chest Wall Irradiation Chest Wall Imediation 1.00 Survival probability 0.75 0.50 0.25 Log-rank P = 0.79 No CWI deaths = 145 (18.1%) HR 1.04 (95% Cl: 0.82, 1.30) CWI deaths = 150 (18.6%) 0.00 0 5 10 Time (years) Number at risk Trial arm 799 695 205 808 680 191 0 5 10 Time (years) --- [Slide 3] Main eligibility criteria SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM UT Isalth AAGR - - - - - December 10-13, 2024 pT1N1M0;pT2N1M0 or pT3NOMO histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer. pT2N0M0 if grade 3 and/or lymphovascular invasion Undergone simple mastectomy (with minimum of 1mm clear margin) and an axillary staging procedure If axillary node clearance node positive (1-3 positive nodes) then an axillary node clearance (minimum of 8 nodes removed) should have been performed. Axillary node negative status can be determined on the basis of either axillary node clearance, or axillary node sampling or sentinel node biopsy Fit for adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (if indicated), adjuvant endocrine therapy (if indicated) and postoperative irradiation. Written informed consent www.supremo-trial.com this prevention b (he interved property of the Condect Dear a od and for permission to reprint Getributz
Erika Hamilton, MD
Erika Hamilton, MD @ErikaHamilton9
SUPREMO / BIG 2-04 MRC Data
1.1K impressions · 23 likes · Dec 12, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Main eligibility criteria SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM UT Health AACR - December 10-13, 2024 pT1N1M0;pT2N1M0 or pT3N0M0 histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer. pT2N0M0 if grade 3 and/or lymphovascular invasion Undergone simple mastectomy (with minimum of 1mm clear margin) and an axillary staging procedure If axillary node clearance node positive (1-3 positive nodes) then an axillary node clearance (minimum of 8 nodes removed) should have been performed. Axillary node negative status can be determined on the basis of either axillary node clearance, or axillary node sampling or sentinel node biopsy Fit for adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (if indicated), adjuvant endocrine therapy (if indicated) and postoperative irradiation. Written informed consent www.supremo-trial.com This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at v1ikunkl@exseed.ed.ac.uk for permission to reprint and/or distribute. --- [Slide 2] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER RESULTS: Basic Characteristics SYMPOSIUM® UT Health AACR - American Application - Cancer - Mays Caren Center Characteristic No Chest Wall Chest Wall Overall Characteristic No Chest Wall Chest Wall Overall Irradiation Irradiation (N=1607) Irradiation Irradiation (N=1607) (N=799) (N=808) (N=799) (N=808) TN stage Age (Median (Q1, Q3), years) 55 (48, 64) 54 (47,64) 55 (47, 64) T1N1 226 (28.3%) 246 (30.4%) 472 (29.4%) T2N0 205 (25.7%) 183 (22.6%) 388 (24.1%) Age range (years) T2N1 361 (45.2%) 368 (45.5%) 729 (45.4%) <45 years 121 (15.1%) 130 (16.1%) 251 (15.6%) T3N0 3 (0.4%) 4 (0.5%) 7 (0.4%) 45-54 years 267 (33.4%) 285 (35.3%) 552 (34.3%) Missing 4 (0.5%) 7 (0.9%) 11 (0.7%) 55-69 years 309 (38.7%) 283 (35.0%) 592 (36.8%) HER-2 positive? 70+ years 102 (12.8%) 110 (13.6%) 212 (13.2%) Yes 158 (19.8%) 173 (21.4%) 331 (20.6%) Histological grade No 556 (69.6%) 554 (68.6%) 1110 (69.1%) 1 42 (5.3%) 58 (7.2%) 100 (6.2%) Missing 85 (10.6%) 81 (10.0%) 166 (10.3%) 2 329 (41.2%) 324 (40.2%) 653 (40.7%) Triple negative? 3 420 (52.6%) 414 (51.4%) 834 (52.0%) Yes 83 (10.4%) 90 (11.1%) 173 (10.8%) Missing 8 (0.8%) 12 (1.2%) 20 (1.1%) No 682 (85.4%) 692 (85.6%) 1374 (85.5%) Number of nodes involved Missing 34 (4.2%) 26 (3.3%) 0 211 (26.4%) 191 (23.7%) 402 (25.1%) 60 (3.7%) Lymphatic/ vascular invasion? 1 312 (39.1%) 330 (41.0%) 642 (40.0%) Yes 302 (37.8%) 316 (39.1%) 2 171 (21.4%) 195 (24.2%) 366 (22.8%) 618 (38.5%) No 477 (59.7%) 3 89 (11.1%) 193 (12.0%) 470 (58.2%) 947 (58.9%) 104 (13.0%) Missing 20 (2.5%) 4 (0.2%) 22 (2.7%) Missing 1 (0.1%) 3 (0.4%) 42 (2.6%) Axillary surgery Tumor size Sentinel node biopsy only 118 (14.8%) 115 (14.2%) 233 (14.5% <21mm 239 (29.9%) 253 (31.4%) 492 (30.6%) Clearance only 349 (43.7%) 393 (48.6%) 742 (46.2% 21-50mm 556 (69.7%) 548 (68.1%) 1104 (68.7%) Sentinel or Sample + Clearance 245 (30.7%) 239 (29.6%) 484 (30.1% >50mm 3 (0.4%) 4 (0.5%) 7 (0.4%) Sample only 40 (5.0%) 31 (3.8%) Missing 1 (0.1%) 3 (0.4%) 4 (0.2%) 71 (4.4%) Missing 47 (5.9%) 30 (3.7%) 77 (4.8%) --- [Slide 3] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER RESULTS: Overall Survival SYMPOSIUM® UT Health AACR American - - Received Mays Cancer Creem Overall Survival by Randomized Treatment and NO or N+ Status NO Patients N+ Patients Trial arm No Chest Wall Irradiation Chest Wall Irradiation Trial arm No Chest Wall Irradiation Chest Wall Irradiation 1.00 1.00 Survival probability 0.75 0.50 Survival probability 0.75 0.50 0.25 Log-rank P = 0.40 0.25 Log-rank p = 0.90 HR 1.21 (95% CI: 0.79, 1.85) HR 0.97 (95% Cl: 0.74, 1.28) 0.00 0.00 0 5 10 0 5 10 Time (years) Time (years) Number at risk Number at risk Trial arm 211 177 58 48 Trial arm 587 518 147 191 160 614 528 143 0 5 10 0 5 10 Time (years) Time (years) --- [Slide 4] SAN ANTONIC BREAST CAN SYMPOSIUM RESULTS: Regional Recurrence UT Health AA - - Came Mays Cancer Cenner Kaplan-Meier Curves for ITT Population: Regional Recurrence by Randomized Treatment Trial arm No Chest Wall Irradiation Chest Wall Irradiation 1.00 Survival probability 0.75 0.50 0.25 Log-rank p = 0.06 No CWI events = 36 (4.5%) HR 0.61 (95% Cl: 0.36, 1.03) CWI events = 22 (2.7%) 0.00 0 5 10 Time (years) Number at risk Trial arm 799 682 204 808 685 192 0 5 10 Time (years)

SUPREMO / BIG 2-04 MRC Top Tweets

Top tweets by impressions — click to view on X

Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD
Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD@to_be_elizabeth

📌Does Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in &#x27;Intermediate-Risk&#x27; Breast Cancer Impact Overall Survival?
👉🏻10-Year Results of the BIG 2-04 MRC SUPREMO Randomized Trial: On Behalf of the SUPREMO Trial…

👁 11.8K ♡ 96 ↻ 42 Dec 12, 2024
M. Bolton
M. Bolton@5_utr

❗️ SUPREMO abstract now up

For pN1 patients: overall survival HR 0.82 (0.63-1.05) in favor of CWI

Authors conclusions: “No impact of CWI on survival”.

No! Their own estimate is for 18%…

👁 7.9K ♡ 45 ↻ 15 Dec 12, 2024
Wendy Woodward MDPhD
Wendy Woodward MDPhD@IBCradiation

Supremo trial 10 yr data PMRT vs not in N0, or 1-3 nodes showing no significant benefit to PMRT for any endpoint/CW benefit significant but small. Important context, all had axlnd. Will future…

👁 5.5K ♡ 13 ↻ 4 Dec 12, 2024
Icro Meattini
Icro Meattini@Icro_Meattini

Does Postmastectomy #Radiotherapy in &#x27;Intermediate-Risk&#x27; #BreastCancer Impact Overall Survival?

The answer is no, though the grey area is still there 📌

10-Year Results of the BIG 2-04 MRC SUPREMO…

👁 4.3K ♡ 27 ↻ 9 Dec 13, 2024
Chelain Goodman, MD PhD
Chelain Goodman, MD PhD@ChelainG

SUPREMO does not answer role of PMRT after SLNB without ALND.

- All N+ had ALND - does not address N+ patients s/p SLNB only.
- Per AMAROS, PMRT associated with reduced risk of lymphedema vs…

👁 2.8K ♡ 14 ↻ 2 Dec 12, 2024
Harold J. Burstein, MD, PhD, FASCO
Harold J. Burstein, MD, PhD, FASCO@DrHBurstein

Perhaps the most practice-defining study so far at @SABCSSanAntonio
SUPREMO study of post-mastectomy RT in intermediate risk (T1N1, T2N0, T2N1) is negative for overall survival with only 2%…

👁 2.8K ♡ 50 ↻ 17 Dec 12, 2024
Stephanie Graff, MD, FACP, FASCO
Stephanie Graff, MD, FACP, FASCO@DrSGraff

SUPREMO—post mastectomy radiation in moderate risk breast cancer—does not improve OS, DMFS, and had only an insignificant reduction in 10-yr chest wall recurrence (&lt;2%) #SABCS24 @OncoAlert

👁 1.9K ♡ 18 ↻ 6 Dec 12, 2024
Abeid Athman (Omar).
Abeid Athman (Omar).@bin_abeid

The SUPREMO trial is a huge hope for many countries in LMIC. This will reduce the number of post mastectomy patients who need to be on the LINAC thus prioritising other disease sites such as cervical…

👁 1.5K ♡ 15 ↻ 10 Dec 12, 2024
Richard Simcock
Richard Simcock@BreastDocUK

Practice changing SUPREMO

When I get back from #SABCS24 I will no longer offer post mastectomy #radonc for these intermediate risk tumours

Some Qs still around a sentinel node +ve population, and…

👁 1.4K ♡ 15 ↻ 12 Dec 12, 2024
Tatiana Prowell, MD
Tatiana Prowell, MD@tmprowell

#SABCS24 #bcsm #OncTwitter
SUPREMO Trial results reassure us that we can further safely de-escalate treatment in #oncology. Chest wall radiation post-mastectomy is time-consuming &amp; comes w/…

👁 1.2K ♡ 10 ↻ 5 Dec 12, 2024

About the SUPREMO / BIG 2-04 MRC Trial

SUPREMO is the definitive Phase 3 trial evaluating whether post-mastectomy chest wall irradiation (CWI) is needed for intermediate-risk breast cancer (1-3 positive nodes, or node-negative with high-risk features like grade 3 / LVI). At 9.6 years median follow-up, NO survival benefit from CWI (81.4% vs. 82.0% 10-yr OS, HR 1.04). Although CWI reduced chest wall recurrence risk by half, the absolute benefit was <2% — clinically insignificant. Results important for shared decision-making: many eligible patients may safely AVOID CWI. Reinforces the movement to minimize radiation exposure in intermediate-risk BC, complementing PRIME II (RT omission in 65+), CALGB 9343 (70+), and IDEA (RT omission by genomic risk).

Trial Methodology & Results

Overall Survival at 10 Years — Primary Endpoint

Median: 81.4 % 10-year OS (chest wall irradiation (CWI)) vs. 82.0 % 10-year OS (no CWI). HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.82-1.30) 10-year OS rate: 81.4% (CWI) vs. 82.0% (no CWI). Median follow-up (years) rate: 9.6% (years). Phase 3 international RCT (ISRCTN61145589). N=1,607 randomized (CWI 808, no CWI 799) between April 2006 and April 2013. Population: intermediate-risk post-mastectomy BC — pT1-2 N1; pT3N0; or pT2N0 grade III and/or LVI. CWI: 50 Gy/25 fx or 40 Gy/15 fx equivalent. Median follow-up 9.6 years. Primary endpoint 10-year OS: 81.4% (CWI) vs. 82.0% (no CWI), HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.82-1.30) — NO difference. Endpoint NOT MET. No survival benefit from CWI in this population. Kunkler et al., SABCS 2024 GS2-03.

❌ 10-yr OS 81.4% CWI vs 82.0% no CWI (HR 1.04, not significant)

📄 Source: KOL commentary on X →

Overall Survival (OS)

HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.82-1.30) Primary 10-year OS endpoint not met (see above). Secondary: chest wall recurrence events only 29 total (9 CWI, 20 no CWI); CWI HR 0.45 (95% CI 0.20-0.99), but absolute rate reduction <2% — investigator deemed clinically insignificant. 98.8% vs. 97.1% chest wall recurrence-free survival. No differential treatment effect in pN1 vs. pN0 (P for interaction = 0.13). Limitations: low accrual of pT3N0 disease, better-than-anticipated overall survival.


📄 Source →

Safety & Tolerability

Radiotherapy safety well-characterized. Specific CWI acute/late toxicity endpoints (skin reactions, pneumonitis, cardiac events, secondary malignancy) not emphasized in primary results — focus was OS. Cardiac and lung RT exposure were recorded per protocol.

Well-established RT safety profile

📄 Source →

Clinical Implications

Negative: Post-mastectomy CWI has no impact on 10-year OS in intermediate-risk BC. Omission may be safe. SUPREMO is the definitive Phase 3 trial evaluating whether post-mastectomy chest wall irradiation (CWI) is needed for intermediate-risk breast cancer (1-3 positive nodes, or node-negative with high-risk features like grade 3 / LVI). At 9.6 years median follow-up, NO survival benefit from CWI (81.4% vs. 82.0% 10-yr OS, HR 1.04). Although CWI reduced chest wall recurrence risk by half, the absolute benefit was <2% — clinically insignificant. Results important for shared decision-making: many eligible patients may safely AVOID CWI. Reinforces the movement to minimize radiation exposure in intermediate-risk BC, complementing PRIME II (RT omission in 65+), CALGB 9343 (70+), and IDEA (RT omission by genomic risk).

SUPREMO / BIG 2-04 MRC in the News

Key KOL Sentiments — SUPREMO / BIG 2-04 MRC

DoctorSentimentComment
Harold J. Burstein, MD, PhD, FASCO ● POSITIVE Perhaps the most practice-defining study so far at @SABCSSanAntonio SUPREMO study of post-mastectomy RT in intermediate risk (T1N1, T2N0, T2N1) is negative for overall survival with only 2% reduction in local recurrence with low baseline. Question answered: no PMRT here.
Abeid Athman (Omar). ● POSITIVE The SUPREMO trial is a huge hope for many countries in LMIC. This will reduce the number of post mastectomy patients who need to be on the LINAC thus prioritising other disease sites such as cervical and esophageal cancer. #SABCS24 @OncoAlert @HamidMD10 @AORTIC_AFRICA @m_mutebi https://t.co/eRMdnRNnLF
Richard Simcock ● POSITIVE Practice changing SUPREMO When I get back from #SABCS24 I will no longer offer post mastectomy #radonc for these intermediate risk tumours Some Qs still around a sentinel node +ve population, and triple negative Congrats Ian Kunkler and all triallists #SABCS24 https://t.co/peK55iqY6g
Tatiana Prowell, MD ● POSITIVE #SABCS24 #bcsm #OncTwitter SUPREMO Trial results reassure us that we can further safely de-escalate treatment in #oncology. Chest wall radiation post-mastectomy is time-consuming &amp; comes w/ physical &amp; financial tox for patients. Many will now be able to avoid it. 👏 @OncoAlert
Hope Rugo ● POSITIVE #SABCS24 10 year results of supremo study. Post mastectomy RT in 1-3+nodes intermed risk. No impact on OS. Question: does this apply if SLNBx and less AXLND. I think it applies. Imp for patients to be able to avoid this short and LT toxicity. @OncoAlert https://t.co/eMWUUKlpmT
Mark Storey ● POSITIVE @IBCradiation wow. Will be an interesting space to watch in the upcoming months. What we once thought we knew... Remember the 1999? trials at release...
Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD ● NEUTRAL 📌Does Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in 'Intermediate-Risk' Breast Cancer Impact Overall Survival? 👉🏻10-Year Results of the BIG 2-04 MRC SUPREMO Randomized Trial: On Behalf of the SUPREMO Trial Investigators by Prof Ian Kunkler #SABCS24 #day3 @OncoAlert #OncoAlertAF… https://t.co/e2JtqZZg2b https://t.co/IUyvw1lQZF
M. Bolton ● NEUTRAL ❗️ SUPREMO abstract now up For pN1 patients: overall survival HR 0.82 (0.63-1.05) in favor of CWI Authors conclusions: “No impact of CWI on survival”. No! Their own estimate is for 18% improvement and can only rule out &gt; 37% improvement in survival https://t.co/9QlOs3QhPR
Wendy Woodward MDPhD ● NEUTRAL Supremo trial 10 yr data PMRT vs not in N0, or 1-3 nodes showing no significant benefit to PMRT for any endpoint/CW benefit significant but small. Important context, all had axlnd. Will future include targeted ax radiation? Does this apply after SLNbx? #SABCS24 https://t.co/hYAgCi4QYm
Icro Meattini ● NEUTRAL Does Postmastectomy #Radiotherapy in 'Intermediate-Risk' #BreastCancer Impact Overall Survival? The answer is no, though the grey area is still there 📌 10-Year Results of the BIG 2-04 MRC SUPREMO Trial presented by Ian Kunkler @OncoAlert @SABCSSanAntonio #SABCS24 #OncoAlert https://t.co/9n0s4QCQqu
Stephanie Graff, MD, FACP, FASCO ● NEUTRAL SUPREMO—post mastectomy radiation in moderate risk breast cancer—does not improve OS, DMFS, and had only an insignificant reduction in 10-yr chest wall recurrence (&lt;2%) #SABCS24 @OncoAlert
Erika Hamilton, MD ● NEUTRAL Prof. Kunkler presents SUPREMO - study of post mastectomy XRT in intermediate risk #bcsm W/ 10 yrs f/u, 🚫diff in survival between XRT or not after mastectomy in those pts Was numerically more local recurrences without radiation (2%) @SABCSSanAntonio #SABCS24 @OncoAlert https://t.co/xDmDr9fcUE
Oncology Brothers ● NEUTRAL 4. #SUPREMO: Selective Use of Postoperative Radiotherapy after Mastectomy: - pT1N1M0, pT2N1M0, pT3N0M0, or pT2N0M0 Gr3 or LVI - No 10 yr survival with XRT after mastectomy 5/6 https://t.co/IFMAmQmAIf https://t.co/QQurxrgs3G
Youssef Zeidan MD, PhD ● NEUTRAL Next week ⏳The long awaited SUPREMO trial reporting 10 yr outcomes in #SABCS24. An international 🌎 effort to better select breast cancer patients for post-mastectomy radiation therapy☢️ 👉Primary outcome: OS @BHCancerCare @ASTRO_org @ESTRO_RT @EORTC @anzctr #CantWait https://t.co/podyWlxvMJ
Elisa Agostinetto ● NEUTRAL Does Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in 'Intermediate-Risk' Breast Cancer Impact Overall Survival? NO‼️ 10-Year Results of the BIG 2-04 MRC SUPREMO Randomized Trial #SABCS24 @OncoAlert https://t.co/coSXyG9nxP
M. Bolton ● NEUTRAL @Icro_Meattini @OncoAlert @SABCSSanAntonio Nobody should be routinely treating T2N0 and probably not T3N0 either; but for pN1, PMRT probably does improve survival https://t.co/sPkHm5YShx
M. Bolton ● NEUTRAL I hope I practice long enough to one day see people stop misinterpreting p-values and the main outcomes from RCTs 😮‍💨 https://t.co/sPkHm5YkrZ
Chelain Goodman, MD PhD ● NEUTRAL Important to engage in patient-centered decision making regarding ALND vs RT for these patients!
Mark Storey ● NEUTRAL @5_utr @Icro_Meattini @OncoAlert @SABCSSanAntonio 75% were node positive right? It's got some odd features - like ALND and RT was NOT to axilla, but are you still leaning on 97 data or did I miss something.
M. Bolton ● NEUTRAL I’m not sure what new knowledge was gained, we don’t regularly administer PMRT for T2N0, and for 1-3 LN+ it has always been “consider” RT, and in setting of routine ALND, RT still decreased regional recurrences - in SLNBx era, we just cannot apply this data which was ALND
Richard Simcock ● NEUTRAL @5_utr When do you think the curves are going to separate?? (Also re the T2 N0 had to be G3 and/or LVI) https://t.co/9mX70dQLyS
M. Bolton ● NEUTRAL @KolPulseAI Also, Bayesian SAP would prevent this type of misinterpretation HT @f2harrell https://t.co/hW7reEdBvv
M. Bolton ● NEUTRAL Where I see use: stop PMRT to T2N0 Weigh risk factors for rest: size, grade, margins, LVI and extent, exact number of LN positive in women who have ALND and discuss may not benefit OS but can decrease locoregional recurrence — exactly as it’s been, “consider” RT in 1-3 LN+ 🤷‍♂️
Chelain Goodman, MD PhD ● NEGATIVE SUPREMO does not answer role of PMRT after SLNB without ALND. - All N+ had ALND - does not address N+ patients s/p SLNB only. - Per AMAROS, PMRT associated with reduced risk of lymphedema vs ALND. So, PMRT still the treatment of choice post SLNB for int risk N+ pts? #SABCS24 https://t.co/VQtia3pKlw
M. Bolton ● NEGATIVE I’m not sure what knowledge was gained from SUPREMO other than in many patients who have mastectomy and ALND and aren’t even typically offered radiation such as T2N0, powering for a whopping 7% OS (HR 1.26) difference, not a lot was actually learned… https://t.co/ERIYYRETPL
M. Bolton ● NEGATIVE @BreastDocUK How is a trial powered for a whopping 7% OS benefit w/inclusion of such low risk patients like T2N0 margin negative, all ALND, with 0.95 CI of 0.82-1.3, “practice changing”? Their own results can only rule out &gt; 18% survival improvement and &gt; 30% worse) 🤷‍♂️
Jeff Ryckman ● NEGATIVE @tmprowell @OncoAlert This is certainly an important study, but it is worth noting that 76% of patients in this population underwent axillary lymph node dissection. Escalating axillary surgery to avoid radiotherapy may not be an equitable tradeoff for some patients.
Sabine MD ● NEGATIVE @5_utr @KolPulseAI @f2harrell I agree, the authors' conclusions are misleading. Their own estimate suggests 18% improvement in survival, which is significant. Bayesian SAP would prevent this type of misinterpretation.
M. Bolton ● NEGATIVE @ProtonStorey @KolPulseAI @f2harrell Im not sure I follow you; their own estimates are for 18% improvement and they can only rule out a massive &gt; 37% benefit. This work is underpowered, but the magnitude of the estimated survival benefit tracks with EBCTCG meta-analysis
M. Bolton ● NEGATIVE @ProtonStorey @Icro_Meattini @OncoAlert @SABCSSanAntonio They powered for a miracle with the inclusion of margin negative N0 patients; what is the prior evidence that treating these improves survival? Meanwhile their own results for pN1 are HR 0.82 and can only rule out massive benefit. I won’t change practice on pN1 based on this