NEW KCRS26 — Kidney Cancer Research Summit: top KOL voices, trial buzz & every slide, decoded View Full Coverage →
KOL Pulse - Trial Profile

EMBER-3 Trial

EMBER-3 is a Phase 3 trial of imlunestrant (Inluriyo), a next-generation oral SERD, in ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer after prior endocrine therapy. In the ESR1-mutant population, imlunestrant improved median PFS to 5.5 vs 3.8 months (HR 0.62; p=0.0008), supporting FDA approval on September 25, 2025 with the Guardant360 CDx. Sponsor: Eli Lilly.

ER+/HER2- ESR1-mutated mBC Imlunestrant (Inluriyo) SABCS 2024 (#SABCS24) FDA Approved
Discover KOL Sentiment on EMBER-3 →

EMBER-3 Key Takeaways

Design — Phase 3, 1:1:1; imlunestrant mono (400 mg) vs investigator's-choice ET vs imlunestrant + abemaciclib, ER+/HER2- advanced BC after ET, n=874 (NCT04975308). (NEJM)

PFS (ESR1-mutant, primary) — Median 5.5 vs 3.8 months; HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.46-0.82; p=0.0008) — 38% reduction in progression/death. (NEJM 2024)

Overall survival — ESR1-mutant median OS 34.5 vs 23.1 months; HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.43-0.86; p=0.0043) — did not cross the prespecified boundary at that interim. (updated OS, med f/u 28.5 mo)

Safety — Favorable, endocrine-like; Grade 3/4 AEs 17% vs 21%; most common fatigue 23%, diarrhea 22%, nausea 17%, mostly Grade 1. (NEJM)

Regulatory — FDA approved September 25, 2025 for ESR1-mutated disease; Guardant360 CDx companion diagnostic. (FDA.gov)

Sponsor / Drug — Eli Lilly; imlunestrant (Inluriyo), an oral next-generation SERD. (FDA label)

Compiled and reviewed by the KOL Pulse research team, led by Brian Shields, Founder, KOL Pulse. Last updated July 21, 2026.

Top KOLs Discussing EMBER-3

Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers
@OncBrothers
45.8K impressions
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
26.0K impressions
Hope Rugo
Hope Rugo
@hoperugo
15.3K impressions
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade
@SuyogCancer
9.7K impressions
Yakup Ergün
Yakup Ergün
@dr_yakupergun
6.8K impressions
Erika Hamilton, MD
Erika Hamilton, MD
@ErikaHamilton9
6.1K impressions

EMBER-3 Key Slides & Visuals

Official trial slides and relevant visuals shared by KOLs at SABCS 2024 (#SABCS24). Click any image to expand.

Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers @OncBrothers
EMBER-3 Data
20.7K impressions · 108 likes · Dec 27, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] SABCS 2025 METASTATIC HR+ HIGHLIGHTS Study Patient Population Treatment / Comparator Key Findings HR+/HER2+ with high - PFS 7mos vs. 13.9mos (HR 0.67) Chemo + maint ET AMBRE tumor burden - ORR 29.2% VS. 35.2% vs. (involving visceral - DoR 7.4mos vs. 10.9mos (HR 0.46, ET + Abemaciclib sites) p=0.023) - PFS with ILC 20.5mos vs. 9.4mos (HR 0.56) MONALEESA-3 - PFS with ILC 1L pts 59.6mos vs. Ribociclib + Fulvestrant HR+/HER2- ABC post 40mos (HR 0.54) Update vs. ET - OS with ILC 51.2mos vs. 30.8mos (ILC Subtype) Placebo + Fulvestrant (HR 0.62) - OS with ILC 1L pts 59.6mos vs. 40mos (HR 0.54) HR+/HER2- ABC Gedatolisib + Palbo + Fulv - PFS by bone mets status triplet NR progression on/after VS. VS. NR VS. 8.2mos VIKTORIA-1 CDK4/6i + NSAI, <2 Gedatolisib + Fulv - PFS in non-bone mets 9.3mos VS. prior ET for ABC, VS. 7.3mos VS. 1.9mos PIK3CA WT Fulv alone Camizestrant + CDK4/6i - Time to first subsequent therapy HR+/HER2- ABC post 16.6mos. VS. 9.2mos SERENA-6 AI + CKD4/6i for at vs. AI + CDK4/6i - Time to second subsequent least 6mos with ESRlm therapy 25.7mos vs. 19.4mos - PFS in ESRlm 9.99mos vs. 5.45mos HR+/HER- ABC <2 Giredestrant + Everolimus - PFS in ITT 8.77mos VS. 5.49mos prior lines of ET, evERA vs. - PFS in duration of prior CDK4/6i progressive disease ET + Everolimus <12mos, 5.55mos VS. 3.8lmos during/post CDK4/6i - PFS in duration of prior CDK4/6i 212mos 9.23mos VS. 5.55mos ER+, HER2- ABC - OS in all patients, NR vs. 34.4mos recurrence on or Imlunestrant + Abemaciclib - PFS with ESRlm 11.1mos vs. 5.5mos EMBER-3 after 12 mos of vs. (HR 0.49) completion of AI+/- Imlunestrant - PFS without ESRlm 9.2mos vs. CDK4/6i 5.5mos (HR 0.64) Sacituzumab HR+/HER2-, ABC post - 12mos PFS rate by BICR 40% VS. ASCENT-07 VS. 37% (HR 0.85, p=0.130) ET Physician's choice - OS NR VS. NR (HR 0.72, p=0.029) Website: ONC x @OncBrothers www.oncbrothers.com
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino @PTarantinoMD
EMBER-3 Data
19.4K impressions · 247 likes · Dec 11, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] 2nd line Rx 3rd line Rx & Adjuvant ET Genomics 1st line Rx Genomics Beyond Im + abema WT F ± abema WT Other ET F+ everol None, Tam, Revisit priors remote Al ESR1mut AI + CDK4/6i Im + abema Chemo/ADC PIK3/AKT ESR1mut Elacest, Imlun F+ capi Im + abema PIK3/AKT F+ alpel Im + abema X F+ PIK3/AKTi Im + abema WT WT F+ abema F+ CDK4/6i ESR1mut F+ everol Im + abema Other ET ESR1mut AI Elacest, Imlun Revisit priors Chemo/ADC PIK3/AKT F+ CDK4/6i X F+ capi PIK3/AKT F+ inavo + palb F+ alpel Im + abema AI + CDK46/i ANTONIO AST CANCER MPOSILIM
Yakup Ergün
Yakup Ergün @dr_yakupergun
EMBER-3 Data
6.2K impressions · 30 likes · May 08, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Proffered Paper session 2970 - Imlunestrant (Imlu) with or without abemaciclib (Abema) in advanced breast cancer (ABC): A subgroup analysis in CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i)-pretreated patients (pts) from EMBER-3 Presentation Number 2970 Lecture Time 16:30 - 16:42 Speakers Cristina Saura Manich (Barcelona, Spain) --- [Slide 2] Imlu + abema n=139lmlu n=140 Events/N HR (95% CI) Overall 79/139 109/140 0.51 (0.38-0.68) Metastases Visceral 47/80 68/81 0.39 (0.26-0.57) Liver 28/45 48/54 0.38 (0.23-0.62) Bone-Only 13/31 17/30 0.57 (0.27-1.22) Mutation ESR1 28/53 59/72 0.44 (0.28-0.70) PI3K-pathway (Includes PIK3CA, AKT1, PTEN)37/61 55/63 0.52 (0.34-0.79) Concurrent ESR1 and PI3K-pathway 13/29 33/39 0.32 (0.16-0.63) Prior CDK4/6i Palbociclib 44/90 66/86 0.43 (0.29-0.63) Ribociclib 25/37 32/39 0.57 (0.34-0.98) Abemaciclib 9/10 10/13 0.93 (0.37-2.31) Prior CDK4/6i duration for ABC (mo.) < 12 21/40 25/32 0.31 (0.17-0.58) ≥ 12 56/92 76/97 0.60 (0.42-0.85) < 18 36/60 40/52 0.50 (0.31-0.79) ≥ 18 41/72 61/77 0.53 (0.35-0.78)
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade @SuyogCancer
EMBER-3 Data
5.3K impressions · 65 likes · Apr 25, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Breast cancer oral Presentations - ASCO 25 1. Comparison of marking techniques for target lymph nodes in 2,596 patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Results from the prospective multicenter AXSANA/EUBREAST-03/AGO-B-053 study 2. INAVO120: Phase III trial final overall survival (OS) analysis of first-line inavolisib (INAVO)/placebo (PBO) + palbociclib (PALBO) + fulvestrant (FULV) in patients (pts) with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-), endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer (aBC) 3. A double-blind placebo controlled randomized phase III trial of fulvestrant and ipatasertib as treatment for advanced HER2-negative and estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer following progression on first line CDK 4/6 inhibitor and aromatase inhibitor: The CCTG/BCT MA.40/FINER study 4. De-escalated neoadjuvant taxane plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab with or without carboplatin in HER2-positive early breast cancer (neoCARHP): A multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial @SuyogCancer --- [Slide 2] Breast cancer oral Presentations - ASCO 25 5. Predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) from clinicopathologic variables and HER2DX genomic test in stage II/III HER2+ breast cancer treated with taxane, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (THP): Secondary results from the EA1181/CompassHER2 pCR trial 6. Efficacy and safety of elinzanetant for vasomotor symptoms associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy: Phase 3 OASIS 4 trial 7. 15-year outcomes for women with premenopausal hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer (BC) in the SOFT and TEXT trials assessing benefits from adjuvant exemestane (E) + ovarian function suppression (OFS) or tamoxifen (T)+OFS 8. Predicting nodal burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with circulating tumor (ct)DNA for surgical planning: Results from the I-SPY2 trial @SuyogCancer --- [Slide 3] Breast cancer oral Presentations - ASCO 25 9. Updated survival outcomes and predictors of benefit from ovarian function suppression in premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer: Results from the ASTRRA trial 10. Prediction of survival after de-escalated neoadjuvant therapy in HER2+ early breast cancer: A pooled analysis of three WSG trials 11. Phase III of oral paclitaxel (DHP107) vs intravenous paclitaxel in HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (mBC): Primary analysis of a multinational optimal trial (NCT03315364) 12. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with ER+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with imlunestrant, investigator's choice standard endocrine therapy, or imlunestrant + abemaciclib: Results from the phase III EMBER-3 trial @SuyogCancer --- [Slide 4] Breast cancer oral Presentations - ASCO 25 13. Phase l/lb study of inavolisib (INAVO) alone and in combination with endocrine therapy ± palbociclib (PALBO) in patients (pts) with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (HR+, HER2- LA/mBC) 14. Analysis of hyperglycemia (HG) in prediabetic/obese pts. 15. The impact of ovarian function suppression with adjuvant endocrine therapy on survival outcomes in young germline BRCA mutation carriers with breast cancer: Secondary analysis of an international cohort study 16. Vepdegestrant, a PROTAC estrogen receptor (ER) degrader, vs fulvestrant in ER- positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer: Results of the global, randomized, phase 3 VERITAC-2 study @SuyogCancer
VIRGINIA KAKLAMANI
VIRGINIA KAKLAMANI @VKaklamani
EMBER-3 Data
5.3K impressions · 37 likes · Dec 12, 2025
View on X ↗
Hope Rugo
Hope Rugo @hoperugo
EMBER-3 Data
4.6K impressions · 34 likes · Dec 11, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Median Progression Free Survival in Recent Randomized Trials of Endocrine Therapy: Outcomes among patients with prior CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment* 10 9 8 SOC VS oral SERD/SERM SOC + AKTi SOC + CDK4/6i Median PFS (months) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 SOC Elac SOC Cami75 Cami150 Fulv Laso Fulv F+Capi Fulv F+Palbo Fulv F+Ribo Fulv F+Abema SOC Imlun Imlun Im+Abema EMERALD SERENA2 ELAINE1 CAPI-291 PACE MAINTAIN postMONARCH EMBER3 EMBER3 Prior CDK46i 100% 100%** 100% 100%** 100% 100% 100% 58% 100%** *there are a lot of problems with cross study comparisons, especially in unplanned subset analyses: extent/types of prior therapy, variable tumor genomics/biomarker profile, SOC options, sample size, exposure VS resistance, investigator VS BICR, etc. .. Denotes subset of larger study cohort --- [Slide 2] Oral SERD/SERMs in combination with abemaciclib after prior CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment Study SERD/SERM Sample Size Median PFS in Reference + abema combination with abemaciclib EMBER-3 Imlunestrant 139 9.1 m Jhaveri et al. + abema NEJM 2024 36* 11.1 m *ESR1mut ELECTRA/ELEVATE Elacestrant 24 8.7 m Rugo et al. + abema SABCS 2024 11* 8.7 m *ESR1mut ELAINE 2 Lasofoxifene 29* 12.3m Damodaran et al. + abema * ESR1mut Ann Oncol 2023
Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD
Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD @to_be_elizabeth
EMBER-3 Data
4.0K impressions · 54 likes · Dec 09, 2025
View on X ↗
[Educational Session — After CDK4/6 Inhibitors, HR+/HER2- MBC (Mafalda Oliveira; SABCS 2025)] Efficacy of CDK4/6i after prior CDK4/6i — cross-trial comparison (Median PFS, experimental vs control; ITT unless noted) MAINTAIN (N=119): PFS HR 0.57, p=0.006; median 5.3 vs 2.8 mo PACE (N=220): PFS HR 1.11, p=0.62; median 4.6 vs 4.8 mo PALMIRA (N=198): PFS HR 0.84, p=0.149; median 4.9 vs 3.6 mo postMONARCH (N=368): PFS HR 0.72, p=0.02; median 6.0 vs 5.3 mo EMBER-3 (N=279): PFS HR 0.51; median 9.1 vs 3.7 mo (imlunestrant + abemaciclib vs SoC ET) Prior CDK4/6i duration <12 mo / >12 mo, respectively: MAINTAIN 33% / 67% · PACE 25% / 75% · PALMIRA 14% / 86% · postMONARCH 26% / (74%) · EMBER-3 26% / (74%) [Cross-trial comparison compiled by the presenter; trials differ in population and design — not a head-to-head. EMBER-3 imlunestrant+abemaciclib PFS HR 0.51 per ASCO/NEJM 2025.]
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO @ErikaHamilton9
EMBER-3 Data
3.6K impressions · 41 likes · Dec 12, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] SAN ANTONIO Secondary Endpoint: Interim os of Imlunestrant vs BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM® SOC ET at 50% Maturity in Patients With ESR1m UT Health AACR Sen.Amele - - Mays Cancer Center Imlunestrant SOC ET 100 86% n=138 n=118 No. of deaths 57 71 64% 75 82% 34.5 23.1 Overall Survival (%) Median (95% CI) (25.4-NR) (18.4-28.9) 50 HR (95% CI) 0.60 (0.43-0.86) 49% p-value = 0.0043* *p-value did not achieve prespecified threshold 25 for significance (p=0.0000004 at IA2) Imlunestrant 0 SOC ET 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Time (months) No. at risk — 138 129 121 117 110 99 89 81 60 47 34 23 17 7 3 1 0 — 118 110 102 97 88 74 66 59 43 31 20 12 8 5 2 0 0 Imlunestrant led to an ~11 month numerical improvement in median os in patients with ESR1m Note: The median follow-up was 29.5 months across both arms. Cl, confidence interval; ESR1m, estrogen receptor 1 gene mutation; HR, hazard ratio; IA2, Interim Analysis 2; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; SOC ET, standard of care endocrine therapy. This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact jhaverik@mskcc.org for permission to reprint and/or distribute. 7 --- [Slide 2] SAN ANTONIO Subgroup Analysis: PFS of Imlunestrant + BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM® Abemaciclib vs Imlunestrant by ESR1m Status UT Health AACR - American Cancer - Mays Cancer - Patients With ESR1m Patients Without ESR1m Imlunestrant Imlunestrant Imlunestrant Imlunestrant + abemaciclib + abemaciclib 100 n=92 n=67 n=121 100 n=146 No. of events 48 82 No. of events 96 92 Progression-free Survival (%) 75 11.1 5.5 Median (95% CI) (7.4-16.4) (3.8-7.2) Nominal p-value = 0.0002 Progression-free Survival (%) 9.2 5.5 75 Median (95% CI) (7.4-13.8) (3.6-5.8) HR (95% CI) 0.49 (0.33-0.71) HR (95% CI) 0.64 (0.47-0.85) 50 50 Nominal p-value = 0.0023 25 25 Imlunestrant Imlunestrant + abemaciclib + abemaciclib 0 Imlunestrant 0 Imlunestrant 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 No. at risk Time (months) No. at risk Time (months) — 67 51 39 36 27 23 19 18 7 3 1 1 0 — 146 108 83 65 51 47 40 36 29 17 13 9 2 0 - 92 60 35 33 20 16 10 4 3 2 1 0 0 - 121 70 43 40 34 30 25 22 15 12 7 4 0 0 Consistent benefit of imlunestrant + abemaciclib maintained regardless of ESR1m status CI, confidence interval; ESR1m, estrogen receptor 1 gene mutation; HR, hazard ratio; PFS, progression-free survival. This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact haverik@mskcc.org for permission to reprint and/or distribute 12 --- [Slide 3] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM Conclusions UT Health AACR I - Cancer Research Mays Cancer - Imlunestrant monotherapy vs SOC ET in patients with ESR1m With an additional 14 months of follow up, a clinically meaningful OS improvement was observed (11.4 months difference; HR=0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.86; p=0.0043), although the boundary (p=0.0000004) for significance was not achieved — OS benefit was consistent across subgroups Sustained PFS benefit and delayed subsequent receipt of chemotherapy by 5.4 months Continued favorable safety profile; no oral SERD-specific safety findings (e.g., ocular or cardiac) Imlunestrant + abemaciclib vs imlunestrant in all patients Favorable OS trend has emerged (HR= 0.82; 95% CI, 0.59-1.16; p=0.2622); median OS not reached Imlunestrant + abemaciclib median PFS now extended to 10.9 months (HR=0.59; 95% CI, 0.47-0.74) - Consistent benefit across key subgroups including patients previously treated with a CDK4/6i Predictable safety profile with low discontinuation rate relative to available combination regimens¹⁻³ 1. André F, et al. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:208-217. 2. Turner NC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:2058-2070. 3. Baselga J, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:520-529. ABC, advanced breast cancer; CDK4/6i, cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; ESR1m, estrogen receptor 1 gene mutation; ET, endocrine therapy; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; SERD, selective estrogen receptor degrader; SOC, standard of care. This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact jhaverik@mskcc.org for permission to reprint and/or distribute 20 --- [Slide 4] SAN ANTONIO Subgroup Analysis: PFS of Imlunestrant + Abemaciclib vs BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM Imlunestrant in Patients With ESR1m and PI3K Pathway Mutationᵃ UT Health AACR Sex Amenie Care Issued Mays Cancer Lenter 100 Imlunestrant Imlunestrant + abemaciclib 68% n=47 n=40 Progression-free Survival (%) 75 No. of events 29 43 48% 12.0 5.5 Median (95% CI) (7.5-16.5) (3.5-6.3) 50 30% 0.48 (0.29-0.77) HR (95% CI) Nominal p-value = 0.0022 37% 25 Imlunestrant 18% + abemaciclib 9% 0 Imlunestrant 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 No. at risk Time (months) — 40 30 23 22 16 14 10 10 2 0 0 — 47 31 16 15 8 7 4 1 1 1 0 Consistent PFS benefit with imlunestrant + abemaciclib in patients with ESR1m and PI3K pathway mutation "Includes single nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions of PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN analyzed by Guardant 360 ctDNA assay. CI, confidence interval; ESR1m, estrogen receptor 1 gene mutation; HR, hazard ratio; PFS, progression-free survival; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase. This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact haverik@mskcc.org for permission to reprint and/or distribute 14 --- [Slide 5] SAN ANTONIO Subgroup Analysis: PFS of Imlunestrant + BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM® Abemaciclib vs Imlunestrant by ESR1m Status UT Health AACR - American Cancer - Mays Cancer - Patients With ESR1m Patients Without ESR1m Imlunestrant Imlunestrant Imlunestrant Imlunestrant + abemaciclib + abemaciclib 100 n=92 n=67 n=121 100 n=146 No. of events 48 82 No. of events 96 92 Progression-free Survival (%) 75 11.1 5.5 Median (95% CI) (7.4-16.4) (3.8-7.2) Nominal p-value = 0.0002 Progression-free Survival (%) 9.2 5.5 75 Median (95% CI) (7.4-13.8) (3.6-5.8) HR (95% CI) 0.49 (0.33-0.71) HR (95% CI) 0.64 (0.47-0.85) 50 50 Nominal p-value = 0.0023 25 25 Imlunestrant Imlunestrant + abemaciclib + abemaciclib 0 Imlunestrant 0 Imlunestrant 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 No. at risk Time (months) No. at risk Time (months) — 67 51 39 36 27 23 19 18 7 3 1 1 0 — 146 108 83 65 51 47 40 36 29 17 13 9 2 0 - 92 60 35 33 20 16 10 4 3 2 1 0 0 - 121 70 43 40 34 30 25 22 15 12 7 4 0 0 Consistent benefit of imlunestrant + abemaciclib maintained regardless of ESR1m status CI, confidence interval; ESR1m, estrogen receptor 1 gene mutation; HR, hazard ratio; PFS, progression-free survival. This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact haverik@mskcc.org for permission to reprint and/or distribute 12 --- [Slide 6] SAN ANTONIO Secondary Endpoint: Interim os of Imlunestrant vs BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM® SOC ET at 50% Maturity in Patients With ESR1m UT Health AACR Sen.Amele - - Mays Cancer Center Imlunestrant SOC ET 100 86% n=138 n=118 No. of deaths 57 71 64% 75 82% 34.5 23.1 Overall Survival (%) Median (95% CI) (25.4-NR) (18.4-28.9) 50 HR (95% CI) 0.60 (0.43-0.86) 49% p-value = 0.0043* *p-value did not achieve prespecified threshold 25 for significance (p=0.0000004 at IA2) Imlunestrant 0 SOC ET 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 Time (months) No. at risk — 138 129 121 117 110 99 89 81 60 47 34 23 17 7 3 1 0 — 118 110 102 97 88 74 66 59 43 31 20 12 8 5 2 0 0 Imlunestrant led to an ~11 month numerical improvement in median os in patients with ESR1m Note: The median follow-up was 29.5 months across both arms. Cl, confidence interval; ESR1m, estrogen receptor 1 gene mutation; HR, hazard ratio; IA2, Interim Analysis 2; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; SOC ET, standard of care endocrine therapy. This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact jhaverik@mskcc.org for permission to reprint and/or distribute. 7

EMBER-3 Top Tweets

Top 10 by impressions - click to view on X

Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

A lot was covered but summary of 7 main studies we touched on during Metastatic HR+ #BreastCancer #SABCS highlights w/ @hoperugo: ✅...

👁 20.7K ♡ 108 ↻ 44 Dec 27, 2025
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino@PTarantinoMD

The new #Halgorithm for treating HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer @DrHBurstein @SABCSSanAntonio @DFCI_BreastOnc #bcsm...

👁 19.4K ♡ 247 ↻ 94 Dec 11, 2024
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

Metastatic HR+ #BreastCancer #SABCS highlights w/ @hoperugo: ✅ #AMBRE#MONALEESA#VIKTORIA1 ✅...

👁 18.4K ♡ 47 ↻ 18 Dec 26, 2025
Hope Rugo
Hope Rugo@hoperugo

#SABCS2025 Honored to present this exciting data. Efficacy seen regardless of mESR1 or mPIK3CA with ela+eve. Data immature for abema. EVERA also shows benefit with giredestrant/EVE...

👁 7.9K ♡ 32 ↻ 13 Dec 11, 2025
Yakup Ergün
Yakup Ergün@dr_yakupergun

#ESMOBreast25 is in 5 Days! One of the key upcoming presentations: EMBER-3 Subgroup Analysis 📌Imlunestrant + abema improved PFS after CDK4/6i (vs. Imlu) 📌No abema benefit after...

👁 6.2K ♡ 30 ↻ 5 May 08, 2025
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

#SABCS24 Part 2: Highlights w/ @jamecancerdoc#EUROPA#TAILORx#PADMA#EMBER3 Full 📢: ...

👁 5.4K ♡ 38 ↻ 9 Jan 16, 2025
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade@SuyogCancer

key oral abstracts in breast cancer from #ASCO25 Covering neoadjuvant, adjuvant &amp; metastatic settings: INAVO120, EMBER-3, VERITAC-2, DESTINY-Breast06, AXSANA, I-SPY2...

👁 5.3K ♡ 65 ↻ 13 Apr 25, 2025
VIRGINIA KAKLAMANI
VIRGINIA KAKLAMANI@VKaklamani

Ember 3 updated results. Imlu maintaining benefit. Combo benefit similar to evera trial although here benefit regardless of esr1m. Would love to see the combo approved to allow us more options for...

👁 5.3K ♡ 37 ↻ 13 Dec 12, 2025
Hope Rugo
Hope Rugo@hoperugo

#SABCS24 beautiful discussion by @DrHBurstein on EMBER3. One of the best!! A fabulous and well qualified accumulation of data attached. Wow. @OncoAlert

👁 4.6K ♡ 34 ↻ 14 Dec 11, 2024
Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD
Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD@to_be_elizabeth

📌 Educational Session 1: After CDK4/6 Inhibitors-Advancing Treatment for HR+HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer ✨Treatment strategies after CDK4/6 inhibitor progression Mafalda Oliveira at...

👁 4.0K ♡ 54 ↻ 21 Dec 09, 2025

About the EMBER-3 Trial

EMBER-3 is a Phase III, randomized, open-label trial that evaluated imlunestrant (Inluriyo), a next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy. The trial randomized 874 patients 1:1:1 to imlunestrant monotherapy (400 mg daily), investigator's choice of endocrine therapy (fulvestrant or exemestane), or imlunestrant plus abemaciclib. Imlunestrant demonstrated a statistically significant PFS improvement in the ESR1-mutant subgroup, leading to FDA approval in September 2025 as the second oral SERD for ESR1-mutated advanced breast cancer.

FDA Approval

FDA APPROVED Inluriyo (imlunestrant) — Treatment of adults with ER-positive, HER2-negative, ESR1-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression following at least one line of endocrine therapy

On September 25, 2025, the FDA approved imlunestrant (Inluriyo) for adults with ER+/HER2-/ESR1-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer that progressed after at least one line of endocrine therapy. The FDA simultaneously approved the Guardant360 CDx assay as a companion diagnostic to identify ESR1 mutations via blood ctDNA. Imlunestrant is the second oral SERD approved in this setting, following elacestrant (Jan 2023). Lilly has also submitted the imlunestrant + abemaciclib combination data for U.S. regulatory review in ESR1-mutated MBC.

Companion diagnostic: Guardant360 CDx co-approved for patient selection.

Source: FDA Press Release

Trial Methodology & Results

Study Design

Phase III, global, open-label, 1:1:1 randomized trial in patients with ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer whose disease progressed on an aromatase inhibitor with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor. ESR1 mutational status was determined by blood ctDNA analysis using the Guardant360 CDx assay. Randomization was stratified by prior CDK4/6 inhibitor use, presence of visceral metastases, and geographic region.

Population

874 adult patients (men and pre/postmenopausal women) with ER+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer who progressed on prior aromatase inhibitor therapy with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Approximately 37% had ESR1 mutations, 38% had PI3K pathway mutations, 60% had received prior CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy, 32% enrolled as first-line for metastatic disease, and 64% as second-line. Patients eligible for PARP inhibitors were excluded.

Interventions

Imlunestrant 400 mg orally once daily versus investigator's choice of fulvestrant 500 mg IM or exemestane 25 mg daily. A third arm evaluated imlunestrant 400 mg daily plus abemaciclib 150 mg twice daily (added via protocol amendment).

Primary Endpoints

Primary endpoints: investigator-assessed PFS of imlunestrant vs SOC in ESR1-mutant patients, imlunestrant vs SOC in all patients, and imlunestrant plus abemaciclib vs imlunestrant alone in all patients. Key secondary endpoint: overall survival (tested sequentially if PFS was significant). Other endpoints included ORR, time to chemotherapy, PFS2, and patient-reported outcomes.

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

In the ESR1-mutant population (n=256), imlunestrant demonstrated median PFS of 5.5 months (95% CI: 3.9-7.4) vs 3.8 months (95% CI: 3.7-5.5) for physician's choice, with HR 0.62 (95% CI: 0.46-0.82; p=0.0008), a 38% reduction in risk of progression or death. PFS in the ITT overall population was not statistically significant. The imlunestrant plus abemaciclib combination achieved median PFS of 10.9 months vs 5.5 months for imlunestrant alone (updated HR 0.59; 95% CI: 0.47-0.74; p<0.0001), with benefit regardless of ESR1 status.

PFS HR 0.62 in ESR1-mutant — 38% risk reduction

Source: FDA Approval

Overall Survival (OS)

Updated OS data (median follow-up 28.5 months) showed median OS of 34.5 months with imlunestrant vs 23.1 months with SOC in ESR1-mutant patients (HR 0.60; 95% CI: 0.43-0.86; p=0.0043), an 11.4-month improvement, although this did not meet the prespecified boundary for statistical significance. The combination showed a favorable OS trend (HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.59-1.16). ORR was 14.3% for imlunestrant vs 7.7% for SOC in ESR1-mutant patients.


Source: ASCO Post - Updated OS Data

Safety & Tolerability

Imlunestrant monotherapy had a favorable safety profile consistent with endocrine therapy. Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 17% (vs 21% for SOC). Most common AEs were fatigue (23%), diarrhea (22%), and nausea (17%), predominantly grade 1. Treatment discontinuation due to AEs was only 4%. No cardiac or ocular toxicity signals (no bradycardia or photopsia). The combination with abemaciclib showed expected CDK4/6i toxicity: diarrhea (86%/8% G3), nausea (49%/2% G3), neutropenia (48%/20% G3), with 6% discontinuation rate.

Well tolerated — only 4% mono discontinuation

Source: FDA Label

Clinical Implications

EMBER-3 established imlunestrant as a well-tolerated oral alternative to fulvestrant for ESR1-mutated ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer, with the key advantage of oral administration eliminating injection-site reactions reported by 72% of fulvestrant patients. The monotherapy benefit is strictly biomarker-gated to ESR1-mutant tumors, mandating Guardant360 CDx liquid biopsy testing. The combination with abemaciclib extends benefit to all patients regardless of ESR1 status, supporting continued CDK4/6 inhibition beyond progression. Key debates include monotherapy vs. combination (QoL advantage of mono vs. PFS advantage of combo), competition with elacestrant and camizestrant in the oral SERD space, and the role of ESR1 testing infrastructure in clinical workflow.

EMBER-3 FAQ

What is the EMBER-3 trial?

EMBER-3 is a Phase 3, randomized, open-label trial (NCT04975308) of imlunestrant (Inluriyo), a next-generation oral SERD, in 874 patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy, randomized 1:1:1 to imlunestrant monotherapy, investigator's choice of endocrine therapy, or imlunestrant plus abemaciclib.

Is imlunestrant (Inluriyo) FDA approved?

Yes. On September 25, 2025 the FDA approved imlunestrant (Inluriyo) for adults with ER-positive, HER2-negative, ESR1-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer that progressed after at least one line of endocrine therapy. The Guardant360 CDx assay was approved as a companion diagnostic to detect ESR1 mutations in blood.

What were the EMBER-3 PFS results in ESR1-mutant patients?

In the ESR1-mutant population (n=256), imlunestrant monotherapy improved median progression-free survival to 5.5 months versus 3.8 months for standard endocrine therapy (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.46-0.82; p=0.0008), a 38% reduction in the risk of progression or death.

Does the approval cover all ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer?

No. The FDA approval is specifically for ESR1-mutated disease, identified by the Guardant360 CDx companion diagnostic. The imlunestrant + abemaciclib combination arm remains under continued study and is not part of this monotherapy approval.

Who makes imlunestrant and how is it given?

Imlunestrant (Inluriyo) is an oral, next-generation selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) developed by Eli Lilly, administered as 400 mg once daily.

EMBER-3 in the News

Key KOL Sentiments - EMBER-3

DoctorSentimentComment
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
● POSITIVE The new #Halgorithm for treating HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer @DrHBurstein @SABCSSanAntonio @DFCI_BreastOnc #bcsm #SABCS24 https://t.co/7uhAJoSYiO
Hope Rugo
@hoperugo
● POSITIVE #SABCS2025 Honored to present this exciting data. Efficacy seen regardless of mESR1 or mPIK3CA with ela+eve. Data immature for abema. EVERA also shows benefit with giredestrant/EVE across mESR1 as did EMBER3. @OncoAlert https://t.co/5rErhPB9sK
VIRGINIA KAKLAMANI
@VKaklamani
● POSITIVE Ember 3 updated results. Imlu maintaining benefit. Combo benefit similar to evera trial although here benefit regardless of esr1m. Would love to see the combo approved to allow us more options for patients. @jhaveri_komal @SABCSSanAntonio #sabcs25 #b
● POSITIVE What a fantastic discussion by super @DrHBurstein from @DanaFarber of the #EMBER3 trial data at the general session 1 #SABCS24 @OncoAlert @SABCSSanAntonio @UTHealthSA @DFCI_BreastOnc @dfcidatascience @DanaFarberNews https://t.co/9ySssQmspW
Francesco Schettini, MD PhD
@FrancescoSche20
● POSITIVE My first takeaway from #SABCS24. The EMBER3 of new oral SERD imlunestrant vs fulvestrant or exemestane vs imlune+abemaciclib in HR+/HER2neg MBC. This study showed in II-line scenario that imlunestrant is superior to ET alone in ESR1mutant patients. A
Sara Tolaney
@stolaney1
● POSITIVE BEAUTIFUL discussion of EMBER-3 by @DrHBurstein Benefit for Imlunestrant + abemaciclib seen irrespective of ESR1m or PI3Km, and seen in the post cdk 4/6i subgroup Put into clinical context perfectly! @DFCI_BreastOnc #SABCS24 @SABCSSanAntonio @O
Gaia Griguolo
@GaiaGriguolo
● POSITIVE Impressive results for Imlunestrant+abemaciclib in pretreated HR+HER2- mBC (Ember3 trial) !! #SABCS24 #bcsm @OncoAlert https://t.co/isOdS7F6kJ
● POSITIVE EMBER3 shows benefit of imlunestrant in patients with HR+ MBC and mESR1 and for the combination of imlunestrant and Abemaciclib for all patients, regardless of ESR1 status #SABCS24 @SABCSSanAntonio @jhaveri_komal @OncoAlert https://t.co/NFsiYO4xfC
Dr. Kelly Shanahan
@stage4kelly
● POSITIVE I think the biggest thing for ER+ MBC out of #SABCS24 is EMBER3 and imlunestrant, which showed benefit regardless of ESR1 status, but only statistically significant in people w/ mutant ESR1. #SABCS24 https://t.co/vbH8vD01Yw
Jason A. Mouabbi MD
@JAMouabbi
● POSITIVE ✨ Exciting Results from #EMBER3! ✨ 💊 #Imlunestrant boosts PFS: 1. As monotherapy in #ESR1m patients 2. In combo with #abemaciclib, irrespective on ESR1 status 📈 Patients exposed to ET+CDK4/6i (palbo 60%) ✅ Well tolerated with low discontinuation ra
Paul Hughes PharmD, PA-C
@paulhughes314
● POSITIVE @ErikaHamilton9 @jhaveri_komal @SABCSSanAntonio @OncoAlert This is a great paper. Do you have any thoughts on figures S15 and S16 from NEJM? I don’t understand why combo arm is underperforming in OS (and even trending worse in figure S16)!
Oncology Brothers
@OncBrothers
● NEUTRAL A lot was covered but summary of 7 main studies we touched on during Metastatic HR+ #BreastCancer #SABCS highlights w/ @hoperugo: ✅ #AMBRE ✅ #MONALEESA ✅ #VIKTORIA1 ✅ #SERENA6 ✅ #evERA ✅ #EMBER3 ✅ #ASCENT07 @OncoAlert @OncUpdates #bcsm #OncTw
Yakup Ergün
@dr_yakupergun
● NEUTRAL #ESMOBreast25 is in 5 Days! One of the key upcoming presentations: EMBER-3 Subgroup Analysis 📌Imlunestrant + abema improved PFS after CDK4/6i (vs. Imlu) 📌No abema benefit after abema 📌Efficacy observed after palbo and ribo 💥Consistent benefit i
Dr Amol Akhade
@SuyogCancer
● NEUTRAL key oral abstracts in breast cancer from #ASCO25 Covering neoadjuvant, adjuvant &amp; metastatic settings: INAVO120, EMBER-3, VERITAC-2, DESTINY-Breast06, AXSANA, I-SPY2 &amp; more! @ASCO @OncoAlert @OncBrothers @ErikaHamilton9 @drsarahsam 🧬📊🩺🎯 https
Elisabetta Bonzano MD, PhD
@to_be_elizabeth
● NEUTRAL 📌 Educational Session 1: After CDK4/6 Inhibitors-Advancing Treatment for HR+HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer ✨Treatment strategies after CDK4/6 inhibitor progression Mafalda Oliveira at #SABCS25 @OncoAlert #OncoAlertAF https://t.co/Y8XTovQJGc
Bertrand Delsuc
@BertrandBio
● NEUTRAL $LLY EMBER3 SERD imlunestrant+CDK4/6i abemaciclib vs exemestane or fulvestrant in HR+ (ER+) HER2- Breast Cancer at #SABCS24 https://t.co/V2I0Izu0ud
Brian Czerniecki, MD, PhD
@BCzernieckiMD
● NEUTRAL At #SABCS24, I had the opportunity to speak with Kathrin Dvir, MD (@DvirKathrin) about the Phase 3 EMBER-3 trial, which evaluates imlunestrant as monotherapy and in combination with abemaciclib for ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer pretreated with end
● NEUTRAL Here, for instance, in EMBER-3 are Investigator reported and BICR endpoints https://t.co/6kFWgXpoYl
Lilly Oncology Medical
@LillyOncMed
● NEUTRAL #ASCO25 | Learn about patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from EMBER-3, a phase 3 study investigating an oral #SERD with or without a CDK 4/6 inhibitor in ER+, HER2- advanced #BreastCancer. See the presentation details here: https://t.co/aWB89PJgXn #B
Dr. Ahmed Elalfy, MD, PhD
@Ahmedelalfy_PRW
● NEUTRAL @SuyogCancer Sure, the PFS jump to 9.1 months is eye-catching—but before we start retooling our ER+ playbook, let’s pump the brakes: OS still in the shadows: A half-glass-full PFS doesn’t guarantee lives are truly extended—show me the OS curves befo
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO
@ErikaHamilton9
● NEGATIVE #imlunestrant OS in ESR1m HR+ #bcsm increased by 11.4 months, but NOT signif Benefit greater in patients with ESR1m Imlu+ abema PFS now 10.9 months Dual mutation (ESR1 and PIK3) also w/ greater benefit with addition of abema to imlunestrant 9% &