Phase 3 randomized double-blind study of abemaciclib (Verzenio, CDK4/6 inhibitor) vs placebo in advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) — a rare, aggressive sarcoma subtype driven by CDK4 amplification. Presented as ASCO 2026 Plenary (LBA2) by Mark A. Dickson, MD (Memorial Sloan Kettering). Median PFS 9.7 vs 1.5 months (HR 0.38) — the first positive Phase 3 trial in DDLPS, a disease with no currently approved systemic therapy.
Discover KOL Sentiment on SARC041 →Design - Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (n=108, 9 centers): abemaciclib (Verzenio, CDK4/6 inhibitor) vs placebo in advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma (NCT04967521; SARC-sponsored, Lilly-funded; ASCO 2026 Plenary LBA2).
PFS (primary, MET) - Median 9.7 vs 1.5 months, HR 0.38 (90% CI 0.25-0.59), stratified log-rank p<0.001; 6-month PFS 60% vs 22%, 12-month PFS 39% vs 13%.
Overall survival (secondary) - Positive trend despite 85% placebo crossover: median OS not reached vs 25.5 months, HR 0.55 (95% CI 0.28-1.07), p=0.07.
Response - Objective response rate 9% (abemaciclib) vs 0% (placebo) - abemaciclib is distinct as the CDK4/6 inhibitor producing meaningful monotherapy responses in a disease dominated by disease stabilization.
Safety - Consistent with the abemaciclib class effects from monarchE and MONARCH 2/3 - predominantly low-grade diarrhea, neutropenia and fatigue.
Regulatory / sponsor - Investigational in DDLPS; abemaciclib (Verzenio) approved in HR+/HER2- breast. Lilly plans a regulatory submission. Sponsor SARC.
Compiled and reviewed by the KOL Pulse research team, led by Brian Shields, Founder, KOL Pulse. Last updated July 21, 2026.
Slides shared by KOLs at ASCO 2026 Plenary (presented by Mark A. Dickson, MD — MSK). Click any image to expand.
SARC041 primary results presented May 31, 2026 (Mark A. Dickson, MD). Abemaciclib significantly improved PFS vs placebo in advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma — median PFS 9.7 vs 1.5 months, HR 0.38 (90% CI 0.25–0.59), p<0.001. A positive OS trend favored abemaciclib despite 85% placebo crossover (median OS not reached vs 25.5 months; HR 0.55, p=0.07). The first positive Phase 3 trial in DDLPS. The KOL slide decks below capture the primary PFS, OS, schema, and conclusions slides.
#ASCO26 🧬 A rare positive phase III sarcoma trial. SARC041 showed abemaciclib significantly improved PFS in advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma. 👥 108 patients Abemaciclib vs placebo 85% crossover allowed 📊 Results: • mPFS: 9.7 vs 1.5 mo • HR 0.38, p<0.001 • ORR: 9% https://t.co/FYYecGICcD https://t.co/lYjHVjn8Kf
2. SARC041: PhIII, Abemaciclib (200mg BID) vs. Placebo in adv/metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma - mPFS 9.7mos vs. 1.5mos (HR: 0.38) - ORR: 9% - AEs: Diarrhea (for breast ca, we use 150mg BID… @hoperugo) - What lines wld you use this? Placebo as in 1L 🙄🙄 3/6 https://t.co/wMxkU0Mhf9
#MarkDickson from @MSKCancerCenter presents the phase 3 SARC041 trial showing that abemaciclib significantly improved PFS vs placebo in advanced DDLPS (9.7 vs 1.5 months; HR 0.39), with an encouraging OS trend. #ASCO26 #Sarcoma @ASCO @OncoAlert @MSKSarcoma https://t.co/BrTZJ4Fgxm
#ASCO26 SARC041: •Abemaciclib vs placebo in advanced dediff liposarcoma • Abema significantly improved PFS vs placebo (9.7 vs 1.5 months; HR 0.38) • 6-month PFS: 60% vs 22% • 12-month PFS: 39% vs 13% • ORR observed with abema (9%) vs 0% with placebo • OS trend favored https://t.co/QThlmFiHLw
🚨 SARC041 at #ASCO26: abemaciclib vs placebo in advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma. -Median PFS: 9.7 vs 1.5 months -HR for PFS: 0.38 -6-month PFS: 60% vs 22% -12-month PFS: 39% vs 13% -ORR: 9.3% vs 0% -Median OS: NR vs 25.5 months -OS HR: 0.55, p=0.07 Abemaciclib clearly https://t.co/NqsfFkgKDP
#ASCO26 💥 Plenary Sessions 5-practice changing studies🤯 2. SARC041: A phase 3 randomized double-blind study of abemaciclib versus placebo in patients with advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma 🗣️ Dr. Dickson ✅ PFS 9.67 vs 1.52m, HR 0.39 ✅ mOS NR vs 25.45m, HR 0.55 ☣️ TRAEs https://t.co/6KFdtutSRF
Outstanding presentation of SARC041 data by Dr. Mark Dickson from @MSKSarcoma, during #ASCO26 Plenary Session, showing a statistically significant and clinically meaningful PFS improvement favoring abemaciclib in pts with treatment-naïve advanced dedifferentiated #liposarcoma. https://t.co/Kj94PEGHA0
#ASCO26 プレナリー 脱分化型脂肪肉腫DDLPSはCDK4/MDM2増幅が特徴的で、抗がん剤で縮小する確率が高くない腫瘍です。そのため、腫瘍縮小よりも増殖抑制・病勢安定化を狙う治療戦略としてアベマシクリブの意義がありました。 SARC041試験はアベマシクリブvsプラセボの比較試験でした。 https://t.co/hntVJG7Jnb
#ASCO2026 A practice-changing step for sarcoma precision oncology? In the phase III SARC041 trial, abemaciclib significantly improved PFS versus placebo in advanced/metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma: ▪️ mPFS: 9.7 vs 1.5 months ▪️ 62% reduction in risk of progression (HR https://t.co/BQnOy24KFw
#ASC026 Plenary Session | SARC041 adv dedifferentiated liposarcoma: abemaciclib improved PFS from 1.5 to 9.7 mo vs placebo for a rare sarcoma with very limited systemic options, OK BUT; Nearly half of the patients were treatment-naive. Why was placebo the control arm? https://t.co/iCmjU0xALB
Much anticipated SARC041 results. Should we give abemaciclib first line for liposarcoma? https://t.co/t2lHMEZnKG
#ASCO26 Plenary LBA2: #SARC041 Phase 3 randomized, double-blind trial #abemaciclib vs placebo in a Advanced/metastatic DDLPS, dedifferentiated liposarcoma 🔹 Primary endpoint: PFS 9.7 vs 1.5 mos (HR 0.38) 🔹 Targets CDK4, a key genomic driver frequently amplified in DDLPS 🔹 https://t.co/p70GK5cCbg
In preparation for the 2026 @ASCO Annual Meeting, I'll post tweetorials for the most expected data in #sarcoma. Starting with the plenary, of course - SARC041! @SARCtrials 🧵1/ Well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS/DDLPS) remains one of the most common,
In preparation for the 2026 @ASCO Annual Meeting, I'll post tweetorials for the most expected data in #sarcoma. Starting with the plenary, of course - SARC041! @SARCtrials 🧵1/ Well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS/DDLPS) remains one of the most common,
The loudest plenary trial at ASCO may be one pharma did not fund. This year’s list tells a very clear story. ⭐ Daraxonrasib 13.2 vs 6.7 mo in pancreatic cancer. But then there is SARC041. A breast-cancer drug working in sarcoma. Pharma did not fund the Phase 3. NCI CTEP https://t.co/HzLK6lZB1v
Similarly I am glad people are highlighting SARC 041 but have seen several AI-generated graphics w/ errors (not just this one). It's a huge triumph! But: - SARC is not an NCI coop group, though it is an awesome nonprofit - Study was funded by Lilly. - Not first Ph3 in ddLPS
Top Trials to Follow on Day 3 @ASCO 2026 CIRCULATE | BREAKWATER | S2107 | SHR-A1811-309 | PUMP | CHALLENGE | EPISODE III | ASCENT-04 | DESTINY-Breast09 | PROTEUS | SARC041 | LIBRETTO-432 | HARMONi-6 | RASolute302 | PSMAddition | Imforte... #ASCO #ASCO26 #ASCO2026 #Cancer https://t.co/CQMXDIqL2h
#ASCO26 LBA2 - Dickson -SARC041: Ph3 DBRCT abemaciclib vs placebo in Pts w/ adv dedifferentiated liposarcoma [May 31, 2026] https://t.co/oWEeVo2oyq #NCT04967521 #scmsm
2/ The biology of DDLPS explains the therapeutic rationale. ➡️ Amplification of chromosome 12q13-15 is the hallmark genomic event. ➡️ This locus includes key oncogenic drivers such as: MDM2, CDK4, HMGA2 CDK4 amplification is present in ~90% of cases.
3/ CDK4 drives cell-cycle progression through phosphorylation of RB. The consequence: ➡️ G1 → S transition ➡️ sustained tumor proliferation This made CDK4/6 an especially attractive therapeutic target in DDLPS.
Daraxonrasib is the obvious talk of the town, but wow in the SARC041 story
5/ Then came abemaciclib. Key differences versus palbociclib: • more continuous CDK4 inhibition • continuous dosing schedule • potentially greater activity in CDK4-dependent tumors This led to the phase II study to be reported by Dickson et al (SARC041)
Abemaciclib vs. placebo in advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma — Phase 3 SARC041. Plenary · Abstract LBA 2 📍 Hall B1, Chicago 🗓 May 31 · 18:39 CT First sarcoma trial in the ASCO Plenary in 7 years. No approved targeted therapy exists for DDLS. Embargoed until presentation.
9/ We expect results to be positive...But several important questions remain: • What is the true magnitude of PFS benefit? • Will there be symptom improvement? • Are there particularly sensitive subgroups? • Are biomarkers beyond CDK4 amplification needed? • What is
SARC041 (NCT04967521) is a SARC-sponsored, Lilly-funded, investigator-initiated Phase 3 randomized double-blind study of the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib (Verzenio) versus placebo in patients with advanced (locally recurrent and/or metastatic) dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS). DDLPS is a rare, aggressive soft-tissue sarcoma subtype with limited systemic therapy options. The biological rationale rests on near-universal CDK4 amplification in DDLPS — making selective CDK4 inhibition a precision-targeted strategy. Patients with placebo-arm progression cross over to open-label abemaciclib. Principal investigator: Mark A. Dickson, MD (Memorial Sloan Kettering). Presented as an ASCO 2026 Plenary Session presentation (LBA2) on Sunday, May 31, 2026.
Phase 3 randomized double-blind multicenter U.S. study. 108 patients enrolled across 9 SARC-network centers (powered at 80% / two-sided alpha 10% to detect HR 0.6). Crossover to open-label abemaciclib permitted at progression.
Adults (≥18) with histologically confirmed locally recurrent and/or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma. ECOG PS 0-1. RECIST 1.1 measurable disease with documented progression (new disease, new sites, or ≥20% growth within 6 months of registration).
Experimental: Abemaciclib 200 mg orally twice daily (continuous, 28-day cycles). Control: Matched placebo. Crossover to open-label abemaciclib permitted at confirmed PD.
Primary: Progression-free survival (PFS) by investigator-assessed RECIST 1.1. Secondary: Objective response rate (ORR), PFS and ORR after crossover, overall survival (OS), safety. Exploratory: Archival tissue biomarkers.
Abemaciclib met the primary endpoint with a median PFS of 9.7 months versus 1.5 months for placebo — hazard ratio 0.38 (90% CI 0.25–0.59), stratified log-rank p<0.001. The benefit held across landmark timepoints: 6-month PFS 60% vs 22% and 12-month PFS 39% vs 13%. This is the first positive Phase 3 readout for any systemic therapy in dedifferentiated liposarcoma. An exploratory analysis by prior treatment showed a larger effect in treatment-naive patients (median PFS 16.4 months with no prior lines vs 5.3 months with ≥1 prior line; p=0.029).
Median PFS 9.7 vs 1.5 mo · HR 0.38 (90% CI 0.25–0.59) · p<0.001Sources: SARC041 Plenary PFS slide (OCR-verified, ASCO 2026 primary readout) · MSK ASCO 2026 press release · FirstWord Pharma ASCO26 recapA positive OS trend favored abemaciclib despite 85% of placebo patients crossing over to open-label abemaciclib at progression. Median OS was not reached with abemaciclib versus 25.5 months for placebo — HR 0.55 (95% CI 0.28–1.07), stratified log-rank p=0.07. Landmark OS favored abemaciclib at 12 months (85% vs 71%) and 24 months (72% vs 51%). The OS comparison did not cross the significance threshold — expected given the high crossover — but the consistent direction reinforces the PFS benefit.
Median OS NR vs 25.5 mo · HR 0.55 (95% CI 0.28–1.07) · p=0.07 · 85% crossoverSources: SARC041 Plenary OS slide (OCR-verified, ASCO 2026) · MSK ASCO 2026 press releaseObjective response rate was 9% with abemaciclib versus 0% with placebo, consistent with abemaciclib's distinction as the only CDK4/6 inhibitor producing meaningful monotherapy responses in DDLPS (a disease dominated by disease stabilization rather than tumor shrinkage). Among the 46 placebo patients (85%) who crossed over to abemaciclib at progression, post-crossover median PFS was 3.4 months with a 4% response rate — demonstrating activity even in a more heavily pretreated, progressing population.
ORR 9% vs 0% · post-crossover PFS 3.4 mo (n=46, 85% crossover)Sources: SARC041 Plenary slides (OCR-verified, ASCO 2026) · MSK ASCO 2026 press releaseDedifferentiated liposarcoma most commonly arises in the retroperitoneum or abdomen. Recurrent/metastatic disease has historically had no standard-of-care systemic therapy — chemotherapy provides modest, short-lived benefit, and prior CDK4/6i trials (palbociclib, ribociclib) showed primarily stable disease. The earlier Phase 2 abemaciclib monotherapy study (Dickson et al., 30 patients) reported median PFS of 30-33 weeks and 12-week PFS of 76.7%, providing the rationale for SARC041.
Phase 2 precedent: median PFS 30-33 wk · 12-wk PFS 76.7%Source: PubMed — Dickson et al., Phase 2 abemaciclib in DDLS (therapy-induced senescence mechanism)Abemaciclib is an oral selective CDK4/6 inhibitor (vs the broader CDK4/6 class — palbociclib, ribociclib). DDLPS is characterized by amplification of the 12q13-15 region containing CDK4 and MDM2, making CDK4 a near-universal oncogenic driver. Inhibition disrupts cell-cycle progression and, per correlative work, induces tumor-cell senescence with secondary immune infiltration (CD4+ TILs). Among the three approved CDK4/6 inhibitors, abemaciclib is unique in producing meaningful monotherapy objective responses.
CDK4 amplification ≈100% in DDLPS · selective monotherapy activitySource: PMC review — CDK4/6i in liposarcoma (mechanism, biomarker rationale)The Plenary safety profile was consistent with the well-characterized abemaciclib class effects from monarchE (adjuvant breast) and MONARCH 2/3 (metastatic breast): predominantly low-grade diarrhea, neutropenia, and fatigue. Grade ≥3 neutropenia rate in prior abemaciclib monotherapy trials runs in the 20-25% range, with median time-to-onset ~29-37 days; dose reduction to 100 mg has not historically compromised efficacy. No new safety signals were reported in the earlier DDLPS Phase 2. Full DDLPS-specific safety detail is in the Plenary deck and the upcoming publication.
Class-consistent · diarrhea + neutropenia · manageable with dose reductionSource: Targeted Oncology — abemaciclib safety profile (monarchE long-term · class context)Verzenio (abemaciclib) is currently approved by FDA in HR+/HER2- early and metastatic breast cancer. SARC041 provides the first randomized Phase 3 evidence of a CDK4/6 inhibitor benefit in any sarcoma subtype. Eli Lilly has stated the SARC041 data will support a regulatory submission for an expanded DDLPS indication. The Plenary selection (LBA2) — alongside LIBRETTO-432, HARMONi-6, RASolute 302, and PROTEUS — signals ASCO's view of the study as practice-changing for a rare disease with no current standard of care.
Expected regulatory submission for an expanded DDLPS indicationSource: Eli Lilly ASCO 2026 portfolio press release · OncoDaily ASCO 2026 Plenary previewSARC041 (NCT04967521) is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (108 patients across 9 centers) sponsored by the Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration and funded by Eli Lilly. It tested the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib (Verzenio) versus placebo in advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma, a sarcoma subtype characterized by amplification of the CDK4-containing 12q13-15 region. It was presented as an ASCO 2026 Plenary (LBA2).
Abemaciclib met the primary endpoint with a median progression-free survival of 9.7 versus 1.5 months for placebo (hazard ratio 0.38, p<0.001), with 6-month PFS of 60% versus 22% and 12-month PFS of 39% versus 13%. Overall survival trended in favor of abemaciclib (median not reached versus 25.5 months) despite 85% of placebo patients crossing over. Objective response rate was 9% versus 0%. It is the first positive Phase 3 trial in dedifferentiated liposarcoma.
No. Abemaciclib is not FDA-approved for dedifferentiated liposarcoma or any sarcoma; its use in SARC041 is investigational. Abemaciclib (Verzenio) is FDA-approved in HR-positive, HER2-negative early and metastatic breast cancer. Eli Lilly has stated the SARC041 results will support a regulatory submission for an expanded indication.
The safety profile was consistent with the well-characterized abemaciclib class effects seen in the breast-cancer trials monarchE and MONARCH 2/3 - predominantly low-grade diarrhea, neutropenia and fatigue. No new safety signals specific to the sarcoma population were highlighted at the Plenary presentation.
Recurrent or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma has historically had no standard-of-care systemic therapy, and prior CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib) showed mainly disease stabilization. SARC041 is the first randomized Phase 3 to demonstrate a CDK4/6 inhibitor benefit in any sarcoma subtype, providing potential practice-changing evidence for a disease with high unmet need.