NEW KCRS26 — Kidney Cancer Research Summit: top KOL voices, trial buzz & every slide, decoded View Full Coverage →
KOL Pulse - Trial Profile

VIKTORIA-1 Trial

On July 14, 2026 the FDA approved Revtorpyk (gedatolisib) + fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, for HR+/HER2−, PIK3CA wild-type advanced breast cancer after prior endocrine therapy — the first pan-PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitor for this population. Basis: the Phase III VIKTORIA-1 trial (Celcuity, $CELC).

✅ FDA Approved · Jul 14, 2026Revtorpyk (gedatolisib)Celcuity ($CELC)HR+/HER2- · PIK3CA wild-typeFulvestrant ± palbociclibVIKTORIA-1 Phase III
Explore Trial Data

FDA Approves Revtorpyk (gedatolisib) — July 14, 2026

FDA APPROVED Jul 14, 2026 · HR+/HER2− · PIK3CA wild-type

On July 14, 2026, the FDA approved gedatolisib (Revtorpyk, Celcuity) in combination with fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, for adults with HR-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer without a PIK3CA mutation detected (PIK3CA wild-type), following progression on or after at least one line of endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting. It is the first pan-PI3K/AKT/mTOR (PAM) pathway inhibitor approved for the PIK3CA wild-type population, which previously had no targeted option in this setting.

Basis — VIKTORIA-1 Study 1 (NCT05501886; n=392; PIK3CA wild-type; randomized 1:1:1 to gedatolisib+fulvestrant+palbociclib [Arm A], gedatolisib+fulvestrant [Arm B], or fulvestrant alone [Arm C]):

  • Triplet (Arm A) vs fulvestrant: median PFS 9.3 mo (95% CI 7.2–16.6) vs 2.0 mo — HR 0.24 (0.17–0.35), p<0.0001
  • Doublet (Arm B) vs fulvestrant: median PFS 7.4 mo (95% CI 5.5–9.9) vs 2.0 mo — HR 0.33 (0.24–0.48), p<0.0001
  • ORR 32% (A) · 28% (B) · 1% (fulvestrant)  |  Median DoR 17.5 · 12.0 · NE mo

Scope note: This approval covers PIK3CA wild-type disease (VIKTORIA-1 Study 1). The separate PIK3CA-mutant cohort (Study 2) presented at ASCO 2026 (LBA1008, gedatolisib vs alpelisib + fulvestrant) is not part of this approved indication.

Dosing: gedatolisib 180 mg IV over 30 min once weekly (Days 1, 8, 15 of each 28-day cycle) with fulvestrant, ± palbociclib, until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Safety: label warnings for stomatitis, dermatologic reactions, hyperglycemia, and embryo-fetal toxicity; in VIKTORIA-1, Grade 3 stomatitis was ~19% (triplet) / ~12% (doublet) with 2 treatment-related deaths (1.5%) (ESMO 2025). Overall survival was immature at the PFS analysis.

Source: U.S. FDA — Approved Drugs (July 14, 2026) ↗

KOL Reaction to the Approval

Verbatim posts from oncology KOLs on approval day (July 14, 2026). @OncBrothers and featured KOL @dr_yakupergun flagged the key nuance — the approval and its single-agent-fulvestrant comparator are in the PIK3CA wild-type cohort, distinct from the mutant-cohort ASCO 2026 data shown further down the page.

Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

Gedatolisib is now @US_FDA ✅ based off VIKTORIA-1: PhIII, Gedato (PI3K/mTORi) + Fulv +/- Palbo vs. Fulv in HR+ after one line of ET in HR+ - mPFS: 9.3mos w/triplet vs. single agent Fulv (HR: 0.24) - mPFS: 7.4mos w/doublet vs. single agent Fulv (HR: 0.33) - AEs (IV/⏰ https://t.co/VdkLGBgPu2

👁 1.2K♡ 10↻ 5Jul 14, 2026
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

This is for PIK3CA-WT. Comparing triplet (Arm A) and doublet (Arm B) to single agent Fulvestrant (Arm C) (rather than this being compared to Alpelisib + Fulv). Thanks for pointing this out @dr_yakupergun 🙏🏽🙏🏽

👁 222♡ 1↻ 1Jul 14, 2026
Harold J. Burstein, MD, PhD, FASCO
Harold J. Burstein, MD, PhD, FASCO@DrHBurstein

The @FDA approves gedatolisib as 2nd line therapy in combo with fulvestrant in tumors w/o PIK3CA mutations. Median PFS F, 2.0m, F+G, 7.4m, F+G+palbo 9.3m. https://t.co/VPzVX3Wglb

👁 209♡ 3↻ 1Jul 14, 2026
Antonio Giordano, MD PhD
Antonio Giordano, MD PhD@antgiorda

FDA approves gedatolisib in combination with fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, for adults with HR+/HER2-locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer without a PIK3CA mutation detected following progression on or after treatment with at least one line of endocrine therapy

👁 113♡ 3↻ 1Jul 14, 2026
Elvina Almuradova
Elvina Almuradova@Dr_ElvinaA

FDA approved gedatolisib (Revtorpyk) + fulvestrant ± palbociclib for HR+/HER2−, PIK3CA wild-type advanced/metastatic breast cancer after progression on endocrine therapy. @Larvol @OncoAlert https://t.co/N9n8lbH21I

👁 96♡ 2↻ 1Jul 14, 2026
Harold J. Burstein, MD, PhD, FASCO
Harold J. Burstein, MD, PhD, FASCO@DrHBurstein

Treatment algorithm in outline for ER+ MBC: Column A: endocrine agent (fulvestrant, oSERD, AI, tamoxifen) Column B: targeted agent (CDK46i, PIK3CAi) Choose one from column A and one from column B. Repeat with each line of treatment.

👁 89♡ 1↻ 1Jul 14, 2026

VIKTORIA-1 Key Takeaways

Design — Phase 3; gedatolisib (Revtorpyk) + fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib; Study 1 = PIK3CA wild-type vs single-agent fulvestrant (NCT05501886, n=392). (FDA label)

PFS (Study 1, wild-type) — Triplet 9.3 mo (95% CI 7.2-16.6) vs 2.0 mo, HR 0.24, p<0.0001; doublet 7.4 mo (5.5-9.9), HR 0.33, p<0.0001. (FDA label)

ORR — 32% (triplet) / 28% (doublet) / 1% (fulvestrant). (FDA label)

Regulatory — FDA approved Jul 14, 2026 for HR+/HER2- PIK3CA wild-type only; the PIK3CA-mutant cohort (Study 2) is NOT part of the approval. (FDA.gov)

Sponsor / Drug — Celcuity; gedatolisib, a pan-PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitor, 180 mg IV weekly on Days 1/8/15 of each 28-day cycle. (FDA label)

Compiled and reviewed by the KOL Pulse research team, led by Brian Shields, Founder, KOL Pulse. Last updated July 20, 2026.

Top KOLs Discussing VIKTORIA-1

Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers
@OncBrothers
47.6K impressions
Dr Sarah Sammons
Dr Sarah Sammons
@drsarahsam
15.2K impressions
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
14.6K impressions
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO
@ErikaHamilton9
13.5K impressions
Matteo Lambertini, MD PhD
Matteo Lambertini, MD PhD
@matteolambe
9.5K impressions
Hope Rugo
Hope Rugo
@hoperugo
5.4K impressions
Free Access · KOL Pulse Intelligence

Track oncology’s top KOLs in your specialty

Create a free account, pick the tumor types you cover, and go beyond the tweet — the intelligence pharma teams use to map influence and prepare for engagement:

  • Enhanced KOL profiles
  • Pharma influence & potential advisory-board patterns
  • 2025 Open Payments financial analysis
  • Social-media sentiment & trend signals
Get free access — pick your specialty
Choose the tumor types you follow. No cost, unsubscribe anytime.

VIKTORIA-1 Key Slides & Visuals

Official trial slides and relevant visuals shared by KOLs at ESMO 2025 (#ESMO25). Click any image to expand.

Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers @OncBrothers
VIKTORIA-1 Data
20.7K impressions · 108 likes · Dec 27, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] SABCS 2025 METASTATIC HR+ HIGHLIGHTS Study Patient Population Treatment / Comparator Key Findings HR+/HER2+ with high - PFS 7mos vs. 13.9mos (HR 0.67) Chemo + maint ET AMBRE tumor burden - ORR 29.2% VS. 35.2% vs. (involving visceral - DoR 7.4mos vs. 10.9mos (HR 0.46, ET + Abemaciclib sites) p=0.023) - PFS with ILC 20.5mos vs. 9.4mos (HR 0.56) MONALEESA-3 - PFS with ILC 1L pts 59.6mos vs. Ribociclib + Fulvestrant HR+/HER2- ABC post 40mos (HR 0.54) Update vs. ET - OS with ILC 51.2mos vs. 30.8mos (ILC Subtype) Placebo + Fulvestrant (HR 0.62) - OS with ILC 1L pts 59.6mos vs. 40mos (HR 0.54) HR+/HER2- ABC Gedatolisib + Palbo + Fulv - PFS by bone mets status triplet NR progression on/after VS. VS. NR VS. 8.2mos VIKTORIA-1 CDK4/6i + NSAI, <2 Gedatolisib + Fulv - PFS in non-bone mets 9.3mos VS. prior ET for ABC, VS. 7.3mos VS. 1.9mos PIK3CA WT Fulv alone Camizestrant + CDK4/6i - Time to first subsequent therapy HR+/HER2- ABC post 16.6mos. VS. 9.2mos SERENA-6 AI + CKD4/6i for at vs. AI + CDK4/6i - Time to second subsequent least 6mos with ESRlm therapy 25.7mos vs. 19.4mos - PFS in ESRlm 9.99mos vs. 5.45mos HR+/HER- ABC <2 Giredestrant + Everolimus - PFS in ITT 8.77mos VS. 5.49mos prior lines of ET, evERA vs. - PFS in duration of prior CDK4/6i progressive disease ET + Everolimus <12mos, 5.55mos VS. 3.8lmos during/post CDK4/6i - PFS in duration of prior CDK4/6i 212mos 9.23mos VS. 5.55mos ER+, HER2- ABC - OS in all patients, NR vs. 34.4mos recurrence on or Imlunestrant + Abemaciclib - PFS with ESRlm 11.1mos vs. 5.5mos EMBER-3 after 12 mos of vs. (HR 0.49) completion of AI+/- Imlunestrant - PFS without ESRlm 9.2mos vs. CDK4/6i 5.5mos (HR 0.64) Sacituzumab HR+/HER2-, ABC post - 12mos PFS rate by BICR 40% VS. ASCENT-07 VS. 37% (HR 0.85, p=0.130) ET Physician's choice - OS NR VS. NR (HR 0.72, p=0.029) Website: ONC x @OncBrothers www.oncbrothers.com
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO @ErikaHamilton9
VIKTORIA-1 Data
12.6K impressions · 20 likes · Oct 18, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] VIKTORIA-1 Study Design HR+/HER2- Arm At Advanced Breast Cancer Gedatolisib 180 mg IV once weekly, 3 weeks on, 1 week off Primary Endpoints Eligibility Criteria Palbociclib 125 mg daily, 21 days on, 7 days off PFS (BICR) Pre- & postmenopausal women & men Fulvestrant 500 mg; cycle 1, days 1 & 15, then Arm A VS. Arm C Progression on/after CDK4/6i + NSAI every 4 weeks Arm B vs. Arm C STUDY 1 R 1:1:1 Arm Bt ≤2 lines of prior ET for ABC PIK3CA-WT (N=392) Gedatolisib 180 mg IV once weekly, Secondary Endpoints Measurable disease, RECIST v1.1 3 weeks on, 1 week off Screening result for PIK3CA status Fulvestrant 500 mg; cycle 1, days 1 & 15, then OS every 4 weeks No T2DM with HbA1c >6.4% or T1DM Response Arm C Safety No prior mTORi, PI3Ki, or AKTi Assign Fulvestrant 500 mg; cycle 1, days 1 & 15, then every 4 weeks QoL No prior chemotherapy for ABC Optional cross-over to Arm A or B at progression Stratification Factors Gedatolisib1 + Palbociclib + Fulvestrant Lung/liver metastases (yes/no) STUDY 2 R3:13 Gedatolisib + Fulvestrant TTP on immediate prior therapy (≤ or >6 months) PIK3CA-MT Region (US/Canada or ROW) Alpelisib Fulvestrant Prophylactic use of a steroid-containing "swish and spit" regimen was protocol-mandated; oral non-sedating antihistamine therapy was recommended Abbreviations: 2-negative; HR+, ABC, hormone advanced receptor-positive; breast cancer, IV, AKTi, intravenous; protein kinase MT, 8 inhibitor; BICR, blinded independent central review; CDK4/6i, cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor; ET, endocrine therapy; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HER2-, human quality of life; R, randomization; ROW, rest of world; 1 mutated; diabetes mTORi, mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor; NSAI, non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PI3Ki, phosphalidylinositol epidermal 3-kinase growth inhibitor; factor receptor QoL, T1DM, type mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; TTP, time to progression; WT, wild-type Presenter: Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, FACP Content of this presentation is copyrighted and responsibility of the author. Permission is required for re-use. BERLIN --- [Slide 2] Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics Gedatolisib + Palbo Gedatolisib + Gedatolisib + Palbo + Gedatolisib + Fulvestrant Characteristic + Fulvestrant Fulvestrant Fulvestrant (n=131) Characteristic Fulvestrant Fulvestrant (n=131) (n=130) (n=131) (n=131) (n=130) Age, yr, median (range) 57 (33-83) 57 (32-81) 54 (28-83) Liver or lung mets, n (%) 102 (77.9) 104 (80.0) 109 (83.2) Female sex, n (%) 129 (98.5) 130 (100) 128 (97.7) Prior (neo)adjuvant tx, n (%) Postmenopausal, n (%) 101 (77.1) 93 (71.5) 92 (70.2) Chemotherapy 33 (25.2) 39 (30.0) 38 (29.0) Race/ethnic group, n (%) Endocrine therapy 46 (35.1) 57 (43.8) 64 (48.9) White 85 (64.9) 95 (73.1) 95 (72.5) Prior lines, ET for ABC, n (%) Asian 18 (13.7) 19 (14.6) 25 (19.1) 0 3 (2.3) 2 (1.5) 4 (3.1) Black/African American 1 5 (3.8) 3 (2.3) 1 (0.8) 113 (86.3) 113 (86.9) 115 (87.8) 2 Other/Unknown 15 (11.5) 15 (11.5) 23 (17.6) 13 (10.0) 10 (7.6) 12 (9.2) TTP on immediate prior tx, n Geographic region, n (%) (%) United States/Canada 21 (16.0) 21 (16.2) 22 (16.8) <6 months 21 (16.0) 19 (14.6) 20 (15.3) Asia Pacific 18 (13.7) 18 (13.8) 26 (19.8) >6 months 109 (83.2) 111 (85.4) 111 (84.7) Latin America 35 (26.7) 36 (27.7) 35 (26.7) Prior adjuvant CDK4/6i, n (%) 3 (2.3) 6 (4.6) 4 (3.1) Europe 57 (43.5) 55 (42.3) 48 (36.6) Prior CDK4/6i for ABC, n (%) Palbociclib 56 (42.7) 47 (36.2) 52 (39.7) ABC at diagnosis, n (%) 63 (48.1) 51 (39.2) 45 (34.4) Ribociclib 59 (45.0) 62 (47.7) 70 (53.4) ECOG PS score, n (%) Abemaciclib 23 (17.6) 26 (20.0) 16 (12.2) 0 70 (53.4) 85 (65.4) 77 (58.8) Prior CDK4/6i for ABC, mo., 1 61 (46.6) 45 (34.6) 54 (41.2) 21.7 (13.7-35.0) median duration (IQR) 18.1 (10.8-30.0) 20.0 (12.0-34.2) Abbreviations: ABC, advanced breast cancer; CDK4/6i, cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; ET, endocrine therapy; IQR, interquartile range; mets, metastases; mo., months; Palbo, palbociclib; TTP. time to disease progression; tx, therapy, yr, years Presenter: Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, FACP ESMD congress Content of this presentation is copyrighted and responsibility of the author. Permission is required for re-use --- [Slide 3] 1st Co-Primary Endpoint: Progression-Free Survival Gedatolisib Triplet vs. Fulvestrant, BICR Assessment 100 Geda + Palbo + Fulvestrant Fulvestrant 90 (n=131) (n=131) 80 9.3 2.0 Median PFS, months (95% CI) (7.2-16.6) (1.8-2.3) 70 Adjusted HR (95% CI) 0.24 (0.17-0.35); P< 0.0001 Progression-free Survival (%) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Months No. at Risk: Geda + Palbo + Fulv 131 127 103 94 69 68 50 49 35 34 24 22 19 16 10 10 9 6 6 6 4 4 4 1 0 Fulv 131 114 45 35 20 20 11 11 7 5 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 enter: Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, FACP ESMO congress nf of this presentation is copyrighted and responsibility of the author. Permission is required for re-use --- [Slide 4] 2nd Co-Primary Endpoint: Progression-Free Survival Gedatolisib Doublet vs. Fulvestrant, BICR Assessment Gedatolisib + 100 Fulvestrant Fulvestrant 90 (n=130) (n=131) 7.4 2.0 80 Median PFS, months (95% CI) (5.5-9.9) (1.8-2.3) 70 on-free Survival (%) Adjusted HR (95% CI) 0.33 (0.24-0.48); P < 0.0001 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Months sk: IV 130 126 93 89 64 63 45 44 33 33 22 22 17 16 11 8 6 5 5 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 V 131 114 45 35 20 20 11 11 7 5 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 urvitz, MD, FACP ESMD congress tion is copyrighted and responsibility of the author. Permission is required for re-use
Matteo Lambertini, MD PhD
VIKTORIA-1 Data
9.5K impressions · 110 likes · Oct 18, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] VIKTORIA-1 results PFS Gedatolisib Triplet vs. Fulvestrant PFS Gedatolisib Doublet vs. Fulvestrant 100-1 Deda Pallse+ Fulvestrent Fulvestrant 100 I (ent21) Furvestment Fulvestrant 90-5 (14131) * (=130) (AME31) : 50- 9.3 2.0 Median PFS, months (95% CI) 7.4 (7.2-16.6) 10- 2.0 (1.8-2.3) Median PFS. months (95% CI) 70" (5.5-9) (1.8-2.3) Adjusted HR (95% City 0.24 (0. 17-0.35); P. 0.0001 & Progression-free Survival (%) 50- Burrival 2 Adjusted HR (95% CI) 0.33 (0.24-0.48); 1.0001 50- 8 8 40" 40- 30- * 20- 20- 10- 1 0- 0- 0 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 # 20 5 22 23 24 0 / 3 4 $ 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 , 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Months No. Months - Code 121 17 - - to - 50 - 30 - - 22 10 - - - - - 114 - 20 " " . II an Interim OS Censored at Cross-Over Interim OS Censored at Cross-Over Gedatolisib Triplet vs. Fulvestrant Geda Palbo Gedatolisib Doublet vs. Fulvestrant Goda Fulvestrant Fulvestrant Pulvestrant Fulvestrant (n=131) (пртат) n=130 (8-131) 100 23.7 18.5 100 NR 18.5 - Median OS, months (95% CI) (21.4-NE) (15.8-NE) Median 08, months (95% CI) (NE-NE) (15.8-NE) no - Adjusted HR (95% CI) 0.69 (0.43-1.12): 0.1328 Adjusted HR (95% CI) 0.74 (0.46-1.19); Pa 0.2122 80 so 70 70 NO GO 50 Overall : Survival % 50 Overal 40 40 ao 30 20 20 10 to 0 0 -0 - : : 0- 10 : 12 -2 -R : : is 24 -* = = : $ : : : : : 8- :- :- Months A Gennari Content of this presentation IS copyright and responsibility of the author Permission IS required for re-use 2025 ESMO congress BEHLIN Hurvitz SA or al, ESMO 2025. --- [Slide 2] Pushing beyond the 6-month PFS ceiling after CDK4/6 inhibitors Combination of SERDs/SERMs with targeted therapies including Pl3Ki and CDK4/6i represents the future of ET-based treatment in CDK4/6i-pretreated population ESR1-mut 10 ITT 9 8 7 ITT AKT-altered 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Fulv + Imlun + Fulv + Fulv + SoC + Gired + Fulv + SoC Elac Fulv Cami75 Cami150 SoC Imlun Fulv Fulv Fulv Gedatol + Abema Capi Ipatasertib Everolimus Everolimus Gedatol Palbo EMERALD SERENA-2 EMBER-3 Capitello- 291 FINER evERA VIKTORIA-1 ESR1mut only Prior CDK4/6is (ESR1mut + wt) Prior CDK4/6is (ESR1mut + wt) Prior CDK4/6is (AKT altered+ wt) 100% previous CDK4/6is 100% previous CDK4/6is PIK3CA wt 100% previous CDK4/6is ~25% 1 CT line for ABC No CT for ABC "25% 1 CT line for ABC No prior CT for ABC 100% previous CDK4/6is 28% 1 CT line for ABC No prior CT for ABC A. Gennari Bardia A et al SBACS 2021; Bidard FC et al JCO 2022; Oliveira M et al Lancet Oncol Content of this presentation is copyright and responsibility of the author Permission is required for re-use BERLIN 2024; Jhaveri et al SABCS 2024 & NEJM 2024; Turner NC et al NEJM 2023; Chia S et 2025 ESMO congress al ASCO 2025; Mayer E et al ESMO 2025; Hurvitz S et al ESMO 2025 --- [Slide 3] Reframing the Paradigm: My Personal View Patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC PD candidate for ET = targeted therapy CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES ESMO Metastatic Breast Cancer Living Guideline v1.2 April 2025 If PIK3CAmut [ESCAT I-A] / If ESR1mut [ESCAT I-A]: If germline BRCA1/2 Switch ET * CDK4/6 AKT1/PTEN alterations Elacestrant [I,A; MCBS 3]ª [ESCAT I-A] inhibitor [II, C]" [ESCAT I/II]: or PALB2mut [ESCAT Fulvestrant-capivasertib II-B]: PARP inhibitor Exemestane-everolimus HR-positive/ [I,A; MCBS 2]ab [I,A; MCBS 3-4] [1, B]* §Imlunestrant HER2-negative MBC, Fulvestrant-everolimus If PIK3CAmut [ESCAT I-A]ᶜ: Fulvestrant-alpelisib [II, Bja.b.d PD Candidate for ET + *Imlunestrant [I, B; MCBS 1]ab Fulvestrant [I, CJa,b,d Targeted Therapy + abemaciclib OFS the patient " premenopausal - not previously exposed Universit PIKELA inhibitor *Ipatasertib + *Giredestrant + *Gedatolisib + " not targeted before Preferred the patient positive and not used before fulvestrant everolimus fulvestrant + palbociclib *Giredestrant + ESR1 mutational status everolimus PD testing, if not done before *Imiunestrant + abemaciclib *Ipatasertib + Candidate for ET Not candidate for ET fulvestrant *NOT FDA approved * TT = TT $FDA approved A Gennari Content of this presentation is copyright and responsibility of the author Permission is required for re-use BERLIN 2025 ESMO congress --- [Slide 4] My conclusions when ET is the option post CDK4/6is Trials results Patients selection matters Challenges evERA and VIKTORIA trials demonstrated statistically significant Combination therapies prevent the Attrition rate in luminal MBC should and clinically meaningful outcome early KM curve decline seen in past be considered when defining early line benefit after CDK4/6is, in ITT trials and overcome the 6-month PFS tretaments analyses. barrier. Clinical judgement & shared decision A comprehensive, multitargeted Careful patient selection is key. with patients should always be approach addressing ER-related ET-based therapy should be pursued pathways has the potential to re- prioritized after CDK4/6is to maximize establish endocrine sensitivity after benefit CDK4/6 i ESMO congress BERLIN 2025
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino @PTarantinoMD
VIKTORIA-1 Data
9.1K impressions · 42 likes · Oct 18, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] 1st Co-Primary Endpoint: Progression-Free Survival Gedatolisib Triplet vs. Fulvestrant, BICR Assessment 100 Geda + Palbo Fulvestrant Fulvestrant 90 (n=131) (п=131) 80 9.3 Median PFS, months (95% CI) 2.0 (7.2-16.6) (1.8-2.3) 70 Adjusted HR (95% CI) 0.24 (0.17-0.35); P < 0.0001 Progression-free Survival (%) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Months No. at Risk: Geda + 131 127 103 94 69 68 50 49 35 34 24 22 19 16 10 10 9 6 6 6 4 4 4 1 0 Palbo + Fulv Fulv 131 114 45 35 20 20 11 11 7 5 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 Presenter: Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, FACP ESMD Content of this presentation a copyrighted and responsibility of the author Permission a required for re-use
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers @OncBrothers
VIKTORIA-1 Data
6.8K impressions · 61 likes · Dec 12, 2025
View on X ↗
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino @PTarantinoMD
VIKTORIA-1 Data
4.5K impressions · 33 likes · Dec 11, 2025
View on X ↗
Hope Rugo
Hope Rugo @hoperugo
VIKTORIA-1 Data
3.8K impressions · 65 likes · Oct 18, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] 10:15 - 11:45 Proffered paper session 1: Breast cancer, metastatic CHAIRS: JAVIER CORTÉS, JANICE WING-HANG TSANG VIKTORIA-1 Study Design HR+/HER2- Arm At Advanced Breast Cancer Gedatolisib 180 mg IV once weekly 3 weeks on week off Primary Endpoints Eligibility Criteria Palbociclib 125 mg daily 21 days on days off PFS (BICR) Pre- & postmenopausal women & men Fulvestrant 500 mg: cycle days 1& 15. then Arm A vs. Arm C every weeks Arm B vs. Arm C Progression on/after CDK4/6i + NSAI STUDY 1 R 1:1:1 Arm BT <2 lines of prior ET for ABC PIK3CA-WT (N=392) Gedatolisib 180 mg IV once weekly Secondary Endpoints 3 weeks on week off Measurable disease, RECIST v1.1 Fulvestrant 500 mg; cycle 1, days 18 15. then OS Screening result for PIK3CA status every weeks Response Sara Hurvitz No T2DM with HbA1c >6.4% or T1DM Arm C Safety No prior mTORi, PI3Ki, or AKTi Assign 500 mg: cycle 1, days 1& 15, then Gedatolisib (geda) fulvestrant 1 Fulvestrant QoL every weeks palbociclib (palbo) vs fulvestrant in patients No prior chemotherapy for ABC Optional cross-over to Arm A or B at progression (pts) with HR+/ HER2-/PIK3CA wild type (WT) advanced breast cancer (ABC): First Stratification Factors Gedatolisib Palbociclib Fulvestrant results from VIKTORIA-1 Lung/liver metastases (yes/no) STUDY 2 R3:13 Gedatolisib Fulvestrant PIK3CA-MT TTP on immediate prior therapy (S or >6 months) Alpeinb Fulvestrant Region (US/Canada or ROW) Prophylactic use of steroid- containing "swish and spit regimen was protocol mandated oral non-sedating antihistamine therapy was recommended Abbreviations ABC, advanced treast cancer, AKT protein knase B inhibitor, BICR blinded independent central review CDK4/6 cycles dependent knase and elhibitor, ET. endocrine therapy HbA1c hemoglobin A1c HER2 human epidermal youth lacks receptor negative HR+ hormone receptor positive N. intravenous, MT, mutated mTOR mechanistic target rapamyon whibitor NSAI non storodal aromatase inhibitor OS, overall survival PFS progression free survival POK phosphatedyleced know Qol. quality R randomization, ROW, rest world TIOM type diabetes melitus, T2DM type diabetes melitus, TTP. time to progression WT. wild type Presenter: Sara A Hurvitz, MD. FACP ESMD Contant of his presentation copyrighted and responsibility of the author Permission is required for - BERLIN AUDITORIUM - HUB 27 --- [Slide 2] 10:15- 11:45 Proffered paper session 1: Breast cancer, metastatic CHAIRS: JAVIER CORTÉS, JANICE WING-HANG TSANG 1st Co-Primary Endpoint: Progression-Free Survival Gedatolisib Triplet vs. Fulvestrant, BICR Assessment 100 Geda Palbo + Fulvestrant Fulvestrant (n=131) 90 (n=131) 80 9.3 2.0 Median PFS, months (95% CI) (7.2-16.6) (1.8-2.3) 70 Adjusted HR (95% CI) 0.24 (0.17-0.35); P< 0.0001 Progression-free Survival (%) 60 50 40 Sara Hurvitz 30 Gedatolisib (geda) + fulvestrant t 20 palbociclib (palbo) vs fulvestrant in patients (pts) with HR+/ HER2-/PIK3CA wild-type 10- (WT) advanced breast cancer (ABC): First 0 results from VIKTORIA-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Months No. at Risk: Geda . Palbo Fulv 131 127 103 94 69 68 50 49 35 34 24 22 19 16 10 10 9 6 6 6 4 4 4 1 0 Fulv 131 114 45 35 20 20 11 11 7 5 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 Presenter Sara A Hurvita, MD, FACP ESMD Content the presentation. copyrighted and responsibility of the author Permission a required for - BERLIN AUDITORIUM - HUB 27 --- [Slide 3] 10:15 - 11:45 Proffered paper session 1: Breast cancer, metastatic CHAIRS: JAVIER CORTÉS, JANICE WING-HANG TSANG PFS in Key Subgroups: Gedatolisib Triplet vs. Fulvestrant Gedatolisib Palbociclib . Fulvestrant Fulvestrant Subgroup n/N mPFS, mo. n/N mPFS, mo. Hazard Ratio (90% CI) Age <65 years 39/93 9.3 74/108 1.9 - 0.23 (0 17-0.35) 265 years 20/38 9.7 15/23 2.1 0.28 (0 16-0.55) Menopause status Pre/perimenopause 9/28 11.1 26/36 1.8 0.13 (0.07-0.29) Postmenopause 50/101 8.9 62/92 2.0 0.27 (0 19-0.38) Geographic area US/Canada 6/21 19.3 14/22 2.0 0.13 (0.05-0.36) Europe 29/57 9.3 32/48 2.0 0.17 (0 12-0.31) Latin America 16/35 5.6 20/35 3.7 0.53 (0 29-0 Asia Pacific 8/18 16.6 23/26 1.8 0.18 (0.09-0.37) Presence of visceral metastasis Yes 44/102 10.7 71/100 1.8 - 0.21 (0.16-0.30) No 15/29 8.9 18/31 5.6 0.35 (0.20-0.71) Sara Hurvitz Liver metastasis Yes 37/74 9.2 60/72 1.8 0.21 (0.14-0.30) Gedatolisib (geda) fulvestrant + No 22/57 9.9 29/59 5.4 0.31 (0.19-0.53) Lines of prior tx for ABC palbociclib (palbo) vs fulvestrant in patients y 52/115 9.7 82/118 2.0 - 0.23 (0.17-0.33) (pts) with HR+/ HER2-/PIK3CA wild type 22 7/16 5.4 7/13 1.8 0.31 (0.09-0.99) TTP on immediate prior tx (WT) advanced breast cancer (ABC): First 56 months 13/26 7.4 13/25 2.1 0.47 (0.24-0.93) results from VIKTORIA-1 >6 months 46/105 9.9 76/106 1.9 1 0.20 (0.14-0.28) Prior CDK4/6i for ABC Ribociclib 29/59 8.9 48/70 1.9 0.22 (0.14-0.34) Palbociclib 21/56 16.6 37/52 1.9 0.21 (0 13-0.35) Abemaciclib 13/23 5.4 10/16 3.1 0.31 (0.23-0.97) 0.01 0.1 1.0 10.0 Gedatolisib plus palbociclib and fulvestrant better Fulvestrant better PFS assessed by blinded independent central review Abtreviations ABC advanced breast cancer, COK4 dependent knase 4 and inhibitor, CL confidence interval, mo. months mPFS median progression free survival TTP. time to disease progression, tx therapy Presenter Sara Hurvitz, MD. FACP ESMO Contant of his presentation copyrighted and responsibility the author Permission required for - BERLIN AUDITORIUM - HUB 27 --- [Slide 4] 10:15 11:45 Proffered paper session 1: Breast cancer, metastatic CHAIRS: JAVIER CORTÉS, JANICE WING-HANG TSANG Safety and Tolerability Treatment-Related Adverse Events (Safety Population)* SAE and Gedatolisib + palbociclib fulvestrant Gedatolisib fulvestrant Fulvestrant discontinuation, (n=130) (n=130) (n=123) (%) Pts with a1 SAE 14 (10.8) 12(9.2) 1 (0.8) Study treatment D/C due to TRAE 3(2.3) 4(3.1) 0 Deaths due to TRAET 2(1.5) 0 0 Gedatolisib palbociclib fulvestrant Gedatolisib fulvestrant Fulvestrant Adverse events, (n=130) (n=130) (n=123) n (%) Any Grade Grade 3 Grade 4 Any Grade Grade 3 Grade 4 Any Grade Grade 3 Grade 4 Sara Hurvitz Stomatitis 90 (69.2) 25 (19.2) 0 74 (56.9) 16 (12.3) 0 0 0 0 Gedatolisib (geda) + fulvestrant t Neutropenia 85 (65.4) 68 (52.3) 13 (10.0) 2(1.5) 0 1 (0.8) 1 (0.8) 1 (0.8) 0 palbociclib (palbo) vs fulvestrant in patients Nausea 57 (43.8) 5(3.8) 0 56 (43.1) 1 (0.8) 0 4(3.3) 0 0 (pts) with HR+/ HER2-/PIK3CA wild type Rash 36 (27.7) 6(4.6) 0 42 (32.3) 7 (5.4) 0 0 0 0 (WT) advanced breast cancer (ABC): First Vomiting 36 (27.7) 2(1.5) 0 30 (23.1) 0 0 1 (0.8) 0 0 results from VIKTORIA-1 Fatigue 29 (22.3) 2(1.5) 0 27 (20.8) 1 (0.8) 0 5(4.1) 0 0 Diarrhea 22 (16.9) 2(1.5) 0 16 (12.3) 1 (0.8) 0 0 0 0 Hyperglycemia24 12 (9.2) 3 (2.3) 0 15 (11.5) 3 (2.3) 0 0 0 0 Abbreviations D/C discontinued Pts. patients SAE serious adverse event TRAE treatment-related related adverse event per investigator) "Shown are adverse events of any grade that occurred in least 20% the patients any trial group unless otherwise noted *Grade events include one considered related to palbocicle (prisumonia) and one due to hepatic failure patient with multiple liver considered related to all three drugs (and likely associated with disease) For stomatis, neutroponia, rash and ryperglycemia, combined preferred terms shown patient experienced multiple terms, was counted once for the highest grade Additional events of clinical importance Presenter: Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, FACP ESMD Contant this presentation is copyrighted and responsibility of he author Permission required BERLIN AUDITORIUM - HUB 27
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers @OncBrothers
VIKTORIA-1 Data
1.7K impressions · 5 likes · Oct 18, 2025
View on X ↗

VIKTORIA-1 Met Primary Endpoint in PIK3CA-Mutant Cohort

May 1, 2026Celcuity ($CELC) announced that the Phase 3 VIKTORIA-1 trial achieved its primary endpoint in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort, joining the previously-reported positive PIK3CA-wild-type readout. Both gedatolisib triplet and doublet improved PFS vs the alpelisib + fulvestrant active comparator. Full data at ASCO 2026 (May 29–Jun 2).

Threads ranked by total KOL discussant count (replies + quote-tweets). Each main tweet shows the actual oncology KOL discussants — both replies (green) and quote-tweets (blue). Wall Street, stock-promo, WhatsApp-spam, analyst price-target tweets, and emoji-only replies all excluded.

Top KOL Discussion Threads

1 active discussion thread
3 KOL discussants

VIKTORIA-1 Top Tweets

Top 10 by impressions - click to view on X

Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

A lot was covered but summary of 7 main studies we touched on during Metastatic HR+ #BreastCancer #SABCS highlights w/ @hoperugo: ✅...

👁 20.7K ♡ 108 ↻ 44 Dec 27, 2025
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

Metastatic HR+ #BreastCancer #SABCS highlights w/ @hoperugo: ✅ #AMBRE#MONALEESA#VIKTORIA1 ✅...

👁 18.4K ♡ 47 ↻ 18 Dec 26, 2025
Dr Sarah Sammons
Dr Sarah Sammons@drsarahsam

Excellent question from the audience. Why in the world are we still using single agent fulvestrant control arms in 2025? Apparently @US_FDA mandated this in Viktoria 1.

👁 15.2K ♡ 70 ↻ 14 Oct 18, 2025
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO@ErikaHamilton9

#VIKTORIA1: combos of gedatolisib (multi target inhibitor of PI3 and mTOR 1/2) in PI3 wt post CDK 4/6 ER+ #bcsm PFS Fulv - 2.0 mo Fulv/ged - 7.4 mo Fulv/palbo/ged...

👁 12.6K ♡ 20 ↻ 10 Oct 18, 2025
Matteo Lambertini, MD PhD
Matteo Lambertini, MD PhD@matteolambe

Fantastic discussion at #ESMO25 by super @ALEDIGNUS12 on the complicated choices for second-line endocrine-based therapy in patients with advanced HR+/HER2-...

👁 9.5K ♡ 110 ↻ 39 Oct 18, 2025
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino@PTarantinoMD

VIKTORIA-1: major improvement in PFS (9.3 vs 2 months, HR 0.24, p<0.001) with gedatolisib/palbo/fulvestrant vs fulvestrant as 2L after CDK4/6i for PIK3CAwt disease. Moderate toxicity, with 2...

👁 9.1K ♡ 42 ↻ 8 Oct 18, 2025
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

#SABCS25 Day 3 Highlights: 1. #AMBRE: 1L in high tumor burden HR+ mBC 2. #VIKTORIA1: 2L after ET/CDK 4-6i in HR+ mBC 3....

👁 6.8K ♡ 61 ↻ 25 Dec 12, 2025
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino@PTarantinoMD

Benefit of gedatolisib in the VIKTORIA-1 trial was seen irrespective of duration of the immediate prior therapy. @BarbaraPistill2 #SABCS25

👁 4.5K ♡ 33 ↻ 11 Dec 11, 2025
Hope Rugo
Hope Rugo@hoperugo

#ESMO25 Sara Hurvitz presented the fascinating and important data from Victoria-1. The PIK3CA/mTOR IV inhibitor gedatolisib markedly increased PFS with palbo (and without) comp to...

👁 3.8K ♡ 65 ↻ 20 Oct 18, 2025
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

4. #VIKTROIA1: PhIII, Gedatolisib (IV, PI3K/mTORi) + Fulv +/- Palbo vs. Fulv in HR+ after CdK4/6i - mPFS 9.3mos vs. 2.0mos triplet vs. Fulvestrant in WT (Fulv alone is not what we...

👁 1.7K ♡ 5 ↻ 2 Oct 18, 2025

About the VIKTORIA-1 Trial

VIKTORIA-1 is a Phase III, open-label, randomized trial evaluating gedatolisib — now FDA-approved as Revtorpyk — a pan-PI3K/mTORC1/2 inhibitor (Celcuity), in combination with fulvestrant ± palbociclib versus fulvestrant alone in adults with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer whose disease progressed on or after a CDK4/6 inhibitor and an aromatase inhibitor. The trial enrolls separate PIK3CA wild-type and PIK3CA-mutant cohorts, both of which reported positive primary-endpoint results: PIK3CA wild-type (presented at ESMO 2025 — the basis for the July 14, 2026 FDA approval) and PIK3CA-mutant (announced May 1, 2026; presented at ASCO 2026). Gedatolisib is FDA-approved for the PIK3CA wild-type indication; its use in PIK3CA-mutant disease remains investigational, with a Celcuity sNDA planned for Q3 2026.

Trial Methodology & Results

Study Design

Phase III, global, open-label, randomized trial. The PIK3CA wild-type cohort randomized 1:1:1 to gedatolisib triplet (gedatolisib + palbociclib + fulvestrant), gedatolisib doublet (gedatolisib + fulvestrant), or fulvestrant alone. The PIK3CA-mutant cohort randomized 3:3:1 to gedatolisib triplet, alpelisib + fulvestrant (active comparator), or gedatolisib doublet.

Population

Adults with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer whose disease progressed on or after prior CDK4/6 inhibitor + aromatase inhibitor. Patients enrolled into separate PIK3CA wild-type or PIK3CA-mutant cohorts based on tumor genotype.

Interventions

Gedatolisib 180 mg IV weekly (3 weeks on / 1 week off, 28-day cycle) + palbociclib 125 mg daily (21 of 28 days) + fulvestrant 500 mg IM (triplet); or gedatolisib + fulvestrant (doublet); or fulvestrant alone (control). PIK3CA-mutant cohort uses alpelisib + fulvestrant as the active comparator instead of fulvestrant alone.

Primary Endpoints

Co-primary endpoints: PFS by blinded independent central review comparing (1) triplet vs control and (2) doublet vs control. Key secondary endpoints: overall survival, ORR, DoR, and patient-reported outcomes.

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PIK3CA wild-type cohort (ESMO 2025): the gedatolisib triplet demonstrated a PFS HR of 0.24 (95% CI: 0.17–0.35) vs fulvestrant, a 76% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death. Median PFS was 9.3 months vs 2.0 months. The gedatolisib doublet showed PFS HR 0.33, a 67% risk reduction. PIK3CA-mutant cohort (May 1, 2026): positive topline announcement — both gedatolisib triplet and gedatolisib doublet improved PFS vs the alpelisib + fulvestrant active comparator. Full hazard ratios, medians, and subgroup detail will be presented at ASCO 2026 (May 29 – June 2).

PIK3CA-WT: PFS HR 0.24 (triplet, 76% risk reduction) · PIK3CA-mutant: positive May 2026, full data ASCO 2026

Source: Celcuity — VIKTORIA-1 ESMO 2025

Overall Survival (OS)

OS data not yet reported in either cohort. Follow-up is ongoing; OS is a key secondary endpoint.


OS data not yet available

Safety & Tolerability

In the PIK3CA-WT cohort, hyperglycemia was notably lower than expected for a PI3K-pathway inhibitor (9.2% triplet, 11.5% doublet) — a key differentiator vs alpelisib. Other most-common AEs are consistent with the palbociclib + fulvestrant backbone (neutropenia, fatigue). Detailed PIK3CA-mutant safety profile to be reported at ASCO 2026.

Grade 3 stomatitis ~19% (triplet) / ~12% (doublet); 2 treatment-related deaths (1.5%) — VIKTORIA-1 safety, ESMO 2025

Clinical Implications

VIKTORIA-1 represents a potential practice-changing option for HR+/HER2- mBC patients after CDK4/6i failure — a population with limited targeted-therapy choices. Gedatolisib is the first pan-PI3K/mTORC1/2 inhibitor to show positive Phase III results in both PIK3CA-WT and PIK3CA-mutant cohorts. The PIK3CA wild-type cohort (ESMO 2025) is the basis for the July 14, 2026 FDA approval of Revtorpyk (gedatolisib) + fulvestrant ± palbociclib; the May 2026 PIK3CA-mutant readout, presented at ASCO 2026, supports a planned Q3 2026 sNDA for the PIK3CA-mutant population.

VIKTORIA-1 FAQ

What is the VIKTORIA-1 trial?

VIKTORIA-1 is Celcuity's Phase 3 trial of gedatolisib (Revtorpyk) plus fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, in HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer after at least one prior line of endocrine therapy. It has two cohorts: Study 1 (PIK3CA wild-type, n=392, versus single-agent fulvestrant) and Study 2 (PIK3CA-mutant, versus alpelisib plus fulvestrant).

Is Revtorpyk (gedatolisib) FDA approved?

Yes. On July 14, 2026 the FDA approved gedatolisib (Revtorpyk, Celcuity) in combination with fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, for HR+/HER2- PIK3CA wild-type locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer after progression on/after at least one line of endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting. It is the first pan-PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitor approved for the wild-type population.

What were the VIKTORIA-1 Study 1 (wild-type) PFS results?

In Study 1 (PIK3CA wild-type), the gedatolisib + fulvestrant + palbociclib triplet had a median PFS of 9.3 months (95% CI 7.2-16.6) versus 2.0 months for single-agent fulvestrant (HR 0.24, p<0.0001). The gedatolisib + fulvestrant doublet had a median PFS of 7.4 months (95% CI 5.5-9.9; HR 0.33, p<0.0001). Objective response rates were 32% (triplet), 28% (doublet), and 1% (fulvestrant).

Does the approval cover PIK3CA-mutant breast cancer?

No. The July 14, 2026 approval is for the PIK3CA wild-type population (Study 1). The PIK3CA-mutant cohort (Study 2, versus alpelisib plus fulvestrant) is a separate readout and is not part of the FDA approval; Celcuity has said it plans a separate supplemental filing for the mutant population.

Who makes gedatolisib and how is it given?

Gedatolisib is developed by Celcuity. It is a pan-PI3K/AKT/mTOR (PAM) inhibitor administered as 180 mg intravenously over 30 minutes weekly on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Labeled warnings include stomatitis, dermatologic reactions, and hyperglycemia.

VIKTORIA-1 in the News

Key KOL Sentiments - VIKTORIA-1

UPDATED MAY 2026: Top 8 rows below capture the May 1 PIK3CA-mutant cohort positive readout reaction.

DoctorSentimentComment
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
● POSITIVE
May 1 readout reaction
BREAKING: positive results from the VIKTORIA-1 PIK3CA-mutant cohort Both the gedatolisib triplet and doublet improved PFS vs fulv/alpelisib, positioning gedatolisib as an active option irrespective of PIK3CA status. Key caveat: the weekly IV formulation. https://t.co/ZclPhQmcWl
Yakup Ergün
@dr_yakupergun
● POSITIVE
May 1 readout reaction
We already knew the positive results in the PIK3CA-wild population. Seeing positive results in the mutant group as well is encouraging. The main drawback of the combination, however, is its parenteral administration: ➡️ IV gedatolisib + IM fulvestrant ± oral CDK4/6 inhibitor ht
Hope Rugo
@hoperugo
● POSITIVE
May 1 readout reaction
The only agent with positive data in wild type and mutant BC since everolimus! Caveats as noted. IV 3 out of 4 weeks and stomatitis. @OncoAlert https://t.co/09ilVZ0pHG
Neil Vasan
@NeilVasan
● POSITIVE
May 1 readout reaction
Gedatolisib (dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor) reaches primary PFS endpoint for patients with PIK3CA mutant ER+ MBC - looking forward to seeing these data! @ASCO @SABCSSanAntonio @SusanGKomen @BCRFcure @PIK3CApathbreak https://t.co/EmeIBeT1yT
● POSITIVE
May 1 readout reaction
👉Positive results from the VIKTORIA-1 PIK3CA-mutant cohort 👉Gedatolisib triplet and doublet improved PFS vs fulv/alpelisib #BreastCancerResearch #PIK3CA #OncologyInnovation #ClinicalTrials https://t.co/8uKb6fhbXC
Dr. Kelly Shanahan
@stage4kelly
● NEGATIVE
May 1 readout reaction
The incredible negative impact on LIVING while being tied to an infusion chair 3 weeks out of 4 means there has got to be way more than a statistically significant ⬆️ in PFS (which could be a month or so) - it better have years ⬆️ OS and virtually no AEs (not “manageable”)
● POSITIVE
May 1 readout reaction
Celcuity Reports the P-III (VIKTORIA-1) Trial Data on Gedatolisib Combination for HR+/HER2- PIK3CA Mutant Advanced Breast Cancer #celcuity #gedatolisib #snda #breastcancer #usfda #pdufa #viktoria1 #piii #clinicaltrial https://t.co/RHXwtIVRwl
Targeted Oncology
@TargetedOnc
● POSITIVE
May 1 readout reaction
🔬 VIKTORIA-1 shows gedatolisib plus fulvestrant, with or without palbociclib, boosts PFS after CDK4/6 therapy in PIK3CA-mutant #BreastCancer. 📊 Full data to be presented at #ASCO26. Read more: https://t.co/fcHcCxySiw
● POSITIVE
May 1 readout reaction
🚨 Latest #Phase3 Update! 🔷 The Phase 3 VIKTORIA-1 trial achieved its primary endpoint, demonstrating a clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort. These results highlight the effectiveness of a targeted treatment approach htt
● POSITIVE Fantastic discussion at #ESMO25 by super @ALEDIGNUS12 on the complicated choices for second-line endocrine-based therapy in patients with advanced HR+/HER2- #BreastCancer @myESMO @OncoAlert #bcsm https://t.co/sI3XT1LDAC
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
● POSITIVE VIKTORIA-1: major improvement in PFS (9.3 vs 2 months, HR 0.24, p<0.001) with gedatolisib/palbo/fulvestrant vs fulvestrant as 2L after CDK4/6i for PIK3CAwt disease. Moderate toxicity, with 2 treatment-related deaths. 3 different routes of administ
Aya Mohamed | MSc, MD
@Dr_Oncologista
● POSITIVE VIKTORIA-1 at #SABCS25 📉 Gedatolisib (pan-PI3K/mTORi) showed robust efficacy in PIK3CA-WT mBC post-CDK4/6i, effectively salvaging patients regardless of prior TTP. With Fulvestrant control arm mPFS at ~2 months, the benefit is clear. @OncoAlert #
● POSITIVE In VIKTORIA-1, brisk stomatitis resolution in ~2 weeks was effective with mitigation strategies #SABCS25 https://t.co/U6FIRnjQVO
● POSITIVE Some more highlights from Day #3 @SABCSSanAntonio #SABCS25 ✅ VIKTORIA1- 2L after ET + CDK4/6i in HR+ mBC ✅ PATINA - 1L for HR+/HER2+ mBC ✅AMBRE - 1L in HR+ mBC w. high tumor burden @drteplinsky @DanielaUruetamd @mayscancer @LSOM_HemOnc @o
Hope Rugo
@hoperugo
● NEUTRAL #ESMO25 Sara Hurvitz presented the fascinating and important data from Victoria-1. The PIK3CA/mTOR IV inhibitor gedatolisib markedly increased PFS with palbo (and without) comp to fulv alone in the wt population. 19% grade 3 stomatitis. 3 of 4 weekly
● NEUTRAL VIKTORIA-1: Gedatolisib + fulvestrant ± palbociclib vs fulvestrant in pts with HR+/ HER2-/PIK3CA WT MBC: mPFS 9.3 mo in triplet, 7.4 mo in doublet, 2 mo in fulvestrant alone. @myESMO #ESMO25 https://t.co/1TCgz19rDe
Susan G. Komen
@SusanGKomen
● NEUTRAL Dr. Sara Hurvitz presented VIKTORIA-1, where gedatolisib + fulvestrant ± palbociclib significantly extended progression-free survival for HR+/HER2-, PIK3CA wild-type advanced BC Triplet: 9.3 months vs 2   Doublet: 7.4 vs 2   Possible new option p
Santhosh Ambika
@RenoHemonc
● NEUTRAL @OncBrothers @AbiSivaMD @hoperugo @ErikaHamilton9 Geda doublet ( triplet) should be effective in mutation WT pts who progressed after AI + cdk4I , thought there will be questions due to the ctrl arm in VIKTORIA-1 It inhibits pi3k, MTOR pathways at
Dr Sarah Sammons
@drsarahsam
● NEGATIVE Excellent question from the audience. Why in the world are we still using single agent fulvestrant control arms in 2025? Apparently @US_FDA mandated this in Viktoria 1. https://t.co/72qsMoWP3Y
Oncology Brothers
@OncBrothers
● NEGATIVE 4. #VIKTROIA1: PhIII, Gedatolisib (IV, PI3K/mTORi) + Fulv +/- Palbo vs. Fulv in HR+ after CdK4/6i - mPFS 9.3mos vs. 2.0mos triplet vs. Fulvestrant in WT (Fulv alone is not what we do today in our practice) - Main AEs were Gr1/2. Hyperglycemia 9.2% a
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO
@ErikaHamilton9
● NEGATIVE Controlled type2 DM allowed on study My take: 💩 diarrhea -low 🩸 🍪 Hyperglycemia - low 👄 stomatitis still a significant problem, 2/3 patients, G3 in 20%! ❤️‍🔥 rash in 1/3 #ESMO25 https://t.co/RMo2Kk6KrD
Dr. Kelly Shanahan
@stage4kelly
● NEGATIVE @PTarantinoMD @BarbaraPistill2 My question: is fulvestrant alone really SOC in a pretreated population? Would a better comparator be a CDKi + ET? https://t.co/61X3Av4Wwf
Munaf Alkadimi
@MunafAlkadimi
● NEGATIVE @PTarantinoMD @myESMO Unclear why we still use fulvestrant monotherapy as 2L?