RECAP DAVA Hawaii Lung 2026 — top KOL voices, trial buzz & every conference slide, decoded View Full Coverage →
KOL Sentiment Index · The Answer

Physician Sentiment on TAGRISSO®

Physicians are broadly favorable, with real nuance on TAGRISSO® — 26% positive across 148 verified physician voices, by clinical trial:

148 physician voices 4 clinical trial(s) 2017-09-09 – 2026-05-31 AstraZeneca · osimertinib
Compiled and reviewed by the KOL Pulse research team, led by Brian Shields, Founder, KOL Pulse. Last updated 2026-07-13. KOL Pulse reports the physician conversation and does not endorse any product.

What do oncologists think of the FLAURA trial (TAGRISSO®)?

FLAURA — First-line metastatic EGFR-mutated (ex19del / L858R) NSCLC — osimertinib monotherapy

FDA APPROVED · Apr 2018FDA-approved April 18, 2018, for the first-line treatment of metastatic NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations.

Physicians are broadly favorable, with real nuance on FLAURA: 20% of 25 verified physician voices positive, 8% nuanced (praising the result while flagging a caveat), 64% neutral, 8% critical.

20%
8%
64%
8%
Positive 20% Nuanced 8% Neutral 64% Critical 8%
Denominator: 25 distinct verified physician voices across 38 oncologist posts, 2017-09-09 to 2025-07-21. Sponsor: AstraZeneca

See full FLAURA conference coverage & trial data →

Primary sources: ClinicalTrials.gov · NCT02296125  ·  FDA — FLAURA first-line approval (Apr 2018)
FDA approval (April 18, 2018): osimertinib for the first-line treatment of metastatic NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations (based on FLAURA, NCT02296125).

Physician voices — verbatim

Full physician voice list (25)

PhysicianComment (verbatim)SentimentImpressions
Stephen V Liu, MD
@StephenVLiu
FLAURA2 press release: addition of chemotherapy to 1L osimertinib in #EGFR NSCLC improves overall survival. Already approved based on significant PFS benefit. Awaiting data to see degree of OS benefit to consider vs MARIPOSA. Important posi… Positive 10,394
Jennifer A. Marks, MD
@jennifermarksmd
So important to remember - continuation of pemetrexed maintenance on the #FLAURA2 likely is required to derive benefit! @JuliaRotow @asco #ASCO25 @EGFRResisters @DFEGFRcenter #LCSM Neutral 3,550
Jeff Ryckman
@jryckman3
Love how the response is that "data suggest that the greatest overall survival benefit is achieved with the use of adjuvant osimertinib, as supported by the results of the ADAURA and FLAURA trials" ...as if there were a trial of salvage vs.… Negative 2,504
Eric K. Singhi, MD
@lungoncdoc
Always love hearing @JuliaRotow speak! Great to spend time with her in NOLA! BOOKMARK her updated slide! 🔖 Positive 2,417
Oriol Mirallas MD
@DrMirallas
#ASCO24 Masterclass by @JordiRemon mechanisms of resistance to #EGFR #NSCLC 1. On-target 🎯 2. Bypass 👣 3. Histo transf #SCLC #SCC 4. Unknown 📌 SoC 1L #FLAURA #MARIPOSA #FLAURA2 📌 CT+/-BEV+/-IO? after #TKI PD no clear #OS ⬆️ HARMONi-A? 👉🏼 Se… Neutral 2,192
Vinay Prasad MD MPH
@VPrasadMDMPH
Osi alone is still fine too Flaura 2 post progression care is not up to the US standard so one doesn't have to add chemo Negative 1,541
Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, FASCO
@CharuAggarwalMD
After FLAURA and ADAURA, we would have expected LAURA to be positive for both PFS and OS. This press release is very encouraging! Positive 677
Balazs Halmos
@BalazsHalmosMD
It will take a lot of balancing of pros/cons, subset considerations and of course shared decision making to settle on optimal choice Just OS cross-look might end up misleading w good crossover to chemo in FLAURA2 while practically none for… Nuanced 624
Bertrand Delsuc
@BertrandBio
It's my understanding that Astra positions FLAURA2 only for subpopulations like pts with brain mets or other subgroups of interest with a larger clinical benefit than in ITT, given the tox addon of chemo. For the other settings, they're cur… Neutral 113
Aɴᴛᴏɴɪᴏ Pᴀssᴀʀᴏ
@APassaroMD
💥 #ESMO19 #LCSM #lungcancer FLAURA trial showed a statistically significant improvement in OS (38.6 vs 31.8m = 6.8 m) for pts treated w/ Osi (HR 0.79). These results confirm t role of OSI as the corner stone for common EGFR+ NSCLC. @EGFRR… Neutral 0
Dr Riyaz Shah
@DrRiyazShah
FLAURA final OS; mOS 38.6m. That’s enough for me. Slam dunk. Khallas. Time to move on. #LCSM #ESMO19 Neutral 0
H. Jack West, MD, FASCO
@JackWestMD
Not exactly non-Asians doing better than Asians. Asians did just as well with first gen EGFR TKIs as with osimertinib. Non-Asians did better w/osimertinib. Could be diff in biology, diffs in health care systems where pts were treated, or so… Neutral 0
Joshua Bauml, MD
@Jbauml
Given early separation of curves between osimertinib and gefitinib/erlotinib in FLAURA, I wonder if osimertinib could overcome the need for concurrent chemotherapy. Interesting study, but will need to be validated with osimertinib before I… Nuanced 0
Dr. Estela Rodriguez
@Latinamd
If you were still debating if osimertinib was better than gefitinib/Erlotinib: FLAURA OS update presented by @RamalingamMD at #ESMO19: MS OS 38.6 vs 31.8 mos, impressive 54% ⬇️ in CNS progression (HR 0.48), we still need better drugs for ra… Positive 0
Lecia Sequist, MD, MPH, FASCO
@LeciaSequist
FLAURA study design #esmo17. Power based on mPFS 10 to 14 mo Neutral 0
Marco Tagliamento
@M_Tagliamento
2nd line treatment following PD in the two arms of #FLAURA trial. New data to discuss about the best first vs sequence. #ESMO19 #LCSM #OncoAlert Neutral 0
Sandip Patel MD FASCO
@PatelOncology
Completely agree, any data on brain mets here? Neutral 0
Patrick C. Ma, MD
@PatrickCMa1
Quite intriguing data. Wonder if it has to do with CNS mets difference btw the two groups: Asian vs Non-Asian... 🤔 Neutral 0
Santhosh Ambika
@RenoHemonc
Question becomes Osi + chemo will be better in pts with p53 mutations upfront Neutral 0
Dr. Antonio Calles 🫁🚭
@Tony_Calles
Final OS analysis from FLAURA trial. 🤫 Don’t tell @EMA_News Exon21 L858R EGFR mutation doesn’t show overall survival benefit from osimertinib. #ESMO19 #LCSM Neutral 0
Carlos Alvarez
@duemed
#ESMO19 On FLAURA: - positive trial (PFS) with important OS results - this is a secondary endpoint; i have some concerns about the protocol and what is now presented (power and death events). From 380 to 318 death events. Statistics adjuste… Positive 0
DENIS
@marcdenisnantes
And there you go ! #ESMO19 #FLAURA #osimertinib @AstraZeneca Neutral 0
Nathan A. Pennell MD, PhD, FASCO
@n8pennell
7 month improvement in median OS with osimertinib compared to first gen TKI in FLAURA ⁦@RamalingamMD⁩ #ESMO19 #LCSM Neutral 0
Nirmal Raut
@oncologician
The “T790M paradox” - prognosis is better if T790M is acquired rather than present at baseline .Does this explain the confidence intervals straddling the line of unity in the L858R subgroup ? #ESMO19 #FLAURAOS @RamalingamMD Neutral 0
Matthias Scheffler
@trnsltnl
Still not sure what to think of the #FLAURA results presented at #ESMO19 for EGFRmut #lungcancer. So up to you: do the results justify the use of osimertinib as SoC 1st line, or have they even strengthen sequences? @EGFRResisters @EgfrUk ? Neutral 0

See full FLAURA conference coverage & trial data →

What do oncologists think of the FLAURA2 trial (TAGRISSO®)?

FLAURA2 — First-line metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC — osimertinib + platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy

FDA APPROVED · Feb 2024FDA-approved February 16, 2024, in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of metastatic NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations.

Physicians are broadly favorable, with real nuance on FLAURA2: 21% of 66 verified physician voices positive, 18% nuanced (praising the result while flagging a caveat), 53% neutral, 8% critical.

21%
18%
53%
8%
Positive 21% Nuanced 18% Neutral 53% Critical 8%
Denominator: 66 distinct verified physician voices across 174 oncologist posts, 2023-09-11 to 2026-03-25. Sponsor: AstraZeneca

See full FLAURA2 conference coverage & trial data →

Primary sources: ClinicalTrials.gov · NCT04035486  ·  FDA — FLAURA2 osimertinib + chemotherapy approval (Feb 2024)
FDA approval (February 16, 2024): osimertinib with platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC (based on FLAURA2, NCT04035486).

Physician voices — verbatim

Full physician voice list (66)

PhysicianComment (verbatim)SentimentImpressions
Vinay Prasad MD MPH
@VPrasadMDMPH
FDA has no standards Approving chemo + Osi based on FLAURA2 is a terrible decision Osi -> chemo may have similar or better OS with better QoL. FDA has no clue. They are permitting an option that could worsen outcomes for people. Terrible… Negative 42,184
Dr Amol Akhade
@SuyogCancer
So much awaited data of flaura2 .29 .4 months. Very good PFS for CNS mets also. 24.9 months . But no OS as of now . Is more toxicity justified if NO OS ? @JackWestMD @PatelOncology @FordePatrick @StephenVLiu @DrSteveMartin #WCLC2023 Nuanced 24,807
Dr Riyaz Shah
@DrRiyazShah
FLAURA2 now FDA approved. It’s the biggest change in this space for some years. I’ll be fascinated to see how this gets used. All comers? Brain mets predominantly? Many patients welcome the opportunity to avoid chemo. Positive 22,010
Stephen V Liu, MD
@StephenVLiu
Dr. @dplanchard at #WCLC25 with highly anticipated Presidential Plenary presentation with OS results from FLAURA2: first line chemo + osimertinib improves OS from 37.6 to 47.5m, HR 0.77, 4y OS rate 41% to 49%. Benefit seen across subgroups.… Neutral 19,071
d.planchard
@dplanchard
FLAURA2 regimen raises the bar! New data from a China study shows impressive PFS/OS gains for Osi + Chemo in EGFRm + TP53 co-mutated pts. Confirms 1L SOC status across the board: TP53 mut, WT, and Asian subgroups…Finding a better future str… Positive 18,468
Benjamin Besse
@BenjaminBesseMD
EGFR update 7 potential options: •3rd gen TKI: osimertinib, lazertinib, aumolertinib •Amivantamab •Pemetrexed •Carboplatin •Ivonescimab •Dato-DXd OS data favor combos upfront—but real-world ≠ trial. In RWD, ~40% of newly diagnosed pts would… Nuanced 14,954
Patrick Forde
@FordePatrick
Same phenomenon occurs in #MARIPOSA as noted by Dr. @harpreet_md in #FLAURA2 - its minor but perhaps early increase toxicity with intensified treatment is bad for some patients outcome? #WCLC2025 #lcsm https://t.co/3eIcoNtrHW Nuanced 13,441
Eric K. Singhi, MD
@lungoncdoc
LOVE that this was included in the #FLAURA2 discussion!! We need to hear thoughts directly from patients and their families!! Positive 13,329
Rami Manochakian MD, FASCO Cancer Education
@RManochakian
🔥🚨Hot Off the Press #BigNews Press Release by @AstraZeneca ⭐️#FLAURA2 trial of #Osimertinib + #Chemotherapy vs #Osimertinib in 1st line Tx for patients with #EGFR+ advanced #LungCancer (#NSCLC) shows: ✅Statistically Significant & Clini… Positive 12,958
Oncology Brothers
@OncBrothers
Updated data on combination options seen at #ESMO25 for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer w/ EGFR mutated disease. Stuck w/ cross trial comparisons for now! We touched on this data and our options 👇👇 with @lungoncdoc! @EGFRSummit #OncT… Neutral 11,927
H. Jack West, MD, FASCO
@JackWestMD
Brain mets, you mean, in last bit? Interesting, because we’ve long considered osi to be most active component for intracranial activity & haven’t attributed much CNS activity to std chemo historically. In the end, key Q for many will be … Neutral 11,701
Dr. Antonio Calles 🫁🚭
@Tony_Calles
🧠 FLAURA2: CNS activity with osimertinib + chemo vs osimertinib alone. @dplanchard 💊 Now you have a subgroup of patients with EGFR mutation who can benefit from treatment intensification upfront. #ESMO23 #LCSM @EGFRResisters Neutral 11,413
Katsuaki Maehara 🇯🇵
@KatsuakiMaehara
🫁 FLAURA2 & MARIPOSA 🫁 @ASCOPost 🌟 OS - Interim analysis 🌟   ⚠️ INDIRECT ⚠️ 📌 Conditional Power used at the time of the interim analysis as indicated in the #WCLC24 discussion, MARIPOSA's H0 is 48%. https://t.co/R4lfF92Twx Neutral 10,802
Jordi Remon
@JordiRemon
🎉FLAURA2 in EGFR-mut aNSCLC is➕ Escalating 🏔️ ttx in blinded way provides toxicity, not all need intensive ttx. CT-DNA status before EGFR TKI (data from FLAURA) is poor prog marker.These are the patients who may benefit of intense ttx.Only … Positive 8,706
Jarushka Naidoo
@DrJNaidoo
#WCLC25 Presidential Superb FLAURA2 OS discussion by @danieltanmd, main questions: - combo may ⬆️likelihood of long-term response? - clinical/molec/ctDNA factors relevant - refinement needs complex integration of factors Extremely elegan… Positive 7,626
Balazs Halmos
@BalazsHalmosMD
Press release, press release! OS-imertinib and chemo are making the oncology Jumbotron today- and with a very hot play on OS they have nothing to hide! With OS being the 🐘in the room and both MARIPOSA and FLAURA2 reaching this key endpoin… Neutral 7,322
Giannis Mountzios
@g_mountzios
An excellent debate here in #ELCC25 on the optimal choice for 1st Line treatment of EGFR pos #NSCLC : ⭐️. Osimertinib monotherapy VS Combinations (FLAURA2/MARIPOSA) Insightful lectures by @ZPiotrowskaMD and @APassaroMD focusing on e… Positive 6,986
Chul Kim
@chulkimMD
Impactful discussion by Dr. Tan dissecting the data behind the OS benefit from #FLAURA2. Potential OS benefit from synergistic effect delaying resistance, better CNS control, ensuring receipt of chemo. Many ongoing first-line trials may… Neutral 6,552
Tejas Patil
@TejasPatilMD
Magnitude of OS benefit for FLAURA2 will be relevant here. Since crossover was not mandated per study design, the next question should be what did the control arm receive and when? IMO - the central clinical, real world, question that FLA… Neutral 5,856
Yakup Ergün
@dr_yakupergun
#ESMO25 / @NEJM FLAURA2 final OS Osimertinib + Chemo vs osimertinib alone in 1L EGFR+ NSCLC: ✅️OS 47.5 vs 37.6 mo (HR 0.77) 💬Confirms dual-therapy as new 1L option for fit EGFR-mutant patients. Between MARIPOSA and FLAURA2, my persona… Neutral 5,739
David Gandara
@drgandara
At Cal Cancer Consortium conference, Jonathan Riess shows impact of baseline positive vs negative plasma ctDNA for EGFR in the FLAURA2 trial. Addition of chemo to Osi mainly benefitting those with positive ctDNA. Food for thought! @UCD_Can… Positive 4,614
Hidehito HORINOUCHI
@HHorinouchi
🔥BREAKING🆙 Positive OS‼️ ✅FLAURA2: Osimertinib + Chemo vs Osimertinib 🎯"Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in the key secondary endpoint of OS" 🗣️@AstraZeneca @OncoAlert @Larvol #EGFR @EGFRResisters https://t.co… Positive 4,280
C. Jillian Tsai, MD, PhD
@CJTsaiMDPhD
Wonderful results - can't wait to see more details. BUT- when/why do we endorse PFS as the valid primary endpoint in drug trials in the definitive treatment, but insist on OS for some Ph3 RT trials in metastatic cancer? As we often argued… Nuanced 3,700
Rita Leporati
@Ritalepp
FLAURA2 exploratory analysis discussion by @marinagarassino at #AACR24: 🔺dynamic ctDNA analysis not useful for clinical decisions 🔹baseline detection of EGFRm is prognostic and may select for a higher degree of clinical benefit from Osi+CT … Neutral 3,606
Jennifer A. Marks, MD
@jennifermarksmd
So important to remember - continuation of pemetrexed maintenance on the #FLAURA2 likely is required to derive benefit! @JuliaRotow @asco #ASCO25 @EGFRResisters @DFEGFRcenter #LCSM Neutral 3,550
Christian Rolfo
@ChristianRolfo
Dr Wu raising important questions in his excellent discussion on the FLAURA2 trial. Toxicity, OS data will clarify the future of the combination, real benefit in subgroups, resist and mechanisms? Patients and Md point of view?@ThomasW35874… Neutral 3,469
Bartomeu Massuti
@bmassutis
In FLAURA2 trial chemotherapy plus Osimertinib increases survival vs Osi single agent with HR 0.77 and median survival 47.5 months and 45% patients alived at 4 years. Is still a role for Osimertinib single agent? @OncoAlert #WCLC25 Neutral 3,361
Kelsey Pan, MD, MPH
@KelseyPanMD
10/20 #TumorBoardTuesday 👨🏽‍🏫Mini Tweetorial 7👨🏽‍🏫 1L tx selection ➡️ impacts 2L💊🧪options! As beautifully illustrated by @JuliaRotow at #TTLC25: Neutral 3,351
Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, FASCO
@CharuAggarwalMD
Results from #FLAURA2 presented at IASLC #WCLC25. 🔹PFS previously presented (primary end point), superior with combination c/w osi alone. 🔹OS presented today, with a mOS 47.5mo Safety as previously reported. Fantastic presentation @dplanch… Positive 3,347
Shankar Siva
@_ShankarSiva
🚨FLAURA2 (n=557; 1L EGFRm advanced NSCLC, incl ~40% CNS mets): shows final OS data for 1st-line osimertinib + chemo ➡️ median OS ~47.5 mo vs 37.6 mo (HR 0.77; p=0.02); ➡️ 4-yr OS 49.1% vs 40.8%. ➡️ Longer exposure to osi + 2nd line chem… Neutral 3,158
Joshua Reuss
@Joshua_Reuss
Dr. @JuliaRotow makes her case for FLAURA2 osimertinib+chemotherapy in EGFRm NSCLC at #WinterLung26. Benefit extends beyond classical "high risk" subgroups. Neutral 2,830
Roberto Ferrara
@RobertoFerrara_
TOP trial shows benefit of osi+chemio in EGFR mut/P53 mut NSCLC with early separation of OS curve (not occurring in Flaura2). P53 mut could be DISRUPTIVE and non-DISRUPTIVE which are functionally different categories. Trials should catch th… Neutral 2,216
Oriol Mirallas MD
@DrMirallas
#ASCO24 Masterclass by @JordiRemon mechanisms of resistance to #EGFR #NSCLC 1. On-target 🎯 2. Bypass 👣 3. Histo transf #SCLC #SCC 4. Unknown 📌 SoC 1L #FLAURA #MARIPOSA #FLAURA2 📌 CT+/-BEV+/-IO? after #TKI PD no clear #OS ⬆️ HARMONi-A? 👉🏼 Se… Neutral 2,192
Eric K. Singhi, MD
@esinghimd
FIRST debate of #TTLC24, @RamalingamMD v @JSabari Chemotherapy plus osimertinib: Should this be our 1L SOC for patients w/ EGFR mutant mNSCLC? Without OS readout, shared decision-making remains PARAMOUNT Very timely given the recent @F… Neutral 2,117
Andres F. Cardona
@AndresFCardonaZ
My perception, after using FLAURA2 combination for months, is that it increases hematological and liver toxicity significantly, at least in the Latin population that I treat. Have you had a similar impression in other latitudes? Neutral 1,957
Julien Mazieres
@JulienMazieres
Highly expected presentation #WCLC2025 Positive OS in FLAURA2 trial with “limited” exposure to chemo. Clear impact on pts outcome but also on pts journey… Nuanced 1,834
Isabel Preeshagul
@ipreeshagul
Share the stage with the INCREDIBLE @CharuAggarwalMD ?! I’m in #nylung24 Take home 🏡 from our session 1) mariposa vs flaura2 vs flaura , pt driven, no right answer 2) SC Ami- less infusion reaction 13 %vs 66% with IV , less chair time 3) … Neutral 1,722
Alfredo Addeo MD
@Alfdoc2
Dr Langen discussing FLAURA2 data. Too early to pick FLAURA2 regimen as new SOC. CtDNA might help us to determine when and if we need to intensify treatment #ELCC24 @myESMO Neutral 1,713
Dr. Luis E. Raez
@LuisRaezMD
FLAURA2 Overall survival presented at #WCLC2025 showing an increase of survival of chemo +osi with 47.5 months HR 0.77 good news for our patients @EGFRResisters @EGFRSummit @EgfrUk @egfr @EGFRmNSCLC @DFEGFRcenter #lungcancer #LCSM Neutral 1,546
Manuel Dómine, MD, PhD
@ManuelDomine
Flaura-2 Second interim Overall Survival analysis witha maturity of 41%. 3 years OS 64% vs 50% HR 0, 70. #ELCC2024 @OncoAlert @myESMO Neutral 1,524
Dr. Estela Rodriguez
@Latinamd
Sometimes the FDA approves treatments that I’m not ready to start in all patients. .. @FDAOncology approves #osimertinib for 1st Line metastatic EGFR NSCLC based on #FLAURA2 which compared chemo+ osi vs osi alone w ⬆️ PFS but ⬆️⬆️toxicity… Nuanced 1,300
Diego A. Díaz-García
@diegoadiazg
🚨 FLAURA2 OS Results: In EGFRm advanced NSCLC, osimertinib + chemotherapy improved OS vs osimertinib alone (47.5 vs 37.6 mo; HR 0.77). Reinforces combinations as preferred first-line options. @IASLC #CánCare #nsclc #egfr #lcsm #wclc25 Positive 1,244
D. Ross Camidge
@DRCamidge
I favor it as a means to an end. To get to maximal response before consolidation radiation. If viewed this way chemo doesn’t have to start day 1. Can be after mex response on tki Neutral 1,180
Daniela Scattolin
@DanielaScattol1
How will the EGFRmut NSCLC treatment landscape change? Personalized approach is the FUTURE ✨ #ELCC24 #FLAURA2 #MARIPOSA #MARIPOSA2 Neutral 974
Santhosh Ambika
@RenoHemonc
New EGFRm consult used to be straight forward..soon it is will be like - ‘ Look we have 3 options ……..’ Neutral 915
Noemi Reguart
@NReguart
Great insights from Tony Mok @TonyMok9 and Solange Peters @peters_solange at the Global Lung Diagnostics Summit — spotlight on #EGFR BM and subgroups of interest in the evolving landscape of #LungCancer Positive 839
Balazs Halmos
@DrSteveMartin
Certainly CNS disease seems key in decision-making as: ☑️poor progn w osi alone ☑️very large PFS benefit w projected QOL impact ☑️anticipated OS benefit given delta in PFS But even there amount of CNS disease prob relevant as per👇data More … Nuanced 724
Alan Reyes-M.D
@dralanreyesonco
Too much toxicity: Chemo/ TKI G3 AE’s 53% vs TKI mono G3 AE 11%, with no OS benefit… should we use only in CNS mets patients?? #FLAURA2 #EGFRm #NSCLC Nuanced 622
Narjust Florez, MD, FASCO
@NarjustFlorezMD
We are here … From FLAURA-2 updates to Northstar - the evolution for the treatment of EGFR lung cancer has accelerated but still we need more for our patients. It doesn’t end here - it starts now #ESMO25 Nuanced 593
Antonious Z. Hazim, MD
@AHazimMD
Without an OS benefit, hard to find an argument to use this regimen Negative 553
Tom Newsom-Davis
@tnewsomdavis
I think this has a role, but in the minority of patients in the real-world setting QoL with non-chemo 1L treatment not to be underestimated PRO data shows most preferTKI only regimen Nuanced 433
Crispin Hiley
@crispinhiley
The trial that should be done - hopefully coming sometime in the future somewhere. A great discussion on monotherapy vs combo therapy for patients with EGFR mutation positive NSCLC. Patient relevant endpoints so key. #ELCC25 Positive 430
Bijoy Telivala
@BijoyTelivala
Judgement call Older / Frail pt - Osi alone Others can discuss options but if not choosing Osi alone , I would prefer Mariposa rather than Flaura protocol Hoping for the Subq version of Avimantanib Nuanced 368
David Heredia.
@HerediaOncologo
First-line (1L) osimertinib (osi) ± platinum-pemetrexed in EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) advanced NSCLC: FLAURA2 post-progression outcomes Trend of OS benefit. #ELCC2024 @myESMO Neutral 368
Adam Dangoor
@DrAdamDangoor
Adds to increasingly complex decision making in NSCLC. We need to get much better at using data to stratify patients, & then have decision support applications so that all oncologists can be offering treatment as close to optimal for surviv… Neutral 338
Martin Dietrich, MD, PhD
@DoctorDietrich
FLAURA2 Update: OS trend HR=0.75, not final but improved from HR=0.9 at 1st interim analysis. Median OS in osi arm 36 months, similar to FLAURA results . Postprogression tx with old concern of ?combination > sequential tx. SOC for 1st line … Negative 276
Clay Reed, MD
@ClayReedMD
Frail (or someone very interested in QOL): Osi single agent Someone fit with brain Mets or who wants slightly more agressive care- Osi + chemo Someone young and fit: Amivant + laz Positive 204
Dipesh Uprety MD FACP
@DipeshUpretyMD
FLAURA-2 @NEJM ➡️Pts w/ advanced NSCLC randomized to osimertinib versus chemo plus Osi ➡️↑ OS with chemo plus osi (Md OS: 47.5 mo vs. 37.6 mo; HR: 0.77) @OncoAlert @BTFCancerNews #LCSM Neutral 147
Evan Thomas MD/PhD
@EvanThomas84
Shouldn’t the curves recross or at least start to converge at 39 months? Neutral 142
Dr. Rajib Bhattacharjee
@rajib99
They should have made a preplanned analysis for exon 21 mut. Without clear benefit hard to press for such a toxic regimen. Prescribed it to a patient with L858R and pontine mets. Too much toxicity. Two cycles done and two interim admission… Negative 123
cadranel jacques
@CadranelJ
Strongly suggest that not all patients should received Flaura 2 intensification and that today and unexpectedly molecular alterations except del/858 are less indicative than metastatic burden and sites of metastases. What is the place for t… Neutral 120
Bertrand Delsuc
@BertrandBio
It's my understanding that Astra positions FLAURA2 only for subpopulations like pts with brain mets or other subgroups of interest with a larger clinical benefit than in ITT, given the tox addon of chemo. For the other settings, they're cur… Neutral 113
Anis Toumeh, MD
@AnisToumeh
I like both. 3 year OS seems comparable, but FLUARA2 with median exposure to chemo all together of 8 months. Would SubQ Ami make a difference for you? Nuanced 111
Mike Pishvaian
@MPishvaian
#TumorBoardTuesday That certainly makes sense...so in the real world, probably a low threshold to drop pem if there are significant AEs Neutral 57
José Sandoval
@JLSandoval
PFS without OS or QoL benefit in this case will just mean added Tox. AZ will sell more, patients will pay the price in Tox and society will pay the monetary cost. Negative 48
Prabhat Gautam Roy, MD
@Prabhat_DM_Onco
Great summary of MARIPOSA, FLAURA2, etc.! We just published a narrative review on recent advances in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, covering first-line combos, resistance mechanisms, and post-progression strategies. Check it out: https://t.co… Neutral 19

See full FLAURA2 conference coverage & trial data →

What do oncologists think of the ADAURA trial (TAGRISSO®)?

ADAURA — Adjuvant EGFR-mutated (ex19del / L858R) stage IB–IIIA NSCLC after complete resection

FDA APPROVED · Dec 2020FDA-approved December 18, 2020, for adjuvant therapy after tumor resection in patients with NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations.

Physicians are broadly favorable, with real nuance on ADAURA: 35% of 49 verified physician voices positive, 16% nuanced (praising the result while flagging a caveat), 39% neutral, 10% critical.

35%
16%
39%
10%
Positive 35% Nuanced 16% Neutral 39% Critical 10%
Denominator: 49 distinct verified physician voices across 107 oncologist posts, 2020-05-31 to 2026-05-31. Sponsor: AstraZeneca

See full ADAURA conference coverage & trial data →

Primary sources: ClinicalTrials.gov · NCT02511106  ·  FDA — ADAURA adjuvant approval (Dec 2020)
FDA approval (December 18, 2020): osimertinib for adjuvant therapy after tumor resection in EGFR exon 19 deletion / exon 21 L858R NSCLC (based on ADAURA, NCT02511106).

Physician voices — verbatim

Full physician voice list (49)

PhysicianComment (verbatim)SentimentImpressions
Vinay Prasad MD MPH
@VPrasadMDMPH
Here is the REAL @Plenary_Session on #ADAURA #ASCO23 #ASCO2023 38.5% of people who had recurrence got OSI (very low!) That just isn't good enough Brain staging is suboptimal= occult met disease Would you let your mother be on the control a… Negative 103,070
Drew Moghanaki 🐕
@DrewMoghanaki
Hey @JackWestMD, did you already see p25 of the #ADAURA supplementary appendix? Curious of your thoughts given 88% of pts in the placebo arm who developed progression and were fit enough to get more tx got a TKI. #ASCO23 https://t.co/vRV8Fe… Neutral 88,661
Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, FASCO
@CharuAggarwalMD
Before we all continue to pile on #ADAURA, can someone tell me % of patients who received Immunotherapy upon progression on IM-010 or KN-91. See figure. I will remind you that immunotherapy alone or in combination is THE SOC for 1L Metas… Neutral 80,524
Nathan A. Pennell MD, PhD, FASCO
@n8pennell
Please check out this cost effectiveness analysis done by @LemmonOnc and I based on various projected final ADAURA OS results. We calculated that adjuvant osimertinib would be cost effective if the OS benefit was 0.7 HR or lower, so 0.49 ex… Neutral 42,496
Bishal Gyawali
@oncology_bg
So only 79 of 343 patients (23%) in placebo arm got subsequent osimertinib in #ADAURA. Would love to see OS results subgrouped by those who got subsequent osi versus those who did not. #ASCO23 Negative 41,217
Jeff Ryckman
@jryckman3
"I have to start with #ADAURA because the Cheerleaders are out there in full force." Bring the truth, VP! Oncology has too many Cheerleaders. Put down the pom-poms and think about trial design, folks. Let's put patients front and cent… Neutral 39,257
Dr Riyaz Shah
@DrRiyazShah
ADAURA; look at NEJM supplementary ; 7% 5y landmark advantage for those who got adjuvant chemo. My view will be to recommend adjuvant chemo before adjuvant osimertinib #ASCO23 #LCSM Negative 32,082
H. Jack West, MD
@JackWestMD
My colleague @n8pennell & I have been askeyd to write a commentary piece together about ADAURA. In the spirit of working together, we have agreed to do so. What do you see as the most likely outcome? Neutral 21,614
Balazs Halmos
@DrSteveMartin
#ASCO23 ADAURAble results! How it started How it is going 👇 👇 Positive 21,191
gilberto lopes
@GlopesMd
If anyone had doubts: @asco #asco23 impressive results from ADAURA - OS hazard ratio [HR] of 0.49; 95.03% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.73; p=0.0004), and in the overall trial population (Stages IB-IIIA) (18% data maturity, OS HR of 0.49;… Positive 18,875
Charles Swanton
@CharlesSwanton
ADAURA trial of adjuvant osimertinib in egfrm early stage NSCLC shows 12% overall survival benefit consistent across all subgroups and independent of prior adjuvant chemotherapy use - fabulous news for patients with egfrm early stage lung c… Positive 16,789
Roy Herbst
@DrRoyHerbstYale
I am excited about the plenary session starting in a few minutes ⁦@YaleCancer⁩ ⁦@ASCO⁩. I will be presenting the overall survival data from the ADAURA study ⁦for early stage EGFR mutant lung cancer. more soon…⁦@ASCOPres⁩ Positive 13,053
Massimo Di Maio
@MassimoDiMaio75
Have a look at my comment on the control arm of the ADAURA trial. Of course I am not discussing the relevance of the results, but the importance of an optimal control arm, for ethical and methodological reasons, also in terms of post-progre… Nuanced 12,969
Stephen V Liu, MD
@StephenVLiu
#ASCO24 Dr. @TommyJohn00 shows #MRD analysis from ADAURA (adjuvant osimertinib for #EGFR NSCLC). This is a tumor-informed MRD assay (individual for each patient). Neutral 8,178
Ziad Bakouny, MD, MSc
@ZiadBakouny
Now @DrRoyHerbstYale with the third presentation of the plenary session with the #ADAURA study. Now with an overall survival benefit with osimertinib in patients with EGFR+ NSCLC. @ASCO #ASCO23 @YaleCancer @YaleMed @IMG_Oncologists @Onco… Neutral 6,554
Julien Mazieres
@JulienMazieres
Looking at ADAURA & LAURA control arms we can wonder whether localized EGFR lung cancer really exists. Multifocal lung extension & mets likely occur very early underlining the need for targeted tt regardless of tumor stage. ctDNA might help… Neutral 6,554
Jonathan Spicer MD PhD
@DoctorJSpicer
#ALINA, #ADAURA and #KN671 were all smiles today @myESMO #ESMO23! Love these guys! Positive 4,913
Ben Solomon
@bensolomon1
Outstanding presentation from @TommyJohn00 about the utility of tumour informed MRD analysis of ctDNA in the ADAURA trial. Glimpsing at the future of disease monitoring in lung cancer. @_ShankarSiva @drshieldsmd #ASCO24 Positive 4,847
Dr Rishabh Jain
@DrRishabhOnco
#ASCO26 🚨 RET-positive early-stage NSCLC just got its ADAURA moment. Phase 3 LIBRETTO-432 showed adjuvant selpercatinib dramatically improved EFS after definitive therapy in stage IB-IIIA RET fusion+ NSCLC. 🧪 Phase 3, double-blind 👥 N=151… Positive 4,716
Lei Deng, MD (He/Him)
@LeiDeng3
The 3 #LCSM studies that I am waiting for at #ASCO23 - KEYNOTE 671, ADAURA & LUNAR. See the Context, Design, and What to Look For. Neutral 4,221
Patrick Forde
@FordePatrick
It was a pleasure to reviewing this excellent MRD work from the ADAURA trial led by Drs. ⁦⁦⁦@DrRoyHerbstYale⁩ ⁦@ThomasW35874311⁩ & co. Key addition to the knowledge in resected lung cancer, primetime for MRD is getting close! #lcsm Positive 3,720
Eddie Cliff
@Eddie_Cliff
Thanks @MassimoDiMaio75 for raising the lack of crossover in ADAURA @NEJM I enjoyed the discussion w @JackWestMD & @n8pennell on @chadinabhan's podcast: https://t.co/8fsu3ON1of We also discuss the ethics of crossover in our recent @JCO_A… Positive 3,147
Jarushka Naidoo
@DrJNaidoo
#ASCO24 Lung orals🔥 MRD analysis of Ph III ADAURA trial: - using tumor-informed approach, 91% samples assessable for MRD - MRD events: 13% osi v 49% pbo - MRD/‘molecular recurrence’ occurred 4.7m before radiologic @TommyJohn00⁩ ⁦@ASCO⁩ ⁦@… Positive 2,790
Mark Lewis, MD, FASCO
@marklewismd
In a superb & balanced discussion @LeciaSequist highlights the potential CNS-protective benefits of indefinite EGFR TKI (citing ADAURA) Positive 2,525
Bertrand Delsuc
@BertrandBio
$AZN TAGRISSO achieved unprecedented survival in early-stage EGFR-mutated lung cancer, with 88% of patients alive at five years in ADAURA Phase III trial #ASCO23 OS HR 0.49 https://t.co/Z0C0gcVcpd Positive 2,345
Rafeh Naqash, MD
@thenasheffect
Bingo ! OS met in #ADAURA presented by ⁦@DrRoyHerbstYale⁩ at ⁦@ASCO⁩ #ASCO23 . The ONE session I was able to attend !😄 Positive 2,083
Bartomeu Massuti
@bmassutis
Results of monitoring ctDNA. In ADAURA trial seems to correlate MRD with recurrence and outcomes. #ASCO24 @OncoAlert Neutral 2,070
Fabrice Barlesi
@barlesi
Smart discussion of ADAURA by @bensolomon1 #ASCO23 Neutral 1,331
Chul Kim
@chulkimMD
#ADAURA OS data by Dr. Herbst. In stage II–IIIA, OS HR 0.49; 5-yr OS 85% with #osimertinib vs 73% with placebo. In stage IB–IIIA, OS HR 0.49 favoring osi. Benefits seen across stages IB/II/IIIA (HR for OS: 0.44/0.63/0.37)! #ASCO23 Neutral 1,159
Dr. Nina Niu Sanford
@NiuSanford
So how do y’all really feel about ADAURA? Neutral 1,112
Christine Lovly, MD, PhD
@christine_lovly
Agree! I am very enthusiastic about the ADAURA data. But can we truly say “cure” with the available data? @JackWestMD Nuanced 896
Dr Amol Akhade
@SuyogCancer
Key is the data of those 79 which got Osimertinib on progression. I am sure this will eventually come out . And that will probably throw enough light on correct magnitude of benifit of adjuvant Osimertinib, if any . Neutral 836
Dr. Estela Rodriguez
@Latinamd
As a fellow cat owner, I’m supporting @n8pennell’s perspective but I’m sure you will find common ground that benefits all patients. Nuanced 807
Manuel Dómine, MD, PhD
@ManuelDomine
ADAURA: Molecular residual disease (MRD) analysis. MRD events were detected + frequently in placebo vs osi. MRD identified recurrence with a median lead time of 4.7 m. Pts receiving osi were more likely to be DFS and MRD event-free vs place… Neutral 794
Pramesh CS
@cspramesh
Clearly not a proper cost effectiveness analysis when just one third of patients got the standard of care? And cost effectiveness is relative? And the US spending 19% GDP on Healthcare with vastly inferior outcomes cannot dictate what is "c… Negative 646
Fred R. Hirsch
@fred_hirsch
Great discussion in ASCO plenary session by our previous “fellow”, Dr. Ben Solomon discussing adjuvant EGFR therapy in NSCLC ! Congrats to Dr.Herbst as presenter and Dr. Solomon as discussant! Positive 494
Robert S Miller, MD, FACP, FASCO, FAMIA-he/him
@rsm2800
ADAURA OS results from Sunday now incorporated into updated @ASCO guideline for the management of Stage III NSCLC https://t.co/yOqVK21a43 #ASCO23 Neutral 397
Allison Chang
@aebchang
Yes very sobering, and reminiscent of the sharp decrement in PFS after pts discontinued osi in ADAURA. We don’t think the answer is to keep everyone on indefinite therapy (a la LAURA), but we need to figure out: 1) how to cure more peopl… Nuanced 386
Eric K. Singhi, MD
@lungoncdoc
I’m here for BOTH viewpoints!! Looking forward to this @JackWestMD @n8pennell!! #lcsm @LungCancerRx Positive 350
Catherine A. Shu, MD
@CatherineShuMD
Yes!!! I see all this all the time in my practice. That being said, it was chilling to see the results of #ADAURA being presented by Roy Herbst! Positive 322
Giuseppe Procopio
@g_procopio_
i am fully agree with you Max.This is a common problem Negative 275
Vladmir C. Cordeiro de Lima, MD, PhD
@ClaudioVladmir
👍When you're about to present a potentially paradigm-shifting study, you better make all effort to leave no room for questioning. In this particular case: no PET / brain RM before osi initiation, adjv chemo at invest discretion, OS as 2nd e… Nuanced 249
Giuseppe Banna
@gbanna74
Although... 1. OS not significant in stage IB & II as well as ex21 L858R 2. about 3 fold patients than placebo discontinued due to their decision or toxicity 3. only 43% progressed to placebo received Osi among those receiving Egfr tki Nuanced 218
Peter B. Bach, MD
@peterbachmd
And haven’t edited out the susceptibility to the mutation yet because, well, prevention never a priority Neutral 208
Dr. Bosch-Barrera
@BoschBarrera
You cannot give osimertinib adjuvant if a patient received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ie for R1) because for safety reasons were excluded from Adaura, but you have a phase III after radical chemoradiation Laura... I have missed something? Nuanced 205
Nagashree Seetharamu
@NagashreeSeeth1
A follow up study looking at practical utility and impact on HRQoL with monitoring eagerly awaited Neutral 131
Vidya Kollu MD
@KolluVidya
#ASCO23 #Plenary session #Lungcancer #adjuvant osimertinib # stage II-IIIA ADAURA study -updated results it only gets better! @Roy Herbst et al. https://t.co/yCdd4aoSj1 Positive 73
Alex Menter
@Alexmenter
I agree. But we also had a huge argument about ADAURA RFS without OS in 2020. I agree this is different because of the established track record of cure with these drugs. There is still a lot that is unknown about whether TKIs ever cure NSCL… Nuanced 57
Patrick C. Ma, MD
@PatrickCMa1
Much anticipated Plenary presnetation of ADAURA study by Dr. Roy Herbst. Just started. Neutral 0

See full ADAURA conference coverage & trial data →

What do oncologists think of the LAURA trial (TAGRISSO®)?

LAURA — Unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated (ex19del / L858R) NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy

FDA APPROVED · Sep 2024FDA-approved September 25, 2024, for locally advanced, unresectable (stage III) NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations and whose disease has not progressed during or after platinum-based chemoradiation therapy.

Physicians are broadly favorable, with real nuance on LAURA: 29% of 86 verified physician voices positive, 16% nuanced (praising the result while flagging a caveat), 42% neutral, 13% critical.

29%
16%
42%
13%
Positive 29% Nuanced 16% Neutral 42% Critical 13%
Denominator: 86 distinct verified physician voices across 224 oncologist posts, 2024-02-19 to 2026-04-01. Sponsor: AstraZeneca

See full LAURA conference coverage & trial data →

Primary sources: ClinicalTrials.gov · NCT03521154  ·  FDA — LAURA stage III approval (Sep 2024)
FDA approval (September 25, 2024): osimertinib for unresectable stage III EGFR exon 19 deletion / exon 21 L858R NSCLC without progression after platinum-based chemoradiation (based on LAURA, NCT03521154).

Physician voices — verbatim

Full physician voice list (86)

PhysicianComment (verbatim)SentimentImpressions
Oncology Brothers
@OncBrothers
#LungSeries: w/ @DrSteveMartin we 🗣️ the SoC for mNSCLC w/🎯mutation in 1L (Osi, Ami, Alectinib, Lorlatinib, et al) Full discussion: - https://t.co/5bMCMgA4P4 - https://t.co/AKwjTkgN49 - Also on the “Oncology Brothers” podcast @CancerN… Neutral 51,196
Mark Lewis, MD, FASCO
@marklewismd
LAURA passes the "truck test" to a rousing ovation at #ASCO24 plenary session, with osimertinib given to patients with locally advanced unresectable stage III EGFRmut NSCLC with no progression following definitive chemoRT #lcsm https://t.… Positive 34,891
Dr Amol Akhade
@SuyogCancer
Laura curves . Incredible. HR of 0.16 . 39. 1 months vs 5.6 months. With almost 80 % Cross over. Definitely practice changing . @DrRiyazShah @OncBrothers @OncoAlert @JackWestMD @FordePatrick @Alfdoc2 @brunolarvol @Timothee_MD #ASCO24 … Positive 34,441
Patrick Forde
@FordePatrick
Impressive increase in PFS with consolidation osimertinib after CRT for pts w unresectable stage III lung cancer. Crossover on progression 82% higher than in most other studies. OS far from mature. Will be adopted as a new standard where it… Positive 31,190
Benjamin Besse
@BenjaminBesseMD
LIFETIME osimertinib after a treatment with curative intent? In pts with EGFRmut stage III NSCLC, chemo-radiotherapy can CURE pts. Were pts in LAURA properly staged by petscan/brain RMI? Why not using MRD to select patient? Strong concerns … Positive 27,888
Eric K. Singhi, MD
@lungoncdoc
Overheard at Best of #ASCO24 Albuquerque: “Wait. Are you that doctor that dances while giving updates on lung cancer?” Why yes, that’s me 😂 Neutral 24,483
Nathan A. Pennell MD, PhD, FASCO
@n8pennell
IT DOESN’T MATTER IF YOU CALL IT ADJUVANT OR CONSOLIDATION, USE YOUR BEST SYSTEMIC TREATMENT AFTER DEFINITIVE TREATMENT FOR EGFR M+ LUNG CANCER (AND PROBABLY ALK AND RET+)! Neutral 22,245
Rami Manochakian MD, FASCO 🇺🇸🇸🇾CancerEducation
@RManochakian
🔥🚨Hot off the press. Press Release by @AstraZeneca. #LAURA Phase III trial of #Osimertinib vs placebo after chemoradiotherapy for pts with unresectable stage III #EGFRm non-small cell #LungCancer showed POSITIVE results with significant ⬆… Positive 19,918
Stephen V Liu, MD
@StephenVLiu
With news of the positive results from LAURA (consolidation osimertinib for stage III #EGFR NSCLC post chemoradiation), how would you approach a similar setting today: unresectable stage IIIA #ALK fusion NSCLC after chemoradiation? #LCSM 🤔 Positive 19,451
Vinay Prasad MD MPH
@VPrasadMDMPH
80% is false. Crossover to OSI was only given to 50/66 75% of patients I guess the other 25% of patients didn't deserve the best care? Paper also doesn't say if OSI was the next initial therapy or given later @Timothee_MD #asco24 #asco202… Negative 18,879
Noemi Reguart
@NReguart
LAURA Trial receives a well deserved huge applause by the audience. Huge benefit in PFS (39 vs 5.6 mo, HR < 0.2. OS still immature and 81% crossover. STAGE III EGFR+ NSCLC INCURABLE? BRAIN RMN BUT NO PET-CT required at baseline. #ASCO24 @L… Nuanced 17,203
Alfredo Addeo MD
@Alfdoc2
Let’s start with getting them properly staged. 50% only get PET scan is at least questionable Negative 16,877
Sanjay Popat
@DrSanjayPopat
Dr Lu presents LAURA CNS and distant PD data. Distant PD rate 16 vs 37%. 55% PET scan staging. PFS HR similar. TTDM HR=0.22. CNS PFS HR=0.17 #ESMO24 @myESMO Neutral 15,850
Bishal Gyawali, MD, PhD, FASCO
@oncology_bg
Many thoughts on LAURA, will record it on @ecancer video later today. But the discussant of the LAURA trial basically said we now don’t need any RCTs even for other targeted therapies given these results? And no comment on the clear under s… Nuanced 13,937
Timothée Olivier, MD
@Timothee_MD
What to look for in LAURA: 1-proper initial staging? (if not, ⬆️difference btw curves) 2-rate of pts not progressing in the control arm ? looks very low, understaging? 3-crossover, 80%, really ? why not 100%? more details? 4-post-RT tox: l… Neutral 13,177
Jarushka Naidoo
@DrJNaidoo
#ASCO24 Plenary🔥 Ph III LAURA trial of consolidation osi v pbo in stage III EGFR+ nsclc: - mPFS 39.1m v 5.6m (HR 0.16; P<0.001) - ⁠ 36m OS 84% v 74% (p NS) Standing ovation for this new SOC, & for the very best of leaders @RamalingamMD @… Positive 12,654
David Gandara
@drgandara
Home run! LAURA: Osimertinib after chemoRT in EGFR-mutated unresectable stage III NSCLC. @ASCO Positive 12,434
Lecia Sequist, MD, MPH, FASCO
@LeciaSequist
Ready backstage for LAURA and ADRIATIC!!! #ASCO24 plenary! ⁦@RamalingamMD⁩ ⁦@DavidRSpigel⁩ ⁦@LaurenByersMD⁩ Positive 12,291
Bartomeu Massuti
@bmassutis
The moving landscape for EGFR mut+ Lung Cancer at #ELCC2025 ⁦@myESMO⁩ ⁦@OncoAlert⁩ Neutral 11,193
H. Jack West, MD
@JackWestMD
Shouldn't Q be whether proactive Rx improves OS compared to getting same best Rx only if/when relapse occurs, if that Rx is best SOC for met dzs? Everyone knew PFS as primary endpoint in this setting is such a low bar as to be ~preordaine… Nuanced 10,706
Balazs Halmos
@BalazsHalmosMD
Stunning to see practically 100% recurrence/progression rate even in PET staged patients - stage 3 EGFR+ NSCLC is indeed stage 4 in disguise- imo justifying the extended course of “adjuvant” EGFR TKI tx Neutral 10,313
Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, FASCO
@CharuAggarwalMD
Beautiful, eloquent and poised discussion of #LAURA by @LeciaSequist emphasizing the importance of PFS benefit in this population, preventing morbidity from CNS Mets while balancing the issue of cost, QoL and biomarkers 👏🏽🫁 @ASCO #ASCO24 @O… Positive 10,300
Julien Mazieres
@JulienMazieres
Looking at ADAURA & LAURA control arms we can wonder whether localized EGFR lung cancer really exists. Multifocal lung extension & mets likely occur very early underlining the need for targeted tt regardless of tumor stage. ctDNA might help… Neutral 6,604
Jonathan Spicer MD PhD
@DoctorJSpicer
I think we are fooling ourselves if we think that anatomic staging with CT/PET/brain MR in unresectable stage III does much to reduce the proportion of patients with underlying micrometastatic disease, especially in EGFR-mutated disease! So… Neutral 6,571
Suresh S. Ramalingam, MD, FASCO
@RamalingamMD
Included in this paper are LAURA outcomes based on whether patients had PET scan or not at baseline. Bottom line- HR favoring Osi is similar with or without PET. @Annals_Oncology @WinshipAtEmory #ESMO24 Neutral 6,446
Jeff Ryckman
@jryckman3
If, say, only a quarter of patients were fully staged, it’s hard to make definitive statements without seeing the actual data. We need to see the outcomes within the fully staged group to determine if we're "fooling ourselves" by assuming f… Neutral 6,317
Rafeh Naqash, MD, FASCO
@thenasheffect
Awesome to see LAURA data. Earlier this year We published the real world experience of consolidation #Osi in #EGFR lung cancer post CRT https://t.co/CEZkTOaNZN , work led by @AminNassarMD in @JTOonline and had Durva consolidation arm as wel… Positive 5,374
Chul Kim
@chulkimMD
Standing ovation after Dr. Ramalingam’s presentation on LAURA! 👏 👏 #ASCO24 Positive 4,780
Yakup Ergün
@dr_yakupergun
#ESMO24 LAURA trial: Analyses of CNS and distant progression Osi vs PBO 🔹median CNS PFS➡️NR vs 14.9 mo (HR: 0.17) 🔹12-mo incidence of CNS progression➡️9% vs 36% 🔹Median TTDM➡️NR vs 13.0 mo (HR: 0.21) Neutral 4,634
Katsuaki Maehara 🇯🇵
@KatsuakiMaehara
🫁 “INDIRECT unresectable EGFR-m stage III NSCLC 🫁 🫁 LAURA and POLESTAR 🫁 🫁 Osimertinib and Aumolertinib 🫁 📌 LAURA (N Engl J Med 2024;391:585-597) 📌 Aumolertinib (#WCLC24, #PL04.13) @NEJM #WCLC24 @IASLC #egfr #LCSM Neutral 4,389
Balazs Halmos
@DrSteveMartin
Time to give all laurels to osi post LAURA- or is a PFS benefit here just stating the obvious? Either way- looks like osi is winning the Superbowl of EGFR-mutated lung cancer (well…st1B-4)- hope for an approval here…Swiftly! https://t.co/kC… Positive 4,343
Garth Nicholas
@Garth_Nicholas1
LAURA trial (indefinite osimertinib in LA EGFR+ lung ca) is a palliative therapy in a setting where up to now we’ve aimed at cure Cures end when people are potentially cured, palliative interventions go on forever Conceptually, this treat… Negative 4,268
Fawzi Abu Rous, MD
@FawziAbuRous
🚨LAURA update from #ESMO24: ▪️55% PET staging > PFS was same w/wo PET ▪️Distant PD rate better w Osi ▪️CNS PFS HR 0.17 favoring Osi Thoughts 💭 ▪️ Distant PD & CNS PFS benefit were as expected ▪️Does cCRT add anything in EGFR stage III? Si… Neutral 4,197
TwoOncDocs
@TwoOncDocs
👏🏼 for #LAURA Osimertinib vs placebo after chemo-RT unresectable stage 3 NSCLC w/ EGFR exon19del 🌀prior SOC is adj Durva #PACIFIC but those w/ EGFRm have ⬇️ efficacy 🌟PFS HR 0.16, 39.1mo vs 5.6mo 🌀OS not mature/significant HR 0.81 w/ 8… Nuanced 4,163
Brendon Stiles
@BrendonStilesMD
In fairness, I was calling improvements in PFS (and presumably cure rates and OS) “progress”. Avoiding a year of ICI after CRT in cases where immunotherapy likely won’t work is also progress in my book. As is taking a pill instead of an in… Positive 4,110
Dr Riyaz Shah
@DrRiyazShah
POLESTAR; aumo in LAURA setting. Common mut; placebo controlled; X over allowed in control arm; n=147; included concurrent and sequential CRT; results akin to LAURA. Atrocious PFS in control arm> IMHO EGFR stage 3 should go straight to opt… Neutral 4,092
Dipesh Uprety MD FACP
@DipeshUpretyMD
PRESS RELEASE: LAURA, a Phase III trial in which ➡️Pts with unresectable stage III EGFR mutant NSCLC ➡️ Randomized to osimertinib vs placebo after chemo-RT ➡️↑ PFS with osimertinib #LCSM @OncoAlert @BTFCancerNews Neutral 3,945
Tom Newsom-Davis
@tnewsomdavis
LAURA: Osimertinib after CRT for st 3 EGFR+ ✅ Massive PFS benefit HR= 0.16 ❗️Cntrl arm performs terribly ✅ Neuroprotective ❓OS immature ❗️81% x-over 🔺 48 v 38% pneumonitis, 2% Gr3 🤔 Practice changing 👏 👏 👏 🤔 PET not mandated, hence poor… Nuanced 3,802
Vamsi Velcheti, MD MBA
@VamsiVelcheti
as academic oncologists sometimes our quest for evidence feels like asking if water is wet while standing in the rain. we need to take a step back and reflect a bit… LAURA study osi consolidation in stage 3 EGFR for me is like insisting on… Neutral 3,377
Jennifer A. Marks, MD
@jennifermarksmd
Congrats Dr. @RamalingamMD for your practice changing work! #LAURA study utilizing osi in Stg III s/p CRT. PFS 39.1 vs 5.6m, HR 0.16. @ASCO #ASCO24 #lcsm @ASCOPost Positive 2,514
Henning Willers, MD, FASTRO
@HenningWillers
LAURA - no baseline PET could explain poor PFS in placebo group. Notion that few EGFR stage III NSCLC are curable with consolidation osi is disappointing. How can one leverage the effectiveness of osi better to increase cures🤔 @LeciaSequis… Negative 2,371
Ana I. Velázquez Mañana, MD, MSc, FASCO
@AnaVManana
Outstanding discussion by @LeciaSequist of the LAURA study highlighting unanswered questions regarding length of osimertinib use and need for better diagnostics and studies to identify patients who may potentially benefit from de-escalation… Positive 2,246
Narjust Florez, MD, FASCO
@NarjustFlorezMD
Truly love this slide by Dr. Saw when discussing 3 abstracts from todays session - it is never a black and white scenario for our patients and many aspects need to be taken into account #ELCC25 Negative 2,184
Aakash Desai, MD, MPH
@ADesaiMD
LAURA Ph 3: Osimertinib vs Placebo #ASCO24 @ASCO ➡️ mPFS: 39.1 vs 5.6 mo (HR 0.16) ‼️ ➡️ 24-mo PFS: 65% vs 13% 📈 ➡️ 81% received osi at progression 💊, Good! ➡️AE discontinuation**: 13% vs 5% ⚠️ Can't wait for @RamalingamMD's presentatio… Positive 1,992
Giannis Mountzios
@g_mountzios
elegantly presenting important updates on LAURA subgroups in #ELCC26 : ➡️ In subgroup of pts who had baseline PET scan , PFS HR similar to ITT ( 0.24 vs 0.17) ➡️post-progression treatments significant crossover to osi, wait to see how this… Neutral 1,473
Percy Lee MD
@PercyLeeMD
LAURA is a phase III trial for EGFR mutated stg III unresectable NSCLC randomized 2:1 after CRT followed by osimertinib vs placebo until progression. PFS endpoint met easily (not surprisingly). OS endpoint will have to wait. New standard… Positive 1,350
Drew Moghanaki
@DrewMoghanaki
I’ve been thinking about this a lot, and I’m curious if “unresectable“ is really the right term to describe a recommendation. Shouldn’t we instead use the phrase “not a good idea to put this patient through surgery”? I find it intriguing wh… Neutral 1,210
cadranel jacques
@CadranelJ
Indeed, very surprise concerning the placebo arm vs Pacific one (even in the small subgroup of EGFR mut). As EGFR NSCLC are not of poorer pronostic, pre therapeutic staging is probably not optimal (PET/MRI). Furthermore, many interruptions … Negative 1,125
Deniz Can Guven
@DenizCanGuven1
Let's discuss the omission of RT for these patients 🤓🤓 Upfront Osi- and the omission of RT would significantly reduce the pneumonitis rates Neutral 1,036
Prof Tom John
@TommyJohn00
I think this is a pragmatic argument. There is no longer equipoise in oncogenic driven tumours that do not respond to immunotherapy (like ROS1). Do you think we should subject these pts to durvalab to prove what we already know? Neutral 1,003
Shankar Siva
@_ShankarSiva
Interesting…. Lifelong therapy and associated toxicity for a curable disease stage (III) would be usually considered quality of life impairing. TKIs are not a free ride! Negative 904
Vishal Navani, MD
@navstruck
Strong concerns? 39% of the placebo arm developed brain Mets vs 6% of the osimertinib arm. OS will have recycled alpha spend and be tested at a later endpoint. This has reclassified the paradigm and made us understand how micro metastatic a… Neutral 818
Sandip Patel MD
@PatelOncology
Long awaited and expected result given +ADAURA, I think magnitude of benefit here is less about decision around using osi and more about if we favor surgery vs radiation in stage III for patients who are reasonable candidates for both Neutral 783
Mudit Chowdhary, MD
@DrChowdharyMD
Yes, we as a field have not designed trials with automatic approval in mind Lack of OS as primary endpoint not changing in med onc Perhaps we should also be designing trials assessing for PFS for consistency Neutral 781
Nicole Kuderer, MD, MS, FASCO 🌎🇺🇸🇪🇺🇺🇦🌏
@NicoleKuderer
“But simply saying crossover would be “allowed” and having a 50% crossover rate, wouldn’t be right.” Well said Bishal 💫It’s like lab experiment that has a suboptimal control group 👉 creates near sure ‘pos study’. Not by virtue of drug makin… Nuanced 743
Santhosh Ambika
@RenoHemonc
Curious, how many Oncology trials have shown that subsequent Rx with an effective trial arm drug is equivalent ? In RW, very hard to imagine that keeping the best drug for subsequent use will help patients in Oncology , though it is usually… Nuanced 672
M. Bolton
@5_utr
“Upon progression, patients in the placebo arm were permitted to be treated with tagrisso” Permitted and actually received are two different things - let’s wait and see details here Neutral 620
Maria Antonia Vélez
@MomaVelez11
Great insights from @LeciaSequist on the LAURA trial! - Can cure be achieved in Stage3? - If we treat with Osi indefinitely, as we do in metastatic, what additional benefit does chemoXRT provide? - How can we ID patients who may achieve a… Positive 589
Sébastien Couraud 🫁🚭🌍
@s_couraud
Deeply agree with you. At this step (20% maturity), osi lifetime in adjuvant arm, and osi at progression arm (cross over) appear similars. Neutral 542
Kate Clarke 💉💉💉💉💉🚴
@drkiwikate
Really need to see mature OS data. If what is being done is treating sub-clinical metastatic disease early, will intermittent treatment similar to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer be an option? Intermittent vs continuous PF… Nuanced 501
Prakash Neupane MD, FASCO
@Oncn
LAURA trial further clarifies EGFR driven stage III is biologically like stage IV. Question is treat now vs when radiological progression unless that OS curve separates well. Neutral 438
andrew robinson
@drandrewrob
Is it possible that conv staging underestimates extent in EGFR+?. I’ve been fooled where preop pet, ebus, only positive for N1 but upstaged to multiN2 at surgery, or where staging entirely negative and only after treatment the bone Mets b… Nuanced 415
Andrea R. Filippi
@AndrearicFili
Hi! in ADAURA too surgical patients performed badly without osi, same in the icotinib trial (and they were stage 2-3a with DFS at 4 years 29%). don’t know if it is staging or other factors but the relapse rate is very high without osi for a… Nuanced 409
Allison Chang
@aebchang
I think we need to start thinking of stage III/IV patients on a continuum, and we need to start doing a better job of risk stratifying based on disease biology. We have some evidence to suggest that certain stage IV EGFR-mutant patients cou… Neutral 360
Tejas Patil
@TejasPatilMD
⭐️ Abstract 1817MO - MRD analysis from LAURA: Having +ctDNA results after curative intent therapy has been consistently shown to have negative outcomes across a variety of clinical situations. Here, we will see MRD outcomes from the very im… Neutral 328
Ian Davis (Bluesky @profiand)
@Prof_IanD
Clearly the latter, although to be fair it’s only ever those with clinically undetectable residual disease who have any chance of benefiting from adjuvant therapy. Unpopular view: I don’t think we can cure any solid malignancies yet with… Nuanced 323
David O Reilly
@DavidOReilly2
I would think it's not about the number but the access, all patients should have access free of charge to the investigational drug upon progression.. There's lots of reasons like local therapy, clinical deterioration etc why this option may… Nuanced 317
Christine Lovly, MD, PhD
@christine_lovly
LAURA results - immediately practice changing. Trial includes del19 + L858R. Acknowledging benefit of TKI after chemorads but lack of approval for atypical EGFR mut… ➡️ Tomorrow, how would you treat a pt with stage 3 unresectable EGFR G719x… Positive 312
Thomas Pierret 🫁
@TomPrt
Neoadaura is the last chance to cure EGFR patients with actually available treatment Neutral 309
José Sandoval
@JLSandoval
I didn't know "winning" a scientific meeting was a thing now... "how was ASCO?" "AZ won" "Will patients live longer and better?" "That may be the case...maybe" Media must do better... Neutral 294
Stephen Rosenberg, MD
@SA_Rosenberg
In my younger years, I was a “OS benefit or forget it “ approach to trials . However , I think the PFS is such a QoL benefit to patients and should become more incorporated into our trial design in the field of rad onc (like the recent CURB… Nuanced 269
Steve Lee
@steveleeyc
It's pretty pessimistic that the best rationale for forever osimertinib is that stage 3 unresectable EGFR+ NSCLC is actually stage 4 in disguise. Negative 250
Coral Olazagasti, MD
@COlazagasti
The amazing @LeciaSequist as discussant of #LAURA study She is someone I highly respect and admire in the field of #lungcancer A powerforce indeed Positive 217
Dr. Bosch-Barrera
@BoschBarrera
You cannot give osimertinib adjuvant if a patient received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ie for R1) because for safety reasons were excluded from Adaura, but you have a phase III after radical chemoradiation Laura... I have missed something? Nuanced 205
Abdulaziz AlJassim 🇵🇸
@DrZ_84
Very important questions here. I would like to see OS data too which i expect is positive and rate or trends of Toxicity whether ILD/pneumonitis of osimertinib after chemorads. Positive 179
Gerry Hanna
@gerryhanna
Control arm has very poor outcomes here, can't be just EGFR driven alone? Was there a difference in PET staging between the arms? Negative 167
Patrick C. Ma, MD
@PatrickCMa1
LAURA study #ASCO24 Plenary presentation the Applause Ovation Loudness "Inversely Correlating" to its PFS HR 0.16 (p<0.001). 👍🏆👏🎉 Congratulations to Dr. Ramalingham and the LAURA Team! Positive 166
Alessandro Russo
@Al3ssandroRusso
Impressive PFS data for the practice changing LAURA trial. After two decades from the EGFR mut we are adding another weapon to our therapeutic armamentarium. #ASCO24 #LCSM Positive 139
Indranil Ghosh
@drindraghosh
Magnitude of benefit in terms of months gained not much considering the very long treatment duration vs treat on relapse or progression Neutral 136
Amir Safavi
@safaviaa
This may be one case where lack of current SoC as control is less of an issue, given limited efficacy of consolidation durva for #EGFR stage3 #lcsm pts #radonc #medonc. ⏱️ of #osi tx is big Q imo. Multicentre @JTOonline review comparing ou… Neutral 116
Rohan Kapur
@rohank30
If there is 80% cross over and it's already standard of care- will things change if it does/does not show OS? Neutral 89
Alex Friedlaender
@DralexGva
MRI every 8 weeks would likely just shorten rPFS of control arm, while the experimental arm was covered. The whole thing stinks. Negative 85
Herbert Loong, MBBS, FASCO
@herbloong
Fully concur with your thoughts @Alfdoc2. I worry about this even more given the long waiting time we have for patients to be seen in our clinic. We need to think of good #neoadjuvant strategies specifically for #EGFR population. Neutral 83
Vladmir C. Cordeiro de Lima, MD, PhD
@ClaudioVladmir
I'm concerned about using osi indefinitely. Following this train of thought, wouldn't be more logical to start osi upfront and then consolidate with radiotherapy those patient who don't reach complete radiological response? Or even consider… Negative 70
Guilherme S. C. Correia, MD
@guicorreiamd
❓Appears similar to LAURA. Questions about a global study. ❓Differences in the placebo arm compared to historical controls ❓how 3rd gen EGFR TKIs compare❓see below!! Neutral 67
Thomas Semrad, MD, FASCO
@TomSemrad
Grand Slam Positive 15

See full LAURA conference coverage & trial data →

TAGRISSO® — FDA status

FDA APPROVEDTAGRISSO® (osimertinib) is FDA-approved for EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R) non-small cell lung cancer across multiple settings — first-line metastatic disease (alone or with platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy), adjuvant treatment after tumor resection, and unresectable stage III disease after chemoradiotherapy. For the full, current list of FDA indications and prescribing information, see tagrisso.com or FDA label (DailyMed). KOL Pulse indexes the physician conversation; the label is owned and maintained by the manufacturer.

TAGRISSO® sentiment — FAQ

FLAURA

What do oncologists think of the FLAURA trial (TAGRISSO®)?

Across 25 verified physician voices in KOL Pulse's index for FLAURA, 20% expressed positive sentiment, 8% were nuanced (praising the result while flagging a caveat), 64% were neutral, and 8% were critical. Positive voices highlight establishing first-line osimertinib as a new standard of care in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, including its overall-survival benefit and central-nervous-system activity; nuanced and critical voices flag optimal first-line sequencing versus combination and chemotherapy approaches, and how to manage acquired resistance.

Where can I find the FLAURA trial data for TAGRISSO® (osimertinib)?

FLAURA is registered as NCT02296125 and studied TAGRISSO® (osimertinib) in First-line metastatic EGFR-mutated (ex19del / L858R) NSCLC — osimertinib monotherapy. For the full FLAURA trial data and conference coverage, see the KOL Pulse FLAURA trial profile at kolpulse.com/kol-pulse-trial-profile-flaura.

FLAURA2

What do oncologists think of the FLAURA2 trial (TAGRISSO®)?

Across 66 verified physician voices in KOL Pulse's index for FLAURA2, 21% expressed positive sentiment, 18% were nuanced (praising the result while flagging a caveat), 53% were neutral, and 8% were critical. Positive voices highlight the progression-free-survival benefit of adding chemotherapy to first-line osimertinib, particularly in higher-risk subgroups such as baseline brain metastases or L858R disease; nuanced and critical voices flag added toxicity and quality-of-life trade-offs, patient selection, and whether the benefit justifies chemotherapy for all comers versus an osimertinib-alone approach.

Where can I find the FLAURA2 trial data for TAGRISSO® (osimertinib)?

FLAURA2 is registered as NCT04035486 and studied TAGRISSO® (osimertinib) in First-line metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC — osimertinib + platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy. For the full FLAURA2 trial data and conference coverage, see the KOL Pulse FLAURA2 trial profile at kolpulse.com/kol-pulse-trial-profile-flaura2.

ADAURA

What do oncologists think of the ADAURA trial (TAGRISSO®)?

Across 49 verified physician voices in KOL Pulse's index for ADAURA, 35% expressed positive sentiment, 16% were nuanced (praising the result while flagging a caveat), 39% were neutral, and 10% were critical. Positive voices highlight the disease-free-survival benefit — and, on longer follow-up, the overall-survival benefit — of adjuvant osimertinib, bringing targeted therapy into curative-intent early-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC; nuanced and critical voices flag the disease-free- versus overall-survival debate at the time of approval, the three-year treatment duration, cure-versus-delay questions, and access to EGFR testing at diagnosis.

Where can I find the ADAURA trial data for TAGRISSO® (osimertinib)?

ADAURA is registered as NCT02511106 and studied TAGRISSO® (osimertinib) in Adjuvant EGFR-mutated (ex19del / L858R) stage IB–IIIA NSCLC after complete resection. For the full ADAURA trial data and conference coverage, see the KOL Pulse ADAURA trial profile at kolpulse.com/kol-pulse-trial-profile-adaura.

LAURA

What do oncologists think of the LAURA trial (TAGRISSO®)?

Across 86 verified physician voices in KOL Pulse's index for LAURA, 29% expressed positive sentiment, 16% were nuanced (praising the result while flagging a caveat), 42% were neutral, and 13% were critical. Positive voices highlight the progression-free-survival benefit of osimertinib consolidation after chemoradiation, filling a real gap for the EGFR-mutant unresectable stage III population; nuanced and critical voices flag the immature overall-survival data at the time of approval, treatment duration to progression, and the need for EGFR testing in the unresectable stage III setting.

Where can I find the LAURA trial data for TAGRISSO® (osimertinib)?

LAURA is registered as NCT03521154 and studied TAGRISSO® (osimertinib) in Unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated (ex19del / L858R) NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy. For the full LAURA trial data and conference coverage, see the KOL Pulse LAURA trial profile at kolpulse.com/kol-pulse-trial-profile-laura.

Regulatory

Is TAGRISSO® (osimertinib) FDA approved?

TAGRISSO® is FDA-approved. KOL Pulse organizes this page by clinical trial and links out to the manufacturer's brand site and the FDA label for the full, current list of FDA indications and prescribing information — the label is owned and updated by the manufacturer, so we point to it rather than reproducing it.

How this index is built

KOL Pulse indexes verbatim posts from verified oncology physicians and rolls sentiment up per clinical trial. Each physician is counted once per trial, at their highest-reach post. Sentiment is classified from the verbatim text (positive / nuanced / neutral / critical), where "nuanced" marks a voice that praises the result while flagging a substantive caveat (immature overall survival, toxicity, or trial-design/selection concerns). Institutional, media, finance, and non-physician accounts are excluded from the denominator. Quotes are reproduced verbatim and attributed to the physician's public post. KOL Pulse organizes this page by clinical trial — the maintainable unit — and links out to the manufacturer's brand site and the FDA label for the full indication list, which the manufacturer owns and updates. Trial efficacy figures are held for medical-expert verification before publication. This page reports the physician conversation; it is not medical advice and does not endorse any product.