KOL Pulse - Trial Profile

FLAURA Trial

1L EGFR NSCLC - AstraZeneca

1L EGFR NSCLC Tagrisso (osimertinib) ESMO 2019 FDA Approved
Explore Trial Data

Top KOLs Discussing FLAURA

Stephen V Liu, MD
Stephen V Liu, MD
@StephenVLiu
11.5K impressions
Jennifer A. Marks, MD
Jennifer A. Marks, MD
@jennifermarksmd
3.5K impressions
Jeff Ryckman
Jeff Ryckman
@jryckman3
2.5K impressions
Eric K. Singhi, MD
Eric K. Singhi, MD
@lungoncdoc
2.4K impressions
Oriol Mirallas MD
Oriol Mirallas MD
@DrMirallas
2.2K impressions
Vinay Prasad MD MPH
Vinay Prasad MD MPH
@VPrasadMDMPH
1.5K impressions

FLAURA Key Slides & Visuals

Official trial slides and relevant visuals shared by KOLs at ESMO 2019. Click any image to expand.

Jennifer A. Marks, MD
Jennifer A. Marks, MD @jennifermarksmd
FLAURA Data
3.5K impressions · 48 likes · May 31, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Why not just give four cycles of chemotherapy followed by continued osimertinib maintenance? Figure 3. PFS according to pemetrexed exposure 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 Probability of PFS 0.6 0.5 0.4 Median PFS, months (95% Cl) 0.43 mes (n=83) 13.1(8,22.2) 0.3 + 3-13 mos 24.7(19.6,NC) 0.2 3-418 mos 27.6(16.7,NC) Longer-term pemetrexed 0.1 218 nos (nk83) 30.6(27.4,NC) maintenance/exposure 0.0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 was associated with No. at risk Time from randomisation (months) 63 44 41 36 30 27 26 21 11 6 0 0 0 longer PFS on FLAURA2 54 80 72 64 59 55 43 31 20 7 4 1 0 49 48 47 45 38 26 23 18 12 8 3 1 0 = 2 82 81 50 80 79 73 63 41 21 14 1 0 Planchard et al. ELCC 2025 2025 ASCO PRESENTED en Julia Rotow, MD ASCO MADRICAN SOCIETY #ASCO25 SPRCOLDER ANNIAL MEETING - - Add - - - - KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO 4 ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASCO ASSO ACCO
Eric K. Singhi, MD
Eric K. Singhi, MD @lungoncdoc
FLAURA Data
2.4K impressions · 30 likes · Jul 19, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] 20th ANNIVERSARY NOSCM NEW ORLEANS SUMMER CANCER MEETING JULY 18 - 20 | 2025 I MEC MECC - - --- [Slide 2] 2L Therapy EGFRm NSCLC in July 2025 FIRST-LINE FLAURA Amivantamab + Platinum Doublet Dato-DXd Osimertinib Platinum Doublet +/- Amivantamab Lazertinib? Osimertinib And resistance-matched therapies SECOND-LINE THIRD-LINE FIRST-LINE FLAURA2 Dato-DXd Docetaxel Osimertinib + Platinum Doublet Amivantamab And resistance-matched therapies Combinations? SECOND-LINE THIRD-LINE FIRST-LINE MARIPOSA Platinum Doublet +/- Dato-DXd EGFR TKI Amivantamab + Lazertinib And resistance-matched therapies OS no statistically significant? patritumab-deruxtecan FDA Anticipated emerging therapeutic regimens: vonescimab/chemotherapy submission withdrawn; osimertinib/savolitinib in MET-driven resistance
Oriol Mirallas MD
Oriol Mirallas MD @DrMirallas
FLAURA Data
2.2K impressions · 13 likes · Jun 02, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Potential sequencing approaches in the coming future PFS data with subsequent FLAURA 18.9 8.3 lines FLAURA 18.9 6.3 FLAURA 18.9 5.7 * 5.5 "If MET+, PFS amivantamab + lazertinib: 12 months FLAURA 18.9 7.4 5.5 FLAURA 2 29.4 5.1 5.5 FLAURA 2 29.4 5.5 5.5 FLAURA 2 29.4 7.4 5.5 MARIPOSA 23.7 5.5 5.5 MARIPOSA 23.7 5.5 5.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Ph III: Amivantamab Lazertinib + CT Phase III: Amivantamab + CT Cohort D/A: Amivantamab + Lazertinib Platinum-based CT Teliso-\ + Osimertinib in MET+ Patritumab Deruxtecan Soria NEJM 2017 Passaro -AoO 2023 - Besse ASCO 2023 (cohort D) Yang ASCO 2023 Horinouchi - ESMO Asia 2023 Planchard NEJM 2024 Shu ASCO 2022 (cohort A) . Yu JCO 2023 (PFS based on BIRC) 2024 ASCO PRESENTED BY: Jordi Remon #ASCO24 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ANNUAL MEETING Presentation is property of the author and ASCO. Permission required for reuse: contact permissions@asco.c KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER
Stephen V Liu, MD
Stephen V Liu, MD @StephenVLiu
FLAURA Data
1.1K impressions · 10 likes · Feb 03, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Luis Paz-Ares II INTERNATIONAL THORACIC CANCER DEBATES February 2nd & 3rd 2024, Canary Islands - I --- [Slide 2] CT + osimertinib shows robust PFS improvement at a cost of more toxicity B Progression-free Survival According to Blinded Independent Central Review (full analysis set) Median (95% CI) Table 2. Efficacy End Points (Full Analysis Set).* mo End Point Analysis According to the Investigator Analysis According to Central Review Osimertinib + Platinum-Pemetrexed 29.4 (25.1-NC) Osimertinb+ Osimertinib Osimertinb+ Osimertinb 1.0 Platinum-Pemetrexed Monotherapy Platinum-Pemetresed Osimertinib 19.9 (16.6-25.3) Monotherapy (N=279) (N=278) (N=279) (N=278) 0.9 difference, 9.5 mo Median progression free survival (95% mo 25.5(24.7-NC) 16.7 (14.1-21.3) 29.4 (25.1-NC) 19.9 (16.6-25.3) Probability of Progression-free Survival 0.8 Hazard ratio for disease progression or death, Hazard ratio for disease progression or death 0.62 (0.49-0.79)T - 0.62(0.48-0.80) - (95%CI) 0.7 0.62 (95% Cl, 0.48-0.80) 62% Osimertinib+ Progression-free survival (95% CI) - % 0.6 At mo platinum-pemetrexed 80 (74-84) 66 (60-71) 80 (75-84) 67 (61-73) At mo Osimertinib 71 (65-76) 0.5 49 (42-54) 71 (65-76) 54 (48-60) At mo 7 (50-63) 41 (35-47) 62(55-68) 47 (40-53) 0.4 47% Objective response (95% CI)-% (78-37) 76 (70-80) 92 (88-95) (78-87) 0.3 Best objective response no. (%): Complete response 0.2 1 (<1) 2 (1) 2(1) 1(<1) Partial response 231(83) 208(75) 254 (91) 229(82) 0.1 Stable disease for 235 days 34(12) 51(18) 10(4) 29(10) 0.0 Disease progression 1 (<1) 9(3) 3 (1) 12(4) 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 Death 6(2) 3 (1) 6(2) 3(1) Could not be evaluated 6(2) $ (2) 4 (1) 4 (1) Months since Randomization Disease control (95%CI)-%| 95 (92-98) 94 (90-96) 95 (92-98) 93 (90-96) No. at Risk Median duration of response (95%CI) mo** 24.0 (20.9-27.8) 15.3 (12.7-19.4) 28.3 (23.7-NC) 21.0 (17.8-NC) Osimertinib+ 279 255 242 223 207 184 158 128 81 39 20 3 0 Continued response (95% CI) % platinum- At 12 mo $0 (74-84) (57-70) 81 (76-86) 73 (66-78) pemetrexed At mo 69 (62-75) 4 (37-51) 70 (63-75) 56 (49-63) Osimertinib 278 247 218 195 169 139 116 88 59 42 18 2 0 At mo (41-57) 35 (27-42) 56 (48-64) 45 (36-52) CT + osimertinib impacts response durability Planchard et al. NEJM 2023 --- [Slide 3] Avimantamab + lazertinib shows robust PFS improvement Amivantamab + lazertinib reduced the risk of progression or death by 30% and improved median PFS by 7.1 months MARIPOSA conducted serial brain MRIs on all patients, which is not routinely done n EGFR mutant NSCLC trials 100 Both median PFS estimates increase if CNS only first progressions are censored but a consistent benefit 5 observed Median PFS Median folow-up: 22.0 months (95% CI) 80 73% Amivantariab Lazertinia 23.7 no (19.1-27.7) 100 Median PFS Median follow-up: 220 months Patients who are progression-free (%) Osimertinib (95% C) 16.6 mo (14.8-18.5) 77% Anivantamab + Lazertinib 27.5 no (22.1-NE) HR, 0.70 (95% CI,0.58-0.85); P<0.001 P Patients who are progression-free (%) 80 Osimertinib 18.5 no (16.5-20.3) 60 65% 48% 53% HR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.56-0.83); P<0.001 60 67% 40 Amivantamab Lazertinib Amivantamab + Lazerlinib 34% Osimertinib 40 Osimertinib 38% 20 20 0 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 Months Months No. at reak No. at risk Lizertinib 301 357 332 201 244 14 135 . 23 I $ Amivantamab Lazertinb 404 258 13 26 205 160 90 0 20 10 $ 391 357 332 291 244 194 106 50 33 8 0 Osimertinb 429 404 358 325 266 205 160 90 48 28 10 0 Extraorial PFS = defined time to underization be docume pogression detacted by scans) . duth The propersion - adely details by OS, few pdes m and 1 the time OS donor progression congress * to prespected fro PFS analysis, for ass to ## PFS neb the barb and sinefin - contined Noninal Pastac entport - 1 and M part herethcal hypothesis being BCR, birded independent cartral miek, 0, confidence intenat HR hard atc, no, noths; PFS, programise be sand BCR birded independent and new a confidence intend CAS, certral mas you R hard atc, no, norths, E of estimable PFS progression the sand Cho et al. ESMO 2023 --- [Slide 4] Questions ahead in front-line EGFR-mutant disease B Progression-free Survival According to Blinded Independent Central Review (full analysis set) Median (95% CI) mo Osimertinib Platinum-Pemetrexed 29.4 (25.1-NC) MARIPOSA conducted serial brain MRIs on all patients, which is not routinely done in EGFR-mutant NSCLC trials 1.0 Osimertinib 19.9 (16.6-25.3) Both median PFS estimates increase if CNS-only first progressions are censored but a consistent benefit is observed 0.9 difference, 9.5 mo Probability of Progression-free Survival 0.8 Hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 100 Median PFS Median follow-up: 22.0 months (PP% co 0.62 (95% CI, 0.48-0.80) 77% Amirantamale Lasertinia 27.5 (2.1-NE) 0.7 62% Osimertinib+ $0 Dsimertinib 18.5 no (16.5-20.3) 0.6 platinum-pemetrexed Patients who are progression free (%) 53% HR, (95% CL 0.56-0.83) P<0 001° 0.5 Osimertinib 60 07% 0.4 Amivantamab Lazertinib 47% 40 0.3 Osimertinib 38% 0.2 20 0.1 0.0 0 0 3 6 . 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 Months - Months since Randomization - Lewing C9 391 MF - 291 244 - - - 33 # 404 004 329 - 275 100 - - . - . 429 No. at Risk - PFS - defined . time has endomization . - progression - by - - - The propession - - - by DEL - - - - . the - CNS disease propession Osimertinib+ 279 255 242 congress 223 207 184 158 128 81 39 20 3 0 ESMD Name Name endoint - - and not part - hypethesis - NOR linded independent - - a confidence interest ONL - - - HR, haved - no. - M. - - PFS, programs - and platinum- pemetrexed Osimertinib 278 247 218 195 169 139 116 88 59 42 18 2 0 Planchard et al. NEJM 2023 Cho et al. ESMO 2023 Which one is the best or optimal front-line combination approach? Do all patients require combinations? In which can we safely avoid them front-line? Role of clinical (e.g., CNS) or molecular biomarkers (e.g., TP53, others) to select upfront therapy? Taylor therapy based on rapid ctDNA clearance?
BiotechX
BiotechX @BiotechX_X
FLAURA Data
110 impressions · 0 likes · Jan 07, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] 50 2024 Targeted Therapies of Lung Cancer Meeting FEBRUARY 21-24, 2024 yo SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA Options for 1L treatment for EGFR+ NSCLC FLAURA FLAURA 2 MARIPOSA 14 Osi mono Osi + chemo Ami + Lazer 100 10 80 73% 04 60 40 41% 34% Osimertine 20 0 0 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 Months (months) Progression- free survival Progression-free survival Progression-free survival Osimertinib 18.9 mo Osi+chemo 25.5 mo Ami+Laz 23.7 mo 1st gen TKI 10.2 mo Osimertinib 16.7 mo Osimertinib 16.6 mo Overall Survival Osimertinib 38.6mo 1st gen TKI 31.8mo #TTLC24
Medscape Education
Medscape Education @MedscapeCME
FLAURA Data
0 impressions · 1 likes · Jun 03, 2018
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Third-Generation TKI Osimertinib Progression-free Survival in Full Analysis Set Overall Survival No. of Median Progression-free Survival No. of Median Overall Survival Patients (95% CI) Patients (95% CI) mo mo Osimertinib 279 18.9 (15.2-21.4) Osimertinib 279 NC (NC-NC) Standard EGFR-TKI 277 10.2 (9.6-11.1) Standard EGFR-TKI 277 NC (NC-NC) Hazard ratio for disease progression or death, Hazard ratio for death, 0.63 (95% CI,0.45-0.88) 0.46 (95% CI, 0.37-0.57) P-0.007 P<0.001 1.0 1.0 Probability of Progression-free 0.8 0.8 Osimertinib Survival 0.6 Osimertinib 0.4 Probability of Overall Survival 0.6 Standard EGFR-TKI 0.4 0.2 0.2 Standard EGFR-TKI 0.0 0.0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 Month Month No. at Risk No. at Risk Osimertinib 279 262 233 210 178 139 71 26 4 0 Osimertinib 279 276 269 253 243 232 154 87 29 4 0 0 Standard 277 239 197 152 107 78 37 10 2 0 Standard 277 263 252 237 218 200 126 64 24 1 0 0 EGFR-TKI EGFR-TKI 22 Soria JC, et al. N Engl. J Med. 2018;378:113-125.
Lecia Sequist, MD, MPH, FASCO
FLAURA Data
0 impressions · 1 likes · Sep 09, 2017
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] congress MADRID 2017 MO FLAURA DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY DESIGN Patients with locally advanced or Osimertinib metastatic NSCLC (80 mg p.o. qd) Key inclusion criteria Stratification by (n=279) ≥18 years* mutation status RECIST 1.1 assessment every WHO performance status 0/1 (Exon 19 deletion Randomised 1:1 6 weeks until objective Exon 19 deletion / L858R (enrolment I L858R) progressive disease and race by local# or central EGFR testing) EGFR-TKI SoC5: (Asian / No prior systemic anti-cancer / Gefitinib (250 mg p.o. qd) or non-Asian) EGFR-TKI therapy Erlotinib (150 mg p.o. qd) Crossover was allowed for patients (n=277) in the SoC arm, who could receive Stable CNS metastases allowed open-label osimertinib upon central confirmation of progression and Endpoints T790M positivity Primary endpoint: PFS based on investigator assessment (according to RECIST 1.1) The study had a 90% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.71 (representing an improvement in median PFS from 10 months to 14.1 months) at a two-sided alpha-level of 5% Secondary endpoints: objective response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, depth of response, overall survival, patient reported outcomes, safety FLAURA data cut-off: 12 June 2017; NCT02296125 >20 years in Japan; "With central laboratory assessment performed for sensitivity; Icobas EGFR Mutation Test (Roche Molecular Systems). $Sites to select either gefitinib or erlotinib as the sole comparator pnor to site initiation, Every 12 weeks the 18 months CNS, central nervous system; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor, NSCLC, small cell lung cancer, PFS, progression free survival, p.o., orally, RECIST 11, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 11. qd, once daily, SoC, standard-cl-care, care, TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; WHO, World Health Organization
Dr. Estela Rodriguez
FLAURA Data
0 impressions · 26 likes · Sep 28, 2019
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] FINAL ANALYSIS: OVERALL SURVIVAL 1.0 Median OS, months (95% CI) 89% 0.9 - Osimertinib 38.6 (34.5, 41.8) - Comparator EGFR-TKI 31.8 (26.6, 36.0) 0.8 83% 74% HR (95.05% CI) 0.799 (0.641, 0.997); p=0.0462 0.7 321 deaths in 556 patients at data cut-off: 58% maturity Probability of overall survival 0.6 59% 54% 0.5 44% 0.4 - 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 Time from randomisation (months) No. at risk Osimertimb 279 276 270 254 245 236 217 204 193 180 166 153 138 123 86 50 17 2 0 Comparator EGFR-TXI 277 263 252 239 219 205 182 165 148 138 131 121 110 101 72 40 17 2 0 BARCELONIA 2019 ESMO-Congress Data cut-off 25 June 2019 For statistical significance, a value of less than 0.0495, determined by O'Brien Fleming approach, was required

FLAURA Top Tweets

Top 10 by impressions - click to view on X

Stephen V Liu, MD
Stephen V Liu, MD@StephenVLiu

FLAURA2 press release: addition of chemotherapy to 1L osimertinib in #EGFR NSCLC improves overall survival. Already approved based on significant PFS benefit. Awaiting data to see...

👁 10.4K ♡ 141 ↻ 61 Jul 21, 2025
Jennifer A. Marks, MD
Jennifer A. Marks, MD@jennifermarksmd

So important to remember - continuation of pemetrexed maintenance on the #FLAURA2 likely is required to derive benefit! @JuliaRotow @asco #ASCO25...

👁 3.5K ♡ 48 ↻ 14 May 31, 2025
Jeff Ryckman
Jeff Ryckman@jryckman3

@MassimoDiMaio75 Love how the response is that "data suggest that the greatest overall survival benefit is achieved with the use of adjuvant osimertinib, as supported by the results of...

👁 2.5K ♡ 11 ↻ 3 Oct 05, 2023
Eric K. Singhi, MD
Eric K. Singhi, MD@lungoncdoc

Always love hearing @JuliaRotow speak! Great to spend time with her in NOLA! BOOKMARK her updated slide! 🔖

👁 2.4K ♡ 30 ↻ 5 Jul 19, 2025
Oriol Mirallas MD
Oriol Mirallas MD@DrMirallas

#ASCO24 Masterclass by @JordiRemon mechanisms of resistance to #EGFR #NSCLC 1. On-target 🎯 2. Bypass 👣 3. Histo transf...

👁 2.2K ♡ 13 ↻ 5 Jun 02, 2024
Vinay Prasad MD MPH
Vinay Prasad MD MPH@VPrasadMDMPH

@dr_yakupergun @SuyogCancer @myESMO @BalazsHalmosMD @Alfdoc2 @5_utr @StephenVLiu @ADesaiMD @FordePatrick...

👁 1.5K ♡ 11 ↻ 1 Mar 20, 2025
Stephen V Liu, MD
Stephen V Liu, MD@StephenVLiu

Dr. @LuisPaz_Ares discusses 1L #EGFR NSCLC at #ITCD2024 - osimertinib is our standard but as most patients see progression within 2 years, need better...

👁 1.1K ♡ 10 ↻ 6 Feb 03, 2024
Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, FASCO
Charu Aggarwal, MD, MPH, FASCO@CharuAggarwalMD

@FordePatrick After FLAURA and ADAURA, we would have expected LAURA to be positive for both PFS and OS. This press release is very encouraging!

👁 677 ♡ 8 ↻ 0 Feb 19, 2024
Balazs Halmos
Balazs Halmos@BalazsHalmosMD

@SuyogCancer @myESMO @Alfdoc2 @dr_yakupergun @5_utr @StephenVLiu @ADesaiMD @FordePatrick @n8pennell It will take a lot...

👁 624 ♡ 9 ↻ 0 Mar 20, 2025
Bertrand Delsuc
Bertrand Delsuc@BertrandBio

@ArianaPantasy @Banana_Oncology It&#x27;s my understanding that Astra positions FLAURA2 only for subpopulations like pts with brain mets or other subgroups of...

👁 113 ♡ 1 ↻ 1 Jan 07, 2025

About the FLAURA Trial

FLAURA is the landmark Phase III trial that established osimertinib (Tagrisso) as the preferred first-line EGFR TKI for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. The double-blind, active-controlled trial randomized 556 treatment-naive patients 1:1 to osimertinib 80 mg daily versus standard-of-care gefitinib or erlotinib. FLAURA demonstrated both a near-doubling of PFS and a statistically significant overall survival benefit, fundamentally changing the first-line treatment paradigm for EGFR-mutant NSCLC and earning NCCN preferred status as the only Category 1 preferred EGFR TKI.

FDA Approval

FDA APPROVED Tagrisso (osimertinib) — First-line treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations, as detected by an FDA-approved test

On April 18, 2018, the FDA approved osimertinib (Tagrisso, AstraZeneca) for first-line treatment of metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC based on the FLAURA trial. This was the first third-generation EGFR TKI approved in the first-line setting. Osimertinib subsequently became the only preferred first-line EGFR TKI in NCCN Guidelines.

Companion diagnostic: cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2, FoundationOne CDx co-approved for patient selection.

Source: FDA Press Release

Trial Methodology & Results

Study Design

Phase III, multicenter, international, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial (NCT02296125) in 556 patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC. EGFR mutations detected by FDA-approved companion diagnostics: cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 or FoundationOne CDx.

Population

Adults with newly diagnosed, treatment-naive, unresectable or metastatic (Stage IV) NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations, WHO performance status 0-1. Stable CNS metastases were permitted. Two-thirds of enrolled patients were women.

Interventions

Osimertinib 80 mg orally once daily versus standard-of-care gefitinib 250 mg or erlotinib 150 mg orally once daily. Crossover to osimertinib was permitted upon progression with T790M positivity; 20-31% of control arm patients crossed over.

Primary Endpoints

Primary endpoint: investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints: overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR). Preplanned exploratory analysis: CNS PFS, CNS ORR, and CNS duration of response in patients with baseline brain metastases.

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Osimertinib nearly doubled median PFS: 18.9 months vs 10.2 months (HR 0.46; 95% CI: 0.37-0.57; p<0.0001), representing a 54% reduction in the risk of progression or death. Confirmed ORR was 77% vs 69%, with median duration of response of 17.6 vs 9.6 months. PFS benefit was observed in patients with and without baseline brain metastases.

PFS HR 0.46 — 54% risk reduction

Source: NEJM - Soria et al. 2018

Overall Survival (OS)

At a later data cut-off (57.7% maturity), osimertinib demonstrated a statistically significant OS benefit: median OS 38.6 months vs 31.8 months (HR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.64-1.00; p=0.0462), a 21% relative improvement in survival. At 3 years, 54% of osimertinib patients were alive vs 44% in the control arm. This OS benefit was achieved despite 20-31% of control patients crossing over to osimertinib, which drove one of the highest control-arm survival rates ever reported for first-generation TKIs.


Source: NEJM - Ramalingam et al. 2020

Safety & Tolerability

Osimertinib was generally well tolerated. Most AEs were Grade 1-2 in severity. Grade 3 AEs occurred in 9.7% and Grade 4 in 0.9% of osimertinib-treated patients. ILD/pneumonitis occurred in 3.9% (0.4% fatal). QTc prolongation >60 msec from baseline in 3.6%, QTc >500 msec in 0.9%, with no QTc-related arrhythmias. Most common AEs (>=20%): diarrhea, rash, dry skin, nail toxicity, stomatitis, fatigue, decreased appetite. Permanent discontinuation due to AEs was 4.3%.

Well tolerated — 4.3% discontinuation

Source: FDA Prescribing Information

Clinical Implications

FLAURA established osimertinib as the undisputed first-line standard of care for EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC, with both PFS and OS benefits plus superior CNS activity. The trial demonstrated that the best agent should be given first-line rather than sequenced, since ~30% of patients never received subsequent therapy. Key ongoing debates include: (1) FLAURA2 showed osimertinib + chemotherapy extends OS to 47.5 months, raising the question of mono vs. combo therapy; (2) MARIPOSA offers amivantamab + lazertinib as an alternative combo; (3) post-osimertinib resistance mechanisms beyond T790M require new strategies; (4) patient selection for mono vs. combo based on disease burden, CNS involvement, and mutation type.

FLAURA in the News

Key KOL Sentiments - FLAURA

DoctorSentimentComment
Eric K. Singhi, MD
@lungoncdoc
● POSITIVE Always love hearing @JuliaRotow speak! Great to spend time with her in NOLA! BOOKMARK her updated slide! 🔖 https://t.co/heMkDrrpfK
● POSITIVE @FordePatrick After FLAURA and ADAURA, we would have expected LAURA to be positive for both PFS and OS. This press release is very encouraging!
● POSITIVE That being said 52.2 months is pretty impressive overall survival in this study #LCSM #ASCO18
Stephen V Liu, MD
@StephenVLiu
● NEUTRAL FLAURA2 press release: addition of chemotherapy to 1L osimertinib in #EGFR NSCLC improves overall survival. Already approved based on significant PFS benefit. Awaiting data to see degree of OS benefit to consider vs MARIPOSA. Important positive updat
Jennifer A. Marks, MD
@jennifermarksmd
● NEUTRAL So important to remember - continuation of pemetrexed maintenance on the #FLAURA2 likely is required to derive benefit! @JuliaRotow @asco #ASCO25 @EGFRResisters @DFEGFRcenter #LCSM https://t.co/0t9OuFtj2f
Oriol Mirallas MD
@DrMirallas
● NEUTRAL #ASCO24 Masterclass by @JordiRemon mechanisms of resistance to #EGFR #NSCLC 1. On-target 🎯 2. Bypass 👣 3. Histo transf #SCLC #SCC 4. Unknown 📌 SoC 1L #FLAURA #MARIPOSA #FLAURA2 📌 CT+/-BEV+/-IO? after #TKI PD no clear #OS ⬆️ HARMONi-A? 👉🏼 Sequencing💥
Balazs Halmos
@BalazsHalmosMD
● NEUTRAL @SuyogCancer @myESMO @Alfdoc2 @dr_yakupergun @5_utr @StephenVLiu @ADesaiMD @FordePatrick @n8pennell It will take a lot of balancing of pros/cons, subset considerations and of course shared decision making to settle on optimal choice Just OS cross-lo
Bertrand Delsuc
@BertrandBio
● NEUTRAL @ArianaPantasy @Banana_Oncology It's my understanding that Astra positions FLAURA2 only for subpopulations like pts with brain mets or other subgroups of interest with a larger clinical benefit than in ITT, given the tox addon of chemo. For the other
BiotechX
@BiotechX_X
● NEUTRAL Context 2: how it stack against Tagrisso FLAURA (osi mono), FLAURA 2 (osi + chemo), Mariposa (ami + lazer) in 1L treatment for EGFR+ NSCLC https://t.co/nEhkZHVJ0d https://t.co/9IHPIZm719
Medscape Education
@MedscapeCME
● NEUTRAL Dr. Ramalingam discusses the effects of Osimertinib in the FLAURA study #ASCO18 https://t.co/iAXtUg0OFm
● NEUTRAL FLAURA study design #esmo17. Power based on mPFS 10 to 14 mo https://t.co/3AzEubmWzN
● NEUTRAL If you were still debating if osimertinib was better than gefitinib/Erlotinib: FLAURA OS update presented by @RamalingamMD at #ESMO19: MS OS 38.6 vs 31.8 mos, impressive 54% ⬇️ in CNS progression (HR 0.48), we still need better drugs for rare EGFR mu
MedPage Oncology
@MedpageOnco
● NEUTRAL "You can either give your best drug first, or roll the dice that you will lose the opportunity . . . This is why we feel that the best drug should be given first," said @RamalingamMD of @WinshipAtEmory, at #ESMO19. @myESMO #FLAURA #lungcancer #LCSM #
Marco Tagliamento
@M_Tagliamento
● NEUTRAL 2nd line treatment following PD in the two arms of #FLAURA trial. New data to discuss about the best first vs sequence. #ESMO19 #LCSM #OncoAlert https://t.co/g70rSaEgzX
● NEUTRAL @Tony_Calles @TonyRen_HK @EMA_News Not exactly non-Asians doing better than Asians. Asians did just as well with first gen EGFR TKIs as with osimertinib. Non-Asians did better w/osimertinib. Could be diff in biology, diffs in health care systems wher
Dana-Farber News
@DanaFarberNews
● NEUTRAL Dana-Farber's Pasi A. Jänne, MD, PhD, comments on the practice changing results from the FLAURA study, which firmly established osimertinib as front-line therapy in patients with EGFRm nonsmall cell lung cancer #ESMO19 #NSCLC #lcsm https://t.co/cCwBt
Dr Riyaz Shah
@DrRiyazShah
● NEUTRAL FLAURA final OS; mOS 38.6m. That’s enough for me. Slam dunk. Khallas. Time to move on. #LCSM #ESMO19 https://t.co/S14sIEv97N
● NEUTRAL 7 month improvement in median OS with osimertinib compared to first gen TKI in FLAURA ⁦@RamalingamMD⁩ #ESMO19 #LCSM https://t.co/aRSyred4LV
DENIS
@marcdenisnantes
● NEUTRAL And there you go ! #ESMO19 #FLAURA #osimertinib @AstraZeneca https://t.co/lYPzUo0K12
Nirmal Raut
@oncologician
● NEUTRAL @JackWestMD @Tony_Calles @TonyRen_HK @EMA_News Can deep learning/AI help us know beforehand which pts will develop T790M /MET/Transfn to SCLC as mech. of aquired resistance. For eq - exon 19 del / Non asian / any particular histological features etc
Dr. Antonio Calles
@Tony_Calles
● NEUTRAL Final OS analysis from FLAURA trial. 🤫 Don’t tell @EMA_News Exon21 L858R EGFR mutation doesn’t show overall survival benefit from osimertinib. #ESMO19 #LCSM https://t.co/Bp5fg54iTt
Carlos Alvarez
@duemed
● NEUTRAL #ESMO19 On FLAURA: - positive trial (PFS) with important OS results - this is a secondary endpoint; i have some concerns about the protocol and what is now presented (power and death events). From 380 to 318 death events. Statistics adjusted to resul
Patrick C. Ma, MD
@PatrickCMa1
● NEUTRAL @JackWestMD @Tony_Calles @TonyRen_HK @EMA_News Quite intriguing data. Wonder if it has to do with CNS mets difference btw the two groups: Asian vs Non-Asian... 🤔
Matthias Scheffler
@trnsltnl
● NEUTRAL Still not sure what to think of the #FLAURA results presented at #ESMO19 for EGFRmut #lungcancer. So up to you: do the results justify the use of osimertinib as SoC 1st line, or have they even strengthen sequences? @EGFRResisters @EgfrUk ?
Sandip Patel MD FASCO
@PatelOncology
● NEUTRAL @Jbauml Completely agree, any data on brain mets here?
Santhosh Ambika
@RenoHemonc
● NEUTRAL @APassaroMD @oncoblogger @GlopesMd Question becomes Osi + chemo will be better in pts with p53 mutations upfront
Jeff Ryckman
@jryckman3
● NEGATIVE @MassimoDiMaio75 Love how the response is that "data suggest that the greatest overall survival benefit is achieved with the use of adjuvant osimertinib, as supported by the results of the ADAURA and FLAURA trials" ...as if there were a trial of salv
Vinay Prasad MD MPH
@VPrasadMDMPH
● NEGATIVE @dr_yakupergun @SuyogCancer @myESMO @BalazsHalmosMD @Alfdoc2 @5_utr @StephenVLiu @ADesaiMD @FordePatrick @n8pennell Osi alone is still fine too Flaura 2 post progression care is not up to the US standard so one doesn't have to add chemo
Antonio Passaro
@APassaroMD
● NEGATIVE @oncoblogger @GlopesMd No significant interaction was showed in the subg-analysis &amp; its not possible to evaluate significant diff between exons! FLAURA was already pratice changing and Osi is overall t standard of care, also considering the % of
Lars Haakon Sraas
@larshaakon
● NEGATIVE @Tony_Calles @TonyRen_HK @EMA_News Do the data show Asians do worse than non-Asians? Or do data show Asians have a relatively lower OS benefit from osimertinib than non-Asians? Maybe OS was 40 months in both arms for Asians and 40 and 30 months for n