● LIVE #ESMO26 live from Madrid, Oct 23–27 — today’s highlights, trending trials and physician reactions Follow ESMO 2026 live →
KOL Pulse - Trial Profile

PATINA Trial

PATINA (AFT-38; NCT02947685) is an open-label phase 3 trial that added palbociclib (IBRANCE; Pfizer) to maintenance trastuzumab (± pertuzumab) plus endocrine therapy after induction in HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer: investigator-assessed PFS HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.59–0.97), with Grade ≥3 neutropenia in 61% (FDA label). FDA approved June 24, 2026; Japan approved September 16, 2026; EU application withdrawn September 15, 2026.

HR+/HER2+ mBC Palbociclib + Anti-HER2 + ET #SABCS25 #SABCS24 FDA Approved · Jun 24, 2026 Japan Approved · Sep 16, 2026 EU HR+/HER2+ Application Withdrawn · Sep 15, 2026
Discover KOL Sentiment on PATINA →

ESMO 2026 physician reactions

Posts by physicians about PATINA during ESMO 2026 week (October 17–24, 2026). Each post is shown in full and verbatim, sorted by reach and linked to the original on X.

FDA APPROVED June 24, 2026 — maintenance treatment following induction, HR+/HER2+ locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

The FDA approved palbociclib (Ibrance, Pfizer Inc.) in combination with trastuzumab, with or without pertuzumab, and endocrine therapy for the maintenance treatment of adults with HR-positive, HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer following induction treatment.

Source: U.S. FDA — approval notice (June 24, 2026)

PATINA at a Glance (TL;DR)

  • Design: palbociclib + trastuzumab (± pertuzumab) + endocrine therapy as maintenance after first-line induction, vs anti-HER2 + endocrine therapy alone (HR+/HER2+ MBC).
  • PFS: Investigator-assessed median PFS 44.3 vs 29.1 months; HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.59–0.96; two-sided P=0.02) (NEJM 2026). FDA label: HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.59–0.97; one-sided p=0.0134); median PFS "cannot be adequately described because of censoring."
  • Safety: Grade ≥3 neutropenia 61%; serious adverse reactions 25%; fatal adverse reactions 1.2%; palbociclib permanently discontinued for adverse reactions in 18% (FDA label, palbociclib arm n=260).
  • Regulatory: FDA approved June 24, 2026; Japan approved September 16, 2026. EU: Pfizer withdrew its application on September 15, 2026; at that time the EMA’s provisional opinion was that the change "could not have been authorised" (EMA Q&A, October 16, 2026). Not approved in the EU for HR+/HER2+ disease; the EMA states there are no consequences for Ibrance in its authorised uses (HR+/HER2−).
  • Design caveat: Open-label trial; the primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. The EMA stated that differences between investigator assessments and an independent review of the scans "raised concerns that the results may have been biased in favour of Ibrance" and that the independent review "did not confirm a clear improvement" (EMA Q&A, October 16, 2026).
  • Drugs: palbociclib (IBRANCE, Pfizer); trastuzumab (Herceptin) ± pertuzumab (Perjeta); plus endocrine therapy (ET).
  • Trial: Alliance Foundation Trials (AFT-38), funded by Pfizer; PI Otto Metzger; NCT02947685.

Compiled and reviewed by the KOL Pulse research team, led by Brian Shields, Founder, KOL Pulse. Last updated October 24, 2026.

PATINA in the EU: Application Withdrawn

EU: APPLICATION WITHDRAWN EU application withdrawn (September 15, 2026). EMA: at the time of withdrawal, the benefits "had not been demonstrated"

Pfizer Europe MA EEIG withdrew its type II variation application (EMA/VR/0000316536) to extend the use of Ibrance to "the maintenance treatment of adults with HR-positive, HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer" on September 15, 2026. The CHMP's draft agenda for its September 14–17, 2026 meeting listed an oral explanation on this procedure for September 15, 2026. (EMA Q&A, October 16, 2026; Pfizer withdrawal letter, September 15, 2026; CHMP draft agenda, September 14–17, 2026)

"At the time of the withdrawal, based on its review of the information and the company’s response to its questions, the Agency had concerns and its provisional opinion was that the change to Ibrance’s marketing authorisation could not have been authorised. The Agency considered that the study did not provide sufficiently reliable evidence that Ibrance was effective in the proposed use. The study was open-label, meaning that the patients and the doctors carrying out the study knew which treatment was being given. The main assessment of whether the cancer had worsened was made by these doctors, and differences between their assessments and an independent review of the scans raised concerns that the results may have been biased in favour of Ibrance. The independent review did not confirm a clear improvement, and the other measures of effectiveness did not provide sufficient supporting evidence. Therefore, at the time of the withdrawal, the Agency’s opinion was that the benefits of Ibrance in the maintenance treatment of HR-positive, HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer had not been demonstrated." (EMA Q&A, EMA/VR/0000316536, October 16, 2026)

"This withdrawal is to allow for additional data collection and analyses to address the questions raised by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). This withdrawal does not have any impact on ongoing clinical trials with palbociclib. Pfizer Europe MA EEIG reserves the right to make a further submission at a future date in this or other therapeutic indication(s)." (Pfizer Europe MA EEIG letter to EMA, September 15, 2026)

Per the EMA, "There are no consequences for Ibrance in its authorised uses" (HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer), and the company informed the Agency that there are no consequences for patients in clinical trials receiving Ibrance. The withdrawal concerns the EU application only; the FDA (June 24, 2026) and Japanese (September 16, 2026) approvals were separate regulatory decisions.

EMA Q&A (PDF), October 16, 2026 · EMA variation page (Ibrance) · Pfizer withdrawal letter (PDF), September 15, 2026 · CHMP meeting highlights, 12–15 October 2026 · CHMP draft agenda, 14–17 September 2026 (PDF)

EMA decision — physician reactions

Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade@SuyogCancer
EMA has raised concerned over Patina trial results . Company has withdrawn the application at EMA for said indication .EMA feels results may have been biased ?? @PTarantinoMD @dr_yakupergun @ErikaHamilton9 @hoperugo @drsarahsam https://t.co/AOCbhoZNt8
♥ 16RT 22026-10-21
Timothée Olivier, MD
Timothée Olivier, MD@Timothee_MD
Not surprised: My take on PATINA: https://t.co/8bNWrcciTy https://t.co/YJKFNWhR4Q
♥ 30RT 52026-10-21
Luca Arecco, MD
Luca Arecco, MD@Lucarecco
@pfizer has withdrawn its #EMA application for #palbociclib in HR+/HER2+ advanced breast cancer following the #PATINA trial results. PATINA showed a significant investigator-assessed PFS benefit, but EMA raised concerns because blinded independent central review did not clearly confirm the magnitude of benefit in this open-label study. @OncoAlert
♥ 30RT 132026-10-21
Yakup Ergün
Yakup Ergün@dr_yakupergun
Frankly, Pfizer’s withdrawal of its application following the EMA’s concerns about efficacy and potential bias is surprising, given that the FDA approved the indication based on PATINA data. Same trial, two different regulatory approaches… Open-label trials, investigator assessment, censored data… Yet I recall that the HR did not change much with independent review either.
♥ 19RT 12026-10-21
Neil Vasan
Neil Vasan@NeilVasan
Hoping we will get more clarity into this decision. https://t.co/c5y3gCQgy3
♥ 5RT 02026-10-21
Pablo Jara Martin
Pablo Jara Martin@pablojaramartin
🚨 PATINA: The EMA questions a 15-month PFS gain (HR 0.75). I highly recommend 📖https://t.co/pIPlN34KPj by @Timothee_MD: An open-label trial, investigator-assessed PFS, and estimated early censoring of 12.1% in controls vs 5.3% with palbociclib. Robust benefit or potential assessment bias?
♥ 4RT 22026-10-21
Pablo Jara Martin
Pablo Jara Martin@pablojaramartin
Olivier flags 3 potential biases: earlier progression calls in controls, later calls on palbociclib, and symptom-driven CTs in controls vs symptoms deemed toxicity on treatment. Independent review did not clearly confirm PFS. We need more data 🙏.Pfizer withdrew its EMA request.
♥ 1RT 02026-10-21
KOL-Made Infographics
Physician-made summary graphic · click to enlarge
@ChandrakanthMv · Oct 22, 2026

PATINA in Japan: Approved September 16, 2026

JAPAN APPROVED September 16, 2026

On September 16, 2026, Japan approved palbociclib as maintenance therapy after chemotherapy for HR-positive, HER2-positive unresectable or recurrent breast cancer (English translation), in combination with trastuzumab (with or without pertuzumab) and endocrine therapy, based on PATINA (Pfizer Japan press release, September 16, 2026).

Indication as published by Pfizer Japan (in Japanese): 「ホルモン受容体陽性かつHER2陽性の手術不能又は再発乳癌における化学療法後の維持療法」

Source: Pfizer Japan press release (September 16, 2026, in Japanese)

Physician reactions to the Japan approval

高野 利実 Toshimi Takano
高野 利実 Toshimi Takano@ToshimiHBM
【抗がん剤のいらない時代へ】 PATINA試験は、「分子標的治療薬とホルモン療法」の可能性を広げ、新しい世界を切り拓いた重要な試験です。 今回の進歩により、「殺細胞性抗がん剤のいらない時代」の到来も近づいたように思います。 (※本試験は、殺細胞性抗がん剤を使用したあとの維持療法ですので、まだ抗がん剤使用を前提としています) 本試験に参加された世界中の患者さんやご家族、医療従事者や関係者の皆様に、心より感謝申し上げます。 そして、本試験をリードしたOtto Metzger先生の熱意に改めて敬意を表します。 PATINA試験には、Metzger先生からお声掛けいただきながら、日本が参加できなかった苦い思い出があります。 日本人の参加がない第III相試験に基づいて承認が得られたのは、ドラッグラグの観点からはよいニュースではありますが、この状況に甘んじて、日本がエビデンスづくりをリードする姿勢を捨てることはあってはなりません。 今後も、グローバル試験に主体的に関与していけるように、環境整備と人材育成を進めていく所存です。 WJOG乳腺グループとしても、引き続き、世界中の患者さんにベネフィットをもたらす新治療開発に力を入れていきます。 #乳がん #WJOG #HER2 #PATINA #HBM
♥ 160RT 17(in Japanese)2026-09-16
Mitsuo Terada, MD, PhD@乳腺科医
Mitsuo Terada, MD, PhD@乳腺科医@MamMa_mimumemo
なんとPATINA試験の結果を元にホルモン受容体陽性乳がんのパルボシクリブ+抗HER2療法+内分泌療法が承認!! 日本は参加してなかったので、無理なのかと思ってましたが、これは朗報です。 https://t.co/lLSM7A4NhU
♥ 80RT 15(in Japanese)2026-09-16
Mitsuo Terada, MD, PhD@乳腺科医
Mitsuo Terada, MD, PhD@乳腺科医@MamMa_mimumemo
乳癌薬剤承認ラッシュ! 1️⃣DESTINY-Breast09のT-DXd+ペルツズマブ(HER2陽性転移再発1st line) 2️⃣TROPION-breast02のDato-DXd(トリプルネガティブ 転移再発 1st line) 昨日のカペシタビン、本日のPATINAのパルボシクリブと、何年に一回しか起こらないであろう大きな変化が一度に… なんという日だ。 https://t.co/NbnevdzFw7
♥ 238RT 47(in Japanese)2026-09-16

Where PATINA Fits: Sequencing, Guidelines and Practice

Posts from breast oncologists since September 2026 on where palbociclib maintenance fits alongside DESTINY-Breast09 and HER2CLIMB-05, how guidelines treat it, and what it looks like in clinic. Quoted verbatim; Japanese posts are shown as written.

Sequencing after DESTINY-Breast09

Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino@PTarantinoMD
We’ve long treated HER2+ breast cancer similarly. Until everything changed. Within 1 year, T-DXd moved earlier, palbo and tucatinib reshaped maintenance, some chemos are nearly gone, biomarkers guide us. The right-sizing era for HER2+ BC has begun. https://t.co/0vIg47n8RD 🧵1/ https://t.co/Py652fFBPx
♥ 199RT 612026-10-08
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino@PTarantinoMD
4/ In the metastatic setting, we can finally tailor 1L treatment. T-DXd/P allows disease control for >3 years, and maintenance palbo or tucatinib can likely further extend this window, preserving QoL. We’re already curing some of these patients, despite the metastatic spread. https://t.co/tiBLQgrrS4
♥ 4RT 02026-10-08
Hope Rugo
Hope Rugo@hoperugo
Another important option for maintenance therapy for HER2+ MBC after induction. More impact in HR neg disease and ET underutilized. Potential to decrease brain mets! Now to evaluate maintenance after TDxd. DB-Guide will evaluate palbo maintenance in HR+/HER2+ MBC. @OncoAlert https://t.co/4gYYD7jeJ6
♥ 42RT 142026-10-08
Yuhei YAMAGUCHI
Yuhei YAMAGUCHI@yymgcmd
今後のHR陽性HER2陽性MBCの治療戦略 ①DB09レジメンPD後、CLEOPATRAレジメンの維持としてPATINAレジメン ②CLEOPATRAレジメンで入ってPATINAレジメンで維持し、T-DXdは二次治療として どちらでしょう
♥ 5RT 0(in Japanese)2026-09-24
ねこまた見習い💙стою з україною💛
ねこまた見習い💙стою з україною💛@vc_neco
@MamMa_mimumemo DB-09が始まるとPATINAのパルボシクリブはいつ使えばいいんや…となってしまう…T-DXd脱落してフェスゴ+AIに切り替えたとこからなんでしょうけど、AE許容範囲ならずっと続けるのかある程度で維持に移行するのか悩ましいです
♥ 1RT 0(in Japanese)2026-09-16

Guidelines

In practice

KOL Reaction to the PATINA FDA Approval

Top KOLs Discussing PATINA

Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
53.0K impressions
Timothée Olivier, MD
Timothée Olivier, MD
@Timothee_MD
34.0K impressions
Erika Hamilton, MD
Erika Hamilton, MD
@ErikaHamilton9
25.8K impressions
Yakup Ergün
Yakup Ergün
@dr_yakupergun
25.0K impressions
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers
@OncBrothers
24.5K impressions
高野 利実 Toshimi Takano
高野 利実 Toshimi Takano
@ToshimiHBM
23.5K impressions

PATINA Key Slides & Visuals

Official trial slides and relevant visuals shared by KOLs. Click any image to expand.

Ilana Schlam
Ilana Schlam @IlanaSchlam
PATINA Data
3.8K impressions · 67 likes · Dec 12, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER AFT-38 PATINA Study Design SYMPOSIUM UT Health AACR Men Cancer Center - Registration Key eligibility criteria Palbociclib (125 mg PO QD Histologically confirmed D1-D21) HR+,HER2+ mBC Completion of induction N=518 Trastuzumab I pertuzumab + No prior treatment in the chemotherapy and no endocrine therapy* advanced setting beyond evidence of disease R Until PD or induction treatment progression (i.e., CR, PR, 1:1 toxicity . 6-8 cycles of treatment, or SD) including trastuzumab + Trastuzumab + pertuzumab + endocrine therapy* pertuzumab and taxane/vinorelbine Stratification factors Pertuzumab use (yes vs no) The non-pertuzumab option is limited to up to 20% of the population Prior anti-HER2 therapy in the (neo)adjuvant setting (yes vs no, including de novo) Response to induction therapy (CR or PR vs SD) by investigator assessment Type of endocrine therapy (fulvestrant vs aromatase inhibitor) *Trastuzumab and pertuzumab were administered per SOC. Endocrine therapy options include an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant. Factors used in stratified analyses. CR=complete response; D=day; HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR=hormone receptor; mBC=metastatic breast cancer; PD=progressive disease; PO=orally; PR=partial response; QD=once a day; R=randomization; SD=stable disease; SOC=standard of care. --- [Slide 2] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER Conclusions SYMPOSIUM UT Health AACR lan Antonio American Association Care - Mays Cancer Center Our results reinforce the strong scientific rationale for overcoming resistance to anti-HER2 therapy and endocrine therapy by adding CDK4/6 inhibition The addition of palbociclib to anti-HER2 and endocrine therapy demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS in patients diagnosed with HR+,HER2+ advanced breast cancer in the first-line metastatic setting Palbociclib added to anti-HER2 and endocrine therapy had a manageable toxicity profile and without new safety signals CDK4/6=cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6; HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR=hormone receptor; PFS=progression-free survival.
Enrique Soto
Enrique Soto @EnriqueSoto8
PATINA Data
2.2K impressions · 25 likes · Dec 12, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER Implications to Clinical Practice SYMPOSIUM UT Health AACR - - Ment - The AFT-38 PATINA phase III study demonstrates a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS among patients diagnosed with HR+, HER2+ breast cancer Median PFS increased from 29.1 to 44.3 months (A15.2 months) Manageable toxicity Palbociclib added to anti-HER2 and endocrine therapy may represent a new standard of care for patients diagnosed with HR+, HER2+ advanced breast cancer HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR=hormone receptor; PFS=progression-free survival. This presentation is the intellectual property or the author/presenter. Contact them at Dto for permission to reprint and/or distribute
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade @SuyogCancer
PATINA Data
2.0K impressions · 30 likes · Dec 13, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] BRINGING THE WORLD OF EP TOGETHER SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM Secondary endpoint: Overall Survival SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM (interim analysis) UT Health AACR - - - 100 90 80 70 60 Final overall survival 50 analysis requires 247 Palbociclib Anti- Anti-HER2 and 40 HER2 and ET ET events. Only 119 Events 58/261 61/257 30 Median in mos (95% CI) NE (71.6 NE) 77 (72-NE) observed thus far. 3-yr os, %. 95% CI 87 (82.8-91.2) 84.7 (80-89.3) 20 5-yr OS, %. 95% CI 74.3 (67.7-80.9) 69.8 (62.4-77.2) 10 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.86 (0.6-1.24) 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 Time (months) "Kaplan- Patients at-Risk Meier method: Unstratified Palbo HER2 ET 261 255 248 239 229 220 207 187 146 101 60 22 7 I 0 Cox model; Cl=confidence HER2 ET 257 235 228 221 215 197 188 167 125 90 49 22 6 0 interval: NE=not evaluable; OS=overall survival; DECEMBER 10-14,2024 * SAN ANTONIO --- [Slide 2] BRINGING THE WORLD OF EP TOGETHER 2 SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER AFT-38 PATINA SYMPOSIUM UT Health AACR Key eligibility criteria Palbociclib (125 mg PO QD D1- Pre-Study D21) Histologically confirmed Completion of induction N=518 Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab + HR+HER2+ MBC chemotherapy and no Endocrine therapy R* Until PD No prior treatment in the evidence of disease or advanced setting beyond progression (i.e. , CR, PR, 1:1 toxicity induction treatment or SD) Trastuzumab * Pertuzumab + 6-8 cycles of treatment, Endocrine therapy including trastuzumab I pertuzumab and taxane Start of Study AFTER Induction Patients who experienced disease progression during induction or screening were not included in study. Patients with de novo resistance were eliminated Metzger o et al. SABCS 2024 DECEMBER 10 14, 2024 * SAN ANTONIO
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers @OncBrothers
PATINA Data
1.1K impressions · 5 likes · Dec 12, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] & SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER Implications to Clinical Practice SYMPOSIUM UT Health AACR - MayCamerCom The AFT-38 PATINA phase III study demonstrates a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS among patients diagnosed with HR+,HER2+ breast cancer Median PFS increased from 29.1 to 44.3 months (A15.2 months) Manageable toxicity Palbociclib added to anti-HER2 and endocrine therapy may represent a new standard of care for patients diagnosed with HR+,HER2+ advanced breast cancer HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2: HR=hormone receptor PFS=progression-free survival. This presentation is the intelectual property of the author/presenter Contact them at Other CL for permission to reprint and/or distribute --- [Slide 2] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER Conclusions SYMPOSIUM UT Health AACR Sex Annoid American Association Mays Cancer Center for Cancer Research Our results reinforce the strong scientific rationale for overcoming resistance to anti-HER2 therapy and endocrine therapy by adding CDK4/6 inhibition The addition of palbociclib to anti-HER2 and endocrine therapy demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS in patients diagnosed with HR+,HER2+ advanced breast cancer in the first-line metastatic setting Palbociclib added to anti-HER2 and endocrine therapy had a manageable toxicity profile and without new safety signals CDK4/6=cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6; HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR=hormone receptor; PFS=progression-free survival. --- [Slide 3] Primary Endpoint: PFS SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM (Investigator-Assessed) UT Health AACR San Americ Mays Cancer Center for Cancer Research 100 93.6% Palbo + anti-HER2 Anti-HER2 and ET 90 and ET 84.9% 87.9% Events 126/261 136/257 80 Median PFS, months (95% CI) 44.3 (32.4-60.9) 29.1 (23.3-38.6) 73.4% 70 Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.74 (0.58-0.94) 65.4% Nominal 1-sided P value 0.0074 60 55.2% 50 46.9% 43.2% 40 38.2% HH 30 33.4% 20 10 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 Time (months) Cl=confidence interval; ET=endocrine therapy; Patients-at-Risk HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; Palbo + HER2 261 231 203 168 146 128 113 94 78 55 33 14 4 1 0 palbo=palbociclib. HER2 ET 257 198 159 137 116 102 87 68 51 29 14 6 1 0 --- [Slide 4] SAN ANTONIO BREAST CANCER AFT-38 PATINA Study Design SYMPOSIUM UT Health AACR Sen Antonio American Association for Cancer Research Mays Cancer Center Registration Key eligibility criteria Palbociclib (125 mg PO QD Histologically confirmed D1-D21) HER2+ mBC Completion of induction N=518 Trastuzumab + pertuzumab + No prior treatment in the chemotherapy and no endocrine therapy* advanced setting beyond R Until PD evidence of disease or induction treatment progression (i.e., CR, PR, 1:1 toxicity SURVIVAL FOLLOW-UP 6-8 cycles of treatment, or SD) including trastuzumab + Trastuzumab + pertuzumab + pertuzumab and endocrine therapy* taxane/vinorelbine Stratification factors Pertuzumab use (yes VS no) The non-pertuzumab option is limited to up to 20% of the population Prior anti-HER2 therapy in the (neo)adjuvant setting (yes VS no, including de novo)+ Response to induction therapy (CR or PR VS SD) by investigator assessment Type of endocrine therapy (fulvestrant VS aromatase inhibitor) *Trastuzumab and pertuzumab were administered per SOC. Endocrine therapy options include an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant. Factors used in stratified analyses. CR=complete response; D=day; HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR=hormone receptor; mBC=metastatic breast cancer; PD=progressive disease; PO=orally; PR=partial response; QD=once a day; R=randomization; SD=stable disease; SOC=standard of care.
Ilana Schlam
Ilana Schlam @IlanaSchlam
PATINA Data
14.9K impressions · 36 likes · Dec 10, 2025
View on X ↗
Yakup Ergün
Yakup Ergün @dr_yakupergun
PATINA Data
11.8K impressions · 88 likes · May 24, 2025
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] QUESTIONS AHEAD OF DESTINY-Breast09 AT ASCO 2025 1. How strong will the benefit be? 1. PATINA vs. CLEOATRA 2. Is sequential T-Dxd use an option? 1. os differential between 1st line - 2nd line 3. What to give after T-Dxd? 4. Proionged T-Dxd use and managing ILD risk
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino @PTarantinoMD
PATINA Data
10.6K impressions · 151 likes · Dec 12, 2024
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] SAN ANTONIO Primary Endpoint: PFS BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM UT Health AACR (Investigator-Assessed) butes - I I I 100 Palbo + anti-HER2 Anti-HER2 93.6% and ET and ET 90 84.9% Events 126/261 136/257 87.9% so Median PFS, months (95% CI) 44.3 (32.4-60.9) 29.1 (23.3-38.6) 73.4% Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.74 (0.58-0.94) 70 Percent alive and disease-free 65.4% Nominal 1-sided P value 0.0074 60 55.2% 46.9% 50 43.2% 40 38.2% 33.4% 30 20 10 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 Time (months) Cl=confidence Interval; ET=endocrine therapy; Patients-at-Risk HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; Pabo . HER2 ET 261 231 203 168 146 128 113 94 78 55 33 14 4 I 0 palbo=palbociclib. HER2 ET 257 198 159 137 116 102 87 68 51 29 14 6 I 0 This presentation is the intellectual property of the authoripresenter Contact them at Offe for permission to reprint and/or distribute i , ,
Abi Siva MD
Abi Siva MD @AbiSivaMD
PATINA Data
8.4K impressions · 30 likes · Jan 21, 2026
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] HR-Positive or -Negative and HER2-Positive See BINV-Q 1 of 15 for Considerations for systemic HER2-targeted therapy. Setting Regimen Docetaxel + Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab (category 1, preferred) with maintenance Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab If HR-positive: Aromatase inhibitor + Palbociclib + Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab First Line Paclitaxel + Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab (preferred) with maintenance Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab If HR-positive: Aromatase inhibitor + Palbociclib + Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab Fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki° + Pertuzumab (other recommended)

PATINA Top Tweets

Top 10 by impressions - click to view on X

Timothée Olivier, MD
Timothée Olivier, MD@Timothee_MD

PATINA trial: maintenance palbociclib after first line anti-HER2+chemo in HER2/HR+ metastatic BC: - PFS benefit, no OS (not mature) - significantly more toxic (including financial) - significant early censoring imbalance (estimated 6% versus 12% over first 6 months in both arms, see Breaking-ICE App) -> makes PFS results less reliable, particularly in open-label trial - nonetheless the biological rationale, it is possible that ultimately no OS benefit will be seen "Adding toxicity without an improvement in clinical endpoints should generally be avoided." -> read our essay on PFS and other surrogates here : https://t.co/2HxtAMe4bT @vkprasadlab @VPrasadMDMPH

👁 24.5K ♡ 36 ↻ 6 Jan 31, 2026
高野 利実 Toshimi Takano
高野 利実 Toshimi Takano@ToshimiHBM

【抗がん剤のいらない時代へ】 PATINA試験は、「分子標的治療薬とホルモン療法」の可能性を広げ、新しい世界を切り拓いた重要な試験です。 今回の進歩により、「殺細胞性抗がん剤のいらない時代」の到来も近づいたように思います。 (※本試験は、殺細胞性抗がん剤を使用したあとの維持療法ですので、まだ抗がん剤使用を前提としています) 本試験に参加された世界中の患者さんやご家族、医療従事者や関係者の皆様に、心より感謝申し上げます。 そして、本試験をリードしたOtto Metzger先生の熱意に改めて敬意を表します。 PATINA試験には、Metzger先生からお声掛けいただきながら、日本が参加できなかった苦い思い出があります。 日本人の参加がない第III相試験に基づいて承認が得られたのは、ドラッグラグの観点からはよいニュースではありますが、この状況に甘んじて、日本がエビデンスづくりをリードする姿勢を捨てることはあってはなりません。 今後も、グローバル試験に主体的に関与していけるように、環境整備と人材育成を進めていく所存です。 WJOG乳腺グループとしても、引き続き、世界中の患者さんにベネフィットをもたらす新治療開発に力を入れていきます。 #乳がん #WJOG #HER2 #PATINA #HBM

👁 23.5K ♡ 160 ↻ 17 (in Japanese) Sep 16, 2026
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino@PTarantinoMD

Among pts with ER+/HER2+ MBC, maintenance HP (control arm) had a PFS of: -29.1 mo in PATINA -16.3 mo in HER2CLIMB-05 The difference? In PATINA all pts also received ET (only 45% in H2C-05). Reminder that, besides fancy new drugs, ET can REALLY make a difference in this disease! https://t.co/Vfbh2VTbgq

👁 18.2K ♡ 115 ↻ 43 Dec 10, 2025
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO
Erika Hamilton, MD, FASCO@ErikaHamilton9

T-DXd + pertuzumab approved for 1st L HER-2+ #bcsm! Now for the debates around induction length, maintenance, re-induction etc. My opinion: I'll induce to maximal patient response (this will likely be longer than 6 cycles), then move to maintenance with PATINA or HER2CLIMB05. https://t.co/MsjT0XNjri

👁 15.1K ♡ 83 ↻ 29 Dec 15, 2025
Ilana Schlam
Ilana Schlam@IlanaSchlam

Nice table to put this rapidly evolving field in perspective #SABCS25 https://t.co/jrwbuPTj0V

👁 14.9K ♡ 36 ↻ 21 Dec 10, 2025
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

PATINA was first presented at #SABCS24 @SABCSSanAntonio and now in @NEJM! This is the SoC for 1L HR+ HER2+ mBC: Anti-HER2 + ET + Palbo after induction chemo. - mPFS 44.3mos vs 29.1mos (HR: 0.74) - #SABC25 Update: At 3yrs, improved CNS progression (or death) w/ Palbo #bcsm https://t.co/PwngPLshzC https://t.co/hBe7GgKjwS

👁 12.1K ♡ 79 ↻ 29 Jan 29, 2026
Yakup Ergün
Yakup Ergün@dr_yakupergun

On DESTINIY-Breast09 before #ASCO25 The announcement of DB-09 in April 2025, showing a significant PFS advantage of T-DXd + pertuzumab over THP in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, has generated great excitement. However, ahead of the full data presentation at ASCO 2025, several questions remain in my mind. According to the criteria in ESMO-MCBS v2.0 and based on my calculations, for the benefit to be considered clinically meaningful, the PFS in the T-DXd arm should exceed ~28.5 months with an HR ≤0.65—meaning more than 2 years of T-DXd treatment. How will we manage toxicity and cost? If PFS is strong, these concerns may take a back seat—but how strong will it actually be? Can it surpass the 44.3-month PFS reported in the HR+/HER2+ cohort of the PATINA study? When DB-09 was designed, the standard was CLEOPATRA’s THP (PFS 18.5 months), but since SABCS 2024, the bar has been raised significantly with CDK4/6 maintenance. Here are the questions I’m grappling with: 🔹️Indirect comparisons are never ideal, but the 44.3-month PFS reported in the HR+ cohort of PATINA is hard to ignore. Yes, it reflects a selected group of patients who didn’t progress after induction chemotherapy—but with an ORR of 80%, how many early progressors could there realistically be? 🔹️How many patients in the control arm received T-DXd upon progression, which is now the standard second-line treatment? What is the OS difference between those who received T-DXd in the first line versus the second line? To answer this more accurately, we’d need data from the T-DXd monotherapy arm—which, apparently, won’t be presented at ASCO. If there’s no meaningful OS difference in the crossover group, we will have to seriously consider sequential use as a strategic option. 🔹️There is a growing belief—one I also share—that the most effective therapies should be used upfront. But then what? What do we give after T-DXd? This remains one of the most pressing unanswered questions. 🔹️If prolonged T-DXd use is required, how will we manage ILD risk? Who might benefit from a shortened treatment duration? Specifically in the HR+ cohort, could switching to ET + CDK4/6 + HP maintenance after 6–8 cycles of T-DXd + pertuzumab strike a better balance between efficacy, quality of life, and sustainability? Our expectations are high. But before we give a standing ovation, we’ll need to see strong and convincing data.💬

👁 11.8K ♡ 88 ↻ 23 May 24, 2025
Paolo Tarantino
Paolo Tarantino@PTarantinoMD

Otto Metzger (@Otto_DFCI) presents the practice-changing results from the #PATINA phase 3 trial: adding palbociclib to maintenance ET after 1L THP for HR+/HER2+ MBC significantly and meaningfully improved PFS (44 vs 29 months, HR 0.74, p=0.007). 44 months!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! https://t.co/a1DT4eS3B8

👁 10.6K ♡ 151 ↻ 44 Dec 12, 2024
Dr Amol Akhade
Dr Amol Akhade@SuyogCancer

EMA has raised concerned over Patina trial results . Company has withdrawn the application at EMA for said indication .EMA feels results may have been biased ?? @PTarantinoMD @dr_yakupergun @ErikaHamilton9 @hoperugo @drsarahsam https://t.co/AOCbhoZNt8

👁 10.3K ♡ 16 ↻ 2 Oct 21, 2026
Abi Siva MD
Abi Siva MD@AbiSivaMD

Latest @NCCN update now supports palbociclib maintenance per PATINA. Many of us have already been doing this in practice, and this should help with insurance approvals. @ASCO @SABCSSanAntonio @OncBrothers @PTarantinoMD https://t.co/FgfjvtBzRD

👁 8.4K ♡ 30 ↻ 13 Jan 21, 2026

About the PATINA Trial

PATINA (AFT-38; NCT02947685) is a randomized, open-label phase 3 trial of palbociclib added to maintenance anti-HER2 therapy and endocrine therapy after induction in HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Global sponsor: Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC; Pfizer provided funding; conducted with six international cancer research groups (PrECOG, Unicancer, GBG, Fondazione Michelangelo, SOLTI, Breast Cancer Trials). (Pfizer press release, June 24, 2026; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02947685)

KOL discussion spans multiple conferences with 89 tracked physician posts from 40 oncology opinion leaders generating 338.8K total impressions (as of October 22, 2026).

Trial Methodology & Results

Study Design

Phase 3, randomized (1:1), open-label, international trial evaluating palbociclib added to maintenance anti-HER2 and endocrine therapy after induction chemotherapy in HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Sponsored by Alliance Foundation Trials.

Population

Adults with HR-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who completed 4-8 cycles of induction chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted therapy without disease progression.

Interventions

Ibrance (palbociclib) plus anti-HER2 therapy (trastuzumab with or without pertuzumab) plus endocrine therapy versus anti-HER2 therapy plus endocrine therapy alone.

Primary Endpoints

Primary: investigator-assessed progression-free survival (RECIST 1.1; open-label). Secondary: objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, safety, overall survival.

Progression-Free Survival (primary endpoint, investigator-assessed)

  • SABCS 2024 (GS2-12, first presentation; Metzger): median 44.3 vs 29.1 months; HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.58–0.94); nominal one-sided P=0.0074 (described as "unstratified 1-sided" in Pfizer’s December 12, 2024 release); 126/261 vs 136/257 events (SABCS 2024 slide).
  • NEJM 2026;394:451–462 (median follow-up 53.5 months): median 44.3 vs 29.1 months; HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.59–0.96); two-sided P=0.02.
  • FDA label (June 2026): HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.59–0.97); one-sided p=0.0134; 124/261 (47.5%) vs 133/257 (51.8%) events; "Median PFS cannot be adequately described because of censoring."
Investigator-assessed PFS HR 0.75 (NEJM) · 0.76 (FDA label)

Source: NEJM 2026 (PubMed 41604639) · FDA label (PDF)

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (secondary endpoint) is immature. SABCS 2024 interim analysis (119 of the 247 events required for the final OS analysis; SABCS 2024 slide, Metzger): 58/261 vs 61/257 events; median not estimable (95% CI 71.6–NE) vs 77 months (95% CI 72–NE); 5-year OS 74.3% vs 69.8%; HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.6–1.24; unstratified Cox model per slide footnote). FDA label: "At the time of the PFS analysis, OS data were not mature with 24% deaths in the overall population."

OS immature · interim HR 0.86 (SABCS 2024)

Source: SABCS 2024 interim OS slide (shared by @SuyogCancer) · FDA label (PDF)

Safety & Tolerability

FDA label (safety population 509; palbociclib arm n=260): neutropenia 78% (Grade ≥3 61%); febrile neutropenia 0.8%; ILD/pneumonitis 1% (no Grade 3, 4 or fatal cases); diarrhea 70% (Grade 3 10%) vs 37% (Grade 3 1.2%) with control; serious adverse reactions 25%; fatal adverse reactions 1.2% (including death, hepatic hemorrhage and sepsis, 0.4% each). Adverse reactions led to palbociclib dose interruption in 70%, dose reduction in 53% and permanent discontinuation in 18%. NEJM 2026: grade 3 and grade 4 adverse events, predominantly from neutropenia, occurred in 79.7% and 10.0% of the palbociclib group (vs 30.6% and 3.6%).

Grade ≥3 neutropenia 61% · fatal adverse reactions 1.2% (FDA label)

Source: FDA label (PDF) · NEJM 2026 (PubMed 41604639)

Clinical Implications

Regulatory status differs by region: approved in the US (June 24, 2026) and Japan (September 16, 2026); in the EU, Pfizer withdrew its application, and the EMA stated that at the time of withdrawal the benefits had not been demonstrated (EMA Q&A, October 16, 2026). The benefit comes with more toxicity: Grade ≥3 neutropenia in 61% and permanent palbociclib discontinuation for adverse reactions in 18% (FDA label). The open-label design and investigator-assessed primary endpoint are central to the debate; see the physician reaction in the EMA Update section. [FDA notice] [EMA Q&A]

PATINA: Frequently Asked Questions

What is the PATINA trial?

PATINA (AFT-38) is a randomized Phase 3 trial testing whether adding palbociclib (IBRANCE) to maintenance anti-HER2 therapy (trastuzumab, with or without pertuzumab) plus endocrine therapy improves outcomes versus anti-HER2 therapy plus endocrine therapy alone, after first-line induction chemotherapy, in HR-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

What were the PATINA progression-free survival results?

Investigator-assessed median PFS was 44.3 versus 29.1 months (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.59–0.96; two-sided P=0.02; NEJM 2026). The SABCS 2024 presentation reported HR 0.74 (nominal one-sided P=0.0074). The FDA label reports HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.59–0.97; one-sided p=0.0134) and states that median PFS "cannot be adequately described because of censoring." Toxicity was higher with palbociclib: Grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 61% (FDA label).

Is palbociclib FDA approved for HER2-positive breast cancer?

Yes, in one HER2-positive setting: on June 24, 2026, the FDA approved palbociclib (IBRANCE) in combination with trastuzumab, with or without pertuzumab, and endocrine therapy for the maintenance treatment of adults with HR-positive, HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer following induction treatment, based on PATINA (investigator-assessed PFS HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59–0.97; one-sided p=0.0134).

Is palbociclib approved in Europe for HR+/HER2+ breast cancer?

No. Pfizer Europe MA EEIG withdrew its EU application on September 15, 2026, stating the withdrawal was "to allow for additional data collection and analyses to address the questions raised by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP)." In its October 16, 2026 Q&A, the EMA said its provisional opinion at the time of withdrawal was that the change "could not have been authorised": the study was open-label, differences between investigator assessments and an independent review of the scans "raised concerns that the results may have been biased in favour of Ibrance," and the independent review "did not confirm a clear improvement." The EMA states there are no consequences for Ibrance in its authorised uses (HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer).

Is palbociclib approved in Japan for HR+/HER2+ breast cancer?

Yes. On September 16, 2026, Japan approved palbociclib as maintenance therapy after chemotherapy for HR-positive, HER2-positive unresectable or recurrent breast cancer (English translation), in combination with trastuzumab (with or without pertuzumab) and endocrine therapy, based on PATINA (Pfizer Japan press release, September 16, 2026).

What is the FDA-approved PATINA regimen and dose?

Palbociclib (IBRANCE) plus trastuzumab (Herceptin), with or without pertuzumab (Perjeta), plus endocrine therapy, as maintenance following induction. The palbociclib dose is 125 mg orally once daily for 21 days, followed by 7 days off, in 28-day cycles.

Who sponsored PATINA and what is its trial identifier?

PATINA (AFT-38) was sponsored by Alliance Foundation Trials and funded by Pfizer; the principal investigator was Otto Metzger. Its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT02947685.

PATINA in the News

EMA
EMA: Withdrawal of application to change the marketing authorisation for Ibrance (palbociclib) — Q&A
At the time of withdrawal, the EMA's provisional opinion was that the change 'could not have been authorised', and the Agency's opinion was that the benefits 'had not been demonstrated', citing differences between investigator assessments in the open-label study and an independent review of the scans.
European Medicines AgencyOct 16, 2026
EMA
Ibrance — withdrawal of application for variation to marketing authorisation
EMA procedure page for EMA/VR/0000316536, linking the withdrawal letter and Q&A.
European Medicines AgencyOct 16, 2026
EMA
Meeting highlights from the CHMP 12-15 October 2026
Lists the Ibrance withdrawal among the month's outcomes: the company withdrew its application to extend use to maintenance treatment of adults with HR-positive, HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
European Medicines AgencyOct 16, 2026
EMA
Pfizer withdrawal letter to EMA — IBRANCE extension of indication (EMA/VR/0000316536)
'This withdrawal is to allow for additional data collection and analyses to address the questions raised by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP).'
Pfizer Europe MA EEIG via EMASep 15, 2026
Media Coverage
CHMP October decisions: AstraZeneca pulls prostate cancer filing; Orphelia gets a second chance; Ascendis nears EU launch
The magazine reports that European regulators 'were less convinced' and that 'Pfizer plans further analyses.'
European Biotechnology MagazineOct 19, 2026
Media Coverage
Dr Barot on Palbociclib Maintenance in HR+/HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer
Video commentary by Shimoli Barot, MD (Cleveland Clinic), on PATINA efficacy and safety.
OncLiveSep 22, 2026
Press Release
イブランス錠、ホルモン受容体陽性HER2陽性乳がんにおける維持療法として適応拡大の承認取得 (Japan approval)
Japan approved palbociclib as maintenance therapy after chemotherapy for HR-positive, HER2-positive unresectable or recurrent breast cancer (English translation), based on PATINA (HR 0.76; one-sided p=0.0134). Includes comment from Toshimi Takano.
Pfizer JapanSep 16, 2026
Media Coverage
Kazuki Nozawa: Palbociclib Has Been Approved for HR-Positive/HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
OncoDailySep 16, 2026
FDA
FDA approves palbociclib with trastuzumab, with or without pertuzumab, and endocrine therapy for maintenance treatment of HR-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer
Investigator-assessed PFS HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.59-0.97), one-sided p=0.0134 in 518 patients; median PFS 'could not be adequately described because of censoring'; OS not mature.
U.S. FDAJun 24, 2026
Press Release
FDA Approves Pfizer's IBRANCE Regimen for HR+, HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Frontline Maintenance
Pfizer release on the June 24 approval: 24% reduction in risk of progression or death (HR 0.76; one-sided p=0.0134); OS secondary and not yet mature; PATINA sponsored by Alliance Foundation Trials with Pfizer funding.
PfizerJun 24, 2026
Media Coverage
FDA Approves Palbociclib Plus Trastuzumab, With/Without Pertuzumab, and ET as Maintenance in HR+, HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer
OncLiveJun 2026
Publication
Palbociclib for HR-Positive, HER2-Positive Breast Cancer — Correspondence and Reply
Letters by Jing & Song and Li & Zhang with a reply by Metzger (NEJM 2026;394(17):1764-1766).
NEJM (PubMed record)Apr 30, 2026
Publication
Palbociclib for Hormone-Receptor-Positive, HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer (PATINA)
Metzger et al. Median PFS 44.3 vs 29.1 months (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.59-0.96; two-sided P=0.02) at 53.5 months median follow-up; grade 3 and 4 AEs 79.7% and 10.0% with palbociclib, predominantly neutropenia.
NEJM (PubMed record)Jan 29, 2026
Media Coverage
The PATINA trial – palbociclib maintenance in metastatic breast cancer
Timothée Olivier's critical appraisal (Feb 2026, before the EMA action) argues that the open-label design with 'no BICR' and early censoring (12.1% control vs 5.3% palbociclib, his estimate) mean 'the PFS gain as reported may have been artifically inflated'.
The Oncology Shot (Timothée Olivier)Feb 8, 2026
Media Coverage
The ASCO Post: palbociclib addition in HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer
The ASCO PostFeb 2026
Press Release
Pfizer IBRANCE in Combination with SOC
PfizerDec 2024
Media Coverage
SABCS 2024: Practice-Changing PATINA Data
SABCS Meeting NewsDec 2024

Key KOL Sentiments - PATINA

DoctorSentimentComment
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
BOSTON, MA
● POSITIVE Among pts with ER+/HER2+ MBC, maintenance HP (control arm) had a PFS of: -29.1 mo in PATINA -16.3 mo in HER2CLIMB-05 The difference? In PATINA all pts also received ET (only 45% in H2C-05). Reminder that, besides fancy new drugs, ET can REALLY make a difference in this disease! https://t.co/Vfbh2VTbgq
Abi Siva MD
@AbiSivaMD
SYRACUSE, NY
● POSITIVE Latest @NCCN update now supports palbociclib maintenance per PATINA. Many of us have already been doing this in practice, and this should help with insurance approvals. @ASCO @SABCSSanAntonio @OncBrothers @PTarantinoMD https://t.co/FgfjvtBzRD
Stephanie Graff, MD, FACP, FASCO
@DrSGraff
KANSAS CITY, MO
● POSITIVE PATINA demonstrates lower rates of CNS progression in both all pts and those with brain meta at baseline with the addition of palbociclib. @Otto_DFCI @OncoAlert #SABCS25 https://t.co/0tlUorXaIG
Erika Hamilton, MD
@ErikaHamilton9
NASHVILLE, TN
● POSITIVE Love this. Short and to the point. Agree biggest takeaways for me were: 1) anthra for RS>31 (traditionally we used N+) 🔆 2) PATINA 15 month ⬆️ PFS w/ Palbo addition after THP induction 3) DO NOT 🚫USE MRD outside of a trial @SABCSSanAntonio #SABCS24 @OncoAlert https://t.co/3DKXOIxCAr
Gaia Griguolo
@GaiaGriguolo
● POSITIVE Maintenance palbociclib (+Pertu-Trastu in PATINA trial) can delay CNS metastases as first site of progression in HR+HER2+ metastatic breast cancer! This is such a clinically relevant result! #SABCS25 @OncoAlert https://t.co/B7VhVz5QhT
● POSITIVE Other very important data from the #PATINA trial presented at #SABCS25 by the great @Otto_DFCI from @DFCI_BreastOnc showing the potential value of #palbociclib in delaying or preventing CNS involvement in HER2+/HR+ advanced #BreastCancer @SABCSSanAntonio @OncoAlert https://t.co/lPQjq2TNRK
Ilana Schlam
@IlanaSchlam
BOSTON, MA
● POSITIVE PRACTICE CHANGING findings from PATINA presented by @Otto_DFCI - n=518 HR+/HER2+ mBC - all received THP followed by HP+ET +/- palbo - PFS was 29 vs 44 months with palbo - Tox consistent with prior studies @DFCI_BreastOnc @SABCSSanAntonio https://t.co/f2r62t2Cd8
Sara Tolaney
@stolaney1
BOSTON, MA
● POSITIVE PATINA: 1L maintenance HP +ET +/- palbo in ER+ HER2+ BC n=518 72% had prior tx for early-stage dz PFS 44.3 vs 29.1 mo, HR 0.74, p=0.0074 median f/u 52.6 mo OS 74% vs 29.8% at 5 yrs Amazing benefit!!!! Congrats to @Otto_DFCI + team! #SABCS24 @oncoalert @DFCI_BreastOnc
Editor’s note: the SABCS 2024 interim analysis reports 5-year OS of 74.3% vs 69.8% (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.6–1.24; immature).
● POSITIVE Major practice change data out now. Combination of palbociclib, anti-HER2 therapy, and endocrine therapy. For HR* HER2+ MBC. https://t.co/l9nXtBsMOd #SABCS24
Hope Rugo
@hoperugo
● POSITIVE Long awaited results and very exciting advance for our patients!! Almost all of my patients still on this well tolerated quadruplet Rx. Stay tuned later this morning. @OncoAlert #SABC24 https://t.co/h0x0kSbla5
Oncology Brothers
@OncBrothers
ORCHARD PARK, NY
● POSITIVE 2. #PATINA: Ph 3, #palbociclib + Anti-HER2 + ET vs. anti-HER2 + ET after induction chemo for HR+ & HER2+ MBC: - mPFS of 44.3mos w/ Palbo vs 29.1mos SoC (HR: 0.74) - OS not mature yet - New SoC for HR+ HER 2+ MBC 3/6 https://t.co/tbMQ0NGEo4 https://t.co/CQmZBqQcz4
● POSITIVE Some more highlights from Day #3 @SABCSSanAntonio #SABCS25 ✅ VIKTORIA1- 2L after ET + CDK4/6i in HR+ mBC ✅ PATINA - 1L for HR+/HER2+ mBC ✅AMBRE - 1L in HR+ mBC w. high tumor burden @drteplinsky @DanielaUruetamd @mayscancer @LSOM_HemOnc @oncodaily @OncoAlert https://t.co/cAHdQYpqis
Dr Sarah Sammons
@drsarahsam
BOSTON, MA
● POSITIVE @EnriqueSoto8 I hear you but palbo is quite manageable for most patients with optimal supportive care and dose reductions. It is not chemotherapy or continuous ADC. And the PFS was almost 4 years! I agree with overall sentiment on tox reporting though.
● POSITIVE @DrSGraff Agree completely. Not everyone needs upfront T-DXd and the side effects of prolonged T-DXd are significant. A maintenance approach is critical. THP with maintenance tucatinib or palbociclib is an excellent option. #SABCS25
Adriana Kahn, MD
@AdrianaKahnMD
● POSITIVE @PTarantinoMD @Otto_DFCI @SABCSSanAntonio This is amazing! It is a big step up on the ladder towards 100% but hopefully one day soon enough we will reach the top; our patients need so much better than all of that..!
Doc Jonathan King
@jonjazzpics
● POSITIVE @stolaney1 @Otto_DFCI @OncoAlert @DFCI_BreastOnc Fantastic results from the PATINA trial! I'm thrilled to see such a significant benefit for patients with ER+ HER2+ breast cancer. Congrats to the team! #SABCS24
● POSITIVE ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ Promising findings from #PATINA presented at #SABCS24 demonstrate a 15-month improvement in PFS with the addition of palbociclib to HER2-targeted therapy and ET as maintenance treatment in the first-line setting, compared to standard therapy @OncoAlert https://t.co/yZfmwXwhGG
● POSITIVE 【抗がん剤のいらない時代へ】 PATINA試験は、「分子標的治療薬とホルモン療法」の可能性を広げ、新しい世界を切り拓いた重要な試験です。 今回の進歩により、「殺細胞性抗がん剤のいらない時代」の到来も近づいたように思います。 (※本試験は、殺細胞性抗がん剤を使用したあとの維持療法ですので、まだ抗がん剤使用を前提としています) 本試験に参加された世界中の患者さんやご家族、医療従事者や関係者の皆様に、心より感謝申し上げます。 そして、本試験をリードしたOtto Metzger先生の熱意に改めて敬意を表します。 PATINA試験には、Metzger先生からお声掛けいただきながら、日本が参加できなかった苦い思い出があります。 日本人の参加がない第III相試験に基づいて承認が得られたのは、ドラッグラグの観点からはよいニュースではありますが、この状況に甘んじて、日本がエビデンスづくりをリードする姿勢を捨てることはあってはなりません。 今後も、グローバル試験に主体的に関与していけるように、環境整備と人材育成を進めていく所存です。 WJOG乳腺グループとしても、引き続き、世界中の患者さんにベネフィットをもたらす新治療開発に力を入れていきます。 #乳がん #WJOG #HER2 #PATINA #HBM
(in Japanese)
● POSITIVE なんとPATINA試験の結果を元にホルモン受容体陽性乳がんのパルボシクリブ+抗HER2療法+内分泌療法が承認!! 日本は参加してなかったので、無理なのかと思ってましたが、これは朗報です。 https://t.co/lLSM7A4NhU
(in Japanese)
Pablo Jara Martin
@pablojaramartin
● POSITIVE 3/3 Con HT, tucatinib: HR 0,72 (0,42–1,24); PATINA, palbociclib: HR 0,75 (0,59–0,96). Aunque no debemos hacer comparación directa🙏,para mí PATINA va por delante en RH+/HER2+. Reservaría tucatinib. ¿Qué habría pasado en HER2CLIMB-05,con 100% HT en las RH+? https://t.co/DmkwQjy2NM
(in Spanish)
Yakup Ergün
@dr_yakupergun
Istanbul, Turkey
● NEUTRAL On DESTINIY-Breast09 before #ASCO25 The announcement of DB-09 in April 2025, showing a significant PFS advantage of T-DXd + pertuzumab over THP in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, has generated great excitement. However, ahead of the full data presentation at ASCO 2025, several questions remain in my mind. According to the criteria in ESMO-MCBS v2.0 and based on my calculations, for the benefit to be considered clinically meaningful, the PFS in the T-DXd arm should exceed ~28.5 months with an HR ≤0.65—meaning more than 2 years of T-DXd treatment. How will we manage toxicity and cost? If PFS is strong, these concerns may take a back seat—but how strong will it actually be? Can it surpass the 44.3-month PFS reported in the HR+/HER2+ cohort of the PATINA study? When DB-09 was designed, the standard was CLEOPATRA’s THP (PFS 18.5 months), but since SABCS 2024, the bar has been raised significantly with CDK4/6 maintenance. Here are the questions I’m grappling with: 🔹️Indirect comparisons are never ideal, but the 44.3-month PFS reported in the HR+ cohort of PATINA is hard to ignore. Yes, it reflects a selected group of patients who didn’t progress after induction chemotherapy—but with an ORR of 80%, how many early progressors could there realistically be? 🔹️How many patients in the control arm received T-DXd upon progression, which is now the standard second-line treatment? What is the OS difference between those who received T-DXd in the first line versus the second line? To answer this more accurately, we’d need data from the T-DXd monotherapy arm—which, apparently, won’t be presented at ASCO. If there’s no meaningful OS difference in the crossover group, we will have to seriously consider sequential use as a strategic option. 🔹️There is a growing belief—one I also share—that the most effective therapies should be used upfront. But then what? What do we give after T-DXd? This remains one of the most pressing unanswered questions. 🔹️If prolonged T-DXd use is required, how will we manage ILD risk? Who might benefit from a shortened treatment duration? Specifically in the HR+ cohort, could switching to ET + CDK4/6 + HP maintenance after 6–8 cycles of T-DXd + pertuzumab strike a better balance between efficacy, quality of life, and sustainability? Our expectations are high. But before we give a standing ovation, we’ll need to see strong and convincing data.💬
Guilherme Nader Marta
@GuiNaderMarta
● NEUTRAL PROs from PATINA trial by @inesvazluis At #ESMO25 Adding palbociclib to HER2 therapy + ET in HR+/HER2+ MBC maintained HRQoL, with similar time to symptom progression (HR 0.89) & stable FACT-B TOI (66 vs 67 at 1 yr; 64 vs 67 at 3 yr) and EQ-5D-5L scores over time @OncoAlert https://t.co/vO1zXplZZO
Anis Toumeh, MD
@AnisToumeh
● NEUTRAL @PTarantinoMD @stolaney1 @ASCO @DFCI_BreastOnc Initial thoughts: what about only 10% of patients receiving Tdxd on progression? AEs are tough too (G5 ILD). With PATINA mPFS of 44m, I am not sure this is straightforward from a change of practice standpoint.
Santhosh Ambika
@RenoHemonc
RENO, NV
● NEUTRAL @PTarantinoMD @ASCO @DFCI_BreastOnc DB-09 -> good responders with HR+ should be deescalated to PATINA regimen..
Ash Paul
@pash22
● NEUTRAL The PATINA trial – palbociclib maintenance in metastatic breast cancer. What is the best 1st-line strategy in patients with HR+/HER2+ advanced/metastatic breast cancer? https://t.co/mc7IhwK2nE via @Timothee_MD @Maherjane @DrMarkLythgoe
Dr Amol Akhade
@SuyogCancer
● NEUTRAL EMA has raised concerned over Patina trial results . Company has withdrawn the application at EMA for said indication .EMA feels results may have been biased ?? @PTarantinoMD @dr_yakupergun @ErikaHamilton9 @hoperugo @drsarahsam https://t.co/AOCbhoZNt8
Luca Arecco, MD
@Lucarecco
● NEUTRAL @pfizer has withdrawn its #EMA application for #palbociclib in HR+/HER2+ advanced breast cancer following the #PATINA trial results. PATINA showed a significant investigator-assessed PFS benefit, but EMA raised concerns because blinded independent central review did not clearly confirm the magnitude of benefit in this open-label study. @OncoAlert
Yakup Ergün
@dr_yakupergun
● NEUTRAL Frankly, Pfizer’s withdrawal of its application following the EMA’s concerns about efficacy and potential bias is surprising, given that the FDA approved the indication based on PATINA data. Same trial, two different regulatory approaches… Open-label trials, investigator assessment, censored data… Yet I recall that the HR did not change much with independent review either.
Neil Vasan
@NeilVasan
● NEUTRAL Hoping we will get more clarity into this decision. https://t.co/c5y3gCQgy3
MV Chandrakanth
@ChandrakanthMv
● NEUTRAL PATINA: Why the Second Look Matters Why can investigator assessment and independent scan review differ—and affect confidence in PFS? EMA raised efficacy concerns; Pfizer withdrew the European indication application for further data and analyses. Existing authorised uses remain unaffected. Source: EMA, 16 Oct 2026 https://t.co/r5WUh36rBb #MVOnco #PATINA #BreastCancer
Pablo Jara Martin
@pablojaramartin
● NEUTRAL 🚨 PATINA: The EMA questions a 15-month PFS gain (HR 0.75). I highly recommend 📖https://t.co/pIPlN34KPj by @Timothee_MD: An open-label trial, investigator-assessed PFS, and estimated early censoring of 12.1% in controls vs 5.3% with palbociclib. Robust benefit or potential assessment bias?
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
● NEUTRAL HER2+ mBC diagnosed in 2020: THP induction->HP maintenance (~2 yrs), 2L T-DXd (~2 yrs), 3L H2CLIMB (~7 mo), 4L+ chemo/H (3-6 mo) HER2+ mBC diagnosed in 2030: T-DXd/P induction (1-2y), PATINA maintenance (~4 yrs), new T-DXd/P induction, new maintenance, new T-DXd/P induction […]
Yakup Ergün
@dr_yakupergun
● NEUTRAL Although the FDA approval of tucatinib based on HER2CLIMB-05 expands maintenance options after first-line therapy, when considered alongside the DB-09 and PATINA data, it is unlikely to be my preferred option. If I were to use it, I would consider maintenance tucatinib + trastuzumab + pertuzumab particularly for patients with HER2 3+ disease, no visceral metastases, HR-negative disease (if used in HR-positive disease, please use it together with endocrine therapy), and PIK3CA wild-type tumors.
● NEUTRAL FDA approved #HER2CLIMB05. Metastatic HER2+ #breastcancer is now crowded, and there is no sequencing trial. Until there is one, here is how I think about it. Most of my patients will see T-DXd in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. When they recur, HER2CLIMB-05 with tucatinib comes into play. If she is HR+, palbociclib per PATINA. If she has not seen T-DXd, I start with T-DXd. Brain metastases are the hard part. If I use T-DXd up front and she develops brain metastases, tucatinib is what I have left. So do I hold T-DXd for the brain, or use it first and keep tucatinib for the brain? I use it first as soon as I can and hope to better sequencing trials or new agents for subsequent lines
Neil Vasan
@NeilVasan
● NEUTRAL @FDA approval of maintenance tucatinib + HP after 1L THP in metastatic HER2+ BC. Another example with PATINA of novel therapies strategically deployed in maintenance setting. @ErikaHamilton9 @SusanGKomen @BCRFcure https://t.co/gjbrmbk2hX
Abi Siva MD
@AbiSivaMD
● NEUTRAL I agree with @Dr_RShatsky and @dr_yakupergun in deciding which ADC to use in the residual disease setting port TDXD If there is no response to T-DXd and we suspect that the disease is being driven by an aggressive TNBC-like phenotype, this would be one of the few scenarios in which I would even consider adjuvant AC, which I otherwise rarely use in the Her2+ setting. On the other hand, if ER-positive luminal biology is driving the disease, which is not uncommon, I would love to see future trials incorporating SERDs and CDK4/6 inhibitors into the triple-positive adjuvant setting, particularly as we continue to learn more about the role of endocrine-based strategies in Her2+ from studies such as PATINA. Neratinib is an established option here as well, for extended Her2 blockade.
● NEUTRAL Two positive trials. No head-to-head comparison. One patient in front of you. For HR+/HER2+ disease after induction, what tips your maintenance choice toward PATINA or HER2CLIMB-05—and what would change your mind? #BreastCancer #OncoTwitter https://t.co/K26b4Lr0bR
● NEUTRAL PATINA selects patients whose disease is already controlled by induction. Could response depth and ctDNA kinetics distinguish those who need immediate CDK4/6 inhibition from those who could safely defer it? The next step may be selecting whom to intensify. #BreastCancer #PATINA
Dr Amol Akhade
@SuyogCancer
Mubai, INDIA
● NEGATIVE So that is how smart trial design help you to get impressive PFS results . You select pts with good biology at the end of induction chemo and then give them additional treatment that control arm good biology pts dont get and show that PFS becomes better . Excellent discussion by Dr Sara Hurvitz 👏. 1- I hope this shows OS if when this data becomes mature . I don't think it will show OS if control arm gets cdk inhibitors on progression in sufficient number 2- question for clinical practice is if additional cdk inhibitor is better then why not add abemaciclib or ribociclib ( they are supposed to be better than palbociclib- or we are back to agreeing that all cdk inhibitors are same ? ) 3 - what happens when control arm of this trial is no more SOC and tdx1 becomes SOC post destiny 09 results . @ErikaHamilton9 @hoperugo @stolaney1 @drsarahsam @DrHBurstein @brunolarvol @OncoAlert
● NEGATIVE PATINA trial: maintenance palbociclib after first line anti-HER2+chemo in HER2/HR+ metastatic BC: - PFS benefit, no OS (not mature) - significantly more toxic (including financial) - significant early censoring imbalance (estimated 6% versus 12% over first 6 months in both arms, see Breaking-ICE App) -> makes PFS results less reliable, particularly in open-label trial - nonetheless the biological rationale, it is possible that ultimately no OS benefit will be seen "Adding toxicity without an improvement in clinical endpoints should generally be avoided." -> read our essay on PFS and other surrogates here : https://t.co/2HxtAMe4bT @vkprasadlab @VPrasadMDMPH
Enrique Soto
@EnriqueSoto8
● NEGATIVE PATINA #SABCS2024 ▶️ Pts have gotten through a tough chemo, if you add something toxic to their subsequent therapy, it should increase OS! ▶️ We NEED to stop saying toxicities are "manageable", the palbo group had much more toxicities, it should be said like that, without spin https://t.co/70i2h7QpPm
● NEGATIVE Not surprised: My take on PATINA: https://t.co/8bNWrcciTy https://t.co/YJKFNWhR4Q
Pablo Jara Martin
@pablojaramartin
● NEGATIVE Olivier flags 3 potential biases: earlier progression calls in controls, later calls on palbociclib, and symptom-driven CTs in controls vs symptoms deemed toxicity on treatment. Independent review did not clearly confirm PFS. We need more data 🙏.Pfizer withdrew its EMA request.
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
● POSITIVE We’ve long treated HER2+ breast cancer similarly. Until everything changed. Within 1 year, T-DXd moved earlier, palbo and tucatinib reshaped maintenance, some chemos are nearly gone, biomarkers guide us. The right-sizing era for HER2+ BC has begun. https://t.co/0vIg47n8RD 🧵1/ https://t.co/Py652fFBPx
Paolo Tarantino
@PTarantinoMD
● POSITIVE 4/ In the metastatic setting, we can finally tailor 1L treatment. T-DXd/P allows disease control for >3 years, and maintenance palbo or tucatinib can likely further extend this window, preserving QoL. We’re already curing some of these patients, despite the metastatic spread. https://t.co/tiBLQgrrS4
Hope Rugo
@hoperugo
● NEUTRAL Another important option for maintenance therapy for HER2+ MBC after induction. More impact in HR neg disease and ET underutilized. Potential to decrease brain mets! Now to evaluate maintenance after TDxd. DB-Guide will evaluate palbo maintenance in HR+/HER2+ MBC. @OncoAlert https://t.co/4gYYD7jeJ6
● NEUTRAL 今後のHR陽性HER2陽性MBCの治療戦略 ①DB09レジメンPD後、CLEOPATRAレジメンの維持としてPATINAレジメン ②CLEOPATRAレジメンで入ってPATINAレジメンで維持し、T-DXdは二次治療として どちらでしょう
● NEUTRAL ESMOの進行再発乳がんの治療ガイドライン最新版。 HER2陽性のT-DXd+P後にHER2CLIMB05やPATINAレジメンの記載はない。TPやパルボのメンテナンスは、DEMETHERやDB-Guide試験の結果が出るまではこのままの記載なのかな🤔 この辺りしばらく議論がありそうだ。 https://t.co/wK7wTcpTrk
● POSITIVE 乳癌薬剤承認ラッシュ! 1️⃣DESTINY-Breast09のT-DXd+ペルツズマブ(HER2陽性転移再発1st line) 2️⃣TROPION-breast02のDato-DXd(トリプルネガティブ 転移再発 1st line) 昨日のカペシタビン、本日のPATINAのパルボシクリブと、何年に一回しか起こらないであろう大きな変化が一度に… なんという日だ。 https://t.co/NbnevdzFw7
● NEGATIVE ツカチニブ+X+Tmabの来院スケジュールも大概だけど、PATINAの来院スケジュールもなんというかユーザーフレンドリーではないというか...
● NEUTRAL Palbociclibを併用すると通常よりもGrade3以上の下痢が増えるのが不思議な感じ Grade3の好中球減少症が起きた158例中FNは2人っていうのは通常臨床と一緒ですね
● NEUTRAL 58%がPalbociclibを減量っていうのも通常臨床と一緒くらいか
Dr Sarah Sammons
@drsarahsam
● NEUTRAL DESTINY-Breast Guide: 1795TiP at #ESMO26 🌍 In triple-positive mBC, can we do DB-09 induction and PATINA maintenance? DB-09 made T-DXd + pertuzumab a 1L option. PATINA showed palbociclib + ET + HP maintenance improves PFS after induction (HR 0.75). DB-Guide puts them together. How long to induce? In a DB-09 post hoc analysis, median time to maximal tumor reduction was ~11 mo (~16 cycles) overall and ~13 mo (~19 cycles) in HER2+/HR+ disease. A 6-cycle stop (~4 mo) lands well before most patients hit their best response. DESTINY-Breast Guide (N=200, single-arm):
1️⃣ T-DXd + pertuzumab for 18-24 cycles (12m), or switch after 8 cycles with confirmed CR
2️⃣ Palbociclib + ET + HP maintenance
3️⃣ T-DXd retreatment at progression. Primary endpoint: 24-mo PFS. QOL built in. Recruiting in the US, Canada, Europe, China, Korea, and Australia, and coming soon to @UMGCCC #BCSM #HER2 #ADC #BreastCancer