KOL Pulse — Trial Profile

KEYNOTE-937 Trial

Adjuvant HCC after complete radiologic response post-resection or ablation — Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Adjuvant HCC after complete radiologic response post-resection or ablationKEYTRUDAASCO GI 2026 (#ASCOGI26)⚠ Negative Trial
Visit Interactive Trial Page →

Top KOLs Discussing KEYNOTE-937

Nieves Martinez Lago MD PhD
Nieves Martinez Lago MD PhD
@DraMartinezLago
5.7K impressions
Nicholas Hornstein
Nicholas Hornstein
@GIMedOnc
5K impressions
Mark Lewis, MD, FASCO
Mark Lewis, MD, FASCO
@marklewismd
3.6K impressions
Daneng Li
Daneng Li
@DanengLi
3.5K impressions
Arndt Vogel
Arndt Vogel
@ArndtVogel
2.1K impressions
Grainne O'Kane
Grainne O'Kane
@graokane
1.3K impressions

KEYNOTE-937 Key Slides & Visuals

Official trial slides and relevant visuals shared by KOLs at ASCO GI 2026 (#ASCOGI26). Click any image to expand.

Nieves Martinez Lago MD PhD
Nieves Martinez Lago MD PhD @DraMartinezLago
KEYNOTE-937 Data
5.7K impressions · 28 likes · Jan 9, 2026
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Phase 3 KEYNOTE-937 Study Design ADJUVANT THERAPY Key Eligibility Criteria Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W Age >18 years of age Confirmed HCC x1 year Treated until Complete radiological R 1:1 response after surgical disease recurrence, N 959 resection or local unacceptable ablation of HCC toxicity, intercurrent Placebo IV Q3W ECOG PS 0 -1 illness, or withdrawal Child-Pugh liver class A X 1 year Stratification factors Endpoints Region (Asia [not including Japan] vs non-Asia) Primary: RFS by BICR or pathology; OS Prior local therapy (resection vs ablation) Key secondary: DMFS by BICR or pathology, safety Risk of recurrence (intermediate vs high vs very high risk) AFP at initial diagnosis before resection or ablation (<200 ng/mL VS >200 ng/mL) AFP, alpha fetoprotein. BICR, blinded independent central review. RFS, recurrence-free survival. DMFS, distant metastasis-free survival. Risk of recurrence: Intermediate, solitary tumor >2 cm without microvascular invasion and not histologic grade 3 or 4; High, solitary tumor >2 cm with microvascular invasion or same size and histologic grade 3 or 4, or multiple tumors regardless of microvascular invasion or histologic grade; Very-high, single tumor or multiple tumors of any size with microvascular invasion ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium --- [Slide 2] Recurrence-Free Survival Events, Median RFS HR (95% CI) n (%) (95% CI), mo P-value 100 Pembrolizumab 239 (50) 46.7 (35.6-53.3) 1.06 (0.88-1.26) 90 Placebo 237 (49) 45.5 (35.6-58.0) 0.719 80 70 60 RFS, % 50 24-mo rate 63% I 40 61% 48-mo rate 50% 30 50% 20 10 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 No. at Risk Time, months 476 391 343 311 290 263 221 181 135 50 2 1 0 483 400 346 305 278 264 218 162 116 49 3 0 0 Data cut-off date: Mar 20, 2025. RFS by blinded independent central review or pathology. ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
Nicholas Hornstein
Nicholas Hornstein @GIMedOnc
KEYNOTE-937 Data
5K impressions · 63 likes · Jan 9, 2026
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Recurrence-Free Survival Events, Median RFS HR (95% CI) n (%) (95% CI), mo P-value 100 Pembrolizumab 239 (50) 46.7 (35.6-53.3) 1.06 (0.88-1.26) 90 Placebo 237 (49) 45.5 (35.6-58.0) P 0.719 80 70 60 RFS, % 50 24-mo rate 63% 40 61% 48-mo rate 50% 30 50% 20 10 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 Time, months No. at Risk 476 391 343 311 290 263 221 181 135 50 2 1 0 483 400 346 305 278 264 218 162 116 49 3 0 0 Data cut-off date: Mar 20, 2025. RFS by blinded independent central review or pathology.
Daneng Li
Daneng Li @DanengLi
KEYNOTE-937 Data
3.5K impressions · 22 likes · Jan 9, 2026
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Recurrence-Free Survival Events, Median RFS HR (95% CI) n (%) (95% CI), mo P-value 100 Pembrolizumab 239 (50) 46.7 (35.6-53.3) 1.06 (0.88-1.26) 90 Placebo 237 (49) 45.5 (35.6-58.0) P 0.719 80 70 60 RFS, % 50 24-mo rate 63% I 40 61% 48-mo rate 50% 30 50% 20 10 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 Time, months No. at Risk 476 391 343 311 290 263 221 181 135 50 2 1 0 483 400 346 305 278 264 218 162 116 49 3 0 0 Data cut-off date: Mar 20, 2025. RFS by blinded independent central review or pathology. ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium --- [Slide 2] Recurrence-Free Survival Events, Median RFS HR (95% CI) n (%) (95% CI), mo P-value 100 Pembrolizumab 239 (50) 46.7 (35.6-53.3) 1.06 (0.88-1.26) 90 Placebo 237 (49) 45.5 (35.6-58.0) P 0.719 80 70 60 RFS, % 50 24-mo rate 63% I 40 61% 48-mo rate 50% 30 50% 20 10 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 Time, months No. at Risk 476 391 343 311 290 263 221 181 135 50 2 1 0 483 400 346 305 278 264 218 162 116 49 3 0 0 Data cut-off date: Mar 20, 2025. RFS by blinded independent central review or pathology. ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
Arndt Vogel
Arndt Vogel @ArndtVogel
KEYNOTE-937 Data
2.1K impressions · 43 likes · Jan 9, 2026
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Overall Survival Events, Median OS HR (95% CI) n (%) (95% CI), mo 100 Pembrolizumab 98 (21) NR (NR to NR) 1.08 (0.81-1.43) Placebo 98 (20) NR (NR to NR) 90 80 24-mo rate 90% 70 94% 48-mo rate 60 79% os, % 81% 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 No. at Risk Time, months 476 471 456 436 422 409 369 305 232 138 62 8 0 483 480 475 466 450 438 380 303 223 124 54 8 0 Data cut-off date: Mar 20, 2025. --- [Slide 2] Recurrence-Free Survival Events, Median RFS HR (95% CI) n (%) (95% CI), mo P-value 100 Pembrolizumab 239 (50) 46.7 (35.6-53.3) 1.06 (0.88-1.26) 90 Placebo 237 (49) 45.5 (35.6-58.0) P 0.719 80 70 60 RFS, % 50 24-mo rate 63% 40 61% 48-mo rate 50% 30 50% 20 10 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 Time, months No. at Risk 476 391 343 311 290 263 221 181 135 50 2 1 0 483 400 346 305 278 264 218 162 116 49 3 0 0 Data cut-off date: Mar 20, 2025. RFS by blinded independent central review or pathology. --- [Slide 3] ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium Adjuvant pembrolizumab for participants with hepatocellular carcinoma and complete radiologic response after surgical resection or local ablation: the phase 3 KEYNOTE-937 study Stephen Lam Chan1, Mohamed Bouattour2, Thomas Yau³, Ann-Lii Cheng⁴, Yabing Guo⁵, Chuang Peng⁶, Do Young Kim7, Lipika Goyal⁸, Long-Bin Jeng⁹, Ming-Chin Yu10, Seung Woon Paik¹¹, Valeriy Breder¹², Robert CG Martin II¹³, Arndt Vogel¹⁴, Masatoshi Kudo¹⁵, Jimin Wu¹⁶, Usha Malhotra¹⁶, Abby B Siegel¹⁶, Josep M Uovet¹⁷, Ja Fan18 State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; 2AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon, Liver Cancer Unit, INSERM U1149, Centre de Recherche de l'Inflammation (CRI), Paris, France; The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Southern Medical University, Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; ®Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Bepartment of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA USA; ©Organ Transplantation Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; 10Department of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; 11Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 12N N Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia; 13The Hiram C Polk, Jr., MD Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA; 14Toronto General Hospital, Medical Oncology, UHN Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; 15Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; 16Merck and Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ USA; "Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion (Ministry of Education), Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China ASCO Gastrointestinal #GI26 ASCO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PRESENTED BY: Stephen Lam Chan, MD CLINICAL ONCOLOGY Cancers Symposium Presentation is property of the author and ASCO. Permission required for reuse, contact permissions@asco.org KNOWLEDGE CONQUERS CANCER --- [Slide 4] Phase 3 KEYNOTE-937 Study Design ADJUVANT THERAPY Key Eligibility Criteria Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W Age ≥18 years of age Confirmed HCC X 1 year Treated until Complete radiological R 1:1 response after surgical disease recurrence, N = 959 resection or local unacceptable ablation of HCC toxicity, intercurrent Placebo IV Q3W ECOG PS 0 -1 illness, or withdrawal Child-Pugh liver class A X 1 year Stratification factors Endpoints Region (Asia [not including Japan] VS non-Asia) Primary: RFS by BICR or pathology; OS Prior local therapy (resection VS ablation) Key secondary: DMFS by BICR or pathology, safety Risk of recurrence (intermediate VS high VS very high risk) AFP at initial diagnosis before resection or ablation (<200 ng/mL VS >200 ng/mL) AFP, alpha fetoprotein. BICR, blinded independent central review. RFS, recurrence-free survival. DMFS, distant metastasis-free survival. Risk of recurrence: Intermediate, solitary tumor >2 cm without microvascular invasion and not histologic grade 3 or 4; High, solitary tumor >2 cm with microvascular invasion or same size and histologic grade 3 or 4, or multiple tumors regardless of microvascular invasion or histologic grade; Very-high, single tumor or multiple tumors of any size with microvascular invasion --- [Slide 5] Recurrence-Free Survival Events, Median RFS HR (95% CI) n (%) (95% CI), mo P-value 100 Pembrolizumab 239 (50) 46.7 (35.6-53.3) 1.06 (0.88-1.26) 90 Placebo 237 (49) 45.5 (35.6-58.0) P 0.719 80 70 60 RFS, % 50 24-mo rate 63% 40 61% 48-mo rate 50% 30 50% 20 10 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 Time, months No. at Risk 476 391 343 311 290 263 221 181 135 50 2 1 0 483 400 346 305 278 264 218 162 116 49 3 0 0 Data cut-off date: Mar 20, 2025. RFS by blinded independent central review or pathology.
Grainne O'Kane
Grainne O'Kane @graokane
KEYNOTE-937 Data
1.3K impressions · 20 likes · Jan 9, 2026
View on X ↗
[Slide 1] Phase 3 KEYNOTE-937 Study Design ADJUVANT THERAPY Key Eligibility Criteria Age 218 years of age Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W Confirmed HCC X 1 year Treated until Complete radiological R 1:1 response after surgical disease recurrence, N - 253 resection or local unacceptable ablation of HCC toxicity, intercurrent ECOG PS 0-1 Placebo IV Q3W illness, or withdrawal Child-Pugh liver class A X 1 year Stratification factors Endpoints Region (Asia [not including Japan] vs non-Asia) Primary: RFS by BICR or pathology: os Prior local therapy (resection vs ablation) Key secondary: DMFS by BICR or pathology, safety Risk of recurrence (intermediate vs high vs very high risk) AFP at initial diagnosis before resection or ablation (<200 ng/mL vs >200 ng/mL) AFP. alpha fetoprotein. BICR, blinded independent central review RFS recurrence-tree survice DMFS, distant metastasis thee survival Risk of recurrence intermediate, solitary funor 22 on without microvascular invasion and not histologic grade 3 or 4. High, solitary numer 22 on with microvascular invasion or same - and histologic grade 3 or 4, or multiple funiors regardless of microvascular invasion or histologic grade, Very-high, single funior or multiple sumors of any size with microvascular invasion --- [Slide 2] Baseline Characteristics Pembrolizumab Placebo Pembrolizumab Placebo Characteristic, n (%) N 476 N 483 Characteristic, n (%) N 476 N 483 Median age (range), years 62 (25 85) 63 (27 85) Child Pugh score Male 375 (79) 384 (80) A5 442 (93) 435 (90) Race A6 33 (7) 48 (10) Asian 268 (56) 262 (54) Missing 1 (<1) 0 White 196 (41) 212 (44) Prior ablation Black 6(1) Yes 4(1) 61 (13) 62 (13) No Other*/Missing 6(1) 5(1) 415 (87) 421(87) Prior local therapy Geographic region Resection 421(88) 424(88) North America 19(4) 25(5) Ablation 55 (12) 59 (12) Western Europe 134(28) 125 (26) Recurrence risk group Rest of World 323(68) 333 (69) Intermediate 96(20) 103 (21) ECOG performance status High 350(74) 343 (71) 0 448 (94) 459 (95) Very high 30(6) 37 (8) 1 27(6) 24(5) BCLC stage Viral etiology A 394(83) 401 (83) HBV+ 287 (60) 286 (59) B 45(9) 41(8) HCV+ 117 (25) 101(21) C 37(8) 41(8) Alpha fetoprotein at initial diagnosis Microvascular invasion >200 ng/mL 91 (19) 97(20) Yes 273 (57) 279 (58) <200 ng/mL 368(77) 374(77) No 148 (31) 146 (30) Missing (4) 12(2) Not evaluated 55 (12) 58 (12) cut-off date: Mar 20, 2025. *Other includes participants of multiple races and Native American or other Pacific Islander. *Includes participants who had ablation and did not have available tissue and one ticipant who had resection and did not have HCC. BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer. --- [Slide 3] Recurrence-Free Survival in Key Subgroups Events/Patients, N Events/Patients, N Pembrolizumab Placebo HR (95% CI) Pembrolizumab Placebo HR (95% CI) Overall 239/476 237/483 1.06 (0.88-1.26) Overall 239/476 237/483 1.06 (0.88-1.26) Age, years Viral etiology <65 126/279 112/268 1.03 (0.79-1.32) Viral 160/343 164/341 0.93 (0.75-1.15) 265 113/197 125/215 1.03 (0.80-1.33) Non-viral 79/133 73/141 1.22 (0.89-1.68) Gender BCLC stage at initial diagnosis Female 54/101 40/99 1.43 (0.95-2.15) A 182/394 186/401 0.97 (0.79-1.19) Male 185/375 197/384 0.92 (0.75-1.13) B 30/45 29/41 0.79 (0.48-1.33) Race C 27/37 22/41 1.64 (0.93-2.88) White 123/196 119/212 1.20 (0.93-1.55) Child-Pugh score Non-White 114/277 118/269 0.87 (0.68-1.13) 5 215/442 205/435 1.00 (0.83-1.21) Geographic region 6 24/33 32/48 1.37 (0.81-2.32) Asia without Japan 81/207 Prior local therapy 86/197 0.82 (0.61-1.12) Non-Asia and Japan 158/269 Resection 203/421 193/424 151/286 1.16 (0.93-1.45) 1.05 (0.86-1.28) Ablation 36/55 44/59 AFP before resection or ablation 0.84 (0.54-1.30) HH Risk of Recurrence < 200 ing/mL 183/368 186/374 0.99 (0.81-1.21) 200 ng/nL Intermediate 44/96 56/103 45/91 1.03 (0.68-1.56) 0.75 (0.50-1.11) 44/97 HBV etiology High 170/350 160/343 1.03 (0.83-1.28) HBV+ 126/287 134/286 0.89 (0.70-1.14) Very High 25/30 21/37 2.01 (1.12-3.59) HBV- 113/189 103/196 Risk within local therapy subgroups 1.19 (0.91-1.55) Resection intermediate risk 26/65 31/68 HCV etiology 0.76 (0.45-1.29) Resection high-risk 155/329 144/322 HCV+ 63/117 1.05 (0.84-1.32) 61/101 0.76 (0.54-1.09) HCV- 176/359 176/382 I 1.08 (0.87-1.33) Resection very high-risk 22/27 18/34 2.14 (1.14-3.99) Ablation intermediate risk 18/31 25/35 0.78 (0.43-1.44) 0.1 1 10 0.1 1 10 Favors pembrolizumab Favors placebo Favors pembrolizumab Favors placebo Data cut-off date: Mar 20, 2025. RFS by blinded independent central review or pathology. --- [Slide 4] Overall Survival Events, Median OS HR (95% CI) n (%) (95% CI), mo 100 Pembrolizumab 98 (21) NR (NR to NR) 1.08 (0.81-1.43) Placebo 98 (20) NR (NR to NR) 90 80 24-mo rate 90% 70 94% 48-mo rate 60 79% OS, % 81% 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 No. at Risk Time, months 476 471 456 436 422 409 369 305 232 138 62 8 0 483 480 475 466 450 438 380 303 223 124 54 8 0 Data cut-off date: Mar 20, 2025.

KEYNOTE-937 Top Tweets

Top tweets by impressions — click to view on X

Nieves Martinez Lago MD PhD
Nieves Martinez Lago MD PhD@DraMartinezLago

#GI26 KEYNOTE-937 (phase III)
🔀 Adj HCC (PEM vs PBO) after complete radiologic response (resection/ablation)
📉 RFS: 46.7 vs 45.5 mo; (HR 1.06; P=0.72)
📉 OS: 48-mo OS 79% vs 81%
🛡️ Higher grade ≥3 AEs…

👁 5.7K ♡ 28 ↻ 8 Jan 9, 2026
Nicholas Hornstein
Nicholas Hornstein@GIMedOnc

#GI26
KEYNOTE-937 is a letdown, but the story feels familiar 😕🩸

Phase 3 KEYNOTE-937 tested pembrolizumab after surgical resection or local ablation for HCC. This was the long-awaited attempt to…

👁 5K ♡ 63 ↻ 25 Jan 9, 2026
Mark Lewis, MD, FASCO
Mark Lewis, MD, FASCO@marklewismd

Negative trials matter too!
Especially given the paradigm shift towards IO in HCC since 2020, it is important (if disappointing) to learn that adjuvant pembrolizumab does not affect survival outcomes…

👁 3.6K ♡ 24 ↻ 3 Jan 9, 2026
Daneng Li
Daneng Li@DanengLi

keynote 937 negative study for adjuvant #HCC in line with prior results from IMbrave 050. Unfortunately, still lack of positive #HCC trials. Novel strategies needed since given uniqueness of HCC…

👁 3.5K ♡ 22 ↻ 8 Jan 9, 2026
Arndt Vogel
Arndt Vogel@ArndtVogel

Keynote-937 phs-3: pembrolizumab for HCC after surgical resection or local ablation
#ASCOGI26
👉mRFS: 46 vs 45 mo
👉4-yr RFS rate: 50 vs 50%
🧐Very disappointing, but inline with IMBRAVE-050, now we…

👁 2.1K ♡ 43 ↻ 13 Jan 9, 2026
Grainne O'Kane
Grainne O'Kane@graokane

KEYNOTE-937- adj pembro v placebo #HCC
➡️ 2nd -ve trial; n=959, mFU 50.7mths
➡️ maj viral aetiology; 77% AFP&lt;200, 83% BCLCA
➡️mRFS 46.7 v 45.5mo, mOS NR either arm
➡️≥G3 AEs 32 v 22%
higher mRFS…

👁 1.3K ♡ 20 ↻ 9 Jan 9, 2026
Jun Gong
Jun Gong@jgong15

Dr. Chan @CUHKofficial rand PhIII KN-937 trial of adj #pembrolizumab X1 year in #HCC after surgery or local ablation ➡️ no sig improvement in #RFS (primary endpoint) vs placebo (HR 1.06), no diff in…

👁 795 ♡ 18 ↻ 8 Jan 9, 2026
Oncology Brothers
Oncology Brothers@OncBrothers

6. KEYNOTE-937: PhIII, Adj Pembrolizumab vs. placebo post-resection/ablation in HCC.

- No RFS benefit: 46.7mos vs 45.5mos (HR 1.06).
- Did not improve outcomes. Negative study!

7/7…

👁 710 ♡ 4 ↻ 0 Jan 11, 2026
Shivani Modi MD
Shivani Modi MD@smodimd

KEYNOTE-937 highlights that adjuvant pembrolizumab after complete radiologic response in HCC does not improve RFS or OS, with higher ≥G3 AEs. Important negative trial shaping practice. #GI26 #HCC

👁 621 ♡ 4 ↻ 3 Jan 10, 2026
Krishan Jethwa
Krishan Jethwa@KrishanJethwa

🚨KEYNOTE-937🚨

Resected or ablated early stage HCC

🔎Adjuvant Pembro vs Placebo

🛑No improvement in RFS and no suggestion of improvement in OS

🧐Findings similar to IMBrave050… more work needed to…

👁 605 ♡ 7 ↻ 0 Jan 9, 2026

About the KEYNOTE-937 Trial

Second negative phase 3 adjuvant immunotherapy trial in HCC after IMbrave-050 showed loss of initial RFS benefit with longer follow-up. Community is shifting toward perioperative (neoadjuvant + adjuvant) immunotherapy strategies. Current SOC for resected/ablated HCC remains surveillance.

Trial Methodology & Results

Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) — Primary Endpoint

Median RFS was 46.7 months with pembrolizumab vs. 45.5 months with placebo (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.26, P=0.719). 48-month RFS rate was 50% in both arms. Primary endpoint was not met; per hierarchical testing, OS was not formally tested.

⚠️ Primary endpoint NOT met (HR 1.06, P=0.719)

📄 Source: KOL commentary on X →

Overall Survival (OS)

Median OS was not reached in either arm (descriptive HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.81-1.43, nominal P=0.704). 48-month OS rate was 79% (pembrolizumab) vs. 81% (placebo). No OS benefit.


📄 Source →

Safety & Tolerability

Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 14% of pembrolizumab patients vs. 5% with placebo. Treatment-related discontinuation was 10% vs. 1%. No treatment-related deaths. Most common TRAEs: pruritus, rash, hypothyroidism.

Grade ≥3 TRAE: 14% pembro vs. 5% placebo

📄 Source →

Clinical Implications

⚠️ Negative trial — standard of care unchanged. Second negative phase 3 adjuvant immunotherapy trial in HCC after IMbrave-050 showed loss of initial RFS benefit with longer follow-up. Community is shifting toward perioperative (neoadjuvant + adjuvant) immunotherapy strategies. Current SOC for resected/ablated HCC remains surveillance.

KEYNOTE-937 in the News

Key KOL Sentiments — KEYNOTE-937

DoctorSentimentComment
Nieves Martinez Lago MD PhD ● NEUTRAL #GI26 KEYNOTE-937 (phase III) 🔀 Adj HCC (PEM vs PBO) after complete radiologic response (resection/ablation) 📉 RFS: 46.7 vs 45.5 mo; (HR 1.06; P=0.72) 📉 OS: 48-mo OS 79% vs 81% 🛡️ Higher grade ≥3 AEs with pembrolizumab ➡️ Adj PEM does not improve outcomes in this setting https://t.co/h6Lp1ZL19S
Nicholas Hornstein ● NEUTRAL #GI26 KEYNOTE-937 is a letdown, but the story feels familiar 😕🩸 Phase 3 KEYNOTE-937 tested pembrolizumab after surgical resection or local ablation for HCC. This was the long-awaited attempt to bring IO into the adjuvant setting after cure-intent therapy. 📉 The results https://t.co/HjCdM66mS6
Mark Lewis, MD, FASCO ● NEUTRAL Negative trials matter too! Especially given the paradigm shift towards IO in HCC since 2020, it is important (if disappointing) to learn that adjuvant pembrolizumab does not affect survival outcomes per KEYNOTE-937 #GI26 https://t.co/HHrxMNZlnw
Daneng Li ● NEUTRAL keynote 937 negative study for adjuvant #HCC in line with prior results from IMbrave 050. Unfortunately, still lack of positive #HCC trials. Novel strategies needed since given uniqueness of HCC adjuvant population and underlying cirrhosis. #GI26 @ASCO https://t.co/JuRHotfCwd
Arndt Vogel ● NEUTRAL Keynote-937 phs-3: pembrolizumab for HCC after surgical resection or local ablation #ASCOGI26 👉mRFS: 46 vs 45 mo 👉4-yr RFS rate: 50 vs 50% 🧐Very disappointing, but inline with IMBRAVE-050, now we need to invest into neoadj. strategies @myesmo @ASCO @EASLedu @ILCAnews https://t.co/EoOx5jOgB2
Grainne O'Kane ● NEUTRAL KEYNOTE-937- adj pembro v placebo #HCC ➡️ 2nd -ve trial; n=959, mFU 50.7mths ➡️ maj viral aetiology; 77% AFP&lt;200, 83% BCLCA ➡️mRFS 46.7 v 45.5mo, mOS NR either arm ➡️≥G3 AEs 32 v 22% higher mRFS than IMBrave050 &amp; STORM @ASCO @ILCAnews @EASLnews @OncoAlert #GI26 https://t.co/DUMRrbZVix
Jun Gong ● NEUTRAL Dr. Chan @CUHKofficial rand PhIII KN-937 trial of adj #pembrolizumab X1 year in #HCC after surgery or local ablation ➡️ no sig improvement in #RFS (primary endpoint) vs placebo (HR 1.06), no diff in OS or met-free survival. Follows negative IMbrave050 trial @OncoAlert #GI26 https://t.co/fTm1RpkNFE
Oncology Brothers ● NEUTRAL 6. KEYNOTE-937: PhIII, Adj Pembrolizumab vs. placebo post-resection/ablation in HCC. - No RFS benefit: 46.7mos vs 45.5mos (HR 1.06). - Did not improve outcomes. Negative study! 7/7 https://t.co/wp94RYYHBX
Shivani Modi MD ● NEUTRAL KEYNOTE-937 highlights that adjuvant pembrolizumab after complete radiologic response in HCC does not improve RFS or OS, with higher ≥G3 AEs. Important negative trial shaping practice. #GI26 #HCC https://t.co/kosMGhFHHi
Krishan Jethwa ● NEUTRAL 🚨KEYNOTE-937🚨 Resected or ablated early stage HCC 🔎Adjuvant Pembro vs Placebo 🛑No improvement in RFS and no suggestion of improvement in OS 🧐Findings similar to IMBrave050… more work needed to identify ways to improve outcomes #ASCOGI26 https://t.co/7L8O5ajvKe
Flavio G Rocha, MD, FACS, FSSO ● NEUTRAL 3rd and final analysis of KEYNOTE-937 trial shows no RFS benefit to adjuvant pembro after resection ✂️or ablation 🔥of #HCC @ASCO #GI26 Need to find another strategy to prevent recurrence after curative intent treatment @OHSUKnight @dotter_IR @OHSURadMed https://t.co/VtdX0NpImh
Ryan Huey, MD, MS ● NEUTRAL Dr. Chan presents KEYNOTE-937, adjuvant pembro in resected/ablated HCC. No change in RFS or OS. #GI26 https://t.co/XXKE7CDsni
VJ Oncology ● NEUTRAL 🧪 Stephen Lam Chan at #GI26 reviews KEYNOTE-937 in #HCC: adjuvant pembrolizumab after resection or ablation did not improve relapse-free survival vs placebo. What does this mean for post-curative strategies? 🤔📉 Watch: https://t.co/1GmvZOO9om This video is available on the
VJ Oncology ● NEUTRAL At #GI26 Stephen Lam Chan (@CUHKofficial) discusses the Phase III KEYNOTE-937 trial, evaluating adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with #hepatocellularcarcinoma achieving complete radiologic response after resection or local ablation Why has the adjuvant setting in HCC been so https://t.co/YIxV175VZB
Maitham Moslim MD DABS FACS FSSO ● NEUTRAL KEYNOTE-937 @ #ASCOGI2026: Adjuvant pembrolizumab did not improve recurrence-free or overall survival after curative-intent therapy for HCC and had higher ≥G3 AEs. No change to standard of care. #HCC #LiverCancer https://t.co/mdTN9z3AJ5
Excellence in Oncology Care - EIOC ● NEUTRAL This for me was disappointing ! 👉Keynote-937 phs-3: pembrolizumab for HCC after surgical resection or local ablation 👉mRFS: 46 vs 45 mo 👉4-yr RFS rate: 50 vs 50% 👉At least for now no role for adjuvant io therapy in this setting. Supports the results of imbrave 050! #GI26 https://t.co/5JwFDRu3Ti
ScienceLink ● NEUTRAL #ScienceLink #Cobertura #ASCO #GI26 #Pembrolizumab #KEYNOTE937 https://t.co/a8hSavBq5I https://t.co/XgPwp2wmaf
Tanios Bekaii-Saab, MD ● NEUTRAL @OncBrothers This one I find challenging to understand fully — many limitations of course
Bhaarath PG ● NEUTRAL Top Trials to Follow on Day 2 @ASCO #GI26 ReFocus | KEYNOTE-937 | IKF-035 | TIGeR-PaC | ACCENT | TWINPEAK | Actuate 1801 | CheckMate9DW.. #ASCOGI26 #ASCOGI2026 #GI2026 #Cancer #Oncology #GastrointestinalCancer #GICancer #GIOnc #GICSM #OncTwitter #MedTwitter #MedX #LARVOL https://t.co/AkUx3K0Y1a
Bhaarath PG ● NEUTRAL Top Trials from Day 2 @ASCO #GI26 INCB161734-101 | KEYNOTE-937 | ABC-HCC | Refocus | CheckMate-9DW | Acutate 1801 | TTD-20-04 | RCT-PAAG.. #ASCOGI26 #ASCOGI2026 #GI2026 #Cancer #Oncology #GastrointestinalCancer #GICancer #GIOnc #GICSM #OncTwitter #MedTwitter #MedX #LARVOL https://t.co/IDScbbAaVz
Arndt Vogel ● NEUTRAL Keynote-937 phs-3: pembrolizumab for HCC after surgical resection or local ablation #ASCOGI26 👉mRFS: 46 vs 45 mo 👉4-yr RFS rate: 50 vs 50% 🧐Very disappointing, but inline with IMBRAVE-050, now we need to invest into neoadj. strategies @myesmo @ASCO @EASLedu @ILCAnews https://t.co/qTTSiZqrBJ
Pashtoon Kasi MD, MS ● NEUTRAL #ASCO21 Final late breaking abstract #plenarysession @ASCO @DrChoueiri presenting on adjuvant #immunotherapy post nephrectomy. How many tumor types do we have now with adjuvant therapy for? Esophageal a recent addition. In GI, will look forward to the HCC Keynote-937 . @OncoAlert https://t.co/V1OPybfjlD