Hamza Hashmi (@hhashmi87) ranks #9 among US multiple myeloma KOLs on X in 2026, by engagement from fellow physicians. 23 physicians shared, quoted or replied to their posts this year. Most-discussed trials in 2026: MajesTEC-3, CERVINO, CARTITUDE-2. CMS Open Payments lists $17,452 in 2025 general payments.

At a Glance
- 22 posts naming a trial since ASH 2025
- 16 trials discussed by name
- Multiple Myeloma: US #9, Global #10 · 23 physicians engaged
- Leading physician voice: #1 of 5 physicians on MIDAS; #2 of 11 physicians on CERVINO
- CMS Open Payments lists $17,452 in 2025 general payments.
This Month
What Hamza Hashmi has posted in the last 30 days. Updated November 11, 2026.
No trial posts in the last 30 days.
Who Amplifies Hamza Hashmi
Physicians who reposted Hamza Hashmi’s trial posts most often since ASH 2025.
- RB
Rahul Banerjee, MD, FACP6 reposts - JC
Jim Cavet🕊️🇸🇩🆘🍉5 reposts - SA
Santhosh Ambika5 reposts - TC
Tontarn Chutima3 reposts - BK
Bhuvan Kishore3 reposts - VS
Vladislav Sergeev2 reposts - PT
Pablo Tenorio Feixas2 reposts - XG
Xabier Gutierrez2 reposts - MB
Marc Braunstein, MD, PhD, FACP, FASCO2 reposts - SZ
Saad Z. Usmani MD MBA FASCO 🇺🇸🇵🇰2 reposts
2026 Rankings
| List | US rank | Global rank | Peer Engagement Score | Physicians engaged | Physician engagements | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multiple Myeloma | #9 | #10 | 64/100 | 23 | 43 | Full ranking |
Trials Hamza Hashmi Discussed since ASH 2025
| Trial | Posts | Rank among physicians posting | Latest |
|---|---|---|---|
| MajesTEC-3 | 4 | #10 of 15 | Sep 24, 2026 |
| CERVINO | 2 | #2 of 11 | Oct 7, 2026 |
| CARTITUDE-2 | 2 | — | Oct 6, 2026 |
| EXCALIBER-RRMM | 2 | #7 of 13 | Sep 25, 2026 |
| PERSEUS | 1 | #7 of 10 | Sep 25, 2026 |
| MajesTEC-5 | 1 | #6 of 6 | Sep 25, 2026 |
| MIDAS | 1 | #1 of 5 | Sep 24, 2026 |
| GEM2014MAIN | 1 | — | Sep 24, 2026 |
| IBEX | 1 | — | Sep 24, 2026 |
| CASSIOPEIA | 1 | #3 of 3 | Sep 24, 2026 |
| CARTITUDE-4 | 1 | #5 of 9 | Sep 23, 2026 |
| MonumenTAL-3 | 1 | #6 of 9 | Sep 23, 2026 |
| MELT-MM | 1 | #2 of 3 | Sep 23, 2026 |
| CAMMA 1 | 1 | — | Sep 23, 2026 |
| ProMMise | 1 | #2 of 3 | Sep 23, 2026 |
| MajesTEC-9 | 1 | #16 of 16 | May 5, 2026 |
Hamza Hashmi on MajesTEC-3
@End_myeloma on MajesTEC-3 competing-risk analysis at #IMS26: Tec-Dara vs DPd/DVd in RRMM, 1–3 prior LOTs • Progression sHR 0.10 • NRM similar (28 vs 26) • OS HR 0.22 after 10 mo Early infection deaths → IgRT + antimicrobial prophylaxis is a must. #mmsm @Myeloma_Society https://t.co/J9QwgmmdCZ
@HadidiSamer It would be interesting to see if pts who were CD38 non refractory (15%) had similar outcomes to those in MajesTEC-3. In other words, do we need CD38+Tec ot TEC alone is sufficient.
@kansagraMD Great to see Talq become q4 week after C4-6 and pom 2mg only. Tal-DP vs Tal-D should be looked at in HRCG, EMD, and Functionally high-risk myeloma subgroups. 2yr PFS looks similar to MajesTEC-3. This could be a great option for post 2L CAR T relapse. Will wait for https://t.co/jSHlySQ8Bn
Hamza Hashmi on CERVINO
#IMS26 recap: CERVINO trial: Etentamig in triple class exposed RRMM: ➡️Unlike other BsAb monotherapy trials, this was a phase III RCT but with suboptimal control arms (Kd,EPd,SVd) ➡️1 step-up dose → monthly + CRS 28% (0% w/ ppx toci) makes it very conducive for https://t.co/iKZxko5t9g
CERVINO (Etentamig Phase 3) @PlasmaCellPete on 🎯#IMS26: CERVINO Ph3: Etentamig superior to SAT (EPD, SVD, KD) in heavily pre-treated triple-class exposed RRMM 💡ORR 74% vs 45%, PFS at 12m NR (60%) vs 6m, OS benefit signal despite many SAT pts receiving TCRT at relapse 💡CRS 28% https://t.co/p9YDE8TJ7P
Hamza Hashmi on CARTITUDE-2
Recap from #IMS26 🧵5-year data from CARTITUDE-2 Cohort A for early line CAR-T: ➡️Cilta-cel infusion in RRMM with 1–3 prior lines (PI-exposed, len-refractory): 💡50% Dara refractory, n=20 but longest follow up for early line CAR-T ➡️50% of patients alive and progression-free https://t.co/mE2Yht421p
CARTITUDE-2 Cohort A, PA-288) 5-year data from CARTITUDE-2 Cohort A at #IMS26 🧵 poster session A single cilta-cel infusion in RRMM with 1–3 prior lines (PI-exposed, len-refractory 💡50% of patients alive and progression-free at 5+ years with no further therapy. 💡5-yr PFS https://t.co/1JC5YO8h0F
Hamza Hashmi on EXCALIBER-RRMM
🧵 EXCALIBER-RRMM, now in @TheLancetOncol and presented in plenary session at #IMS26. https://t.co/v9EBfpEwez 💡Iberdomide + dara + dex vs DVd in RRMM after 1–2 prior lines: the first myeloma approval built on MRD. ➡️2-stage seamless phase 3 (939 randomised), Stage 1 selected iberdomide 1.0 mg over 1.3/1.6 m ➡️Dual primary endpoints: MRD-neg CR (10⁻⁵, NGF) + PFS ➡️Excluded: anti-CD38- or bortezomib-refractory disease ➡️MRD analysis: first 420 patients 💡Efficacy (median FU ~15 mo): ➡️ MRD-neg CR: 40% vs 20% (OR 2.75, p<0.0001) ➡️ ≥CR: 46% vs 25% ➡️Time to MRD-CR ~9m ➡️Consistent across sub groups, except age>75, HR CG, soft tissue plasmacytoma ➡️Encouraging, but PFS (800-pt cohort) and OS are pending. MRD is a surrogate until PFS confirms it. 💡Safety: ➡️Neutropenia is the main safety issue: Grade 3+: 84% vs 11% ➡️Onset ~3 weeks in; median duration 8 days ➡️~80% in cycles 1–2, then ~15–20% later with G-CSF, low rates of febrile neutropenia 5.5% ➡️Dose reduction for neutropenia in 13% ➡️Infections G3+: 40% vs 20%. After DMC review, the protocol was amended to strengthen antibacterial prophylaxis. ➡️VTE 6.4% despite mandatory prophylaxis; arterial events 3.4% (MI 2%, stroke 1.5%) ➡️SPMs 7% vs 5% ➡️Serious AEs: 58% vs 40%, and ~75% in patients ≥75
EXCALIBER-RRMM (Iberdomide-Dd vs DVd) by @SagarLonialMD 🏆#IMS26: EXCALIBER-RRMM: IberDd doubles MRD-neg CR vs DVd in 420 pts (40% vs 20%, P<0.0001). 💡Non-Heme AE: Diarrhea 30%, fatigue 25%, rash 10%, mostly G1, seemingly better than Len based combinations 💡Gr3+ neutropenia https://t.co/vjD9YDbW5G
Hamza Hashmi on PERSEUS
PERSEUS long-term follow-up at #IMS26: D-VRd → DR vs VRd → R in transplant-eligible NDMM (median follow-up >80 mo) 💡72-mo PFS: 81% vs 56% 💡Median PFS: not reached vs 80 mo 💡The benefit held across risk groups: 🟢 Standard risk: 88% vs 63% (HR 0.27) 🔴 High risk: 55.0% vs 33% https://t.co/L310hqwcEC
Hamza Hashmi on MajesTEC-5
GMMG-HD10/MajesTEC-5 Arm E (Tal-DR induction) 💪 #IMS26: Tal-DR induction in TE-NDMM (MajesTEC-5 Arm E) delivers 💡ORR 90%, 90% MRD-neg pre-ASCT, with lower Gr3-4 infections than BCMA-based arms 💡Encouraging, but n=20 and 4/20 discontinued Tal for AEs (vertigo, balance, https://t.co/pG3ShunSvJ
Hamza Hashmi on MIDAS
MIDAS (Isa-Iberdomide maintenance) 🧬 #IMS26: MIDAS: Isatuximab + iberdomide maintenance drives MRD conversion in MRD-positive TE-NDMM pts post Isa-KRd: 💡MRD-neg (10⁻⁶) rates rising 40%→58%. 💡Encouraging depth, but only 1-yr data so far 💡will conversions translate into https://t.co/wbs0wW3grk
Hamza Hashmi on GEM2014MAIN
GEM2014MAIN (MRD-guided maintenance discontinuation) 🎯 #IMS26: GEM2014MAIN: MRD-neg pts who stopped maintenance at 2yrs had median PFS not reached vs 3.5yrs for MRD-positive pts who continued. 💡50% remained progression-free at 7yrs. 💡Early MRD neg > late MRD neg 💡sustained https://t.co/TJI1PPYAf1
Hamza Hashmi’s Most-Engaged Posts since ASH 2025
Their own 2026 posts that fellow physicians reposted most, quoted word for word.
Thank you @ravivij & @My_Cancer_Haven for this wonderful opportunity to share my thoughts on CAR T vs Bispecific with key clinical considerations, patient selection strategies, and emerging data that help guide treatment decisions in real world practice #MMSM #MedED #Medtwitter https://t.co/lTFkHxqdWn
#IMS26: Unmet needs and unanswered questions at 1st relapse in #myeloma by @mvmateos ❓When to start: biochemical vs clinical PD? MRD-neg relapse? ❓Fixed or MRD-adapted duration for bispecifics? ❓Maintenance after CAR-T? ❓Longer dosing intervals for safety? ❓Sequencing BCMA/GPRC5D without losing targets #MMSM #IMS26 @Myeloma_Society
Although cross trial comparison, but, HR for Dara exposed/non refractory is similar between Tec-9 (Tec Monotherapy) and Tec-3 (Dara-Tec) combination. Also, higher rates of Grade 3 infections in Tec+Dara. I do not think patients who are Dara Ref should be getting Tec+Dara. https://t.co/h5MHX2dytW
#MMSM The CAR-PRISM: Cilta-cel in high-risk smoldering myeloma @NatureMedicine @OmarNadeemMD https://t.co/5XVn3F56O7 ➡️N=20, Single infusion cilta-cel (n=7 with 0.3 mil cells/kg), No induction or bridging ➡️100% MRD negativity (10⁻⁶) by 2m ➡️No progression or deaths (median Fu https://t.co/Vuroejs3As
💡Practical implications: ➡️Best suited for pts who are not candidates for CAR-T, BsAb, and CD38 non-refractory at relapse; better non-Heme AE profile than Len and Pom ➡️Oral CELMoD + SC dara, with no twice-weekly bortezomib clinic visits should replace DVd ➡️Weekly CBCs in