RECAP ESMO 2026 — 117 trials, 1,732 results slides and physician reactions, all in one place See ESMO 2026 results →
Hamza Hashmi profile photo
KOL Pulse Profile · 2026

Hamza Hashmi

@hhashmi87 · USA
Assistant Attending Physician, Myeloma Service (cellular therapy) · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · Institution profile ↗

Hamza Hashmi (@hhashmi87) ranks #9 among US multiple myeloma KOLs on X in 2026, by engagement from fellow physicians. 23 physicians shared, quoted or replied to their posts this year. Most-discussed trials in 2026: MajesTEC-3, CERVINO, CARTITUDE-2. CMS Open Payments lists $17,452 in 2025 general payments.

Hamza Hashmi, #9 multiple myeloma KOL in the USA, KOL Pulse 2026 rankings
Hamza Hashmi, #9 multiple myeloma KOL in the USA, KOL Pulse 2026 rankings

At a Glance

This Month

What Hamza Hashmi has posted in the last 30 days. Updated November 11, 2026.

No trial posts in the last 30 days.

Who Amplifies Hamza Hashmi

Physicians who reposted Hamza Hashmi’s trial posts most often since ASH 2025.

2026 Rankings

ListUS rankGlobal rankPeer Engagement ScorePhysicians engagedPhysician engagements
Multiple Myeloma#9#1064/1002343Full ranking

Trials Hamza Hashmi Discussed since ASH 2025

TrialPostsRank among physicians postingLatest
MajesTEC-34#10 of 15Sep 24, 2026
CERVINO2#2 of 11Oct 7, 2026
CARTITUDE-22—Oct 6, 2026
EXCALIBER-RRMM2#7 of 13Sep 25, 2026
PERSEUS1#7 of 10Sep 25, 2026
MajesTEC-51#6 of 6Sep 25, 2026
MIDAS1#1 of 5Sep 24, 2026
GEM2014MAIN1—Sep 24, 2026
IBEX1—Sep 24, 2026
CASSIOPEIA1#3 of 3Sep 24, 2026
CARTITUDE-41#5 of 9Sep 23, 2026
MonumenTAL-31#6 of 9Sep 23, 2026
MELT-MM1#2 of 3Sep 23, 2026
CAMMA 11—Sep 23, 2026
ProMMise1#2 of 3Sep 23, 2026
MajesTEC-91#16 of 16May 5, 2026

Hamza Hashmi on MajesTEC-3

@End_myeloma on MajesTEC-3 competing-risk analysis at #IMS26: Tec-Dara vs DPd/DVd in RRMM, 1–3 prior LOTs • Progression sHR 0.10 • NRM similar (28 vs 26) • OS HR 0.22 after 10 mo Early infection deaths → IgRT + antimicrobial prophylaxis is a must. #mmsm @Myeloma_Society https://t.co/J9QwgmmdCZ
514 impressions · View on X ↗
@HadidiSamer It would be interesting to see if pts who were CD38 non refractory (15%) had similar outcomes to those in MajesTEC-3. In other words, do we need CD38+Tec ot TEC alone is sufficient.
227 impressions · View on X ↗
@kansagraMD Great to see Talq become q4 week after C4-6 and pom 2mg only. Tal-DP vs Tal-D should be looked at in HRCG, EMD, and Functionally high-risk myeloma subgroups. 2yr PFS looks similar to MajesTEC-3. This could be a great option for post 2L CAR T relapse. Will wait for https://t.co/jSHlySQ8Bn
1,835 impressions · View on X ↗

Hamza Hashmi on CERVINO

#IMS26 recap: CERVINO trial: Etentamig in triple class exposed RRMM: ➡️Unlike other BsAb monotherapy trials, this was a phase III RCT but with suboptimal control arms (Kd,EPd,SVd) ➡️1 step-up dose → monthly + CRS 28% (0% w/ ppx toci) makes it very conducive for https://t.co/iKZxko5t9g
919 impressions · View on X ↗
CERVINO (Etentamig Phase 3) @PlasmaCellPete on 🎯#IMS26: CERVINO Ph3: Etentamig superior to SAT (EPD, SVD, KD) in heavily pre-treated triple-class exposed RRMM 💡ORR 74% vs 45%, PFS at 12m NR (60%) vs 6m, OS benefit signal despite many SAT pts receiving TCRT at relapse 💡CRS 28% https://t.co/p9YDE8TJ7P
400 impressions · View on X ↗

CERVINO trial profile →

Hamza Hashmi on CARTITUDE-2

Recap from #IMS26 🧵5-year data from CARTITUDE-2 Cohort A for early line CAR-T: ➡️Cilta-cel infusion in RRMM with 1–3 prior lines (PI-exposed, len-refractory): 💡50% Dara refractory, n=20 but longest follow up for early line CAR-T ➡️50% of patients alive and progression-free https://t.co/mE2Yht421p
1,282 impressions · View on X ↗
CARTITUDE-2 Cohort A, PA-288) 5-year data from CARTITUDE-2 Cohort A at #IMS26 🧵 poster session A single cilta-cel infusion in RRMM with 1–3 prior lines (PI-exposed, len-refractory 💡50% of patients alive and progression-free at 5+ years with no further therapy. 💡5-yr PFS https://t.co/1JC5YO8h0F
462 impressions · View on X ↗

Hamza Hashmi on EXCALIBER-RRMM

🧵 EXCALIBER-RRMM, now in @TheLancetOncol and presented in plenary session at #IMS26. https://t.co/v9EBfpEwez 💡Iberdomide + dara + dex vs DVd in RRMM after 1–2 prior lines: the first myeloma approval built on MRD. ➡️2-stage seamless phase 3 (939 randomised), Stage 1 selected iberdomide 1.0 mg over 1.3/1.6 m ➡️Dual primary endpoints: MRD-neg CR (10⁻⁵, NGF) + PFS ➡️Excluded: anti-CD38- or bortezomib-refractory disease ➡️MRD analysis: first 420 patients 💡Efficacy (median FU ~15 mo): ➡️ MRD-neg CR: 40% vs 20% (OR 2.75, p<0.0001) ➡️ ≥CR: 46% vs 25% ➡️Time to MRD-CR ~9m ➡️Consistent across sub groups, except age>75, HR CG, soft tissue plasmacytoma ➡️Encouraging, but PFS (800-pt cohort) and OS are pending. MRD is a surrogate until PFS confirms it. 💡Safety: ➡️Neutropenia is the main safety issue: Grade 3+: 84% vs 11% ➡️Onset ~3 weeks in; median duration 8 days ➡️~80% in cycles 1–2, then ~15–20% later with G-CSF, low rates of febrile neutropenia 5.5% ➡️Dose reduction for neutropenia in 13% ➡️Infections G3+: 40% vs 20%. After DMC review, the protocol was amended to strengthen antibacterial prophylaxis. ➡️VTE 6.4% despite mandatory prophylaxis; arterial events 3.4% (MI 2%, stroke 1.5%) ➡️SPMs 7% vs 5% ➡️Serious AEs: 58% vs 40%, and ~75% in patients ≥75
1,001 impressions · View on X ↗
EXCALIBER-RRMM (Iberdomide-Dd vs DVd) by @SagarLonialMD 🏆#IMS26: EXCALIBER-RRMM: IberDd doubles MRD-neg CR vs DVd in 420 pts (40% vs 20%, P&lt;0.0001). 💡Non-Heme AE: Diarrhea 30%, fatigue 25%, rash 10%, mostly G1, seemingly better than Len based combinations 💡Gr3+ neutropenia https://t.co/vjD9YDbW5G
631 impressions · View on X ↗

EXCALIBER-RRMM trial profile →

Hamza Hashmi on PERSEUS

PERSEUS long-term follow-up at #IMS26: D-VRd → DR vs VRd → R in transplant-eligible NDMM (median follow-up &gt;80 mo) 💡72-mo PFS: 81% vs 56% 💡Median PFS: not reached vs 80 mo 💡The benefit held across risk groups: 🟢 Standard risk: 88% vs 63% (HR 0.27) 🔴 High risk: 55.0% vs 33% https://t.co/L310hqwcEC
1,451 impressions · View on X ↗

PERSEUS trial profile →

Hamza Hashmi on MajesTEC-5

GMMG-HD10/MajesTEC-5 Arm E (Tal-DR induction) 💪 #IMS26: Tal-DR induction in TE-NDMM (MajesTEC-5 Arm E) delivers 💡ORR 90%, 90% MRD-neg pre-ASCT, with lower Gr3-4 infections than BCMA-based arms 💡Encouraging, but n=20 and 4/20 discontinued Tal for AEs (vertigo, balance, https://t.co/pG3ShunSvJ
246 impressions · View on X ↗

Hamza Hashmi on MIDAS

MIDAS (Isa-Iberdomide maintenance) 🧬 #IMS26: MIDAS: Isatuximab + iberdomide maintenance drives MRD conversion in MRD-positive TE-NDMM pts post Isa-KRd: 💡MRD-neg (10⁻⁶) rates rising 40%→58%. 💡Encouraging depth, but only 1-yr data so far 💡will conversions translate into https://t.co/wbs0wW3grk
748 impressions · View on X ↗

MIDAS trial profile →

Hamza Hashmi on GEM2014MAIN

GEM2014MAIN (MRD-guided maintenance discontinuation) 🎯 #IMS26: GEM2014MAIN: MRD-neg pts who stopped maintenance at 2yrs had median PFS not reached vs 3.5yrs for MRD-positive pts who continued. 💡50% remained progression-free at 7yrs. 💡Early MRD neg &gt; late MRD neg 💡sustained https://t.co/TJI1PPYAf1
700 impressions · View on X ↗

Hamza Hashmi’s Most-Engaged Posts since ASH 2025

Their own 2026 posts that fellow physicians reposted most, quoted word for word.

Thank you @ravivij &amp; @My_Cancer_Haven for this wonderful opportunity to share my thoughts on CAR T vs Bispecific with key clinical considerations, patient selection strategies, and emerging data that help guide treatment decisions in real world practice #MMSM #MedED #Medtwitter https://t.co/lTFkHxqdWn
828 impressions · View on X ↗
#IMS26: Unmet needs and unanswered questions at 1st relapse in #myeloma by @mvmateos ❓When to start: biochemical vs clinical PD? MRD-neg relapse? ❓Fixed or MRD-adapted duration for bispecifics? ❓Maintenance after CAR-T? ❓Longer dosing intervals for safety? ❓Sequencing BCMA/GPRC5D without losing targets #MMSM #IMS26 @Myeloma_Society
180 impressions · View on X ↗
Although cross trial comparison, but, HR for Dara exposed/non refractory is similar between Tec-9 (Tec Monotherapy) and Tec-3 (Dara-Tec) combination. Also, higher rates of Grade 3 infections in Tec+Dara. I do not think patients who are Dara Ref should be getting Tec+Dara. https://t.co/h5MHX2dytW
1,286 impressions · View on X ↗
#MMSM The CAR-PRISM: Cilta-cel in high-risk smoldering myeloma @NatureMedicine @OmarNadeemMD https://t.co/5XVn3F56O7 ➡️N=20, Single infusion cilta-cel (n=7 with 0.3 mil cells/kg), No induction or bridging ➡️100% MRD negativity (10⁻⁶) by 2m ➡️No progression or deaths (median Fu https://t.co/Vuroejs3As
299 impressions · View on X ↗
💡Practical implications: ➡️Best suited for pts who are not candidates for CAR-T, BsAb, and CD38 non-refractory at relapse; better non-Heme AE profile than Len and Pom ➡️Oral CELMoD + SC dara, with no twice-weekly bortezomib clinic visits should replace DVd ➡️Weekly CBCs in
115 impressions · View on X ↗

Industry Payments

CMS Open Payments · 2025 general payments
$17,452 across 30 payments
View the CMS record ↗
Free Access · KOL Pulse Intelligence

Track oncology’s top KOLs in your specialty

Create a free account, pick the tumor types you cover, and go beyond the tweet — the intelligence pharma teams use to map influence and prepare for engagement:

  • ✓Enhanced KOL profiles
  • ✓Pharma influence & potential advisory-board patterns
  • ✓2025 Open Payments financial analysis
  • ✓Social-media sentiment & trend signals
Get free access — pick your specialty
Choose the tumor types you follow. No cost, unsubscribe anytime.

FAQ

How does Hamza Hashmi rank among oncology KOLs in 2026?

Hamza Hashmi ranks #9 among US multiple myeloma KOLs on X in 2026, based on engagement from fellow physicians (KOL Pulse rankings, updated November 11, 2026). Peer Engagement Score: 64/100 in multiple myeloma, where the top-ranked physician worldwide in each tumor type scores 100.

Which clinical trials does Hamza Hashmi discuss most?

In 2026, Hamza Hashmi posted most often about MajesTEC-3, CERVINO, CARTITUDE-2. Each post is quoted word for word on this page with a link to the original.

On which clinical trials is Hamza Hashmi a leading physician voice on X?

Among physicians posting about each trial on X in 2026, Hamza Hashmi ranks #1 of 5 physicians on MIDAS; #2 of 11 physicians on CERVINO; #2 of 3 physicians on MELT-MM; #2 of 3 physicians on ProMMise, based on engagement from fellow physicians.

Does Hamza Hashmi receive industry payments?

CMS Open Payments lists $17,452 in 2025 general payments. Source: CMS Open Payments, program year 2025.

See something wrong? Report an issue with this profile.

KOL Pulse analysis · Reviewed by Brian Shields, Founder, KOL Pulse · Updated